Ashenden, the specialist 'peace-maker'

Nice to see Ashenden still keenly reading my blog from the Middle East, where he is probably stirring trouble there as he does in Jersey and Normandy as well as doing his usual effort to get acclaim for himself and build his ego.
He is the face of the Church of England, a cold-hearted and dishonest troublemaker, who damages the vulnerable and has abused his power in order to harm me and protect a wrongdoer, and yet the Church see fit to let him wear a dog collar as he continues his charade and his harm.
But he is only a small part of the massive wrongdoing, a small part, yes, I have heard that too, which is probably why he has to be so nasty and unChristian.

Funnily enough, this Jersey blog is timely, and funny:

http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/a-restored-palimpsest-of-4th-century.html

Ashenden has been trying to force himself into a position in the Diocese of Normandy, hurting people there and behaving very badly, after behaving very badly in Jersey. It is very funny that he is now showing off as 'peace envoy to the middle East' and showing up on my blog feed from there for some unknown reason tonight, well, not so unknown, his efforts to get the Steel report published, the reoprt that he contributed, helped to co-ordinate to without ever having met me while I was not included in the Steel report, that is why he is reading my blog, because of my reaction?
He reads my blog, I can count Ashenden as a fan, a regular reader, who avidly logs in while others in the Jersey Deanery distain it :) He runs on a firefox and Vista feed.

Yes, there are still safeguarding issues in Jersey, Ashenden is one of them, with his cold and unacceptable behaviour, his public shows of trying to exorcise the mentally ill, his mysogany, his bullying, his lack of people skills, his dishonesty his deplorable behaviour in the Dean of Jersey's case. It is hilarious that he is in the Middle East, maybe they can keep him?

Those who don't know it, he is a lawyer who wears a dog collar, and he used to be chaplain to the Queen, and he doesn't do well as a Parish priest anywhere as he is not a people person but thinks very highly of himself, far more highly than everyone else thinks of him.

Here is the letter that made him whimper about the Bishop owing me and the Dean of Jersey and apology in 2013, after he himself had behaved outrageously to me, slandering me on BBC Jersey:
http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-letter-to-jersey-deanery-as.html#.VMWuRtKsXqc

And here is Bob's illustrated version of it:

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-hgs-guest-posting-open.html

I think it is time that the Diocese of Dover dealt with all the safeguarding issues, including Gavin Ashenden, and if Bishop Willmott can't face actually doing anything about the Channel Islands situation, as appears to be the case, then he needs to hand it over to someone who can. Because, hey, I am not counsellor to the poor Diocese of Normandy who he has been trying to burden with his arrogant presence and I am tired of hearing their dismay as he marches in with his nose in the air.

The Church of England really aren't representative of Christianity any more. Ashenden is a real marker of that.

The Church are keeping very quiet about...

'Savile had ties with Calderdale. He often used to visit St John’s Church, Cragg Vale, for which he raised thousands of pounds, and was an honorary church warden. He was a popular figure in the Calder Valley right up until his death. In the 1970s he had a caravan parked outside the Hinchliffe Arms Cragg Vale..'

Which may be one of the reasons why Butler is so keen to hijack the national CSA inquiry, and why the Church have already got through two National CSA inquiry chairs, Woolf and Butler-Sloss, and will probably elect the next one very soon. Will it be Heather Steel?
The church of england have made such a loud noise about safeguarding but as they continue to destroy me, there is no sign that they even know what safeguarding means, and their noise and their excuse for tampering with historic files is only to prevent outside inquiry and mislead people into thinking all is well in the church.

http://www.achurchnearyou.com/cragg-vale-st-john-the-baptist-in-the-wilderness/

As yet, no-one has ever mentioned this link, the church are keeping very quiet while making such a huge pretence of caring about abuse and victims, all while destroying me for my abusers,
The situation in Jersey is that big powerful men like Savile are getting what they want and killing a silenced victim.

The Bishop of Winchester's lawyer dies suddenly

Er, no, he wasn't a lovely man, he aided the Bishop of Winchester in LYING TO A COURT OF LAW.
You sent another man to hell, Dakin, now he has to line up behind Scott-Joynt to explain his wickedness in aiding you in destroying me.
How did I find out that this unlovely man had died, well I contacted him about taking the Bishop back to court.
He died suddenly ten days ago.
I am normally respectful of the dead, but not of any of the increasing numbers of dead church of england members who abused and destroyed me and have never faced justice.

http://www.salisbury.anglican.org/news/statement-on-the-death-of-andrew-johnson

My sympathies to his family, if they are Christians they sadly won't see him in the afterlife because of his deliberate dishonesty in harming me on behalf of the Diocese of Winchester.

I guess this is also why the Deanery of Jersey are baying for my blood again, maybe they think a different lawyer will advise the Bishop differently.

Here is the 'Jersey Synod's 'demand'

And isn't it funny how, after their complete failure to act in a Christian way, including dishonesty, they think it would be 'Christian' to destroy me by having their dishonest and conflicted report published.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-jersey-30972876

A brief letter to Trevor Willmott

Dear Bishop Willmott,

I hold you personally responsible for the continued harm to me.

I would like you to explain why one of your church members, Michael Birt, is using his position as Bailiff to continue to harm me, and why your Jersey Deanery are so keen to have a report published if they don't know what it in it? Of course they do, because the Steel report was a whitewash concocted by a little circle of freemason-judiciary-lawyer-church members including Dame Steel, Michael Birt, Philip Bailhache, the Dean and Gavin Ashenden, the last of these, Ashenden clergy-lawyer, is apparently causing a lot of trouble in the Normandy Diocese, just to add to his life's work of hurting people and not being in the slightest bit concerned for their humanity.

Now that you are 'in charge' you can launch a proper investigation.

You can investigate why the Dean 'apologized' and was cleared after 'apologizing' , you can also explain why the Dean 'apologized' to empty air, and failed to inform me, as did the Diocese of Winchester, of this 'apology' and then you can tell me what the 'apology' was for when he was then cleared, and then you can tell me why the Church of England, still having not told me of this 'apology' kept this apology up on their website for many months, at least until I objected and asked for it to be removed as the Church had no right to be glorifying themselves through a fake apology that I never received, when they had 'cleared' the Dean anyway.

It is interesting that you have taken over the overseeing of the Channel Islands but have never contacted me about my experiences there, and have allowed the Church Times and Jersey media to go on harming me as a result of the inaccurate rubbish known as the Korris report, and that you have not made sure that the Jersey and general public know that the Korris report is not an accurate representation of events, neither is the conflicted Steel report. Maybe it is about time you did.

Maybe it is time you, as Bishop of the Channel Islands, let the conflicts of interests be known to the public. 

Start with these few:

• According to Juliet Montague, you were infatuated by her and took every opportunity to spend time with her, she made it into a joke in the church room. She took me out of college to replace her step-daughter, Sally, who looked just like me but who Juliet's violent husband, Sally's Father, had driven from the family after allegedly abusing her as well as taking his temper out on her for years. I then suffered abuse at the hands of Juliet's husband, and his temper, while Juliet, who was supposed to be my counsellor but obviously wasn't, blamed me. As you can imagine, already deeply damaged and vulnerable, this meant my young adulthood was the same as my childhood and as a result my problems became more severe. Nothing has been done about your sweetheart, Juliet, or her husband, who laughed at me in the street when I returned homeless from Jersey, I was homeless and branded whiel Jane Fisher protected him and I lost all my old friends in Winchester while the church protected him, paid for his keep, and destroyed me beyond belief, it is only a miracle that I am here to recount that, I survived only by going on the run and changing my name, and in two years before Jane Fisher and the church launched on me again in 2013, I recovered enough to fight back stronger this time. I saw you in Jersey one time, at one of the abusive cult churches, and again you are conflicted because you went along with their games, so of course you wouldn't see their manipulation as a safeguarding issue. You were told what to say by Heather Warren, as people with 'signs' and 'words' usually are, and you told people you 'sensed that some people there had 'fear' so you told them to come up. So how can you oversee wrongdoing in the Channel Islands and bring justice? You can't if you are on the side and in agreement with people who manipulate and spiritually abuse the vulnerable. Is any of this in any report by the Diocese of Winchester yet? No, do you know what the Korris report accuses me of? Abusing my abusers.  Does it include my side? No, so as Bishop of the Channel Islands, you need to comission a report that gives my side, to counter the slander I have suffered and the damage I have suffered.
• Is the General public aware of the Chief Minister being part of a church closely allied to the cult churches where I was harmed in Jersey? Are they aware of how the Steel report was arranged by the church-lawyer-freemason-states clique that included the Dean, Philip Bailhache, Michael Birt, Gavin Ashenden and others, abusing dual roles and none of them having met me but all of them playing a part in this report? 
• How exactly is a safeguarding report that ruins a vulnerable person for years and excludes her got anything to do with either safeguarding or what really happened? And How is a church counsellor who is not qualified to write a report and makes it clear she doesn't understand autism independent or competent to write a report, how is a Jersey judge who is close to the Dean's supporter's independent? How does the church explain the glaring conflict of the advert by the Church laity advertising Dame Steel as representing them? When did the UK  take into account their lack of knowledge of Jersey connections, for example why did they allow my abuser's nephew, a prominent man, to be involved in the Jersey investigation? 
• Why was there an illegal liason by Dame Steel and the police, who treated me unfairly and kept proven inaccurate reocrds, I have not consented to access of my police records by the church and it has been illegal as well as the same police officer 'appointed' by Dakin illegally influencing Jersey's sham safeguarding board to whitewash the terrible way I have been treated.

Now, this is a very very small sample of the horrific misleading of the press and general public by the Church of England, at my expense, the wrongdoing of the church has cost me my adulthood from age 19, after an even worse childhood, and now, aged 33 and still suffering at the hands of the Church of England, the question is, when are you going to let me live?

Would you like to act to stop this sick mess or do I have to take you to court? You are now the Bishop, along with Dakin who seems to still be involved, and I will take you both to court unless you stop your mouthy church members such as Sir Michael Birt, from causing me harm. 

Of course he wants the report that he and his colleagues spent hours and thousands of pounds on at Jersey tax payers expense, of course he wants it published, they worked so hard to utterly destroy my character as if the Korris rubbish, Jane Fisher's personal cover-up, hadn't done that already, of course they want to triumph publicly at my expense, and on the subject of conflict, you were the Bishop of Basingstoke, working with Jane Fisher all those years while Juliet kept me as 'her daughter' and ran to you for help when her husband got nasty because she said that 'Wolvsley were cold to her'.

sincerely

Third Formal Letter to the Bishop of Winchester

Dear Bishop Dakin,

I was already drafting a third letter of warning to you as I have had no assurance from the church that you will stop harming me.

Then the news from BBC Jersey is that the churches in Jersey are pushing for the publication of your whitewash Steel report.

Please bear in mind that the Steel report is nothing to do with what actually happened in Jersey and is a cover up by Steel, done in conjunction with her colleague Philip Bailhache, a strong supporter of the Dean, and a church officer as well as a lawyer and states member.

You are not to release any defamatiory report that breaches my human rights and leaves me ill, broken down or in danger of death, as the Korris report did, the Steel report is a very expensive act of wrongdoing on behalf of the church, at my expense, and the only reason the Jersey church would be so keen for it's publication is that it was done to cover up at my expense and 'exonorate' the Dean, and was done without my input because I was told it was conflicted, if I had not been told, then despite the blatant cover up of Jane Fisher's misconduct in the Korris report, I may have been naive enough to go along with Steel and let her do as Butler-Sloss did in the Chichester report. 

The Steel report, as it is nothing to do with my case and what happened to me, is a breach of my human rights and is taking my name in vain and deliberately ruining me when I am already broken and living in abject poverty.

Therefore, you are not to release it, or any other report or oversee the release of it or any other report, if you warn me that you are going to, threaten me that you are going to, or release any report, I will take you to court again, or I may apply to the court for protection as a result of the Jersey church pushing for this whitewash to be released.

And think about it, why would they push for a report that could potentially defame their Dean? Well, because they, and the Dean know, the report clears the wrongdoers at my expense, and contains no input from me, the report is done by the clergy-lawyer-church-freemason group in Jersey, who have limitless power, it is not independent as Dame Steel is proven not to be.

Throughout this matter you have not been independent, you have not included me or my side of things, not in the Korris report, which you refused to even amend when I did hear about it and make a complaint, and not before that, when, if you could have me traced by the police to try and intimidate me after the release of the Korris report, you could have had me traced by the same to include me in it, instead of lying to a court of law that efforts had been made to include me in the report.

The same goes for the Steel report and the Gladwin report, I was not included, Gladwin made a token effort because Bob Hill pushed for it. Steel tried to illegally access my advocate's records regarding things she was not even investigating, and caused me trauma, before snottily inviting me to meet her when I complained, despite the fact I was asking her to step down as she was conflicted.

You are to stop allowing me to be harmed by threats of this conflicted report and other whitewashes including the Gladwin whitewash mark 2, he did one for Chichester, and the sham safeguarding board in Jersey's whitewash, done in conjunction with Jane Fisher and your 'appointed officer' who you had no right to appoint to illegally access my inaccurate reocrds with Steel. Your actions have no only been illegal but have been a severe breach of my human rights, and I am going to fight you until the risk of me being defamed and destroyed yet again is over.

You have not bothered to respond to my concerns and you lied to a court of law at Winchester about the situation, and that and all the other factors show that whatever this charade has been about, it has not been about safeguarding. You have destroyed me over and over and over again, left me crippled, ruined, and living in fear, and actually it is time that this living in fear is stopped, it is time that the police or courts or a national agency stepped in, prevented you from harming me and launched a REAL independent investigation into this whole matter. 

As yet there has never been an outside investigation into the church of england, at all, and the church misuse the word 'independent' with people like Gladwin, Steel, Korris, Butler-Sloss and others, to mislead the public and to prevent outside investigation. A notable case of this was the recent effort to tamper with historic records to do with confession and clergy, with the claim that these would be 'independently audited', well if the church don't know what independent is, and they keep angling to avoid investigations such as the National CSA inquiry, which incidentally elected two Church of England position holders in a row, both of whom had to step down because of other conflicts of interests, then it is time an outside agency stepped in, investigated personally what the Diocese of Winchester have done to me and covered up for years.

I will return you to court within the week if I feel in any way threatened by this continued threat of being destroyed beyond repair, your non-independent Korris report nearly finished me off and this continued threat to me after everything you have made me suffer, is too much, it is time these attacks on me stopped, it is unChristian, it is dishonest, it is illegally to destroy a vulnerable adult this way and leave her living in fear and suffering severe psychological harm, and it is to stop. It doesn't matter if the condition of 'The Dean being delighted' about the Canterbury agreement in the press was that you release your whitewashes in reply, what matters is that the church are continuing to behave in a devious, unChristian illegal and abusive way, and I remain omitted from all reports and silenced as acts of contempt and destroyal such as the attack on me in the Church times and the jeer by the unpunished Jane Fisher adding me on twitter and this recent 'request' by the unpunished and unrepentant Jersey churches continue.

Eventually my side will break into the media, even if you do as I strongly suspect you would try to do to during this matter, silence me as before, have me arrested and imprisoned, eventually, no ,matter what you do, I will speak and be heard, and I will keep speaking, because you have throughout this matter, done me grave and serious harm. Anyone else among the vulnerable, who can't speak or write, would be silenced and destroyed, and many have, in the church's history of abuse, many have committed suicide, branded mentally ill by the church as a result, and many have ended up homeless and in psychiatric wards, and Jane Fisher did her very best to discredit me as mad and have me put away, but here I still am, speaking, and I will speak, even if only through the Jersey bloggers even if I die or am imprisoned. I won't be silenced and I won't let you destroy me.

Now please announce that the Steel report is not valid, announce in the news that these whitewashes are not valid, stop making me live in fear, announce that these reports that exclude me are not viable and make that an end to your horrific harm to me, I am copying the police who you have used to destroy me in on this email and despite Hampshire constabulary being openly corrupt, they are a police force, they do have a duty of care to the vulnerable and they are to stop you harming me, or the court are to stop you harming me, either way, I am asking for protection, from the corrupt police, from the court, from all recipients of this email, from all national agencies and I am asking you to stop leaving me at threat of harm. No-one onthis earth is made to endure this kind of serious harm, not a murderer, not a rapist, so why should I keep being under fear of press and public slander and destroyal? It is wrong. The Steel report is nothing to do with what happened to me in Jersey nor was it ever intended to be, if it had been you would have met with me instead of lying about that, and you would have made sure I was heard, and you deliberately didn't, instead you threatened me when I begged you not to violate my life as Jane Fisher did in 2010 and 2011, acting illegally and getting me a record for my reaction, a record and the police brutality that I will NEVER be able to live with, and yet you then went on to illegally violate my life some more AFTER threatening me.

If you like I can send a copy of this to every diocese in the country so that they can act as witnesses, it cost me about £50 to do that last time but the more people who know I am living in fear as a result of your misconduct, the better.

Bishop Dakin, you, your and Bishop Willmott's  Jersey Deanery under your joint juristiction, your staff, employees, safeguarding officer, and anyone in connection with you are to cease to harass and annoy me with defamatory and inaccurate reports and the threat of their release, you made those reports using my name in vain and without my side being included, you are not permitted to take information from my blog to claim you included me, you are to announce that these pathetic attacks on me, these defamatory whitewashes that include illegal liasons with Jersey police, are at an end and no further defamations and attacks on me are to occur.

The action of making me suffer the threat of these defamatory reports counts as abuse and counts as harassment, it is a matter for police and safeguarding authorities it is a matter for the courts, to make someone suffer this way for this long is henious, it is serious abuse and the damage to me physically, mentally and materially is serious and severe.

Please note that this is a written warning and will be followed by  court action if the police and national authorities do not act. Please also note, that my psychological report is freely available, both the one done in Jersey before I was made homeless and the more recent one, so continuing to use the 'madness' slur that church and government traditionally use against victims is not going to excuse this. I am not mad, I am autistic, suffering severe trauma, I have behavioural and psychological issues, I was dangerously regressed to childhood in Jersey by my second abuser in the church, and then Jane Fisher destroyed me to cover up. Nothing has been done by church or police about Fisher, it seems both are protecting her.

Steamrolling the poor and vulnerable is a horrific thing to do, you have done it to me, and to others, and yet you collectively claim to be followers of Christ. 

The reason I send this email to so many people is the reason I always have, because I want witnesses to how I have been treated and am being treated. I have suffered the Church of England since I was 19, and that is so many years of abuse and cover-ups, and it should have stopped when Jane Fisher drove me from the Church of England and from my home town by slandering me after having me imprisoned and left homeless in 2011.

Due to the very serious nature of this ongoing destroyal of me, a copy of this will be sent to 10 Downing Street and the Queen and the Home Secretary. Eventually, after years of pleading, someone, somewhere must stop this destroyal of me by the Church of England, and wipe out all the whitewashes and lies and inaccurate reports and let me live again. My whole adult life has been marred by abuse, cover ups and blame by the church, and being patronized, controlled and sexually, emotionally and spiritually abused by well off old church people has prevented me from getting the help I need to develop into a healthy adult, unfortunately the damage is done, and for life because of the record the church got me while protecting my abusers, I do not need to be destroyed by reports, I am crippled and my life is limited forever.

The Diocese and Jane Fisher have had years to cover up, tamper with evidence and prevent themselves facing any action for what I have suffered, but I still have a story to tell, and I am waiting for the very very belated outside investigation into this matter. The Korris report was a classic example of uncontrolled cover up, published internationally and sent to the police as fact, all illegal in many ways, and yet, nothing has been done, the Korris report and the Dean's apology were used by the diocese and church to show off at my expense, until I objected and took the diocese to court, there has been no apology.

Jesus please protect me from my destroyers, who stand up and preach in Your Name while guilty of destroying me and remorseless about it, no conscience, no love for You or justice.

Surely other people can see how ridiculous it is for the church to be allowed to go on destroying me and making me live in fear unchecked,with my side being ignored despite my request to be interviewed independently of Steel, who was known to be conflicted, and while the Bishop refused to add my amendments to the Korris report, while he lied to the court that Korris had tried to contact me to include me in her report?!

I have been abused and destroyed in the Church of England as a vulnerable adult since age 19, I am 33 and they have robbed me of my adulthood and character and left me ruined in grinding poverty and living in fear, it is time someone stepped in and stopped this criminal theft of my life. The Church do not know how to safeguard as they are generically a club for the elderly and well-off, they treat the poor and vulnerable as less and subject them to an apatheide where the poor and vulnerable are not allowed in church people's houses and not told why, it meets the insurance conditions but segregates the poor and yet abusers who are well off and keep the church running are allowed in church houses. The Diocese of Winchester have never safeguarded me, they destroyed me and safeguarded my abusers, Jane Fisher is responsible for me being branded for life and thus limited for life, by an inaccurate and terrible police record that does not tell the real story. Why should I be subject to further damage? It is laughable that AFTER I made my second formal complaint against her, she was allowed to illegally refer me to the NSPCC without my consent, as if they could help me or I would accept help from anyone influenced by her, and it was done only because the Bishop needed to claim in yet another inaccurate press release and to the authorities that I had been 'offered help'. 

Those not familiar with the case need to read these links below to my first two warnings to the Bishop of Winchester and Bob Hill's blogs on Heather Steel being conflicted, here is also my psychological report.

Previous letters of Warning to the Bishop:

http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/formal-letter-of-warning-to-bishop-tim.html#.VMTRaNKsXqc

http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/formal-letter-to-bishop-dakin-2.html#.VMTR2NKsXqc

Psychological report:

http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/13082013.html#.VMTSC9KsXqc

These links are to some of Bob Hill's account of Heather Steel's Conflict and conduct:

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/jerseys-dean-diocese-of-winchester.html

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/jerseys-dean-they-have-learnt-nothing.html

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/jerseys-dean-steel-report-fit-for-waste.html

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/jerseys-dean-laitys-jep-advert.html

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/jerseys-dean-steel-and-gladwin-reports.html

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-dame-heather-saint-or.html

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/jerseys-dean-unhappy-anniversary.html

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-truth-whole-truth-or.html

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/jerseys-dean-steel-and-gladwin-reports.html

sincerely,

'HG' from the Korris report. 

A letter to the JEP, who should be looking at the Bailiff's failures in Justice regarding the Care abuse matters

Dear Editor,

I am writing regarding the comments of the outgoing Bailiff in the JEP.

I am HG from the Korris report.

The Bailiff uses his outgoing comments to bring the Church matter to light and in the wrong light yet again,abusing his dual positions in the town church and States/judiciary once again.

What he fails to mention is, he is both a member of the Town Church and part of the circle that includes the Dean, Sir Philip Bailhache who held dual roles in church and states and abused the dual roles to libel me in the JEP in his 'Open letter to the Archbishop' and used his legal expertise to ensure the Dean was cleared.

 Dame Steel was a colleague of both Sir Michael Birt and Sir Philip Bailhache, and was thus conflicted, therefore Sir Michael Birt is incorrect in saying that there is no reason for the report not to be published. He should not be acting in this conflicted manner. 

I am well aware that he and Sir Philip Bailhache and that conflicted circle of States-Judiciary-Church want the report published, and the reason that they want it published is that it is a work of art in cover-up for the Dean at my expense.

I was not interviewed in this report any more than I was interviewed for the inaccurate Korris report, these reports are simply the Church playing at doing their duties and are nothing to do with what actually happened.  The problem was, the Diocese of Winchester had no right to do what they did, and the States-Judiciary-Church clique were able to turn it around to suit them.

The JEP have reported extremely negatively on my case without consulting me for my side of things, and have published repeated slurs of me and basically acted on behalf of the church and this little States-Judiciary-Church group, but the fact remains that these people are not always right, the Dean did commit misconduct, and it has not been investigated or dealt with fairly.

And Sir Philip Bailhache is famous among abuse victims's for his care of Jersey's reputation above their welfare, as was the case in my case too. As a member of the church, he showed what Christianity is not by defaming me publicly, and going on to influence the report by his colleague Dame Steel to protect the Dean.

I am aware from the attitude of the JEP to my case that you are unlikely to ever publish this letter, but I will.

I would like the JEP to stop causing me distress by reporting one-sided on this matter and dragging up the horrendous mess the church have made, I have suffered enough trauma already.

sincerely,

HG,

PS Due to concerns for my safety and welfare after the massive smear campaign against me aided by the JEP and other media, I can't give an address.

The JEP article:

http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2015/01/25/bailiffs-parting-shot-at-bishop-over-dean-report/

Jersey

This is a terrible thing to happen, and it does happen in Jersey.

In my case, my abuser, protected by the church, never went to prison but laughed whenever he saw me and his supporters in the church had me put away.

http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2015/01/21/jersey-is-hardest-place-to-be-a-victim-of-sex-crimes

The lady is right, Jersey is a terrible place for abuse victims, not just because the terrible experience she suffered, but also because of the police's attitude.

http://www.jerseycareinquiry.org/news?newsid=119

We was too late, Reverend Grundy bit the ceiling

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDnE-5lD7w8

This gets a mention especially because of the comments

And especially because of the comment by planet Autism.

Hampshire Social services have treated me like shit to protect Jane Fisher and the Diocese of Winchester, and social services as a whole are a disgrace and an outdated form of harm to society.

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2014/12/08/must-never-disbelieve-sometimes-actions-involved-cause-hurt/?utm_content=buffer681f0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

It's a cold and it's a broken hallelujah

http://www.jerseycareinquiry.org/news?newsid=115

http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2015/01/20/date-set-for-retired-bishop-and-fellow-former-brighton-priest-to-face-child-sex-abuse-trial/37198

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp2DDjhhb-s

The diocese are shyly hiding their stats.
HEY DIOCESE, SEND ME A FAT CHEQUE FOR THERAPY!

:):):):):)

too much sugar.

What the church say and what they actually mean

There is such a discrepancy between what the church say and reality.

I never used to  take any notice of what the Church of England had to say in the press, in fact I had no reason to care what they said, until I realised that they are a Political party with massive power, which they abuse with impunity.

The first time I noticed the Church abuse of the press was in Jersey and while the Diocese of Winchester were destroying me and showing off in the press at the same time. I saw how what they put in the paper was PR rather than news or reality.
Unfortunately, even good people or well-meaning people are mislead by Church Propaganda and even repeat it, believe it and defend it. Planet Jersey, who are well meaning, often further harm to me by repeating church lies and propaganda, there's this rather puffed up guy who calls himself BoatyBoy, who often harms me and causes me distress by furthering the Church's lies about my case and about other things. He's the guy who for some unknown reason decided to attack me himself by sending money to the Dean of Jersey for me, I couldn't have thought of anything nastier to do to someone than sending money to their destroyer for them, but I give him the benefit of the doubt, he appears very naive and quite limited with regards understanding of the world and church and politics.
The problem with Jersey is that unless you can afford one of the private schools, you don't get much of a shot at education unless you are very pro-active.

But it is the same in the UK, this 'Mandate Now' guy on twitter was naively supporting the church's spin-doctor, Paul Butler, Jane Fisher's friend who is thus nothing to do with safeguarding. These big fat people can pronounce for the Church until eternity, it doesn't make the church anything more than a greedy, selective political club that uses Jesus' Name in vain.
Exaro News have appointed themselves as personal protectors of the church while slamming the government over abuse, that is a paradox that I can't figure out, but I imagine that the church are paying them enough to keep them running.

So what do Church Press releases mean?

• 'We care about the poor' = 'We care about our image/we are politically advocating labout to win the next general election'.
• 'We care about abuse victims' = 'We care that we averted a government inquiry into abuse in the church, and we are trying to avoid outside inquiy at all costs, and we will use victims as PR for the church while we are at it'.
• 'We care about the minimum wage and living wage' = 'We use the poor as a PR stunt for the church because they are voiceless and we think it makes us look good, however, we forgot that people know we pay our clergy a very low salary and treat them like dirt at a diocesan level'.

 I think you could keep yourselves amused in future by deciphering the Church of England's press relase code! I would write more but I have to go out and look in bins because the Church of England left me homeless and destitute and shattered my career.

Living Wage

The Daily Fail have just called Justin Welby a hypocrite again over his comments on living wage at odds with the fact that the CofE don't pay their clergy well. They are correct, I think. JM used to complain to me about her salary, she apparently managed because her husband was better off than she was and could manage her money for her.

err, the Church are a rich corporation who pay their staff badly.

Good Cop Down/Patheos

A new and interesting blog is 'Good Cop Down' https://goodcopdown.wordpress.com/

And a Great Support to Religious abuse survivors is Patheos SASBN:

 http://www.patheos.com/blogs/nolongerquivering/spiritual-abuse-survivor-blogs-network/spiritual-abuse-survivor-blogs-network-articles-sasbn/

Does Anyone know if this Damian Thompson chap is married yet?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2912621/DAMIAN-THOMPSON-Bishops-wrong-poverty-time-irrelevant.html

If not, he has a proposal :)

Would you believe it, the Daily Fail has at least temporarily turned against their employers, the Church of England!

15/01/2015

Dear Archbishop Welby,

I am sorry to see that you have come back from pneumonia straight into church propaganda in the press with a vengeance. I can only assume it is because the church has had so many negative mentions regarding abuse while you had a very quick bout of pneumonia.

I think yet again, you are a leading light in hypocracy, as you show off at slamming the government to try and make the church popular.

Whoever writes your propaganda scripts really needs to be replaced.

It is hilarious that you think a narrow, abusive club for the rich that excludes and abuses the poor can slam the government over the poor.

You and your church, in being there, in government as you are, in abusing your power, in upholding the divide between the rich and the poor, in wiping your feet on the poor as you do, in having apartheide policies against the poor, you are upholding the abuse of the poor, you and your church and your billion pounds of church properties held by church commissioners.

When you sell the billions of pounds, and when you right the injustices you cause, such as the Jersey matter, which has had no resolution for the abuse survivor who you oversaw national and local press vilifcation of, rather than bringing justice, and when you recompense Kendal House victims and their families, then you will have more credibility, and indeed will be right in God's eyes, as you are not now as you show of in such hypocracy.

Slamming the government for doing exactly as you do, when you could be spending that time putting the Jersey injustice right? When does your hypocracy end?

Please stop showing off and spreading propaganda, the only response you get in the comments section of the papers and social media is that you are a hypocrite.

And as for setting your lawyers on me over a clergy discipline measure? Thousands of pounds wasted, money which, if you were Christians and going by the Bible, you would be using to feed the poor, not oppressing one person who lives in abject poverty since you destroyed her career and life.

I think I should write a book about your propaganda and how it makes you into a hypocrite, in the meantime why has the clergy discipline measure not been upheld as you continue to mislead the sheeple and annoy people who know better than to believe you.

someone shut the archbishop up, please, he told the press he doesn't believe in God, he maligned his father publicly, he is an embarrassment to the church, a real burden, who is happily losing them numbers by his incessant contradictions.

Uphold my clergy discimpline measure against him, get him to be quiet so abuse victims don't have to suffer him or spin-Doctor Butler any more.

sincerely,

Thank You Daily Fail, for not upholding the Propaganda and Flannel of the church Any More! 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2912573/Fury-bishops-say-cuts-mean-poor-cast-aside-Cameron-angry-MPs-attack-church-s-two-senior-figures.html

There's a turnup for the books - 'That there man is from the Home Office, young William'.

http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2015/01/15/uk-raised-concerns-about-haut-de-la-garenne-in-70s/

A short letter to the Bishop of Durham on his continued nonsense in the House of Lords

14/01.2015

Butler,

Some idiot, because it has to be an idiot to take in your flannel and lies to protect the church and make it look good, has been trying to force your flannel and spin on me this morning.

As long as Jane Fisher remains in power at Winchester, and as long as you do nothing either about the whitewashes and conflicted reports and as long as you do nothing about Kendal House, you are a sham, a liar and a spin doctor, nothing else, and every time you abuse your power and mislead people, you are re-abusing victims, be quiet, or preferably stop being a sham safeguarding authority, because while you have been in a safeguarding position I have been relentlessly destroyed and had no voice and the church have continued where they left off destroying me in 2011, and I am shattered.

I made a clergy discipline complaint against you because why should the National CSA inquiry end up led by another CofE stooge so that the CofE are never called to account for their institutional abuse? And why should I go on suffering because the CofE have acted illegally.

Until you address these issues, you need to stop abusing your power in the House of Lords and the press, and you should be ashamed of yourself before God and repent.

For goodness sake, how long do we have to endure you? Former Bishop of Southampton protecting an abusive safeguarding officer? Do I have to go back to court to stop you re-abusing victims through misleading press articles and abuse of power in the house of Lords? 

The church's pretence of care and responsibility at the expense of victims, use of victims for PR and self-glorification, is beyond the pale.

Stop wasting time glorifying a corrupt, abusive church that is there for the rich and powerful to console themselves that they are forgiven of their abuses, start doing something about the horrific injustice at Winchester and Kendal House, remove your friend Jane Fisher after her many illegal and seriously harmful actions, which are so glaring that even the Korris report highlights some, and she influenced that to protect herself.

Do something for the victims, who are suffering and do not need a fat man in a purple shirt using them in vainglorious boasts.

The CSA inquiry needs to be independent of the Church of England, not hijacked by it, you have managed to elect two Church of England leaders of that inquiry and both have been dishonest about their links that make them conflicted, much as Steel and Bailhache and others have been in the Jersey inquiry. So, for an honest and fair inquiry, the Church of England and their 'dignitaries' such as Butler-Sloss and Woolf, should be well out of the way, as should you. Please stop using the inquiry to glorify yourself and your corrupt and hugely powerful church, which exists for the rich and powerful to protect themselves.

Jesus wasn't up in government, showing off and abusing power, the Pharisees were. And for some reason the Church of ENgland fails to notice that they are not a Christian orgnaization, they are the modern day pharisees, they have wealth, power, influence in the press and government, dishonesty, abuse of the poor.

While Jesus had nothing, lived a simple life, had no influence in government and whatever media there was, he was on the level of the poor and needy, he was genuine.

You and your church aren't and cannot be genuine, not having left me destroyed by an almighty shambles that is all your making. You are the pharisees and you claim to be Christians, and I am sick of your noise in the press and House of Lords and I want you to go, and stop harming victims by dishonesty and pretending to care and investigate, you have never yet successfully investigated the Church's own abuse, even your Chichester inquiry was rife with cover ups and denials, such as that by your elected CSA inquiry chairwoman, Butler-Sloss, who's husband is rumoured to have visited child prostitutes. 

Please stop misleading people, it isn't Christian, and the more the Church of England continue to veer from Christianity in favour of their image, the more you become a defunct pharisee organization, there to protect the freemasons and powerful position holders who use the church for their own needs.

There is no place in the church for the vulnerable, poor, disabled or children, such people are actively discouraged from being part of the church, not least when the old and very rigid and narrow minded people who like to 'own' the church make children out to be a nuisance or call an autistic visitor 'mentally retarded' and you have a secret apartheide policy against the vulnerable, wherein an abuser can visit the houses of vicars and church leaders, as my abusers could and did, but someone like me is secretly banned without being told why, and is left feeling rejected and hurt, and not because the church want to protect me from abuse, but because they want to protect themselves.

So until you resolve these issues, and until you resolve other issues such as a female General Synod member from Jersey proclaiming that 'Women Bishops are against God' (but apparently not women representing at General Synod) and then the Deanery of Jersey having to do what all other Diocese had to, even those against Women Bishops, and claim to be 'delighted' that there are women Bishops, even though the decision for women Bishops was forced on the church by the government, until the Church of England stop being so blatantly dishonest and abusive and refuse to resolve the harm they have done through abuse and cover ups, please be quiet and stop misleading the Lords and the press, you are offending God, and you are doing so blatantly, and you are also offending me and other victims.

Your fake apology to victims is only seen as duplicity and the more you go on with this charade and misleading gullible people, the further from God your Church goes and the more defunct it becomes.

Your facilitating of abuse of me in the church times was beyond the pale, and if I have to go on putting up with this and my clergy discipline measure against you is not dealt with, I will go to court to stop you re-abusing victims to glorify the church.

sincerely,

-- 

HG

My blog   http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/

A survivors account

As with many she found the police unhelpful to extremes. She was also a survivor of faith related abuse and as I have had to and am doing, she has had to work hard to change the beliefs that were drummed into her. An outsider cannot imagine how hard this is, when you are brought up believing extreme things about God, linked to abuse, it can be very hard to change those beliefs, which can affect your whole life.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/child-abuse-victims-letter-theresa-4974568

A lot of negative articles in the papers about the Church of England and organized religion at the moment, even their pet papers are speaking out

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paedophile-vicar-still-wears-dog-4971960

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2637961/Convicted-paedophile-allowed-interrogate-victims-Jehovahs-Witness-meeting-wanted-barred-church.html#ixzz3Mw9uYo00

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2904696/Victims-Church-care-home-Dr-Mengele-Teresa-children-damage-drug-experiments-inflicted-girls-Church-England-care-homes-20-years-ago-never-undone.html

The Church-led National CSA Inquiry

Dear Home Secretary,

I am writing to talk about the National CSA Inquiry, and the mess it has got into. I am sure you receive a lot of correspondence about it.

My letter to you is about the Church of England involvement in the CSA inquiry.

Both Baroness Butler-Sloss and Fiona Woold were not neutral, not just because of their connections in politics and law, but also because they were both Church of England positions holders. Baroness Butler-Sloss was famously a Church position holder and tried to avert the misconducts of a Bishop reaching public knowledge, but Fiona Woolf, as well as being in public office, was also a church position holder, and was on the PPC of a church. Now while some may count that as insignificant, I don't believe it is, especially not after Paul Butler. the Church of England's PR guy, started shouting in the press about the CSA inquiry. It really made me think.

The Church of England remain unable to deal with Safeguarding as they are still in the dark ages where abuse was pretty much a 'perk of the job'. I am sorry if that offends you as I realise that you are a Vicar's daughter and you may well have a bias to the church that will enable them to elect yet another of their own to lead the inquiry, but the thing is, that will not be an effective inquiry if you do, because the Church have done great wrong and a huge amount of institutional and serious abuse is their responsibility, which is why they should not be allowed to influence the CSA inquiry.

Undoubtedly you have heard of Kendal House and the horrific abuse that was carried out there, and as yet there has been no justice and no apology to victims, from the Church of England, who ran Kendal House, and it has had effects on generations of Kendal House survivors.

I also do not want the Kendal House victims to be further used as I have been, I was used for a PR stunt by the church, who seemed to be desparate to claim that they are good at safeguarding, and yet they publicly 'apologized' to me in the press, didn't bother to personally apologized, lied that they did, and spewed my private life all over the press which led to a smear campaign by my abusers' supporters and the wrongdoers who covered up for the abuse at my expense and vilified me.

As yet, nothing has been done about this and I remain anguished, unheard and living in fear because of the church and press vilifying me and leaving me driven from one community and another.

This would be catastrophic for Kenday House Survivors if they are allowed to be treated the same as I have been. 

So, your inquiry, much as you may love the Church of England, needs to be independently led, not led by a Church position holder, because the extent of the church's past and continuing cover up and harm to victims does need to be seen, and as they still can't handle safeguarding but have continued relentlessly to harm me, they should not lead the inquiry, they should be being investigated from the outside either through the inquiry or through an independent body.

I am absolutely sure that Paul Butler or Justin Welby can and will do a PR stunt apology to Kendal House, and make a lot of noise about caring, and probably needlessly defame me as they did in a recent church times article, but public lavish showing off won't change the reality of the horrendous culture of the Church of England, which is a club where government and society condone and pay for these wealthy old people to throw their weight about, influence the press and abuse their power, the CofE most of the time forgets Jesus teaching and example. Jesus lived simply, homeless, dependent on others, and without the affectation and propaganda that the church spew into the press to cover for themselves.

I live simply and in poverty, the church took my career and home from me and I sleep on a mattress and look in bins and will never be able to have quality of life due to what the church have done to me. They are the modern day pharisees and they do not look after children or the vulnerable, in fact they have a very very discriminatory policy against the vulnerable and they call that 'safeguarding' and they actually believe themselves.

sincerely,

The new Jersey

Apparently, under the new rules, The Diocese of Canterbury gets all the money, while the Diocese of Winchester appoints new clergy to the Channel Islands.
Actually potential clergy are selected by the existing Jersey clergy, who meet candidates and decide who they want. Then they tell Winchester.
And these days they only select clergy who will go along with the cult theme of the Jersey churches.
As I was repeatedly told.

And the Voice of Reason in the comments section, did they ask the people what they wanted?:

http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2015/01/12/dean-of-jersey-welcomes-excellent-news/

Because, if the Church of England have any morals left, which is unlikely, I know, they will remove Dakin for his million pound embarrassment which didn't achieve anything good and needlessly severely harmed me.
If Dakin can't run the Channel Islands, can't deal with a dispute without needing a PR firm and threatens a homeless abuse victim who he forcibly traced and who was begging him and his church not to keep coming after her and violating her, then something is wrong.
He likes showing off and PR, but that doesn't make a Christian, in fact it doesn't make a good person.

This sounds like the Jersey cult churches, not New Jersey!

http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/12/fear-of-god-doesnt-work-any-more-so-violence-will-right-5018678/

Where are Welby's Tears? Well, I think when he is better from pneumonia, he may have a crack at being 'Heartily sorry' or whatever other script is put in front of him.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2904696/Victims-Church-care-home-Dr-Mengele-Teresa-children-damage-drug-experiments-inflicted-girls-Church-England-care-homes-20-years-ago-never-undone.html#i-8aa33475438ed366

Ballast for a sinking ship

There's an upside down ship in the Solent
an insurance job, they say,
but they can't seem to right it
so it will just have to stay that way

the Anglican church is burdened
with fat unholy men
let put them on the sinking ship
to balance it out again

And we all say ayyy-menn
(unless posing as a rabid evangelical offends us)


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-30745137

why has the church of england suddenly started reading my blog?

Dear Bishop Dakin,

In August 2013 I made a complaint against Jane Fisher, 

You didn't deal with it and it still hasn't been dealt with, she has been left to continue to be involved in my case even though she is conflicted by the fact she has commited misonduct and has been able to cover up for herself at my  expense by continuing to be involved in the Jersey matter, while pretending to 'care' about me as she has throughout her six year destroyal of me.

It remains that there is a complaint and it hasn't been dealt with, so all the PR and showing off in the world only puts you in the wrong and shows you as Godless and without integrity.

I am re-iterating my complaint, but as you and Elizabeth Hall and Bishop Butler appear to be protecting Fisher, and you made a cop out of referring her to her 'line manager' who did nothing, and you both allowed her to continue to harm me with an illegal referral to the NSPCC, I am re-iterating this complaint.

This time I am re-iterating the complaint to you, because she is a Church of England Reader, and YOU are her line manager.

You have a reader under you who has harrassed, stalked and destroyed a vulnerable adult, acting ILLEGALLY repeatedly, in liasing with services and authorities, even lying to authorities and the police as she wiped out my friendships and home, defamed me, shamed and slandered, me drove me from all sources of help by slander, libel, defamation and illegal interventions, lied to police and courts of law and made illegal referrals of me such as that to the NSPCC, all the time making me out to be mentally ill.

She has also perverted the course of justice, by witholding evidence that would protect me from defamation by my abuser in Jersey, to which I reacted, but illegally liasing with the police in 2013 so that between them and her, they tried to force me to give evidence against my abuser, which of course I wouldn't under the circumstances, I am not a puppet to be used by the church, although that is what you have been doing, using me as a puppet.

I woouldn't give evidence after the way the church and police have treated me, what you have done is far far worse that the churchwarden sexually abusing me, and especially what Jane Fisher has done is far far worse than sexual abuse.

You are employing a reader who had knowingly and deliberately inflicted severe harm on me, not least to cover her back, your back and Scott-Joynt's back, and you have not at any time interviewed me regarding this, you massive attack on me in the press with the Fisher-led Korris report, which she influenced to cover her back at my expense, is criminal, as is the fact that i remain voiceless and living in fear of your whitewash Fisher-influenced reports.

So, when are you going to bring justice and let me be heard, when are you going to remove that dangerous woman, Jane Fisher, from church positions, and when are you going to take my story down instead of leaving me defamed by rags like the church times on your behalf?

Last year Jane Fisher jeered by adding me on twitter, boasting on her twitter account that she is matey with your wife, and that she was going to Guernsey, even though the Channel Islands are not under you juristiction any more.

Jane Fisher has actively gathered and furthered defamation of me, is that why she went to Gurnsey? To meet with the Lihou-Honour-Warren family who have harmed me and committed misconduct but Fisher protects them with their side of things but excludes mine, and actively helped Key to use this family against me in Jersey.

If you are not capable of dealing with my complaint against Fisher, as you  weren't capable of overseeing the Channel Islands, then you will have to pass this complaint to another Bishop.

Unfortunately Bishop Trevor would be severely conflicted just as he is in the channel islands complaint, because just as he knows Juliet and Fred Montague who abused me, he also knows Jane Fisher and has worked with her, just as Paul Butler has.

This is why there needs to be an OUTSIDE INVESTIGATION, something the church of England in all their duplicity and dishonesty are not capable of allowing, because they need all the Press reports to be favourable, which is why Justin Welby releases propaganda and flannel on a regular basis to his pet newspaper, the Daily Fail.

If you cannot deal with this matter, and cannot find a non-conflicted Bishop, then there needs to be an outside investigation, of I need to take this matter to a court of law.

As long as you continue the vainglorious boasting in the press, you keep reminding me of your acts against God in defaming and destroying me, leaving me voiceless and upholding my abusers, because that is all you have done with the million pounds you have wasted, showing off in the paper and publicly clearing the Dean before investigating him and having me internationally defamed.

When are you going to act on this matter, or are you really so incompetent that you don't know how? I have made a disciplinary complaint about you, the same disciplinary process you jeered at me because you sit on the complaints panel, and others have made complaints about you, so isn't it ridiculous that you are still at Wolvsley to sign the bit of paper you were showing off in the press about yesterday?

I have made a formal complaint to the police about Fisher, but this is the same police force who, just as you have, refused my side of things, and battered me and locked me in a cell for responding to Fisher and Scott-Joynts continual illegal interventions in my life, and they too upheld Fisher in harming me and in lying to them about it.

Your pretence of caring for me and helping me last year by Jane Fisher's illegal referral of me to the NSPCC was sick, you destroyed me over again, left me voiceless and pretended to help me through an illegal referral without my consent, by a woman who had acted illegally for years and destroyed me.

When are you going to deal with this matter? 

Or are you going to take Jane Fisher's advice that I am 'just attention seeking'?

You would be angry as I am if you had been through what I had and had to see you showing off in the paper when you should have been removed from Wolvlsey by now, while Jane Fisher, who has committed serious misconduct, is still in her position, treating me and the harm she has done to me as a joke, while I have been internationally defamed by the cover-up led by her and damaged for life, and still living in fear of harm from you.

This is a re-iteration of my formal complaint against Jane Fisher. It is in the context of the fact she is an abuser who has acted illegally and is a reader in your Diocese.

Although the fact that you have deliberately refused to deal with a complaint against her as a safeguarding officer is disgusting and you have invalidated your insurance as a result. Also, this matter cannot be dealt with by another church of england safeguarding officer, as they will be conflicted.

The fact that you have made so much loud noise in the press about safeguarding and as yet you are not capable of safeguarding one vulnerable adult is disgusting.

You can deal with this and rectify it or I can take you to court, one thing you are not permitted to do is deliberately harm me through whitewash reports done by colleagues of the Dean or his supporters.

sincerely,

HG

Another PR stunt for the church of england, another triumph for the general public who answered it with their online comments

It is funny how the Bishop of Dover is only touring Guernsey, at everyone else's expense, wasn't he allowed in Jersey? And has anyone noticed the lack of comment by the church on the St. Peters matter?
Click the links and scroll down for comments:

http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2015/01/08/details-released-of-jerseys-new-relationship-with-church-of-england/

and

http://guernseypress.com/news/2015/01/05/bishop-of-dover-is-on-five-day-visit-to-island/

I agree, the JEP being a bit squalid here, nothing new

http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2015/01/02/st-peter-vicar-resigns-after-affair/

I don't agree with the diocese covering up for and protecting abusers at the expense of victims or people hurt by the abuse, but I do agree with the comments that this could have been kept private, for decency's sake, especially the naming of the lady involved.
The Vicar may well leave Jersey, but the lay reader is less likely to, so what becomes of her? Will she be shamed in the small and closed community of the Jersey churches, just as I was for reporting the churchwarden? Will she be hated for 'losing them their Vicar' as Jersey is old fashioned?
If you are named in the paper like that, on a small island like Jersey, it can make your life hell.

The Vicar came from the UK, but a lay reader is more likely to be a longer term resident, although that is just a guess. It seems all wrong to name the reader, or indeed, why did the matter make the news, couldn't a decent quiet stepping down of both parties have been arranged?
I mean, when it comes to abuse, that is what the Diocese of Winchester tend to arrange, isn't it? Is an affair really worse than child abuse?

Well, as far as the church are concerned, autism, psychological damage from childhood, poverty and being naive are all worse than abuse and abusers, hence them branding me and having me imprisoned while they protected my abusers and their supporters, hence them publishing a report slandering me and spewing my personal life internationally so I was slandered by strangers, but the same wasn't done to my abusers and their supporters.

One of my earliest experiences of the Diocese of Winchester was JM's Benefice administor running of with a woman from the Diocesan Headquarters and leaving his wife alone, dying of cancer.
The fact that these were people in Church positions was bad enough, but the fact it was all excused was worse, followed swiftly by our youth leader being found guilty of paedophilia, and also excused, and called a 'good man really' despite the fact that child abuse ruins lives.
The church shouldn't excuse the inexcusable, they should not cover up to the point they harm people, they shouldn't condone wrong, but they also shouldn't allow the business of vulnerable people or their employees to be spewed round the press, as they did in the Korris report. The Church of England are a bit topsy-turvy.

Regarding the Jersey Vicar and his affair, he is indeed supposed to be setting an example to his flock, and he has got it wrong, and that will affect him for the rest of his life, likewise the lay reader, but that is between them and God.
Pray for them and for the Vicar's wife, this must be catastrophic for her, to find out and to see it in the papers.

The cover up merchant who also covered up in my case

https://audioboom.com/boos/2765739-phil-johnson-has-decided-to-go-public-with-a-recording-of-his-exchange-with-dame-butler-sloss-re-that-bishop?utm_campaign=detailpage&utm_content=retweet&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Happy New Year!