Showing posts with label Jersey abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jersey abuse. Show all posts

Tuesday, 4 July 2017

Ian Gorst and Jersey Care Inquiry

Dear Ian Gorst,

Your 50,000 of tax payers ,money on PR training must have been well spent, for you to offer a 'personal' apology to victims when you have been involved in exactly the same wrongdoing and appear unable to admit that during your PR apology.
Remember your persistent and criminal efforts against a vulnerable adult in order to protect States and Church Dignitaries? That remains unresolved and not accounted for. It needs outside investigation.
So did your little speech really have to cost £50,000 of tax payers money?

Make sure something is done about the million pound Winchester and Jersey cover-up at the expense of one lone and destroyed victim whose story remains unheard. You have taken so much time on your PR training that you seem to have forgotten to resign over the matter, not least because you personally tried to force the release of the whitewash Steel report and you personally had the victim bullied and trolled over the States personal whitewash by the failed and disgraced safeguarding partnership. You had no right to abuse your position to have a voiceless vulnerable adult destroyed with her side of things unheard, not least because as Chief Minister and dubiously a 'Christian' you were obliged to be impartial, instead you acted as badly and as conflictedly as you could.

Now that you have done your £50,000 speech at taxpayers' expense, maybe you can arrange the inquiry into Church, States and Police severe misconduct from 2008 onwards and of course especially from 2013-2016, not forgetting the severe abuse of the vulnerable adult by press and media and the states from their positions, and the inaction of yourself or the safeguardijng partnership to stop this. Because just as the systemic abuse and corruption in Jersey didn't go away and still remains a problem, not least under your unstable and corrupted leadership, the matter of the million pound public destruction of a lone vulnerable adult also isn't going to go away.

Any National or International Press ready to interview the victim instead of continuing the complicit silence, she is willing to be interviewed, and I don't think Ian Gorst's £50,000 of tax payers money on PR will ever wash the stain from him and his inter-conflicted corrupt States-Judiciary-Police-Church members.

And because Gorst, Bailhache and others have broken the law in their efforts, and so have the hopelessly corrupt and brutal States of Jersey Police,  but all consider themselves to be above the law, this needs to be a criminal investigation, and must be investigated by an outside police force as well as a neutral judge.
 You are responsible for allowing an openly conflicted judge to illegally act in the matter, Dame Steel's connections to the wrongdoers in this are open and evidenced and you were shown that evidence, as if you didn't already know, and yet you allowed her to continue to terrorize her victim and act illegally for the States and Church, and you even used tax payers money on a PR stunt trip to the UK to try to force the release of the Steel report, leading to further hate attacks against the victim, who you have never met, and the end result of that was the collapse of former Deputy Bob Hill as he tried to counter the hate attacks against the lone, destroyed and voiceless vulnerable adult. The blood on your hands, nearly two lives lost for the sake of cover-up, doesn't seem to affect your attendance at church, because you won't take responsibility for yourself, and this all the £50,000 apologies and fake care for the abuse victims, is worthless, and is your ticket to hell, if you really believe in God rather than being one of the group who go to church for show and status and to be fawned upon, which is the usual thing.

And remember, as well as the persistent and unashamed failings of Jersey safeguarding partnership over the years, which despite being published, have not led to improvement, they also were involved in criminal activity against your victim, at your behest, nearly killing her. The formal complaint against this remains unanswered and un-investigated, so your 'apology' is of no worth to anyone, especially not if that is all £50,000 of tax payers money spent on PR brings.Make sure your own personal victim, the victim of your conflicts of interests and place in the church and among the corrupt clique, receives justice and a full investigation into the actions of church, states, judiciary, press and media, and last but not least the police. It isn't possible to imagine that you go to church on Sunday for any reason except to be seen, and the same goes for the horrifically corrupt and callous men in your clique in the States.

I attach some of the reports waiting to be used in the inquiry into the horrific callous, open and utter destruction of a lone vulnerable adult to cover up for wrongdoing and protect the image of the church and states. Make sure justice is brought to this matter, no matter what your 'prejudices', and you don't need to spend so much money on covering up and PR this time.

Remember, there are 23 other reports waiting, as well as the ones attached, and the wrongdoing hasn't gone away just because of your unchristian illegal and deviant behaviour. The matter isn't closed, and will not be closed, until the whole matter is investigated by unbiased individuals and bodies who will have to ask you and your clique why you knowingly allowed a conflicted and biased associate of yours to hijack and whitewash the token investigations by the diocese of Winchester which were, incidentally to glorify themselves and cover their backs rather than any genuine wish for justice. And why you allowed illegal actions by the inter-conflicted parties to continue for three years without any thought for your victim's welfare.
Your apology means nothing while the Jersey Way marches on and lives remain at risk and your victim is destroyed. Make sure your victim is heard on an equal footing with the people who have smeared and discredited her, including yourself, and if you don't, your work and life and 'christianity' are worth nothing at all, if you allow a vulnerable adult to be destroyed voiceless, you would allow your own children to be destroyed voiceless and that is all that your life, work and ministry are worth.

What has happened in the States-led atrocity of the million pound Jersey and Winchester whitewash is an indication that nothing has changed, and you can whitter 'apologies' in much the same empty and PR-led way that the church do, but if you do not change things, starting with this massive injustice, your PR apologies make no difference, Jersey is still a corrupt mess, headed by a useless two-faced man who recently faced a vote of no confidence and in a panic he tried to save himself by sacking his right-hand man who he had determinedly tried to save from justice before. Horrifying isn't it, Ian Gorst, what you have done and got away with. So make sure outside investigation occurs, and have the grace to step down.

Finally, Jersey is obviously unable to function without proper supervision and outside audits, so before you step down, you should discuss this with the States and make sure that an outside governor and suitable facilities for the persistent wrongdoings in Jersey and the persistent need for the UK to keep investigating Jersey are looked into.  But straight away, Jersey Safeguarding Partnership's actions should be dealt with and they should be replaced, and you should dismiss Philip Bailhache just as you dismissed your other comrade, and this time not to save your sorry skin but because you were presented evidence of his criminal wrongdoing a few years back and refused to act, except to promote him to External Affairs Minister despite the nature of his wrongdoing. Time to stop following your PR script and start acting. No apology for PR makes any difference whatsoever when you are involved in and upholding wrongdoing and harm, the same thing has been said to the Church of England's National Safeguarding Team, who openly said that what has happened is wrong but that  they daren't stand up to you and your corrupt circle, not that they are anything but corrupt and employed to protect the church from victims. Horrifying, More horrifying if any victim hearing your apology believes you are genuine and not completely two-faced.

The only reason you have pretended to care about victims or apologize is because you like your cushy job and all expenses paid trips all over the world with the pretence that a tiny island with no trade or status, which can't run it's own affairs, needs you to visit exotic locations and pay you to, while when you can be bothered to come home to Jersey you are there because you allow the corruption and wrongdoing that caused decades of harm to children and the vulnerable, and still is doing.

Your £50,000 of taxpayers money for PR lessons when your right-hand crook grumbled about the costs both of the child abuse inquiry and the Jersey and Winchester whitewash, is a very poor financial judgement, and a waste of money, I can see through your duplicity, so can others. Image is more important to you and your corrupt clique than genuine apology, repentance or even justice, you couldn't stop the care inquiry so you did your best with sabotage, PR and pretend care. It is small wonder that Jersey has to be run and investigated by the UK, while the corruption and abuse and lack of safeguarding remains and you and your comrades are using your positions to enjoy free and needless travel round the world at taxpayers' expense. 

Time for Change. Goodbye Gorst, find a more suitable position and Jersey may have a chance of being a better, more productive place, with a better quality of life for those who belong there.

sincerely,


JJ - victim of the horrific current corruption and open wrongdoing in the inter-conflicted unregulated and uncontrolled States, police, church and judiciary in Jersey

Friday, 13 November 2015

Lessons won't be learned, they will trot that line out until the care inquiry leaves, and then return to selling children

Funny how BBC Jersey were attacking me very recently and now exposing the unsafeguarding partnership board.
 
courtesy  of : 
 
 

Abused children 'not heard', Jersey serious case review finds

  • 3 hours ago
  • From the section Jersey
Image copyright Thinkstock
Image caption Three families took part in the serious case review which covered a period of ten years from 2004 to 2015
Agencies involved in dealing with sexual abuse within three families in Jersey failed to take the children seriously, a serious case review found.
The review, by the Safeguarding Children Partnership Board, examined cases between 2004 and March 2015.
In one case, there was no record of one victim being spoken to alone by children's services over eight years of abuse, the report found.
Assistant chief minister, Senator Paul Routier, apologised to the children.
He also thanked them for participating in the review process, and said their insights had "contributed greatly to our understanding of what happened and why".
Six main areas of concern were identified, including a failure to identify sexual abuse, ineffective supervision and a failure to see the whole picture in the home.
In one case, the review found a female child had remained living in the same place as an alleged abuser and, even though he was placed in separate accommodation, the child was not safe.

Image copyright Thinkstock
Image caption The review found children were not listened to or spoken to alone about abuse

Key findings:

  • Naive and ineffective and useless safety plans: Children waited months after being assessed as a risk before something was done. In all cases delay in identifying and then acting on risk of sexual abuse
  • Failure to see the whole picture: Focused on mother's parenting, on just one child in the family.
  • Absence of challenge: Failed to monitor man with history of sexual offences. He was allowed to stay in a separate part of the accommodation where young girl lived.
  • Families did not know about previous offences: Offender on bail allowed to stay near family.
  • The need to speak to children alone: One child had no record of being spoken to alone by Children's Services, so her experience over eight years of abuse was never heard.
Source: Safeguarding Children Partnership Board Serious Case Review

Mr Routier said a number of actions had already been taken, including a £5.5m investment in children's services and better training for government and non-government agencies.
"We must learn from any mistakes that may have been made and we must work to deliver all the recommendations set out in this review," he said.
"This thematic review, like all serious case reviews, is about being open and transparent.
"It is not about apportioning blame. Services will not improve if we do not allow people to learn lessons."

Friday, 6 November 2015

If you ever get tired of Jersey being petty and childish, drop them a line :)

Dear States Giraffe,
I made a formal complaint to you regarding Philip Bailhache and his efforts to get the whitewash report he engineered released so that he can publicly destroy me again and unjustly exonorate the Dean.
And despite my complaint, he is there showing off in the press and demanding that report again since I made the complaint.
Jersey looks from the outside like a lawless ungoverned and corrupt miniature version of North Korea, and actually I believe North Korea actually has a government and according to reports, it's people are happy, while Jersey grows more and more weary and miserable as Philip Bailhache. and Senators Ouzouf and Gorst continue frequent trips to the far east for mysterious reasons, at tax payers' expense - are they using those thousands spent on flights to try to pull Jersey back from it's bankrupt and empoverished state in which inadequate school, care, medical and safeguarding systems are failing people and breaking lives?
Wouldn't it be better if they did that by staying at home and coming down to the level of real islanders, who are on the bottom rung below finance industry workers and States members? Any important business with the far East and indeed most places could be done by online conferencing until Jersey is well off enough to provide for the children, vulnerable, sick and tired of Jersey.
I myself am sick and tired of Jersey but Jersey won't safeguard me from their corrupt government either so it remains my business until they do.
Well whether they are flying for good reasons or not from a little island that is theoretically overseen by the crown and has no trade with the middle east or any country, openly and persistently harassing a vulnerable adult and being proud and cocky over a very deliberate hijack of a safeguarding investigation to protect wrongdoers and destroy an already destroyed vulnerable adult makes them bad ambassadors for Jersey and they are fully aware of what they are doing and show no remorse or repetence, so I am concerned that there is a safeguarding issue around this jet set club who you have received a formal complaint about.

If Philip Bailhache considers any sexual assault on a child to be a minor and unimportant issue, and if he is unchecked in destroying a vulnerable adult for wrongdoers while trying to mislead people to get the care inquiry closed down and trying to get a his own whitewash report published, then he needs to be chaperoned in the far east as their safeguarding may not expect to cover visiting 'dignitaries and children in some far east countries are more vulnerable than they may be in Western Countries, although in Jersey you have a safeguarding and social services system that is quite keen to aid abusers and provide for their 'needs' and have not yet realised that safeguarding means preventing children and the vulnerable from being abused.
While you consider my complaint, would you like to curb the Bailhache-Gorst bad and childish behaviour as an interim measure? Jersey is making itself look very bad and when Jersey loses the finance industry, then there will be nothing left, the agriculture and tourism industries are gone, all that is left is an ugly mass of concrete and a few dictators who think they merit flights abroad while the people of their island suffer hardship.
Jersey is hopeless, run down, dirty, poor systems, hostile and with an occupation mindset because the occupation never ended, I don't want to have to spend half my time in Jersey fighting for my human rights after I have left and moved on.
So please make sure that the people who threw me away for being abused and daring to report it remember to let go of my throat so that I can actually go.
And then , when you have time, make sure Philip Bailhache is disciplined for the first time in his spoilt self-centred and arrogant life.
I would like to see it happen, the City of London will be booming down the phone that you can't cane a two-year old. The answer to which is, why is a two year old (mis-)representing Jersey internationally?
I am going to pop this email on the blog so that at a later date it can be reviewed to see if the Greffe or safeguarding board or anyone else acted in response. If they haven't then Jersey needs intervention, maybe from the UK or the UN or any amnesty organization which can deal with a teeny lawless island who think they are big enough for 'trade' with other countries. Speaking of 'Trade' I have been told that Jersey dignitaries have tried to intervene in the UK abuse inquiry, I am sure that would be about another kind of 'trade' that Jersey used to find lucrative. Child traffiking. Would that be Sir Bailhache again?


Sincerely,
HG

Thursday, 22 October 2015

And at last BBC Jersey record it

Jersey Care Inquiry: Police chief suspension review 'missed evidence'

  • 49 minutes ago
  •  
  • From the sectionJersey
Graham Power
Image captionIn 2010, Graham Power's suspension was described as unfair by the Napier Report and he said he had been exonerated
Important evidence was missed in a review into the suspension of a police chief who was accused of mishandling a historical abuse inquiry, a former Jersey politician has claimed.
Bob Hill told the island's care inquiry key witnesses were not interviewed.
He said the review in 2008 failed to quiz a minister and police officers.
In 2010, Graham Power's suspension was described as unfair in the Napier Report and he said he had been exonerated.
Mr Hill - a former member of the Health and Social Services Committee - told the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry the Home Affairs Minister Wendy Kinnard responsible during the police investigation was not interviewed.
He added that London police officers, who wrote a report allegedly used to suspend Mr Power, were also not interviewed.
Haut de La GarenneImage copyrightGetty Images
Image captionThe Independent Jersey Care Inquiry is investigating child abuse in Jersey's care system including the Haut de la Garenne care home
In November 2008, Mr Power, who was the chief of police, was suspended over his handling of Operation Rectangle - the historical child abuse investigation.
His performance became subject to a separate £1m investigation by Wiltshire Police and Mr Power accused ministers of "a state-sponsored, taxpayer-funded personal vendetta".
He said politicians "interfered" with police investigations and "closed ranks" with civil servants.
Mr Power was suspended in 2010, but no charges were brought against him.
Mr Hill told the inquiry he was not aware of child abuse at Haut de La Garenne care home until the police investigation in 2008 was made public.
The inquiry is investigating child abuse in Jersey's care system since 1945 and is focusing on - but is not restricted to - Haut de la Garenne during the 1960s.

Friday, 14 August 2015

In The news...

As I have already blogged, Sir Philip Bailhache, the Dean's main protector and the main attack of me, using his power in the States, has been named for protecting a paedophile in Jersey.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-jersey-33872613

Unfortunately, of course, this was not the only case.

http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/philip-bailhache-and-roger-holland.html

And the Church of England allowed him to destroy me publicly for my abuser and the Dean. And they are claiming the Church in Jersey is a safe place!

I like Tony the Prof's blog recently, where he quotes me, and I am trying to work out where the quote comes from, I think it is from my open letter to Sir Philip Bailhache:

http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/quis-custodiet-ipsos-custodies.html

My open letter to Philip bailhache:

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jerseys-external-affairs-minister-sir-philip-bailhache

And yes, reading through this, Tony has obviously read my letter to Bailhache and plucked that quote from there.

Anyway, I must go back to following the Janner case, and doing my university prep, and waiting to hear if the joyful arrival of a new baby has occured as well.





Thursday, 6 August 2015

Formal and Public Letter to Mrs Glenys Johnstone, OBE, chair of Jersey's safeguarding report

Of course the obvious question is... Is Johnstone also a member of the Church of England as Korris and the others are?

06/08/2015

Formal Letter to Glenys Johnstone, Chair of Jersey’s ‘Independent’ Safeguarding Panel. This letter is distributed to the press, media, Jersey bloggers and also published online on blogs and websites, this letter is also distributed among twitter and other social media and survivors groups. Observers of this letter, there is a whole list of links at the end and throughout to illustrate the matter. This letter will not be redacted and will form part of an ongoing complaint.

Dear Mrs Johnstone,
Hello, I am HG, the abuse survivor who you have been helping to destroy.

You don’t know me, and you don’t want to, but I know my formal letter of warning reached you, I know you reacted, and I know you have been repeatedly reading the letters posted on my blog. Why don’t you hear about who I am instead of listening and documenting lies? I observe no response from you, a diocese of Winchester style contempt for my views.

Here is my daily diary that started online in 2011, when I was homeless and still being harmed by Jane Fisher’s illegal interventions, as I still am through you. Life After the Diocese was originally called ‘Homeless’ and then ‘The Wanderer’ and named ‘Life After the Diocese’ in honour of the prolonged attack on me by the Diocese in 2013: 


The story of a peaceful life daily harmed by the church and police and your panel and the trauma they have caused, I dare you to read it, the Church of England are terrified of it, they won’t read it because it invalidated their attack on me and it discredits them. This diary has had a good following from the start and helped to save my life and restore me.

It is difficult to find the right spelling for your name but I will get it right in time for court, it is made harder by Bob Hill spelling it several ways.

I don’t know a lot about you except that you are dishonest and that you have made me suffer prolonged stress and illness by whitewashing a report and saying that the police have committed no misconduct when they have, and leaving me waiting to be further damaged and defamed by your whitewash alongside waiting to be destroyed by the Steel whitewash, and the two reports are not mutually exclusive, they are linked by Jane Fisher and Stuart Gull, part of a relationship of mutual cover-up between the Diocese of Winchester and Jersey police that has now been running at my expense since 2008, and even the Korris rubbish shows glimpses of it although it has been well covered up.

Both your report and the Steel report are whitewashes to mutually scratch police and church backs, and it is astounding it is still happening considering how such whitewashes and cover ups are currently hitting the news with regular impact in other abuse cases. We will chat about LEICESTER in that context during this letter.

Can you imagine any situation, under any excuse, when members of the defendants team are allowed to write the report, to the exclusion of the victim, and that be considered balanced or fair? Because Stuart Gull represents the seriously compromised States of Jersey Police, who committed serious and sustained misconduct and Dame Heather Steel represents her friends and colleagues in the intermeshed Jersey Deanery and Judiciary, including Philip Bailhache, Michael Birt, Ian LeMarquand, Bridget Shaw, Gavin Ashenden, etc, all of whom have been involved in other misconducts, but none of whom have been subject to public crucifiction as I have.

Are they vulnerable? Are they abuse survivors? No. Have you acted on their harassment of me in the press and community? No. Have you been asked to? Yes. So why have you proceeded your conflicted whitewash without my consent and knowing it is conflicted, instead? Don’t you think you have got the concept of safeguarding inside out then? Please deal with the safeguarding issue of dignitaries in Jersey slurring and attacking abuse survivors.

Let me just clarify a few things about Police officer Stuart Gull, who you have liased with, he is part of your safeguarding panel, he is also the officer ‘appointed’ by the Bishop of Winchester in a grandiouse show in the press, to liase without my consent with the conflicted Dame Heather Steel, who is allied with members of the Jersey Deanery, to illegally access my inaccurate police records.

Let me ask you something, do wrongdoers usually put their hands up and admit to wrongdoing? Do they put their misconducts on record or cover up for themselves? Especially if they are in authority and at risk of dismissals or press and public negativity? If people who are essentially defendants are allowed to have control of or influence of reports, for example Steel and Gull and Fisher, are they going to do a fair and balanced report? Are they going to include my side of things? Or are they going to ensure that I am excluded, and the people they are protecting are cleared? I think you either know the answer to that or you are not fit to be in your job.

The Korris report was the first and only whitewash to be published, that was primarily Jane Fisher’s cover up for her misconduct, notably it excluded me, and the Bishop of Winchester ignored my views on it until I took him to court and he then hurriedly removed the report from the diocesan website while muttering lies about how he had ‘tried to include me’ which was indeed a blatant lie, which he has never tried to qualify by explaining why he didn’t amend the report with my views.
The Bishop further refuses to discipline the conflicted Jane Fisher or remove her from this matter, again showing that this is nothing to do with safeguarding at all. Jane Fisher’s colleagues, Paul Butler and Elizabeth Hall, famous for their desparate uncoverup to try and prevent the church from being investigated, are also protecting Fisher, even though she is responsible for serious and sustained harm to me.

In the same vein, you told Bob Hill the police had no case to answer when your whitewash was first announced, failed to interview me, and contacted me after you had apparently completed your report. Steel was much the same vein. And what excuse do you all have for these whitewashes that exclude the key witness? That I am mad? Bad? Have you heard my story? Heard how severe the trauma was that led to what happened? No, you haven’t even tried to hear me, so what use are your reports? What is their purpose apart from being a box ticking exercise and a cover-up for wrongdoers? Why then are you collectively claiming that these are safeguarding exercises?

I am not on trial any more, not voiceless,  we who survived, we have a voice and we can say ‘No more’. So this is the end of me being condemned by you and your associates. I say that in Jesus Name too.
I am just going to illustrate a few points, madness:


Previous letters to Glenys Johnstone:



Unfortunately you do have to be part of an investigation now, an investigation into how this massive whitewash was engineered at my expense and has left me ill and under massive pressure and stress for the past few years.

And you personally need to be involved in an investigation that explores your links between high profile abusers in Leicester and their cover up, and your timely ‘choice’ to head safeguarding in Jersey. I am sure that as you have been happy to play a part in publicly destroying me, you will not take offence at the connection I have made and already shared with you. Your actions led to me making that connection.

You were in Leicester social services during a time that high profile abusers were also operating to take advantage of vulnerable children, and unfortunately I was also around, as I am sure you have realised. Would you like to talk about Greville Janner and Frank Beck, and then your transfer to heading Jersey’s safeguarding at such a sensitive time – a time when other powerful people are being linked to abuse in the care homes in Jersey. 
Stuart Gull is a spin doctor and cover up doctor for the police, am I right in assuming, due to your whitewash in my case, that you, having not faced any investigation for the endemic abuse in Leicestershire, not just Beck and Janner, and why that abuse was going on under your nose, moved to Jersey to continue the good work?

I am sure you won’t like my ‘allegations’ but allow that to illustrate just how much I dislike YOUR allegations! You have tried to discredit me by claiming that the serious and sustained misconduct of Jersey police didn’t occur! You have no idea how hard it is for me to survive not only the horror of what I survived in Jersey, followed by the combined and sustained attack on me by you and Gull and Steel and the Diocese and Deanery, if I was anyone else I would have conveniently committed suicide, as some of the Leicester Victims who you failed conveniently did, as some of the Jersey abuse survivors conveniently did, convenient for you and your police and the dignitaries who you have protected.

I am trying to find you a copy of the letter written to Jersey’s joke of a police complaints authority in 2009, that they never responded to, and it only got much much worse from then on, this isn’t in your scabby excuse for a report, I recall a lot of evidence that both Jersey and Leicester police are very corrupt and have deliberately acted for abusers in power, some of the psychological harm to me that prevents me relating to people well is directly as a result of Leicestershire constabulary’s failures, and more from Jersey police.

Back to the Leicester matter, I know both from my childhood and from accounts of survivors on the streets how horrendous the care system in Leicester/shire was, now can you tell me a bit about your OBE in return? We could go through a list of titles allocated to both abusers and people who covered for them, an interesting trend in the news, but here’s a complete and utter wild card question, did a man called Mark Lupton ever come to your blind eyes or bribe? Oops, I meant attention!

So Glenys, I gather you are not an observant lady, all that abuse going on in Leicester/shire, and you didn’t notice a thing and you got an OBE for it! And in Jersey you are still not noticing a thing! Wow! I guess you get to be a Dame or something pretty soon?

I already know how wrongdoers in authority react to being challenged. Stuart Syvret and Trevor and Shona Pitman were ruined for challenging them, my parents suffered terribly, and I have been repeatedly and publicly destroyed. So before you set off the routine beatings and imprisonments, remember, I have survived it repeatedly, I am brutally and severely harmed but I have lived, and my attitude now is that you will kill me or I will live, but this letter is printed and circulated, indelibly, copied, recorded, forever. I learned that from the Jersey bloggers, especially Stuart Syvret and Trevor Pitman. You can ruin, even kill, but you can no longer delete, and I hope survivors are picking that message up very fast.

You and your police and church only know how to destroy in order to silence, but as I said, it doesn’t work any more, the world is changing, it worked in Leicester in the 80s and 90s, it worked in other areas, Islington, Kincora, it worked against victims who ‘committed suicide’ and met other accidents, but I am prepared to live or die, I have survived so much that I will not take my life, I will let you take my life by police beatings if necessary, as long as the culture of cover- up continues to be smashed as a result and other survivors are freed. There are a lot of survivors now, and Leicester and Jersey stand out, and you are now a link, as far as I am concerned, and I saw that link through your whitewash of my case.

Your whitewash and your link to Leicester means you are not credible, how are you doing in influencing the Jersey Care Inquiry, seeing as you were wheeled in AFTER the inquiry was decided? Jersey had NO safeguarding provision previously and reports and press articles indicate that is still doesn’t, just a damn good pretence on your part!
Let’s see if Jersey has ‘learned lessons’ or has any safeguarding, shall we? I want this complaint investigated, and all the complaints surrounding it!  That will be the test.

Can we just go back to your Liecester connection? You are probably in contact with Keith Vaz? The esteemed member of the committee regards Child abuse? The interlinks are so clear aren’t they? You are part of those interlinks, and your place is the same as Vaz’s, if I judge by my case, keep it sweet for the dignitaries and police? Yes?

Mr Vaz was approached about Greville Janner, by my MOTHER in 1992, and he sent her away and defended Janner. How do you feel about your associate, Mr Vaz, at the moment? Do you remember it all? Leicester in the 80s and 90s, complaints about Janner? What did you do? What earned you the OBE? Why is Vaz on the committee regards the CSA inquiry?

I wonder what your response will be to this letter? Maybe I will know in a few years, judging by you contacting me a year after you had stated the police were innocent and contacting me only as a token, like Steel did, after you had made your arrangements to clear wrongdoers.
Let me do a little diagram: Ted Heath-Leon Brittan-Greville Janner-Vaz-Glenys Johnstone-Heather Steel-Philip Bailhache-Ted Heath-(Name redacted)-Ian LeMarquand-(name redacted)-ButlerSloss, Hedley. this is almost exhaustive but rather than being an allegation it is a power line. Time it ended. No-one should be in an omnipotent position to prevent justice for victims.

I just thought I would observe a pattern that illustrates how the various reports on my case were engineered, John Gladwin was wheeled in due to his name for the Chichester report but he was relegated to looking at ‘constitutional issues’, Steel then ‘stepped forward’ to whitewash the rest for the Deanery and because she didn’t investigate the police and deportation, couldn’t credibly whitewash that, Johnstone could whitewash that from her dual position. Neat, you have to look hard to see the arrangement.

Let me assure you, Jersey police actually contradicted themselves while keeping inaccurate records about me for those they favoured. I lived through appallingly dishonest aand brutal treatment at their hands when I was suffering traumatic stress from the sexual and very severe emotional abuse at the hands of the church warden, and your whitewash will not change that.

Let me be clear, you are going to be sued or face an injunction over your whitewash, I do not have any respect for titles or dignitaries, they haven’t done anything to earn respect, it is those on the ground who are working with and for survivors who are commanding respect, the old days of titles and dignitaries being above the law and ‘giving the order’ for those such as me to be destroyed for writing these things are over. Destroying me will not erase these indelible words, nor will the legal expertise or corruption and brutality of any police force or dignitaries change my course, I survived the last lot, branded and horrifically damaged, I survived it to write this.

You will not harm me further. I formally make that clear. You have claimed in response to a Freedom of information act request that you still intend to publish the whitewash, and this letter is to explain to you why you have no right to do so and why you are guilty of misconduct and who you are guilty of misconduct in liason with.

Jane Fisher was recorded and witnessed as being in Jersey to engineer this matter, and other acts of hers have been witnessed, so as well as holding you liable, the Diocese will also continued to be held to account for your and Steel and Gull’s actions, I will continue to contest them until their prolonged attack on my life is destroyed, and having me beaten and locked up will not turn my course, and if I am killed, as I nearly have been by the public crucifiction and the trauma, these words are indelible like the statements made in the 90s against Janner.

I hereby officially discredit and annul your position and report on my case, you have proved unreliable and dishonest and devious in recording events in Jersey relating to my case, and yes, this can and will be shown to a court of law. Your report is forbidden by me from any further publication, it is not to be shared with the diocese if you have not already shared it, after all it was a whitewash for their aims, and they and you will face legal action if it has been shared or is used by them, and this is now written and recorded.

And this is the well-worn phrase I have shared with you all collectively regarding this matter ‘If this is how you treat me and I have barely survived and been able to answer back in a small voice against you and your press, what happens to the voiceless vulnerable who you do this to?’ What happens to countless whitewashes and beatings and silencing of vulnerable? Will it all come to light as the tide changes against you? Or will those deaths remain in silence and in vain, blamed on madness as you tried to with me? I think Lowell Goddard needs a copy of this letter, would you do the honours?

The gentleman who you defamed in the only report you have published is dead, can’t answer back, I speak for him, you are annulled.
If I hear you spluttering about ‘allegations’ ‘unfounded’ and harassment, you kicked off by harassing me, and put me in a position to believe that you are complicit in cover-ups at my expense to protect wrongdoers. 
And seeing as you have been unwilling to genuinely include me in any report, you have no right to swipe this aside with the defamatory opinions that others have of me, you need to at least consider their own misconducts first and include them in any report to balance it.

Sincerely,

HG


And Here are some of the relevant links, these are exhaustive so this is only a few:


More of Bob Hill's Blogs: