The Church of England cover up team

church abuse cover up and smoothing over crack team:

Korris report...Notes on acknowledgements... Dame Butler-Sloss

Dame Butler Sloss to abuse victim 'We can't give the press a Bishop'.

Dame Butler-Sloss...Korris...deliberately vague and non-chron report omitting Fisher's misconducts and omitting my views...Gladwin...Dame Steel..

Butler-Sloss-Gladwin-Steel-Korris

and round and round we go.

part 1.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/westminster-abuse-inquiry-baroness-butlersloss-accused-of-hiding-claims-of-bishops-paedophile-allegations-9602065.html

watch this space, some posts tomorrow you may find readable :)

ureka!

UREKA!

DAME BUTLER-SLOSS   -  DAME HEATHER STEEL.

no, not just because they are both female elderly judges.

correspondence with the Chief Minister

Dear Senator Gorst,

I am just emailing regarding correspondence.

I do find that you and the sham safeguarding board emailing just before the weekend kind of gives the impression that you don't want correspondence, but, nonetheless, while you are harming me, you will get correspondence.

Before I continue, may I congratulate you on the march for gay rights in Jersey today. The march gained international coverage and gave many hope that Jersey is changing for the better, the island that is known for it's archaic and feudal government that is known as a government that robs the poor and vulnerable and children and minorities of rights and freedoms because of the finance industry and the few all-powerful conflicted States-Judiciary-masonic-church members, has today shown hope for change, for a better Jersey, one where there are no longer any atrocities such as the way I was destroyed and the way it was covered up, including your sham investigation and Philip Bailhache's smear campaign against me and his fight to silence Haute de la Garenne abuse victims for the sake of the Island's reputation, and his use of his coleague and friend, Dame Steel, to hijack the Diocese of Winchester's investigation and further damn me in a report that excludes me and yet includes people who were not in Jersey during the events being investigated and had not met me.

Well, done, as chief Minister, for leading your Island today, in full view of the world, to state that things will change in Jersey. The March for equality was stunning!

I am mainly emailing though, in light of the new hope for Jersey, for justice and equality, to remind you to withdraw the whitewash safeguarding sham investigation because the counteractions will have negative consequences on the new and hopeful Jersey's reputation, because I do have the evidence to counter your sham investigation that has already cleared wrongdoers on their say-so without my version of events being recorded. What kind of investigation only records the defendants? Not a genuine or balanced one, a genuine investigation involves the complainant from the start, not at the last minute just to put on record that they have been contacted.

And also to remind you that I would like an investigation into the serious breach of safeguarding, States conduct and my rights and dignity that has been the smear campaign headed by Philip Bailhache and Ian LeMarquand, conflicting and abusing their roles in States, Church and Judiciary and abusing their power to influence people against me with propaganda.

I look forward to the very readily available evidence of this, and evidence that is not so readily available of liasons over this, being examined by the safeguarding board.

I would like to add, finally, that there is an illusion, not a very good one, that Glenys Johnstone is independent, unfortunately she is not independent but is not on the Island and thus not able to see the workings of a corrupt and badly run system against the poor, the vulnerable and victims of Jersey's covered-up decades of abuse of children in care. Basically, as I mentioned, victims have been ruined, driven to death and intimidated out of giving evidence, I have first hand experience of this happening to victims of Haute de la Garenne while I was in Jersey, and it is still happening, with victims afraid to give evidence due to knowing the harm that can befall them in return, because the details of their evidence will be put in the public domain. There is no sign that Mrs Johnstone knows or cares about this, but is more there to protect the establishment, fortunately for me, she is in the UK and I can take her to court.

I look forward to seeing you continue the progress started with your excellent gay rights march by ensuring that the ministers who have acted in bias to the church by smearing me and upholding the grave wrongdoing of the Dean and Church, are disciplined, as is the Dean, this is now also your responsibility as the Diocese of Winchester, fended off by the Deanery of Jersey, and with no power in Jersey, were forced to abandon the matter and leave it to the Steel/Bailhache whitewash.

It will be so wonderful to see you put all this right, now that you have made the first step in transforming Jersey from a communist/feudal state to democracy and transparency by arranging and publicising the Gay Rights March.

I look forward to you disciplining your government ministers, including the Dean, in order that they can learn to be part of this new and hopeful Jersey and leave their corrupt and abusive ways behind, for the sake of all poor, vulnerable, disabled and young people in Jersey, and also in light of their objections to the wonderful march today, that they also learn the basic values that Jesus taught 'Judge Not', and 'love your neighbour as yourself'.

sincerely, 

A gay day in Jersey

Now remember as you read this link, Jersey is the Island where the Dean who called me wicked and said I wasn't abused, because it was his friend I reported, was allowed to ask new political candidates 'Why should a bunch of 'Christians' vote for you?'
A bit like communism run by the Church, a bit like Poland's Catholic Priests telling their congregations who to vote for.

http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/jersey-take-streets-biggest-ever-gay-marriage-rally110714

I just wanted to nick some comments off VoiceforChildren's blog:

Anonymous11 July 2014 15:17

I would be attending to if I wasn't stuck 5000 Miles away, to show support for the principal of equality and vent my anger at this (mostly) pathetic apology of a government that currently turns a deaf ear to the people. There are but a few courageous and fair representatives of the people that deserve all our support in the defense of civil rights, equality and justice.

My only other point would be if 800 people truly can and do get off their butts to support this just and noble principal, then I hope they can feel similarly driven and empowered to support the fight against the corrupt and illegal cover up of pedophiles in Jersey.

Wake up your island needs you now!

JRCbean

For the record not gay, but proud to stand along side all my gay friends in granting them equality.

Gillian Gracia11 July 2014 20:05

Hear, hear! Nuff said.

This is how bigoted the old and wealthy in the Church of England can get!

It was at the Lihou's house, a book, the book was called 'Inside the mind of unChurched John and Jane'.

There is no better statement of bigotry and prejudice than that.

Can you believe anyone could even write a book with that title?!

No, I never read it.

Jill and George didn't get on particularly well with their next door neighbours.
And Jesus said 'Love your neighbours as yourself'.
So what is the point of such awful bigotry?

This may cause offence

In the Great Grim Church
the old ladies sit and pat themselves on the back
for everything they have done for Charity
and the money they have donated

While out in the real world
activists fight for human lives and freedoms
and don't always believe in a God 
that allows the church to harm people and congratulate themselves

Jesus said 'Love your neighbour as yourself'
and the elderly and wealthy in the church don't
they don't like or know their neighbour
while the activists fight for human lives and freedoms
people they may not have met, but care about
freedom from abuse and opression and injury and poverty
all the things that the Church of England generate in their ignorance, wealth and coldness

Wow!

Read this, and wonder why the inexperienced Bishop of Winchester launched on the Dean of Jersey and then allowed Steel to cover it up and villify me.

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article4145685.ece

Recalling having to deal with the church and their protected abusers myself:

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/article3342526.ece#commentsStart

Right, anyone who thinks Steel is anything to do with anything other than cover up! Listen to a more senior investigator doing cover ups!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3fug1GuC0U&feature=youtu.be

Does anyone think a sex offender should give communion?
Does anyone think it is safe for a priest to officiate to vulnerable people when he is a convicted sex offender.

Apparently the Deanery of Jersey thinks a sex abuser churchwarden should go on unsupervised to pick up an groom vulnerable person and liase with his and Dean to villify her.

Chichester:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75_BnoUC4Pc



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VBn2LXNg3s

listen again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3fug1GuC0U

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10957364/Baroness-Butler-Sloss-criticised-over-previous-flawed-paedophile-report.html

Jersey and Church of England petitions, sign if you wish

Jersey:

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/theresa-may-home-secretary-include-jersey-channel-islands-in-the-historic-csa-inquiry?post_id=100008019813700_1440365352907445#_=_

Church of England:

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/the-archbishop-of-canterbury-rt-revd-justin-welby-enable-outside-investigation-into-church-abuse-and-misconduct-complaints

Feel free to sign, although knowing most of you, you will gawp at my profile instead.
Nothing to see, and it is allowed.

Dear Jersey Police

In case it isn't already understood...
You did me at least as much damage as the churchwarden who abused me did.
Your idea of victim care is to violently and uneccesarily brutalize and abuse survivor the day you EMAIL her the results of your investigation and let her abuser go while you fling her in a cell and lock her in when she has done nothing to merit it.
I never recovered and it was the start of me detriorating, you are responsible for it.

sincerely,

OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28257488

JANE FISHER

HEATHER STEEL

DAME BUTLER-SLOSS


STOP PROTECTING THE CHURCH AT THE EXPENSE OF VICTIM'S LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

c/o BBC News

Abuse victim: 'Baroness Butler-Sloss the wrong person'

10 July 2014 Last updated at 21:49 BST

A man abused by a paedophile priest in Sussex says Baroness Butler-Sloss is the wrong person to lead an inquiry into how public bodies dealt with allegations of child abuse.

Phil Johnson says she told him she wanted to exclude his allegations of abuse at the hands of a bishop from a public report because she "cared about the church" and "did not want to give the press a bishop".

Baroness Butler-Sloss has now been asked to look into how the government handled allegations of child abuse by senior politicians in the 1980s and has already faced calls to stand down.

Colin Campbell has this exclusive report.

Read more

Actor Nigel Havers defends aunt's abuse inquiry role

Butler-Sloss: I won't quit as head of abuse inquiry

Out of media player. Press enter to return or tab to continue.

Addition to Jersey police email

I am sorry, at one point in my previousl email I mention the violent brutality and detention, and I put 'The day you released me', which should have read 'The day you released him' - my abuser, the day you punished me for reporting him, I also meant to add, that from that point onwards I began to deteriorate, I never got over the shock of that uneccasry adn violent treatment by the police, never recovered, and deteriorated rapidly, very severely traumatized.

The other thing I omitted was, when I mentioned Jane Fisher liasing with the police over my case during the smear campaign against me, led by Philip Bailhache, neither jane Fisher nor the police did anything about the distress I was suffering as a result of the smear campaign, so what valid reason did the police and Jane Fisher have to meet?

Basically that was a cover up liason.

Also, at the same time, Jane Fisher refused a safeguarding complaint of another vulnerable adult against Jersey church members.

I have suffered and been silenced for too long, it is time that all the horrendous treatment I have suffered came out in the open and the villification and smears about me being insane are stopped.

Fact is the authorities in Jersey completely let me down.

The beating and detention you subject me to, the day you let my abuser go is one very clear example, and the police are responsible for my subsequent deterioration as a result, as the police continued to treat me like dirt and ignored my complaints.

Here is one of my complaints

 http://policemisconductpublic.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/police-complaint-letter-from-anything.html

letter to Jersey Police

Dear Officer ********,

I wrote to you earlier regarding how someone has perverted the course of justice if the police claim only last year to have received evidence.

Basically the level of dishonesty in that is unbelievable,

the church want my abuser prosecuted for their own ends and so you receive evidence all of a sudden five years too late and the other side of destroying me.

You could have prosecuted him on the evidence you got 5 years ago, because no evidence was witheld by me then, and whoever else has witheld evidence, ie the church, until they want the man prosecuted 5 years too late, has committed a criminal offence.

I would also like to bring to your attention the fact that at the height of the smear campaign last year, Jane Fisher came to Jersey and liased with you over my case, she did not have my consent and has seriously and permenantly damaged me, and as you will be aware, she is one of the people who brought criminal charges against me and thus had no right to be further involved in my case or any cover ups such as the Korris report which omits her behaviour, or any further liason with the police. Please ensure that this is investigated.

There is also another matter to bring to your attention. Jersey's sham safeguarding panel, apparently on the request of the Bishop and Diocese who have destroyed me, are forcing a whitewash defamatory investigation on me, Jersey is in the past for me and what happened to me in Jersey is so traumatic that I have blank patches in my memory which the psychologist says that I must not recall, I am still aware I was treated atrociously by Jersey police and my letters of complaint were ignored, and that other agencies in Jersey also let me down, but the sham safeguarding panel has already, before contacting me for my views, completed a report and cleared the wrongdoers.

The reason I bring this to your attention is, the same officer 'appointed' by the Bishop of Winchester to liase with the conflicted Dame Heather Steel and apparently illegally access my inaccurate records on her behalf, is also on Jersey's sham safeguarding team, and undoubtedly acting against me in the same way.

Unfortunately no-one involved in this matter knows me and are all singularly going on what they are reading and what they are reading is not me or an accurate representation of me or what happened to me.

You have tried to get me to bring a case against my abuser five years too late and when you are part of the police force who destroyed me and who keep inaccurate records against me, and you did this upon a perversion of the course of justice and while I am too unwell to even comprehend a court case, especially as, much publicized in the JEP recently, you half kill abuse victims in court. Your police force destroyed me without even putting me in court, such is the corruption in the force, you had me violently brutalized and thrown roughly in a cell and locked in the day you let my abuser  go, as a punishment for reporting him. Five years later, when you should be investigating who perverted the course of justice by witholding evidence, you want me to be further injured by Jersey's corrupt police and judiciary?

So, I am asking you instead, to make sure my concerns raised here are investigated, even if an outside force has to investigate.

Because it appears that my police records in Jersey, inaccurate as they are to start with, are open to viewing and tampering by the diocese and their representatives, by this officer Gull who has acted against me on behalf of the Bishop as well as Jersey's sham safeguarding board, by Senator Bailhache and his close colleague Dame Heather, and by the overseer of the police, Ian LeMarquand, who is also a church of england reader and long time friend of my abuser.

If you feel that the concerns raised here are not within your field of work, please refer them to a collague who will investigate as they are serious matters, and can't be fobbed off as insanity, as is the Jersey way, because my psychological report, available here, shows that I am not 

insane.

 http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/13082013.html#.U7_gJ5RdXhE

email to Senator Gorst

I am just going to re-iterate that I have not granted consent for the violation of my life and privacy that you claim to be an investigation.

An investigation without my views is only useful as toilet paper.

You need to investigate why you have allowed a smear campaign against me by conflicted members of the church-judiciary-states clique and why you have allowed me to be harmed and not safeguarded that way. I consent to an investigation into your politicians smearing me, lying about me and abusing their office that way, for example senator Bailhache writing a public letter full of untruths and publishing it using his title as senator, and later claiming he is intitled to support the church that way as a member/officer of the church.

Er no, no politician is entitled to abuse their power.

So Senator Gorst, so impressed with this public display of misconduct by a man who had never met me defaming me, promoted him. 

And to add, what kind of Christian behaves as Bailhache consistently does anyway?

And on the subject, another conflict is that the same officer on the safeguarding panel is the one the Bishop 'appointed' to liase with Daem Heather Steel, the conflicted jusge, close colleague of Philip Bailhache who hijacked the Diocesan inquiry on behalf of Philip Bailhache.

Jersey care inquiry, make notes, THIS is what goes on in Jersey, THIS is how the establishment works to silence victims and uphold wrongdoers.

We are discussing the same Philip Bailhache who was head the board of Haute de la Garrenne during the decades when abuse took place.

http://planetjersey.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,212.msg59271.html#msg59271

Jersey's sham safeguarding board continued

I, HG, State the following:

1. I have not agreed to intrusion and intervention by Jersey's Sham 'safeguarding board'.
2. I forbid continued intrusion and intervention.
3. One of the reasons I forbid this is because they are conflicted by acting for a government who have publicly smeared me.
4. The sham safeguarding board have already made their stance clear by stating in February that their report was nearly finished and they were apparently trying to contact me then but did not go through Bob Hill when it was made clear to them that he was acting for me, they made no attempt to contact me in February.
5. They contacted me directly very recently, presumably as an afterthought so that they could claim in their whitewash report to have contacted me. The report, if nearly finished in February, would be complete by now. Presumably they hoped I would reject them out of hand and they could thus publish the report and say that. Instead, I am charging them to publish both this legal letter/warning and the previous legal letter to Glenys Johnstone in their report if they insist on harming me by publishing their whitewash.
6. The board need to be aware that their actions in accessing any records of mine are illegal, that publishing anything dishonest or untruthful that omits my views is illegal and I will proceed action in all ways possible while widely publicising the board's actions against me, and my reach now through blogs and other media is extensive.
7. The sham safeguarding board are not carrying out an investigation, and have not, they have been carrying out a biased cover up for a government who smeared my name, as shown in the email links in the formal letter to Glenys Johnstone.
8. I intend to persue this matter until Jersey's sham safeguarding board desist from harassing me. The report is a sham for a government who publicly smeared me, it is conflicted, it is a whitewash and it will be sent round the world for the whitewash it is, and Jersey's government and sham safeguarding board are already known to a wide audience as corrupt and ineffective. Jersey's sham safeguarding board is getting a lot of negative publicity for being ineffective and protecting no-one, so harassing a vulnerable adult for a whitewash report is going to come as no surprise to the world, nor is the continued action and publicity I produce.
9. The days of re-abusing victims is coming to an end, the recent CSA inquiry has highlighted in the media just the kind of thing Jersey's corrupt government and sham safeguarding board are inflicting on me, a re-abuse, a harassment to drive me to death and ruin and silence me, this is what thousands of children and young people in the UK have suffered and this is what Jersey and the diocese have made me suffer, but the time of being silenced is well and truly over, we are speaking and being heard, and you are nothing more than a sham government agency who are harassing me, and I am asking you again and formally, to desist.
10. The only people to investigate this matter are to be independent of Jersey, and puppets like Glenys Johnstone, who cleared the police of misconduct months ago without my views, are not independent.
11. This will be published on my blog, on twitter and on other media.
12. Mike Higgins, who often raises my case in the States without my consent, has my consent to raise this in the States.

sincerely,

STILL NO WORD FROM THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND ON A PROPER INQUIRY THAT INCLUDES ME AND INCLUDES JANE FISHER'S MISCONDUCT.
OBVIOUSLY THEY DONT CARE ABOUT SAFEGUARDING.
THEY PREFER COVER UPS THAT DESTROY AN ALREADY DESTROYED PERSON.

briefly

Everything that happened in my childhood was too much for me,
trying to learn to live in the real world and ending up abused again was too much for me,
Jersey was far far too much for me,
what happened since Jersey was too much for me,
and the last 16 months have been too much for me,
and it isn't over,
how much longer can I go on holding onto this shattered life and soul?
When will I be free from the diocese and able to seek help and try to patch my wounds?
My anger and lashing out,
is because I need to be free and safe and get help and I am too hurt to cope with everythin

follow up email to Jersey Safeguarding (what a joke!) board

Good morning,

Just a reminder that I have had no response to my complaints and concerns from either the chief minister who is too busy fighting for inequality for gay people, or the safeguarding (what a joke!) board.

Some months ago this woman  leading the destroyal of me under the guise of safeguarding, claimed that the police had done nothing wrong.

And then all this time later she contacts me.

I would say the police dishonesty, inaccurate records and brutality constitutes the police doing something wrong, unless you are in Jersey, where the police have been causing deaths and wrecking lives for a long time, and as they are overseen by a man who is a church of england reader and friend of my abuser, or course it would be claimed they have done no wrong, but I was on the receiving end of their wrong and no lies and liars will ever tell me that what happened to me did not.

the report is a whitewash, and I have not had a response to my safeguarding complaint of Bailhache and friends running a public smear campaign against me, publicly lying about me and acting in a way unseemly and inappropriate for politicians.

Nor an explaination of why my emails to Jersey safeguarding in February of this year were ignored, nor an explanation of why the board claimed in february to be trying to contact me, didn't try, didn't respond to my emails and contacted me now instead.

The board claimed to be finishing their report and trying to contact me to include my views, what a lie, and what a crass and unfair way of doing a report, if it had been genuine, then I would have been contacted in the first place and included properly in the report.

Jersey's safeguarding (what a joke!) board is not fit for purpose and is there only to make Jersey look good, it safeguards no-one, as media articles keep showing.

If safeguarding really care about my views and what I have suffered, then they need to look into onlaughts against me by Philip Bailhache, Ian LeMarquand and Mike Higgins.

These men have used their office to cause me harm.

Your 'reports' will be completely invalid unless you include this, and anyway, your report is invalid and is simply an act of harassment and defamation, so let me know as and when you shred it.

CSA inquiry amendment

I did a post the other day about the CSA inquiry and said it was handed over to the NSPCC.

I wasn't completely correct, the NSPCC were put in charge of the Whitehall and missing files, and the man appointed, Peter Wanless is an ex-civil servant, with connections, conflicted much?
Whitewash.

And so then Dame Butler-Sloss was put in charge of the rest, now this is the lady who has excused the Diocese of Winchester's appalling behaviour and been used to try and make the Korris rubbish look valid.
Her brother is implicated in some of the historic stuff, and also, she will ensure that no harm befalls the church of England as a result of their part in the historic abuse.

Whitewash.

A toast to the Queer Old Dean!

Jersey is all at war over gay marriage.

Marriage is usually gay,
unless it is a shotgun wedding,
and they don't happen any more,
because living in sin and illigitimate children are acceptable these days.

Now I'm not taking sides here,
but I see my case has come up as a result of this.

Now one of the reasons Bishop Scott-Joynt appeared to
take exception to me is,
that if I was mature enough to be capable of relationships
or interested in them
I would very likely be gay.
Bishop Scott-Joynt is or was,
homophobic,
only people in church have another way of putting it,
they claim the Bible says it's wrong.

Funny, they seem to forget the 10 commandments and bear false witness,
as Scott-Joynt, Jane Fisher and the Dean all did,
and they forget Jesus teaching 'Judge not',
and they forget the lesson of the woman who was about to be stoned.
But they use religion as an excuse for homophobia.

Here endeth the lesson.
I need some tea.

Oh, I guess I had better add that even in my years, both the words 'gay' and 'queer' have changed.
Both are now
connected with homosexuality, but when I was young, gay still meant bright or happy, and queer meant odd.
My elderly friend still uses the words in their old context.

JM taught me that there are worse sins that homosexuality and that we have no right to judge.
So, at least she taught me something worthwhile.

from 07 October last year

Monday, 7 October 2013

email to Hampshire constabulary cc the Bishop (who uses his chaplain's email address) when the Bishop made contact after I formally withdrew from the charade of an investigation (please note, I keep being dragged back into this farce investigation, and yet my evidence isn't being taken and I am not going to give evidence to anyone who is conflicted)

Regarding my formal complaint of harrasment against Bishop Tim Dakin of Wolvsley Palace, Winchester, I do not know his date of Birth but he is 53.

This was my formal letter to the Diocese, informing them that I have withdrawn, the Bishop has since distressed me by making contact with me, please ensure that he is prevented from doing so again.

He needs to accept that I have withdrawn, you as the police, have a duty of care to protect me, not just to beat me up and lock me in for this same Diocese when I react to them.

Please not the date of my letter and the dates of the Bishop's email subject boxes in the screen shot, and please take this seriously.

I feel frightened and threatened by the Bishop, and always have done and am not pleased that you traced me so that he could hurt me and use me in his war on the Jersey Deanery. Please remember your duty of care and put an end to his aggression and intimidation of me.

I am not able to attend a police station as I do not want to be beaten and locked in, and I cannot phone you

Also could you ensure that the Diocese remove the defamatory 'Korris report' from internet publication as it has harmed me and is harming me as it is grossly inaccurate.

Please make it clear to the Bishop of Winchester that he has had an opportunity to talk to me, meet with me and gather evidence and he has not taken it, and thus he is never to make contact with me again.

The email below is dated 14/08.13 and he has contacted me on 16/08/13, I do not read his intimidating, aggressive and hostile messages and never will, and he is to accept that this matter is over for me. It is a travesty that you traced me so that the Bishop and his Diocese could harm me and harm the clergy in Jersey in a massive public and very very messed up 'investigation' instead of him having a quiet word with the wrongdoers and leaving me out with it, instead he has herded all the clergy in Jersey together, the innocent and the good, and publicly attacked them while threatening me, lying in the press about personally apologizing to me, and ruining me for no good reason at all.

It is vitally important that it is seen that I have been damaged for five months solid by the Bishop of Winchester and that he appears to have no intention of ceasing to harm me and no intention of helping me, and his lies about apologies, publishing of the Korris report and continued contact with me is sending me mad with distress.

I have also sent this in letter form to the Archbishop of Canterbury, who is responsible for the Bishop of Winchester's dreadful behaviour and harm to me, and also to the national safeguarding officers, who need to e aware that I am still being harmed by the Bishop of Winchester.

I will continue to make a complaint against the Diocese of Winchester until someone hears me and forces them to withdraw and stop harming me. The way the Bishop has treated me and his own clergy is a disgrace and the way I have had to see the Korris report and the untruth about an apology that I never got and have been dragged into this war for no reason at all, is unacceptable, and eventually, 

someone, the police, Archbishop or an outside agency need to step in and remove the Bishop of Winchester before he harms any more clergy or vulnerable people and there needs to be an independent enquiry into why I have been beaten and detained repeatedly and treated as if mad by the Diocese of Winchester for responding to their harm to me, especially the harm inflicted on me by Jane Fisher, who is a danger to vulnerable adults and yet still works with them, she had an abuse victim villified and put in prison and repeatedly beaten and locked up, that is safeguarding is it?

 I will never recover from what has been done to me by the police on behalf of the Diocese, but the Bishop of Winchester does not care about that, he threatened me over it, he does not care about what he is doing to me and the consequences, he is using me to make life hell for his clergy in Jersey, to no apparent aim at all, and it is time that either the Archbishop or the police stopped his mad destructive behaviour.

Bishop Dakin, Withdraw means withdraw, it does not mean go on distressing me, since you threatened me, your emails are a source of great distress and harm to me.

Your investigation is nothing to do with me, and I cannot put it strongly enough you are harming me! STOP! I do not care what you have to say, as long as those police brutalizations and detentions are on my record, as long as I am living in fear, and as long as I am treated as mad and bad and cannot rebuild my life because of the record you got me, you are not to contact me, use me, lie about me or continue to harrass me in any way! The more you harm me, the less chance I have of surviving, with the return of my M. E. asthma and tachycardia all being a result of this, you are literally putting me in danger as well as causing disruption to my life, therapy and relationships.

sincerely,

As Church of England continues to blatantly disregard us and go against Jesus' Teachings

LETTER TO THE DEAN OF WESTMINISTER. RE: 28TH JUNE 2014 ILF PROTEST WITHIN THE WESTMINISTER ABBEY GROUNDS. SENT 03/06/2014

08JUL

This is the letter we were complled to write in response to the outrageous behaviour of the Metropolitan Police and especially the Dean of Westminster and his staff…who allowed this bullying, harrassemnt and violentce by the Metopolitan Police caused the 50 Disabled Activistes and ILF users. Also, allowing the refusal of any food, water, vital medications and collostomy bags all which were stopped by the Metropolitan Police. Where is your Christain Faith which has come to this the Dean Of WestminterDr John Hall it is your duty as a Christian Minister and Dean of the Cloth to care and look after the Sick, Disabled, Poor, Dispossed, Orphans. Shame on You.

This letter has also been sent to Mr Michael Meacher MP, Mr John McDonnell MP, Mr Jeremy Corbyn MP, Mr Dennis Skinner MP & Mr Ed Miliband MP.

3rd July 2014

The Very Reverend John R Hall

BA HONDD HOND THEOL FRSA

HONFCOLLT

Dean of Westminster

Westminster Abbey

20 Dean’s Yard

London

SW1P 3PA…

Dear Dr Hall

Greetings in the name of God our Father and our Lord Jesus Christ.

I am writing this letter as I have been distressed to hear that on Saturday 28th June 2014, members of several disabled groups were harassed and bullied within the grounds of the abbey by the Metropolitan Police. Among them were members of several charities such as DPAC (Disabled People against Cuts), UK Uncut, Occupy and many others.

These people were fighting to save what is known as the ILF or the Independent Living Fund, which this government plans to axe and thereby put many of these people’s lives at risk. They were denied food, water and medication after the gates had been locked and the police stopped people from passing them their supplies over the railings. These people were made to STARVE with no food or water and with NO MEDICATION, their lives were at risk. These people, and by the way I am talking about disabled people here, some of them needed things such as colostomy bags which were in their supplies on the other side of the fence which they were refused by the police and if anybody on the other side of the fence helped them, they would be arrested.

Since this government came to office, disabled people have been marginalised, harassed to the point of suicide by Iain Duncan Smith’s “Welfare Reforms”. During January to November 2011, 10,600 people died within six weeks of having their benefits stopped. This figure is more likely to be anywhere between 30,000 to 40,000 people, maybe even more as the DWP have stubbornly refused to release the figures as it would shock the general public.

But what I am shocked at even more is the fact that YOU did NOTHING to stop it! YOU gave permission for the police to harass and bully disabled people and treat them like vermin, which they are anything but. They are human beings made in God’s image. As one fellow Christian to another, I am stunned as to why nothing was done to protect them. As Christians, we are meant to protect people such as these, the sick, the disabled, the terminally ill, the poor, the widows and orphans.

This is our Christian duty to each and every person regardless of race, colour, creed, sexual orientation or religious beliefs.

I am sure that I do not need to remind you that when the Lord was on earth he went to help the most vulnerable in society. Today, he would be no different. He would still be defending the poor, the sick, the disabled, the terminally ill, the dispossessed and we as Christians should do the same. Jesus said in Luke 10:25-37 “On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. ‘Teacher,’ he asked, ‘what must I do to inherit eternal life?’ ‘What is written in the Law?’ He replied. ‘How do you read it?’ He answered, ‘”Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind”; and “Love your neighbour as yourself.”

‘You have answered correctly,’ Jesus replied. ‘Do this and you will live.’ But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, ‘And who is my neighbour?’ In reply Jesus said: ‘A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half-dead. A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. So, too, a Levite when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. But a Samaritan, as he travelled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to the inn and took care of him. The next day he took out two denarii and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’

‘Which of these three do you think was a neighbour to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?’ The expert in the law replied, ‘The one who had mercy on him.’

Jesus told him, ‘Go and do likewise.’

As you can no doubt see from the passage above, when Jesus says GO it is NOT a suggestion but a COMMAND! As in the Great Commission in Matthew 28:19 where Jesus says “Therefore GO and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” We are meant to stand up and fight for those who don’t have a voice and to take care of those who society has cast aside and written off.

If we don’t stand up for them and fight for them, then who will? Let me ask you one final question if I may:

If the situation was reversed and you were disabled and needed the Independent Living Fund and the government were going to get rid of it, wouldn’t you fight with everything you had in order to save it and also that other people were fighting alongside you with the same purpose?

Thank you for taking the time to read this

Yours in Christ’s Service

Joshua & Elizabeth Christian