Jersey safeguarding update

Jersey Safeguarding Partnership,

I am just going to add to my complaint regarding the safeguarding board.

You can't be blind to the fact that I am suffering severe traumatic stress, which has been compounded by the last three years of public hate attack by the church. 

Did you even bother to think of the psychological harm to me of sitting through a meeting with you over your whitewash version of events?

Your report is an attack on me and you have showed no concern whatsoever for me.

I wouldn't survive your whitewash. I certainly could not sit through a meeting regarding an engineered whitewash and agree to it and be traumatized with the memories of what I lived through being dragged up by wrongdoers who have tried to re-record what I lived through to protect themselves. And I would be wasting my time giving my side of things to a complicit group of people who have no interest in my side of things or my welfare and have already created the report on behalf of the wrongdoers.

You people have lost the plot and are without purpose or understanding of safeguarding. How can you put someone at risk and under pressure as you have with me and still call yourselves safeguarding?

I remain traumatized and profoundly upset and distressed by your attack on me last week.

Of course I will always fight back but that does not remove the impact on me. It is affecting my ability to cope with day-to-day situations still. 

HG

Jersey Safeguarding Partnership Complaint

This email is sent from Central Contact as requested by Jersey's Safeguarding Partnership, and is a letter from HG who the safeguarding partnership are bullying over a report.

STATEMENT TO JERSEY SAFEGUARDING PARTERSHIP FROM THE COMPLAINANT KNOWN AS HG:

DEAR JERSEY SAFEGUARDING PARTNERSHIP,

1. First and foremost, Senator Ian Gorst should not have shown the interest in my case that he has, as he is an evangelical church member who, with his family, have long established links to the Churchwarden who sexually abused me, and other people close to the churchwarden, including conflicted States-Church Members. 

You have been made aware of the conflicts of interest repeatedly but have failed to respond. The only times you have contacted me have been when you have been trying to force me to agree to your report. You have not even tried to address my concerns. And if your report is about my treatment, it does look odd that you have re-abused me by ignoring my concerns and pushing for your report to be published despite my concerns and other people's concerns too.

I consider your report to simply be another punishment by the conflicted circle in Jersey, and certainly the indication is that it is their consolation prize for the banned Steel report. I don't need any further media and press attention and harm. You should be listening to me, not to the conflicted circle. My wellbeing should be your priority, not a report that has been created in dubious and conflicted circumstances, and if I say to you that I do not want this report published, and explain to you why, then you should listen, you should not troll or bully me or treat me like a naughty child.

2. The next question is, you and I know that you have been proven resoundingly unfit for purpose by recent reports into your conduct, actions and inactions. Senator Gorst's second in command trotted out the usual feeble lines in the news at the time, but seeing as you have been proven to fail consistently in your duties, and considering the fact that you have received my complaints for years, and failed to communicate with me except to try to push your whitewash on me, especially since the Steel report failed, and thus you are presumably acting on behalf of the Church. Senator Gorst's inappropriate and extreme involvement would re-enforce that belief. Would it not be better to accept that the report is another of your failures, and then you can start focussing on an overhaul of your organization which removes the culprits of the failures in my case and others.

3. The safeguarding board were presumably covering the police misconduct, although they have never actually contacted me to explain what they were covering. And of course Glenys Johnstone told a member of the public that she had cleared the police of misconduct a year before she tried to contact me, and was rebuffed by me because it had been apparent that the report was a whitewash without any concern for my feelings regarding Johnstone and Gull publicly discrediting me at the time. 

Why, if the report included the police misconduct, was a member of the States of Jersey Police who had never met me, allowed to be involved and influence the report? What would the police say? Especially a force so corrupt that the IPCC were flown in to investigate them specifically? 'It's a fair cop, guv?' No, they were quite simply given an opportunity to cover up further, tamper with evidence, defame me and ensure that a fair investigation can never be carried out.

4. Why have conflicted interconnected States-Church-Judiciary members been allowed to influence this report? What kind of report hears the defendants and records their views and only considers the alleged victim as an afterthought and then you try to force her to agree to such a report?

This is not a genuine report, you have not responded to concerns about it, and you resorted to bullying and trolling when instructed by a member of the church who took legal advice because he wants his church and authorities cleared and me further defamed after three years of me being maligned and discredited by the conflicted church-states judiciary members in the press. A scenario which amounts to abuse, and which the safeguarding panel have done nothing whatsoever about, despite being asked. So why is this report of your so important? The same people who were involved in the things that you have done a serious case review, have done exactly the same again, with you looking on. No lessons have been learned, and you still appear to be protecting abusers despite the damning report against you.

Further to the Church conflict of interests, It has been suggested to me that the Diocese of Canterbury, who openly uphold the Deanery of Jersey's bad behaviour and lie about safeguarding being good while the Jersey Deanery have continued to harm me, are involved with you in this. This is very seriously inappropriate and conflicted, The people who have done wrong should not be running the show and steering investigations into their wrongdoing. That goes against the best interests of any victim of failings by authorities or the Church.

5. Don't you think that Senator Gorst's time would be better occupied controlling the behaviour of his church-states-judiciary members, who's public attacks on my character are a safeguarding failure that show both you and the church up as unable to safeguard?

 Your report is apparently designated to be a further act of defamation, discrediting and attack on my character on top of what I have suffered from the Jersey press and public with no voice in reply for over three years. For three years the slurs on me in the press and media have been brought to your and Gorst's attentions, and rather than acting on them and saying that this is a grave safeguarding concern, you have ignored complaints and continued to badger me about your report.

 No more material that can harm or distress me should be released, and confidential records violated, tampered with and turned into a report that you feel that you need to release despite my feelings, is not safeguarding, it is an attack and a violation, one that should not have been instigated and which should have been terminated upon my request in 2013.

What happens to other vulnerable people who are made to suffer this? Why do authorities who have done wrong still have this ability to breach human rights and put people under threat of harm like this?

6. No report into anything at all excuses you badgering someone with autism who is at breaking point because of your safeguarding failures over the past three years of allowing her to be publicly defamed and discredited by you, the police and the conflicted States-Church-Judiciary circle.

Especially not when you have been told to leave her alone and stop badgering her and annul your conflicted report and also stop the attack on her. Your 'central contact' email whimpers about you receiving hurtful emails, which is very self-interested indeed, especially considering the hurt you have allowed and inflicted, but you fail to mention that the hurtful correspondence you have received is in reply to the much more serious hurt that you have allowed and inflicted. You are not vulnerable, not abused and destroyed, have not spent three years sleeping rough due to failures and have not spent a further three years being publicly smeared in press and media while the safeguarding partnership and authorities look on, join in and deny any hope of justice or resolution.

7. The fact that HG contacted the serious case review panel and numerous other organizations to ask you to be stopped from continuing to push the whitewash on her should have been a good indicator to you, if you are genuine safeguarding professionals, that it was time for you to stop forcing your report and apologize. Evidence will be made available to court and enquiry of the pleas to the Serious Case Review Panel and the subsequent efforts of the conflicted John Cameron to try to close that down. Cameron's repeat interferences in the case need to be investigated.

8. The fact that your repeat demands came as the care inquiry withdrew from Jersey and the Steel report was banned, should be investigated, and because it is extremely likely that Senator Gorst was egged on in his interference, his involvement and other conflicted people's involvement should go before an investigation and disciplinary panel, as it is pure abuse of power, and the conduct of his colleagues in the three year petty war between the Diocese and Deanery, has already been presented to the States Complaints Department, but not properly responded to. As you need something to occupy you and have nothing better to do than bully the vulnerable, maybe you could make it your project to ensure this is arranged. No-one can carry out an investigation impartially unless they are independent, and you are not.

9. Why is it so hard for you to comprehend that more public attention and media attention would harm me? it is very simple. The media and press have been very biased and very hurtful and discredited me without being challenged, even when they published blatant lies, and as your report was not instigated or carried out correctly, impartially or for the right reasons, I see it as a threat to my wellbeing, and you have not at any point tried to reassure me, which increases my concern.

This point is a very simple comprehensive explanation of my objection to your report. My wellbeing is more important than your need to make distorted confidential information and tampered-with evidence public to meet anyone else's demands or any target or legislation, and you have a duty of care to me, and you have resoundingly failed in your duty of care thus far and are still failing as you continue to push for your report.

 Sentors Gorst, Bailhache and LeMarquand are known to have abused their positions to handle and mis-use evidence and inaccurate police records in order to discredit me and protect the Church, of which they are members and dignitaries, and your time would be better spent investigating this rather than pushing for your report that they have been involved with.

Point 9 concludes my points due to being a perfectly good reason on it's own for you to stop bullying me and threatening my welfare with your report. I will say conclusively that you are not to release your report or any part of it, and you are not to bully, intimidate, threaten, harass or annoy me regarding this matter any more. I know that you won't like that and you may feel upset, but that is that. No more. You  need to take a step back and a long hard look at yourselves, because you have failed children in Jersey and you have failed me. Worse still, the damage to me and to those children can never be undone.

Any child abused will be changed for life by the abuse, and I have been abused and mistreated all my life, I don't need you to continue the abuse me. I will suffer for the rest of my life what I suffered in Jersey, in flashbacks and nightmares and trauma and sadness, why do you need to drag this up and keep pushing it onto me? I have moved on as best I can, why can't the dignitaries who are sponsoring your misconduct do the same?

Something needs to change about these 'Safeguarding Partnerships' and 'serious case reviews' because all they appear to be is an open invitation to wrongdoers in power to abuse power and cover wrongdoing by themselves and others in authorities. Being cynical I would ask if that was what they were set up for, especially considering the damning reports of the last few years.

I hope that the safeguarding partnership have actually read this document, as they appear to have ignored the previous ones and continued to try to bully me into agreeing to their whitewash.

The university are trying to encourage me to write more concisely...That'll be the day!

sincerely,

HG

Further Reading: 

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/open-response-being-bullied-and-trolled-jerseys-safeguarding-partnership-behalf-ian-gorst

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/senator-ian-gorst-resignation-and-freedom-church-jersey-safeguarding-complaint

http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/starting-to-respond-to-bullying-by.html#.V5SpVPkrLcc

Starting to respond to bullying by Jersey's safeguarding partnership

Good morning 'Central contact' Jersey Safeguarding Partnership, 

No more smell of desperation attacks today please, I have to return to work as normal today and work a full and normal day even if it is going to be hot today.

Losing almost three days work to your bullying is not acceptable. You are liable and I hope that dismissal proceedings for the troll, Glenys Johnstone, Stewart Gull and any advisors in the NSPCC are now underway.

No-one who took part in the troll attack can credibly remain, not even the bimbo who answered the phone and said they had been advised by central contact. And presumably the troll attack contingent are also the ones involved in persistently failing abused children in Jersey.

I will have to work this weekend as well as today, which is not ideal as I don't feel well and I do need more rest. I can't afford time off at the moment, as you are aware, my work and my business are technically seasonal, so as well as working as much as I can now, I am negotiating the contracts to get me through the winter. You owe me the money for three days work.

Your foolish and ill-advised bullying has been very damaging and you need to think about the impact and the danger that you pose to the vulnerable by taking mis-advice and following it through. Your report is not and never was anything to do with what happened to me, and for three years you have openly allowed and taken part in, the safeguarding failure of letting the interconnected states, church, police and judiciary who your whitewash was presumably about, openly continue to abuse and harm me, so isn't it rather silly that you have trolled me on behalf of one of those conflicted States-Church members who is so desparate for you to destroy me publicly with the whitewash that he sought legal advice?!

Wow, why do a report and trot out the usual sickening empty whimper about 'lessons have been learned' when the same people are still openly committing abuse and misconduct against me with your blessing and help?! This would be a comedy if it was so very serious. Nothing has been learned, no-one has faced any action for abusing and harming me, and the wrongdoers have openly and with you blessing and help, publicly destroyed me, and you have trolled me because those wrongdoers want you to publish their whitewash created by you, as a consolation prize because they were too blatant with their Steel Whitewash, nearly got away with it, cost Bob Hill his life and still lost their Steel whitewash because it was too blatant. 

Your whitewash is too blatant and you have abused and harmed me, and I am awaiting an apology and the results of disciplinary action against you for your actions.

If the NSPCC were the advisors for this attack on me through you, as one indicator would suggest, they are increasingly likely to face legal action as well, on a number of counts.

Please make sure my complaint against you is esculated until it reaches a competent and impartial person - probably outside of Jersey then.

And if you send me any rubbish today I will continue my efforts to raise the profile of my complaint about your criminal acts in my case.

I would like you to commission a serious case review into the harm to me by you and your colleagues in the states-church-judiciary-police circle and especially into the desparation to defame and discredit me leading to the recent troll attack by you. I don't think that there is any escaping the fact that the troll attack and the incorrect motives and complicit behaviour by the safeguarding board is serious case review material, and make a strong point that the troll attack came not long after you have been pointedly, angrily and repeatedly told to stop bullying me over your whitewash. Provide both the troll attack and my fury at your repeat efforts to force your whitewash on me, to whoever the panel investigating will be.

HG

Jersey Safeguarding Partnership and the NSPCC

22/06/2016

I did a taped Statement about Jersey's safeguarding Partnership and letters to go with it, and it is all set up ready to send.  Anyone who would like a copy of the taped statement, please ask. Although I am not well off, money isn't that important when my life is close to ending.

But in the meantime a much darker matter has come up.

Do you remember John Cameron, head of children's services at the NSPCC being illegally and inappropriately involved in my case on behalf of the Diocese of Winchester?

Refresh your memory here:

http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/bob-hill-julie-wallman-and-nspccletter.html#.V2o5RvkrLcc3

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/statement-world-about-what-really-happened-me-november-2013

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/1st-open-letter-bishop-winchester-0

Anyway, I made a complaint to the NSPCC regarding this inappropriate abuse of power by John Cameron and the Diocese of Winchester, the 'referral' by the Diocese of a vulnerable adult to a children's service without consent was illegal and inappropriate. Cameron's acceptance of the referral and the Diocese's cover up to him and his unsolicited contact was equally inappropriate and illegal, he aided the Diocese in harassing me while they were harming me as described in the links below.

For three years the NSPCC have received my complaint and I have a file of automated replies to my emailed complaints, they have never responded to my complaint though.

A children's services director has no place in the case of a vulnerable adult unless something inappropriate is going on.

Now as you know, part of the onslaught against me in 2013 was Jersey Safeguarding Partnership doing a very swift whitewash of my case after Jane Fisher and Bishop Dakin liaised with Stewart Gull of Jersey Police, it was very strange and very frightening as the safeguarding board boasted to a member of the public that they had cleared the wrongdoers, while the police officer, Gull 'appointed' by the Bishop to illegally liaise with Dame Steel was also on the safeguarding board who did this swift whitewash and boast.

Did anyone factor John Cameron into this? Did anyone put two and two together about his position in the NSPCC and thus being a colleague of both Jane Fisher and the Jersey Safeguarding partnership and realise that this terrible corruption and conflict of interests could be even worse?
I had no idea, until yesterday.

Jersey Safeguarding Partnership have been threatening me with their whitewash report for three years now, while I have been under threat of the Church's whitewash reports, having already been destroyed by one of them.
If you need more information on the safeguarding partnership's terrorism of me, please read these:

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-jerseys-safeguarding-partnership-board

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/formal-public-letter-mrs-glenys-johnstone-obe-chair-jersey-safeguarding-board

I guess I never imagined that Cameron's violation of me was more than a one-off 'colleagues' back-scratching exercise between him and the disgraced former safeguarding director, Jane Fisher of the Winchester Diocese.
But gathering by what has happened, John Cameron did more than just violate me during the onslaught against me in October and November 2013, an account of which is available here:

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/statement-world-about-what-really-happened-me-november-2013

Anyway, the NSPCC failed to respond to my complaint for three years, but after persisting in questioning them about what was claimed by the Diocese of Winchester about the NSPCC being able to house me, they finally replied to that query, and said they didn't house adults. Which I knew, but Bob Hill was duped into believeing that the NSPCC were going to house me, as you will have seen here:
http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/bob-hill-julie-wallman-and-nspccletter.html#.V2o5RvkrLcc3

The above link is not well presented but my mind was too distressed when I created it.

So anyway, on the tail end of the recent catastrophic press and media harm to me by the Church in the last few months, Jersey's safeguarding partnership start once again harassing me over their desire to publish their whitewash and further harm me. They have learned nothing and have ignored my persistent complaint and are determined to add to the public attack on my character in order to tick their boxes, despite damning reports recently on their own failures with children.
Their whitewash report on me has become a form of bullying, abuse and harassment that has contributed to the harm to me. What happens to the voiceless vulnerable? Especially when this is the way a 'serious case review' is carried out?! Shocking and unacceptable.

So what do you do when faced with something like this? Well you look for authorities who oversee such misconduct and harm, don't you?
Who oversees Jersey's safeguarding partnership? The conflicted council of ministers, most of whom are in the church!
Who else? Well I can keep putting my case to the home office, can't I? Theresa May is a Vicar's daughter.
Well I contacted as many social services and safeguarding boards in the country as I could, but I have been treated appallingly by social services who also were influenced by and acted for, the Church of England in my case, and have refused to protect me from harm by the church, and of course, being inextricably linked to the police, social services and safeguarding do not protect a victim of abuse of power by the church and police.
But I found that there is a government serious case review panel, so I sent them my complaint.
Unfortunately they meet only once a month.
So, I noticed that Peter Wanless was part of this panel, and I contacted him directly, despite the bad things I have heard about the NSPCC that he also is CEO of. This is because the serious case review panel meet only once a month and the safeguarding partnership are terrorizing me for their whitewash report here and now.

It's funny, the NSPCC have a very bad helpline and haven't responded to my complaint against John Cameron for three year. They are inaccessible and unhelpful, but Peter Wanless responded by telling me to phone the NSPCC helpline. No, not for a serious case review matter, as I told him, so I emailed him the details.

The next thing I knew, John Cameron was emailing me, and I was sick.
Peter Wanless handed this matter over to THE DIRECTOR OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES IN THE NSPCC, THE SAME MAN WHO HAD ACTED UNDER JANE FISHER'S INSTRUCTIONS THREE YEARS AGO AND HAD THREE YEARS OF UNANSWERED FORMAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST HIM!

My case is not a children's services matter, it is a case of a vulnerable adult being hounded towards death by whitewash reports and misleading press releases and being discredited and destroyed. Now this has been going on since six months before John Cameron was wheeled in as part of the cover-up. Why is a member of children's services in the NSPCC being repeatedly brought into this case?!
This is not an NSPCC matter, this is a serious case review matter, and something is seriously wrong when this man Cameron keeps popping up.

I got the impression yesterday that Cameron is a bit like a cover-up hitman, he is actually hired in to protect wrongdoers in safeguarding, but is really being a bit blatant in involvement in an adult case when he is a children's service manager, and I do object as it is too inappropriate and too blatant. As the complainant, I have a right to see him withdrawn from interfering, and an apology made. Because his re-involvement means it is being made quite clear that Jersey Safeguarding Partnership's behaviour will be upheld while I will be discredited and continue to be treated as mad and bad. After all, Cameron blatantly acted on behalf of the Diocese of Winchester in their nwrongdoing and had their side of things, he is conflicted. And if Peter Wanless didn't know that, he should know that, because his NSPCC have received three years of formal complaint and failed to respond, leaving Cameron to re-abuse me and presumably act in the interests of wrongdoers yet again.

Cameron's re-involvement shows Peter Wanless's and the NSPCC's contempt for my case in one way or another and that I remain at risk of this whitewash that Gleny's Johnstone boasted to a member of the public to 'clear wrongdoers' after this remarkably swift report was carried out without consulting me or including me, and I was contacted as an afterthought when the report was finished and because a Jersey deputy kept badgering the corrupt officer Stewart Gull about it.

Now, the question is, did Cameron actually arrange this whitewash with the safeguarding partnership? After all, he was working with Jane Fisher to harm and violate me and treat me as an object, Jane Fisher is known to have co-ordinated the tandem Steel and Safeguarding Partnership whitewashes with Officer Gull as the link between the two, did Cameron also abuse his power to oversee that uncannily swift discrediting of me in the form of the safeguarding partnership half of the whitewash?

Or was the fact that he remained unreprimanded to jeer by contacting me yesterday about the complaint sent to Peter Wanless in a serious case review capacity just a coincidence?
If it was, then it shouldn't have happened, because I have made a formal complaint against Cameron for three years.
Cameron has no right to conflict and jeapordize my complaint when he has acted on behalf of the people who have harmed me and is biased by their side, that he took in so well that he contacted me on their behalf while they were seriously harming me.
This is Jane Fisher who he acted for before:
 http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/jane-fisher-safeguarding-director-winchester-diocese

What happens to the voiceless vulnerable?

So the situation is that I have been left sickened and incapacitated at a time when I need all my energy to ensure I do not end up as a long term rough sleeper after the recent destroying attack on me by the Church of England and the press.

Peter Wanless has some questions to answer, although judging by his response so far, he has no intention of either answering them or dealing with Jersey Safeguarding Partnership's wrong actions.

These are the questions:

• Why did the NSPCC leave John Cameron in a position to harm me again after his unethical actions on behalf of the defendants?
• Why has the NSPCC failed to respond to my complaint for three years?
• Why did you pass a complaint to YOU in YOUR CAPACITY on the serious case review to an NSPCC manager?
• Why was it passed to the head of children's services when this is a vulnerable adult serious case review?! 
• Is it co-incidence that it was passed to someone who acts for the defendants and is prejudiced by that and now in a position to prevent justice and protection and allow harm to me?!
• Do you think it is acceptable that you allowed this man to terrorize and distress me when I am in a very vulnerable position when your transfer of my complaint from a government board to a charity is illegal?!
• Peter Wanless are you going to take my case seriously with Cameron influencing your view? Are you going to withdraw this matter from the NSPCC as it was submitted to your serious case review panel and are you going to deal with it fairly or deliberately fail to protect me and uphold the corruption and deceit of Jersey Safeguarding Partnership?

I will circulate this because in the end, when I die, someone will co-ordinate all these letters and things will have to change, no child or vulnerable person should be met with this level of corruption, failure or denial, and if the NSPCC routinely allow Cameron to be hired out as a cover-up hitman to derail complaints and cover up for wrongdoers, something has got to change.

Jane Dodds and Graham Tilby who have been overseeing my destroyal on behalf of the Bishop and Archbishop will be sent a copy of this to see how they can cover it up. 

Dishonesty, corruption and lack of action have left a vulnerable adult irreparably and seriously harmed, but what happens to the voiceless vulnerable?

To Conclude, these were my recent responses to the Safeguarding partnership, and also my psychological report:

http://lifeafterthediocese.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/jersey-safeguarding-partnership-impact.html

http://lifeafterthediocese.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/bishops-dakin-and-gladwin-safeguarding.html

The production of this letter when I should be at work and am homeless and trying to get myself housed is a great inconvenience as is making the very long journey to post the transcripts safely. Right now I am supposed to be making sure a disabled person can have a shower safely, so this safeguarding failure has far-reaching affects and impacts on other people.

Also please note, just as the Bishop refuses to release a copy of the conflicted Steel report to me, the safeguarding partnership refuse to let me see their whitewash. It's all a bit too blatant, and John Cameron's re-entry onto the scene is too. This complaint is not to be rubbished by someone who thinks the same as the church, that they can claim to offer 'help' to me while destroying me publicly and through whitewash reports. No help can reach someone being destroyed in this way, it is a back-covering excuse to offer it, and it is twisted and sick.

Children do not have the voice that I do, what happens to them at the hands of the church, NSPCC and safeguarding partnership?

HG

Reaction to Jersey's Safeguarding Partnership

Bishops Dakin and Gladwin, safeguarding board, Church of England,

You will be held responsible in court if Johnstone and the Bishop's 'appointed' police officer Gull do not leave me alone and stop threatening me with their whitewash.

This message is also for the IPCC and HMIC and Police Complaints who have failed to deal with this matter for years and have not dealt with either the police's harm of me or the refusal by the police to protect me from harm by the Church. I re-iterate that I want protection from the Church and the associated people named in the forwarded email and I want my complaints against Jersey, Hampshire and Sussex Police forces dealt with, belatedly is better than never. The way I have been brutalised and mistreated by the police and their continued act of treating me as mad and failing to protect me after acting as thugs for the Church is not acceptable and it is still harming me. 

The press  article where the Bishop abused his title in the house of Lords is still available waiting for the day when we discuss in court how the Bishop used a police officer to illegally access my records and 'by co-incidence' it was the same officer who worked with Glenys Johnstone to whitewash the 'safeguarding report'.

'The Lord Bishop of Winchester has 'appointed Stewart Gull of Jersey Police..' 

Do you think a Bishop who is part of an organisation who has used the police to destroy an abuse victim should be allowed to 'appoint' a police officer to illegally access that abuse victim's police records on behalf of the conflicted person whitewashing the case for police and church? And despite my very loud disagreement to this? What do you think of the co-incidence that the same officer was on the safeguarding board who whitewashed the case and are now harassing me as part of the unbearable onslaught of the last few months? Stewart Gull, Jersey Police's Head of Coverup and corruption.

Despite my use of bad language, the email below has to be sent to the same courts and services who I am begging to protect me from the Bishop of Winchester and Archbishop of Canterbury, because I am losing my life at the hands of the church and their police, and the damage is too much. Wouldn't you swear if your life and welfare remained under persistent and constant threat? 

The email below contains a complaint that is interlinked with the serious formal complaints of the last few days, Johnstone and Gull are just belatedly kicking off as part of the recent onslaught against me by the church.

And to make things worse, having to give attention to this matter is affecting my ability to find myself a new home, as the recent onslaught left me homeless again and because of the abuse of me by the church and police and safeguarding board, I am too weak to sleep rough any more even though it is the only way I have of feeling safe from the church.

Presumably the step-up of attack on me by Gull and Johnstone is a response to my step-up of formal complaint against the Church of England. The whitewash reports and smears and discrediting of me in the press and media can no longer be referred to as misconduct and must now be referred to asabuse. Each and every person harming me is an abuser. 

These people have publicly destroyed a vulnerable abuse survivor for three years, not her abusers, who they protected.

In the meantime, While this complaint is under consideration, Gull and Johnstone cannot publish their attack on me, so they are better off shredding it and going to the Jobcentre to find work away from Children and the vulnerable.

HG

---

From:**************@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:34:11 +0100
Subject: SERIOUS FORMAL COMPLAINT OF ABUSE AGAINST JERSEY'S SAFEGUARDING BOARD, RISK TO A VULNERABLE LIFE AND WELLBEING

SERIOUS FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST JERSEY'S SAFEGUARDING BOARD, RISK TO A VULNERABLE ADULT'S LIFE AND WELLBEING

Autistic and traumatised vulnerable adult at ongoing risk from abusers, Glenys Johnstone and Stewart Gull from Jersey WHO WISH TO PUBLICLY DESTROY HER.

Dear Home office and other independent and neutral recipients, please excuse me swearing but I have been seriously damaged and harmed by this safeguarding sham board for over three years. I will also publish this on my blog. I guess I will have to also alert IPSO and Ofcom that Gull and Johnstone intend to continue the press and media abuse of me, in a small island where all the victims who they publish reports on are easily recognisable, me especially as I have been named, traced, threatened, hated, condemned and trolled as a result of Gull and Johnstone's colleagues in the police and church for some time now.

 Publication of the whitewash means another open attack on me by the press and media while the church and police pat themselves on the back and absolve themselves at my expense. The report, the same as the Steel report, is nothing to do with the reality of what happened, and Johnstone has made a statement to that effect to a member of the public, thus breaching the data protection act.

A note for social services in Jersey, you are allowing me to be abused by Gull and Johnstone again. You are liable. You have allowed too much abuse already, and if you claim I am not in Jersey and thus it is not your problem, that would explain years of UK paedophiles using Jersey as a child shop and is not an excuse anyway. The abusers, Gull and Johnstone, are using the safety of Jersey, or so they think, to abuse me. The complaints already made still stand, it is just that there is further misconduct as the IPCC and complaints authorities and safeguarding chairs have failed to act thus far and will be asked again to act.

The whitewash report was done in conjunction and in tandem with the Church of England's whitewashes and thus it is hardly surprising that they are trying to force publication of it now, it is, despite this being illegal, to be used by conflicted Bishop John Gladwin, along with the Steel whitewash, to defame, destroy and discredit me to cover up for wrongdoers in the Church. And my response to the Church's recent attack on my life in the press and media will have lead to the harassment against me by Johnstone, demanding a meeting today. I am sure the church don't like me speaking truth to power, but as the onslaught drives me slowly and horrifically to my death, I have no choice.

Several months ago I re-iterated a formal complaint against Jersey's failed and disgraced safeguarding board and their police officer Stewart Gull and their 'independent chair' (what a joke) Glenys Johnstone, who have harassed and intimidated me over their whitewash report for years, they work closely with the Church of England and police who destroyed me and presumably members of the Church such as IAN GORST who will be disappointed in the other whitewash, the conflicted Steel report not being released, will be pushing for this completely biased whitewash by the conflicted Stewart Gull and his 'safeguarding board' to be released. 

Any report overseen by an officer of the States of Jersey Police is not valid as the corrupt and brutal force who destroyed me in conjunction with the Church for reporting abuse, have a lot to hide. And according to Johnstone's open boast to a bystander, a member of the public, Bob Hill, 'The police have done no wrong'. How can the police investigate themselves? Especially a force that is so corrupt that the IPCC actually had to fly a team of investigators to Jersey to have the force investigated, and an investigating officer told me she was 'horrified' at what was going on in Jersey's police force and it was 'unreal'.

Here are the formal complaints that I also published as open letters. The letters were much more clear and coherent because they were before what seems to be the real final combined effort by the Church and 'safeguarding partnership; to force me to my death, the email I am writing now is from someone truly at the end of their tether.

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-jerseys-safeguarding-partnership-board

and

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/formal-public-letter-mrs-glenys-johnstone-obe-chair-jersey-safeguarding-board

and also:

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/initial-formal-legal-warning-letter-and-reprimand-senator-gorst-be-circulated-governor-jersey

Jersey 'safeguarding' what a joke board have just emailed me also trying to force me into a meeting with the disgraced 'independent chair' as if I was not suffering enough from the Church of England's recent onslaught against me and abuse of me in the press and media. Their report on my case is merely an exercise in cover-up. It is to be destroyed and never to be published, it is completely irrelevant and was a deceitful waste of time and money and there is to be an investigation into why I have been harassed and terrorised by Johnstone and Gull. And why public money was spent on their attack on me. The government don't seem able to acknowledge that the police can be corrupt and abusive and should not be able to influence safeguarding because of the risk to victims and witnesses, especially in a case like mine, when the conflicted police have been able to use the safeguarding whitewash to cover their backs and terrorize me. I want an independent investigation over the whole matter, from church to police to safeguarding, it is time for disciplinary actions and for me to be heard.

The Church of England have for over three years terrorized me with conflicted whitewash reports and defamatory and discrediting press releases, culminating in the recent all-out discrediting and smearing of me when the Archbishop, who has never met me or heard my story or ensured it is included in a report that isn't just a whitewash like the others, met with the Dean and his powerful and conflicted church-lawyer-states-judiciary clique repeatedly and 'apologized to the Dean' publicly and with only one side of the story and no thought for my welfare whatsoever.

Presumably the Johnstone attack on me today, the sham safeguarding board attack is as a result of the Jersey dignitaries not getting their Steel report, so they decided for second best, the Gull and Johnstone safeguarding whitewash that discredits me, and presumably Johnstone wants to publish this to avenge them, breaking the law as I am recognisable from it just as I have been recognizable from the press and media attacks and traced by name, and threatened.

Remember, Ian Gorst a church member who upheld the Dean and has publicly campaigned for the release of the Steel whitewash, actually instigated the Johnstone and Gull whitewash himself, so it can in no way be seen as neutral.

In 2013 the sham safeguarding board tried to force me into a meeting to tick boxes AFTER writing their whitewash and AFTER GULL HAD SMEARED AND DISCREDITED ME IN THE PRESS ON BEHALF OF THE JERSEY DEANERY AND DIOCESE OF WINCHESTER. I REFUSED. THEY HAD ALREADY BOASTED TO BOB HILL THAT THEY HAD CLEARED THE POLICE,AND GULL HAD DISCREDITED ME IN THE PRESS BY CLAIMING THAT THE CHURCH WARDEN HAD NO CASE TO ANSWER.

If you remember, this is what Gull based his lie on, not fact nor trial nor evidence:

   http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/sojp-and-my-friend-buster-few-miffs.html#.V17Ep7srLcc

The only reason for this repeat attack three years later  is because Johnstone and Gull want to publish her whitewash report done to cover up for the police, and done in conjunction with Stewart Gull of the conflicted police, Gull publicly smeared and attacked me in the press alongside the Jersey Deanery. Nothing has been done to discipline either Gull for his actions, or Johnstone for proceeding with a whitewash report, smearing and discrediting me to a member of the public, Bob Hill, and trying to contact me as an afterthought after claiming the police had done nothing wrong.

Jersey Safeguarding failure board, Fuck off, stop harassing me and I will be taking legal action if you do me any further harm. How many times do I need to re-iterate this? Why are Gull and Johnstone still not sacked after their illegal actions and not just failures to safeguard but harm to children and to me by their failures! 

I am sick to death of you and your pathetic threat to my life, welfare and wellbeing. You do not have my consent to break the law and harass me after what you have already done to me and know very well my feelings about this, you have just PUT THE PHONE DOWN ON ME, HAVEN'T YOU?!

I am copying Dodds and Tilby and others in on this because I consider this to be part of the recent attack on my life. The violations of me by Gull and Johnstone are never mutually exclusive, they always push for their whitewash or smear me during attacks on me by the press, media and Jersey Deanery.

and also, because the 'independent chair' whitewashed my case with the police, how can you investigate the police through one of their own?!

Make sure you whitewash report that you have been threatening me with is shredded as it is simply an attack on me and doesn't remotely relate to my case, it is just part of a prolonged and extremely nasty abuse of power smear campaign that Johnstone has been warned about for years.

Also, because I have made complaints about this for three years now, make sure the whole matter including the re-iterated forcing on me today is sent to an independent auditor, as I asked the woman at Jersey Safeguarding Board who just put the phone down on me. Make sure it is sent outside of Jersey and outside of Johnstone's juristiction in Leicestershire, where she won an OBE for protecting some of the most high profile abusers of all time. Hey, I was their victim, I know she didn't act.

I am going to file for an injunction as Johnstone has instigated the attack and she is resident in the UK, Stamford? I slept in her porch before she put the homeless spikes up.

Johnstone you will receive a last letter of warning, and unless you apologise and bring your harassment of me to an end, you will be taken to court. I am happy to file in Jersey with an English judge presiding as well. 

How dare the safeguarding failure board relaunch on me at a time of severe crisis! How dare they! They are nothing but a bunch of conflicted cowardly liars, led by one of Greville Janner's medal-winners and a corrupt police officer who has deliberately publicly smeared me. How FUCKING DARE THEY RELAUNCH THEIR ATTACK! 

You do not 'propose a meeting' to someone who you have injured publicly and harassed and made to live in fear. you just simply do not.

The only reason you have come up with this fake proposal is because instead of dismissing the disgraced corrupt officer and non-independent Johnstone, you are determined to force me into a box-ticking exercise and then release your whitewash attack on me. Tough shit, you are not meeting with me, why should I meet with repulsive corrupt liars as part of a whitewash? Fuck off. Three years of suffering your smears of me and the threat of your whitewash and now your corrupt church-judiciary-lawyer circle want a consolation prize for the Steel report? No, If you destroy me, I will make sure you go too, I am not having you left as a danger to the vulnerable when your failures in child care cases has led to children being abused beyond repair. The recent damning report into your failures means you have no credibility and no excuse whatsoever to go on harassing me. I have suffered beyond bearing, especially recently and this is the final straw.

You do not and never will have permission from meto release your whitewash and you do not and will not ever have the excuse that you 'tried to include me' because you did not, you wrote the whitewash before you even made a token effort to contact me as an afterthought in 2013/2014. No one who has harmed me has any right to request a meeting with me under any circumstances, I am not meeting with this cold psychopath Johnstone who claims to be in a safeguarding position while knowingly harming a vulnerable adult to protect wrongdoers. I am furious and sickened at this renewed onslaught.

JOHNSTONE AND GULL, 

YOU ARE ABUSERS WHO HAVE MADE MY LIFE HELL BY MAKING IT CLEAR TO ME THAT I AM UNDER THREAT FROM Y0UR WHITEWASH RELENTLESSLY FOR THREE YEARS WITH NO REGARD FOR MY DISTRESS WHATSOEVER.

YOU HAVE NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO PUT ME UNDER LIFE-THREATENING PRESSURE OR RISK OF HARM OR SUICIDE BY TRYING TO FORCE YOUR BOX-TICKING MEETING ON ME BEFORE YOU TRY TO RELEASE YOUR WHITEWASH REGARDLESS OF MY FEELINGS OR OBJECTIONS.

YOU FUCKING ANIMALS, FUCK OFF. You are a danger to children and the vulnerable, a whole report damned you recently, you have damaged children, you have acted corruptly in my case, you have intimidated and harmed me for years, and you make it quite clear that your positions are to abuse power and protect powerful wrongdoers. Is this attack on me because the child abuse review has gone whimpering off with it's tail between it's legs and paedophile protectors such as Philip Bailhache remain?! Yeah, you are great at safeguarding, you saw in the press that Philip Bailhache wasn't able to deny that his actions as a judge had protected abusers and allowed abuse to persist. Philip Bailhache, the lay chair of the church in Jersey, who has attacked me in the press and media and stirred up hatred against me while you stood by! Your report doesn't include that does it???

I understand that the home office and other recipients won't like me swearing, but I have for years made it very clear that to put a vulnerable adult in a situation of knowing very well she is powerless against people who have very deliberately smeared and discredited her to cover up, and knowing for years that these people intend to attack her publicly and drive her to suicide is not acceptable, and no-one has stepped in or acted to protect me from these abusers who are above the law because they hold positions in safeguarding and in the police.

The onslaught of the past three years has been too much for me and I am already finished by the recent press and media attack on me. In my death these pleas to be protected from this incredible open and blatant corruption will not go away. I want this email and the linked letters read out at my inquest, I want the inquest to be about the contructive murder of me by the Church of England and Police and Safeguarding Failure Boards, I want my death to be an end to the Church of England being above the law and the police being able to protect themselves by controlling safeguarding boards.

The police, church of england and other agencies including this disgraced safeguarding board, have been allowed to openly and unchallenged, destroy me. It is time that that stopped.

HG

This email is cc the Home Office, social services, the IPCC and HMIC, Jersey Police complaints authority (who are ineffectual), 10 Downing Street, all safeguarding chairs in the country, Jane Dodds and Graham Tilby who represent safeguarding in the Church of England and are thus also liable for this ongoing attack on my life by Gull and Johnstone. It will continue to be circulated until I am protected. I won't stop fighting this terrible miscarriage of justice until I die or I am protected, the first of which is increasingly likely if the combined onslaught is not stopped.

Johnstone is never to make contact with me again, she is to shred her report, and as well as taking her and her band of corrupt abusers to court, I will hold the Church of England liable for the harm, the 'offers' to carry out reports by the conflicted 'safeguarding' board and Gladwin and Steel, were well set up and co-ordinated to look genuine but they are three reports set up and implemented by conflicted people. Reports that only contain the defendants' views with no interest in including the plaintiff are of no worth at all, and afterthought meetings such as the one offered by Johnstone and Dodds this week as part of the 'to-the-death' closedown of a horrific three years onslaught, are a sick abusive joke.  Does Johnstone want to copy Dodds in a weedy little mutter about the 'Church not meaning me any harm'? What a co-incidence that all this happens at once if there is no connection and it is all independent?

HG

Impact Statement and warning to Jersey's Safeguarding Partnership

Impact statement and formal warning to cease to harass pester or annoy the vulnerable adult known to Jersey safeguarding partnership as HG:

13/06/2016

Dear Jersey Safeguarding Board,

Let me start by telling you about my day.

Today I had to go to the dentist as I lost a filling, I grind my teeth a lot due to trauma and it breaks teeth and fillings. I try to keep my gum shield in during the night but trauma is such that I rarely can, I fight you and the church and police in my sleep and this impacts on me and my surroundings.

My dentist is excellent, and after a lifetime of bad dentistry, I have a dentist who can usually do repairs without hurting me or using anasthetic, I react badly to anasthetic. However, my jaw is damaged and sensetive, so any work done usually means I need painkillers and a few hours of sleep after a dental appointment as the jaw impacts on the skull and I get a headache even after very careful dental work.

So I left the dentist with the need to sleep as well the urgent need to continue to sort out and dispose of, most of my possessions and most importantly, the need to find somewhere to live, which becomes more urgent and serious with each passing day. I am too weak from your and the Church's constructive murder of me to sleep rough now, you have nearly collectively achieved your aim, my public and utterly humiliated and discredited death.

Your email to me, unprovoked, harassment, took away my sleep, and my time to find a new home and resolve my situation here, so instead of possibly viewing places to live, I ended up sitting here unable to even eat or do anything, with the hooligan crashing about and reminding me that I need to get myself somewhere safe, which I can't do with you harassing me.

This evening, I remembered I had missed Hollyoaks and supper and I really wasn't feeling good, hypoglycemia wouldn't help, so I had to get chips, which is a bad meal but at least I have eaten.

You wrecked my day because you want to force your whitewash report to kill me publicly after what I have already survived, because that is what the Church want and your report was part of their set-up and discrediting of me to clear them and the police. I am in pain and I don't see how I can get up at 6am to do the papers when you have left me so ill and distressed.

You are to stop harassing me, you are to shred the whitewash, you are to stop abusing and intimidating me and putting this pressure on me. You really think after what you have done that I would meet with the creature that has implemented the harm to me? No, I want her to resign along with the corrupt police officer, and you have been sent a formal complaint against her and have failed to implement it, again you are so incompetent that it is small wonder that you are responsible for the abuse of a number of children who's situation you were aware of.When a child is abused, that affects them for life, and when you have allowed and enabled abuse, you have no credibility whatsoever.

This letter lets you know the impact of contacting me when you are my abusers, it also warns you to leave me alone and never ever try to contact me, meet with me or release a harassment attack and breach of the data protection act against me into the public domain disguised as a safeguarding report.

Also, as repeatedly asked, make sure an independent review is carried out into your actions and the wider actions of your friends and colleagues in the Church of England and Police. I know it is a huge task but the more time that goes by and the more damage you do to me, the bigger it gets.

sincerely,

HG

Dear Jersey

Dear Jersey,

Regarding Bob Hill.

I redact what I said last week, it was said in fury as he was rubbing raw wounds. I apologise.

Bob Hill should have been enjoying his retirement. He shouldn't have been trying to put right the wrongs of the church or the authorities in Jersey.

The UK government should be intervening in Jersey and putting the henious corruption and safeguarding failures right, not leaving it to a retired man who has a disabled wife to look after.

But apparently instead, the UK government are allowing Jersey dignitaries to intervene in the UK care inquiry, which is henious. I am sure the Jersey care inquiry have been briefed on this as well as how to let the Jersey dignitaries off the hook.

The States of Jersey are responsible for providing safeguarding and witness support and justice and safety for the vulnerable and abuse survivors, and they don't, so Bob spent his retirement on helping people who were suffering, and the States did nothing. Bob's wife is disabled and Bob worked hard all his life. Why was he the only one standing up for me and for others, when the States have used the press and media to hurt me and other victims? What exactly are the safeguarding board there for? Well I gather they are there to protect abusers, the same as Jersey police are, but things need to change. it shouldn't cost the life of innocent people for things to change.

Why did Bob get taken ill? well for two and a half years, rightly or wrongly, he has caused himself and me stress by taking on my case when my case was set up to exonorate the people who have harmed me and lay all the blame on me. The desparation by the States in their use of the press and media to smear me once again recently shows that something went wrong with what the church had planned with their whitewash conflicted Korris smear report followed by the tandem steel and jersey unsafeguarding smears set up and overseen by Gull and Johnstone in liason with the abuser Jane Fisher.

Bob's interventions couldn't change the fact that the whole case had been mapped out and planned to exclude me and eventually have me imprisoned and destroyed again, that remains the case and for me it has been a long two and half year wait, with complete puzzlement at the desparation of the Jersey Deanery, to the point that they spent a thousand pounds of tax payer's money when Jersey's economy is in a shocking state, just to try to get the conflicted Steel report released.

and Jersey safeguarding partnership stood and watched, and didn't see what the problem was.

So, having failed, the Jersey Deanery and associated states members attacked in the press and media again, abusing their power and misleading people while the 'safeguarding' partnership who's Stuart Gull had illegally acted with regard my case, looked on again and ignored my complaints to them.

Bob Hill, having been asked by me over and over again not to waste his retirement on my case when it was a set up and all he was doing was prolonging and worsening the anguish, launched into the media with his latest blog and on BBC Jersey, despite me having banned this.

It was the last thing he did, and the last thing I did in response was attack him and call him names.

And I will have to live with that, and on top of everything else I can't live with, this is a last straw, I can't recover physically or mentally from the latest onslaught and it shouldn't have cost Bob Hill his life.

If he recovers, someone else, someone who he listens to, needs to make sure he rests and enjoys his time with his family.

He can't do any more for me, I am already ruined, defamed, publicly smeared and lied about and discredited, with the active help of Jersey police and safeguarding board. I am done for, but my death is slow and agonizing and drags on year after year. There has been no justice, no arrangement for my side to be heard and investigated, and even Bob never met with me and heard me, and instead used the Korris smear report as a guide and anguished me. He shouldn't even have had to, the Korris report was illegal and had no right to be published and Bob and Neil, even meaning well, have left me sick with distress in repeatedly reproducing parts of it as if it were fact, which is one of the reasons I raged at him, he couldn't see how much he was hurting and humiliating me.

If I could trade places with Bob, so that he could be well and happy and with his family at home, while I, the branded hated worthless one, could be finished and out of my misery, then I would trade, right here and now.

I may be responsible for Bob's situation because he shouldn't and couldn't go on carrying me, and the other survivors while Jersey failed them. But Jersey's safeguarding board and social services and States are also responsible, for leaving him to carry us, indeed worsening the situation with their illegal part in the cover-ups, when Bob should have been enjoying retirement. And now that he has gone, who is left of the human rights activists in Jersey? Who is left who hasn't been ruined for fighting for justice and human rights, who is left who isn't fearful for their own safety for speaking up? Not many.

Jersey is getting worse, the actions of the Bailhache brothers and their servants Gorst and the Governor regarding my case recently have been so blatant and open, even spending a thousand pounds of tax payers money openly and withour fear of account, while Bailhahce tried to close the care inquiry due to cost! Why would a man who wants to deny a voice to hundreds of victims be demanding an 'abuse report' to be released?

Hypocrite.

The recent safeguarding failure serious case review led to the usual 'lessons will be learned (but not in our time)' lines being trotted out. So when will lessons be learned? When a few more lives are lost? Or never?

Bob shouldn't have been in a position where he was the only person defending me and I was out of my mind and furious that he was still acting in my case without consent, I know I said terrible things but why is Jersey safeguarding partnership allowing me to be driven to the end of my tether? Why have they left Bob Hill safeguarding me against a paedophile protector and a bunch of equally corrupt and dishonest States-Church members? Why hasn't Jersey learned anything from the embarrassment of being international news in 2008 because of abuse and the failure of the States, judiciary and social services? Why are they standing by while the same States members who failed those children are killing me, have left Bob in a critical condition?!

Bob refused to stop acting in my case and others, no matter what abuse I hurled, no matter how upset I was, and he has a disabled wife to look after, and the safeguarding board and police not only let my case go on in this terrible way, they left Bob struggling with it while they were complicit in allowing and aiding the corrupt states-church members!

How much is a human life worth to the Jersey authorities?

Well, it depends on who you are, doesn't it?!

If Bob makes any recovery, I sincerely hope that he will listen to his family and not return to the fight for human rights, for his own sake. But now with Bob not defending my case, what are safeguarding going to do? Aid the police and church in finishing me off with the whitewash set up reports on Jane Fisher and the Deanery of Jersey's behalf? Presumably, yes, because no one oversees Jersey police and safeguarding, they are a corrupt, ineffective law unto themselves, that is why a good man has wasted his retirement doing their job for them and is in critical condition in hospital.

I will never forgive myself.

I intended to redact that furious email calling Bob an abuser for launching into the press and media without warning again when I have told him repeatedly not to, I also, while I have been ill in bed, taped my concerns about Bob and Neil representing my case without warning or consent and had it transcripted yesterday to send to them. Too late. Bob isn't a bad man, or an abuser, I am sorry I said he was, but he did leave me screaming with anguish over the way he represented my case, because he wasn't listening to me, wasn't warning me when he was going to release things or checking with me for accuracy.

I go mad because I have suffered more than anyone can live with. Now I have to live with the fact that the last thing Bob did before being taken ill was try to represent me when blatant lies about me and my case were being read out, and the last thing I did was call him names and scream at him to leave my case alone.

Are the care inquiry really going to leave Jersey knowing that they are leaving an island that is in such a desparate state that men like Bob Hill have to give their lives to try and change things because those in authority are active in keeping the bad, dark, abusive and corrupt practices in place? Are the care inquiry really going to leave Jersey knowing that they and the authorities were told over and over again about the situation with the Bailhache brothers, the Dean, the States, are they really going to leave and not see that things change in Jersey?  It is looking that way and Bob gave his life and time to make sure there was a care inquiry, and he gave his testimony and I and others think that the way he was interviewed by the inquiry was dissapointing.

And then they won't even interview me, and I have experience of how bad the systems in Jersey are, as well as having witnessed active protection of paedophiles.

The last straws are raining down, and presumably the people attacking me and trying to force the release of their whitewash reports will have no respect for Bob and no regard for his or my welfare and will now press on with their attacks relentless, with the safeguarding joke board eager to assist them.

What kind of State is Jersey, to allow a paedophile protector to openly attack a vulnerable adult he has never met and use the press and media to do so, while a retired man uses his retirement to try to defend her? Are the care inquiry really going to turn their backs and claim that this is not in their remit. If they do, then the same Paedophile protector was right when he said they were not worth the tax payer's money.

HG