I am getting a tremendous amount of traffic to my blog from people looking for Gavin Ashenden. This tends to happen when he is attacking people, and this is no different.
He is ranting in the Times about the Koran being used in a Cathedral.
Well a) did anyone notice, the old dears are usually asleep, and b) isn't it a good idea to educate people to stop the blind Islamophobia continuing to rise? c) Isn't Ashenden's attack on the Archbishop more to do with the secret court that he faced? d) The Archbishop should resign, because he is a cowardly corrupt lying crook, not because of the Koran.
Gavin Ashenden spends his life attacking and showing off, and, having never met me, took part in a press and media smear campaign against me, full of lies, some of which is available here:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/hg-review-team/very-cuttings/paperback/product-23028126.html
Ashenden isn't in any postion to lay down the law to anyone, aside from his public attacks on me without having both sides of the story, he is a divorcee, which is against Jesus' teachings, and he has relentlessly attacked and slurred abuse victims and the mentally ill, as well as making racist and xenaphobic attacks in the press constantly.
He thinks very highly indeed of himself, and the Church don't appear to have any ability to silence his hatred and rants, even though he is a safeguarding danger.
He really needs a copy of the Bible, I don't think he can ever have seen a copy or read it.
This is Tony the Prof's blog. look at what a churchgoer in Jersey has observed about Gavin Ashenden:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Gavin+Ashenden
This is Bob's blog, look through this and see what Ashenden was part of:
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/
It is time that Ashenden was asked to step down, he is mean-spirited, untruthful, hateful, prejudiced, proud and boastful, he is bringing Christianity into disrepute and would be bringing the church into disrepute if they weren't already, and the church are scared to face up to him because he is chaplain to the Queen.
Showing posts with label Gavin Ashenden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gavin Ashenden. Show all posts
Sunday, 22 January 2017
Friday, 30 December 2016
Gavin Ashenden
I deleted the post about Ashenden because it was offensive.
Offensive to Muslims.
However. If you want to know more about the offensive unchristian clergyman who worships his own ego, there is a guy in Jersey who writes about him and his offensive behaviour.
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Gavin%20Ashenden
You have to wonder what Bishop Willmott thinks safeguarding means when Ashenden attacks any vulnerable group and Willmott spouts to the unquestioning press and media about safeguarding being good?
Especially as Ashenden tends to view my blog when he has been looking at porn sites, his feed always comes up as transferring from porn to my blog. Weird or what?
I remember one of the former students at Sussex telling me why Ashenden went insane, his wife was very ill and he tried to look after her, she got better and left him.
He has been nuts ever since, apparently, and he is the church of england's advert as they uphold his persistent narrow-minded and prejudiced rants.
As yet the church of england, especially the joke of a national safeguarding team, are doing nothing about him and have condoned his attacks on me and on muslims, other races and nations, disabled people, homosexual people and any minority group he feels able to attack to meet his own needs.
Anyone who thinks the man's behaviour is Christian has never read or understood the New Testament or Jesus' teachings.
Offensive to Muslims.
However. If you want to know more about the offensive unchristian clergyman who worships his own ego, there is a guy in Jersey who writes about him and his offensive behaviour.
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Gavin%20Ashenden
You have to wonder what Bishop Willmott thinks safeguarding means when Ashenden attacks any vulnerable group and Willmott spouts to the unquestioning press and media about safeguarding being good?
Especially as Ashenden tends to view my blog when he has been looking at porn sites, his feed always comes up as transferring from porn to my blog. Weird or what?
I remember one of the former students at Sussex telling me why Ashenden went insane, his wife was very ill and he tried to look after her, she got better and left him.
He has been nuts ever since, apparently, and he is the church of england's advert as they uphold his persistent narrow-minded and prejudiced rants.
As yet the church of england, especially the joke of a national safeguarding team, are doing nothing about him and have condoned his attacks on me and on muslims, other races and nations, disabled people, homosexual people and any minority group he feels able to attack to meet his own needs.
Anyone who thinks the man's behaviour is Christian has never read or understood the New Testament or Jesus' teachings.
Sunday, 4 September 2016
Gavin Ashenden
A divorcee clergyman who is on his second marriage, has not been reprimanded or dealt with either for his open harm to me in the press and media or his repeat and ongoing attacks on various vulnerable groups, most notably his homophobic attacks which he rather incredibly tries to use Christianity as an excuse for.
It is horrifying, just as it was with my case, that the press and media uphold this without question, but less surprising that the Church of England turn their embarrassed backs and do nothing, because they have no power to discipline clergy in Jersey or France.
God didn't condemn gay people, he did condemn divorce, and for so long the Church have twisted the Bible and Christianity to suit themselves, and it has got to blatant.
Is there ever going to be an overhaul of the archaic Church, and a system of accountability and discipline put in place?
It is horrifying, just as it was with my case, that the press and media uphold this without question, but less surprising that the Church of England turn their embarrassed backs and do nothing, because they have no power to discipline clergy in Jersey or France.
God didn't condemn gay people, he did condemn divorce, and for so long the Church have twisted the Bible and Christianity to suit themselves, and it has got to blatant.
Is there ever going to be an overhaul of the archaic Church, and a system of accountability and discipline put in place?
Thursday, 14 January 2016
The Dean has a whole lot more than homophobia to apologise for
The Dean thinks the Church has a whole lot more than homophobia to apologise for.
The Dean has a whole lot more than homophobia to apologise for, including destroying me to cover his own back, and also allowing Gavin Ashenden to go on behaving appallingly.
When Women Bishops were voted in, the Dean and other people who were against women Bishops, were included in the countrywide campaign of frothy notices and announcements about how pleased they were that women Bishops had been voted in.
So presumably the homophobic Dean has been beamed his message from Canterbury to trot out, while Ashenden doesn't listen to much apart from the voices in his head these days. So they are giving out opposing messages and neither because they care about homosexual people.
As for being welcome in Jersey churches, you have to be rich and/or narrowminded.
I would like someone to volunteer to go to the town church and announce their gay wedding please.
The Dean has a whole lot more than homophobia to apologise for, including destroying me to cover his own back, and also allowing Gavin Ashenden to go on behaving appallingly.
When Women Bishops were voted in, the Dean and other people who were against women Bishops, were included in the countrywide campaign of frothy notices and announcements about how pleased they were that women Bishops had been voted in.
So presumably the homophobic Dean has been beamed his message from Canterbury to trot out, while Ashenden doesn't listen to much apart from the voices in his head these days. So they are giving out opposing messages and neither because they care about homosexual people.
As for being welcome in Jersey churches, you have to be rich and/or narrowminded.
I would like someone to volunteer to go to the town church and announce their gay wedding please.
Monday, 4 January 2016
Gavin Ashenden
Due to the incredible increase in views of this blog, obviously due to Ashenden behaving badly (or acting out his insanity) I decided to update this post from a while back:
Well, Gavin Ashenden is performing in the spotlight again.
He is apparently in the National press with his recent opinion on Islam.
I know he reads my blog, usually from the safety of Yemen or Normandy, but I know he won't mind me blogging about him, as he is never averse to maligning me or hurting other people's feelings.
Some peaople might expect me to write an open letter, about how he shouldn't be telling Muslims how to live when he hasn't worked out what Christianity is all about yet, But actually, he can make enough of a fool of himself and the church without my help.
Peacekeeper from Yemen, trouble stirrer from Jersey.
Do you remember Pepper Anne?
'...He's his own biggest fan...
Ashenden, Ashenden'
Here is the recent Story of Ashenden and Islam, as told by a Jersey Blogger:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/httpwww.html
Afterthought on Islam from me.
I do not like the way the media are playing up these stories of young people being radicalised. It is scaremongering. The Churchwarden's wife used to include in her daily fears that we were going to taken over by Muslims and it would be awful for us women.
I used to live among Muslims. They were peaceful, respectful and had good senses of humour, their beliefs lead them to have a set of ethics, something that Catholics and Buddhists have but the Church of England lacks.
Gavin Ashenden saw an advert in the church rag (Times) and it said 'Come and work where clergy discipline cannot reach you! Golden sand, corruption, old boys and favours in kind'.
So he went to work in Jersey.
It is a puzzle then why he is trying to take over in Normandy!
Further Ashenden reading and links for recent viewers after his most recent rantings.
http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jersey-deanery-15-october-2013
http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/lies-that-bishop-willmott-tells-us.html#.Vojvp1LP7D4
http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/ashenden-googles-himself.html#.VorLElLP7D4
http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/gavin-ashenden-2.html#.VorLSlLP7D4
Saturday, 21 November 2015
The Bible and the church
Come home Bob: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGGJbwmhIZ8
This little thing from twitter reminds me, so much of the Jersey Deanery's Bible-based evil:
Thursday, 10 September 2015
Ashenden googles himself
One of the mysteries of life, why is Gavin Ashenden looking himself up on my blog? Does he want acclaim?
I dunno Ashenden if you really want an article about yourself, I could put together what people have sent me.
Apparently you used to be a very unbiased and inclusive Christian.
You were liked by your friends, some of whom have contacted me.
You were married and your wife's bipolar disorder became very serious and she threatened suicide a lot.
Incredibly, after a very stressful time where your wife's illness caused you very much stress, especially the suicide threats, she recovered.
And left you.
It is thought by the various people contacting me about your rabid behaviour of recent years, that that episode with your first wife was what tipped you over into your own mental illness that manifests as the rabid rantings and attacks that you are known for now.
When you judge everyone else as you do, you omit the fact that you are a divorcee and remarried and thus not in a position to lay down the law at all regarding Christianity. But I think you are too far gone to either understand or stop your wrong behaviour.
Anyway, while you were chaplain at the University in Sussex, you were seen to change from inclusive and liberal to rabid and unforgiving, biased and judgemental.
This is apparently why you had to leave there.
And Jersey of course being the trash can for priests with misconduct records who are not actually welcome to preside anywhere else but are welcomed to Jersey as the Church there is very different from the norm.
Since going to Jersey you have blatantly and constantly attacked minority groups and vulnerable people and rubbished abuse victims and their feeling, you have been openly racist and homophobic. Your rants and the fact that they are met by silence in the church of england, who proceed to proclaim 'great safeguarding' in Jersey, are a terrible reminder that the Church of England is not a Christian church.
Why are you googling your reaction to immigrants or searching my blog for it?
I have no idea if you ranted about immigrants or if you decided to do the church's usual PR trick of pretending to 'care very deeply'. Honestly, you are not very important, Ashenden, I pity you, I don't waste blog time and space on you.
It is true that people in the Diocese of Normandy have complained about your rude and arrogant behaviour and taking over there, but they contacted the wrong person, I am not your boss.
And regarding your Xenophobia, why did you go to Yemen? Just an all-expenses paid trip like when you go to Normandy?
You know and can't hide from yourself that your dishonesty and judgement of others and bad behaviour won't go away when you stand before God, and He will ask why you have abused me and others and continued to the charade of representing Him. And He will hold you responsible. The Queen won't be there to protect you then, neither will anyone in law or the church. If you really believe in God while you behave so badly, what is he going to say to you about the way you have behaved towards me in the media when I had no voice? What is he going to say about your engineered Steel report?
Seeing as you are looking yourself up on my blog, I hope this satisfies your cravings. You are not really worth my time or a proper article. If you were, I would print what was sent to me, a bit like you wanting the Steel report published to destroy me and cover up for the Dean's wrongdoing.
I dunno Ashenden if you really want an article about yourself, I could put together what people have sent me.
Apparently you used to be a very unbiased and inclusive Christian.
You were liked by your friends, some of whom have contacted me.
You were married and your wife's bipolar disorder became very serious and she threatened suicide a lot.
Incredibly, after a very stressful time where your wife's illness caused you very much stress, especially the suicide threats, she recovered.
And left you.
It is thought by the various people contacting me about your rabid behaviour of recent years, that that episode with your first wife was what tipped you over into your own mental illness that manifests as the rabid rantings and attacks that you are known for now.
When you judge everyone else as you do, you omit the fact that you are a divorcee and remarried and thus not in a position to lay down the law at all regarding Christianity. But I think you are too far gone to either understand or stop your wrong behaviour.
Anyway, while you were chaplain at the University in Sussex, you were seen to change from inclusive and liberal to rabid and unforgiving, biased and judgemental.
This is apparently why you had to leave there.
And Jersey of course being the trash can for priests with misconduct records who are not actually welcome to preside anywhere else but are welcomed to Jersey as the Church there is very different from the norm.
Since going to Jersey you have blatantly and constantly attacked minority groups and vulnerable people and rubbished abuse victims and their feeling, you have been openly racist and homophobic. Your rants and the fact that they are met by silence in the church of england, who proceed to proclaim 'great safeguarding' in Jersey, are a terrible reminder that the Church of England is not a Christian church.
Why are you googling your reaction to immigrants or searching my blog for it?
I have no idea if you ranted about immigrants or if you decided to do the church's usual PR trick of pretending to 'care very deeply'. Honestly, you are not very important, Ashenden, I pity you, I don't waste blog time and space on you.
It is true that people in the Diocese of Normandy have complained about your rude and arrogant behaviour and taking over there, but they contacted the wrong person, I am not your boss.
And regarding your Xenophobia, why did you go to Yemen? Just an all-expenses paid trip like when you go to Normandy?
You know and can't hide from yourself that your dishonesty and judgement of others and bad behaviour won't go away when you stand before God, and He will ask why you have abused me and others and continued to the charade of representing Him. And He will hold you responsible. The Queen won't be there to protect you then, neither will anyone in law or the church. If you really believe in God while you behave so badly, what is he going to say to you about the way you have behaved towards me in the media when I had no voice? What is he going to say about your engineered Steel report?
Seeing as you are looking yourself up on my blog, I hope this satisfies your cravings. You are not really worth my time or a proper article. If you were, I would print what was sent to me, a bit like you wanting the Steel report published to destroy me and cover up for the Dean's wrongdoing.
Thursday, 6 August 2015
Sunday, 26 July 2015
He's his own biggest fan, Ashenden, Ashenden...
He is one in a million.
And apparently he is causing offence to non-brainwashed people again:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/forgiveness-and-anger.html
And someone video'd worship in the Jersey cult churches one day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9mbomIvYQQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n453yVHMpbw
Gavin Ashenden's finest preaching:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTfpR5HDzoc
And apparently he is causing offence to non-brainwashed people again:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/forgiveness-and-anger.html
And someone video'd worship in the Jersey cult churches one day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9mbomIvYQQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n453yVHMpbw
Gavin Ashenden's finest preaching:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTfpR5HDzoc
Friday, 24 July 2015
Another former Queen's chaplain jailed for abuse
I may be wrong but I am pretty sure this is the second one recently?
What strikes me here is Paul Butler isn't frothing emptily about sorrow, grief and all the other emotions that fat old men in palaces are not capable of feeling.
Article: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queens-former-chaplain-jailed-terrifying-6133351
By the way, did you spot what Diocese this was in? :)
What strikes me here is Paul Butler isn't frothing emptily about sorrow, grief and all the other emotions that fat old men in palaces are not capable of feeling.
Article: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queens-former-chaplain-jailed-terrifying-6133351
By the way, did you spot what Diocese this was in? :)
Sunday, 17 May 2015
Gavin Ashenden 2
A lot of people are landing on my blog looking for Ashenden, again.
Well, I gather he has had a row with the JEP, but I am still not wasting time on him.
Other bloggers have done posts, and one blogger has actually posted the article that the JEP have refused.
I cannot locate that article but I can link you to the other blog posts about Ashenden's whatever.
Please feel redirected, I am too busy for Revd. Ashenden at the moment.
Here you are:
http://changingattitude.org.uk/archives/7536
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/gavin-ashenden-and-broad-historical.html
Well, I gather he has had a row with the JEP, but I am still not wasting time on him.
Other bloggers have done posts, and one blogger has actually posted the article that the JEP have refused.
I cannot locate that article but I can link you to the other blog posts about Ashenden's whatever.
Please feel redirected, I am too busy for Revd. Ashenden at the moment.
Here you are:
http://changingattitude.org.uk/archives/7536
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/gavin-ashenden-and-broad-historical.html
Sunday, 5 April 2015
A letter of Questions
Dear Dioceses of Winchester and Canterbury,
This is a letter of questions.
Some of Which I have already asked you but have decided to share with the general public.
The list of questions is exhaustive, because what the Church of England have done in their crazy showing off has brought up many many questions, and as you continue to subject me to harm and damage to my life, I am answering with questions.
1. Diocese of Winchester, Don't you think it was ultimate abuse of power that you liased with the police to destroy me for continuing to fight both your refusal to deal with my complaints and your illegal violations of my life, and then you used the same police to have me illegally traced so that you could go on destroying me?
2. Can you explain why, if your reports were about safeguarding, why you allowed Gavin Ashendent to be interviewed for the Steel report when he has never met me, was not in Jersey when I was there and was abusing his power as a former lawyer and chaplain to the Queen in order to protect the Dean, and has gone on to cause serious safeuarding issues in Jersey and the Diocese of Normandy?
What is being done about the safeguarding issues that Ashenden is causing in Jersey? Examples of which are commented on here:
1)http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/gavin-ashenden-and-devil.html
2)http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/on-demonic.html
3) http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/httpwww.html
3. This is one of your clergy, who you are permitting to use the press to spread terrible propaganda against vulnerable people and Islam. Can you explain why?
4. What is being done about Ashenden's behaviour, including his slander of me in the press and media, which is also a safeguarding issue? Can you explain why the Diocese of CAnterbury and the Diocese of Winchester are allowing Ashenden to run a column in the JEP that is furthering his damaging views and harm to vulnerable groups?
5. Unrelated. According to Bob Hill, the Diocese have agreed to pay for my accommodation for the rest of my life. That was in 2013. It is now 2015. Would the Diocese like to make the arrangement to backdate the money to 2013 and start paying me?
6. Could the Diocese of Winchester please explain why, if there was nothing wrong with the Steel report so that they were prepared to release it in 2013 and again in 2014, why it has been 'being looked at by legal and safeguarding experts' for a year now. With legal fees starting at £300 per hour, and safeguard expert fees probably not much lower, how much has a year of these experts cost? Who is paying, and why, if the report has twice been prepared for release, has it needed a year of 'being looked at'?
7. Can the Diocese then confirm that what they intend to release in the end is not the full whack of what Steel, Bailhache, Key, Ashenden, Birt, LeMarquand, LeFeuvre and other powerful and conflicted interrelated people engineered to cover up for the Dean and my abuser at my expense? Can the Diocese explain what worth a report hijacked by the defendants and amended is worth to the general public, transparency and safeguarding, especially considering how much it has cost?
How much, including the year of having the Steel report looked at by experts has this un-safeguarding report cost? And who are these experts? And why have these experts been given a report that excludes the person it is about and their views? Why after a year if these are genuine experts, haven't they spoken out about this being one sided?
8. A question was asked in the States of Jersey recently: Why is the Dean on Sabattical (again) and who is paying for it? I would like to ask the above question and also add, why was he apparently sent on Sabbattical by the Luitenant-Governor of Jersey? And why did he and the Deanery make a concerted effort to get the Steel report released before his sabbattical?
9. Can the Church please explain which authority they have referred the complaint about Sir Philip Bailhache's abuse of power and breaches of the data protection act while holding documents he was not entitled to, and when the results of that investigation will be available and where to get a copy?
10. On the same theme of investigation, who is investigating the smear campaign and lies about me in Jersey's local press and media by the Jersey Deanery, and the wider attacks on me as a result of the Bishop of Winchester and Archbishop of CAnterbury's launch of my case and the Korris report into the National Press. Who is carrying out this report and when will I be interviewed?
11. Remaining on the subject of reports and investigations. The Diocese of Winchester made a lot of noise about safeguarding and transparency and independent report, but as yet, no independent report that includes me has been arranged, unless it has been arranged without announcement, and as yet, I have not been contacted for interview. As all are aware, the Bishop has instigated investigations into Jane Fisher and the Deanery of Jersey's complaints against me, in the form of the Korris and Steel reports, but has not instigated any investigation into my complaints against the Jersey Deanery and Jane Fisher. Therefore this is an entirely unfair situation. When is the Bishop of Winchester or the Bishop of Dover going to arrange for a report into my complaints?
12. Can the Bishop explain exactly why he has effectively done a public, illegal and unjust investigation into me, and called it a safeguarding report? Can the Bishop explain how paradoxically destroying me while claiming it is in the interests of safeguarding makes sense? Can the Bishop explain why he has given a voice to my destroyers and unpheld them?
13 Can the Bishop explain why he had me illegally traced by the police on the claim that the diocese 'wanted to help me' after they had destroyed me, and he then went ahead in upholding the way the diocese had destroyed me, by threatening me, with the police and record that I would not have got if his clergy and safeguarding officer had not been doing wrong in the first place?
14. Can the Bishop of Winchester explain why, when he claims to consider Safeguarding is very important, why he has not dealt with Jane Fisher, his safeguarding director who has committed serious misconduct, and, as she is also a Reader in the Diocese of Winchester, why he has personally not dealt with complaints against her and left her to openly harass me, in the case of her illegally referring me to the NSPCC, illegally liasing about me, and her jeer of adding me on twitter last year, showing off that neither diocese nor police had dealt with he rmisconduct? And can the Bishop also explain how, as Jane Fisher is a reader, he has dealt with her conflict of interests in the 'Safeguarding complaint' as she is a reader alongside other readers in the Jersey Deanery, such as Ian LeMarquand and Neville Brookes and others who are close to my abuser? And can the Bishop explain why the formal complaints against Jane Fisher have not been dealt with and why after the complaints were made, she was allowed to continue to be involved in the Jersey Safeguarding matter? And why she refused to deal with the case of another vulnerable adult mistreated by the Church in Jersey, when she was in Jersey to illegally liase with the police over my case?
15. When is the Diocese of WInchester going to announce the conflicts of interest and coercions and abuses of power that rendered their 'visitation' and investigations in Jersey worthless? This includes connections between the Jersey Deanery and: Judiciary, Police, Masonic agreements, lawyers, advocates others involved in law, press and media workers, relatives and friends of the Dean, my abusers and the others listed here, other people not listed here. Unless the Diocese is quite open and blatant about these conflicts then they are neither being transparent nor honest, and if the Diocese do know these conflicts, then that again invalidates their 'investigations'.
16. What are the Diocese of Canterbury doing about the Jersey situation? Not a lot if Ashenden is anything to go by.
17. Did the Diocese of Winchester undertake this open public attack on me without foresight or was it deliberate? If the Bishop felt that he had the evidence on which to suspend the Dean, why did he then clear him before the Steel report was carried out, and thus defame me by anulling what had happened to me, and giving the press opportunity to attack me as discredited, why, if the Bishop re-instated the Dean, did he then proceed with the Steel report, having gone from suddenly suspending the Dean to suddenly clearing him? How did the evidence change from publicly suspending the Dean in the NAtional press, to clearing him? And why did the Steel report then occur when the Bishop had annulled his own actions, and why then has the Bishop not apologized to the Dean?
18. Why if the Dean was cleared, did he 'apologize' to no-one? Why did the feeble 'apology' never get sent to me by the Diocese? And why, when it was never sent to me, was it used as a 'trophy' on the Church website, after the Bishop cleared the Dean without even interviewing me?
19. Why, if the Korris report was inaccurate and thus you have cleared the Dean, have you not publicly annulled the Korris report and instead allowed me to continue being shamed and defamed by it? For example, in the Church (Times) Rag? Incidentally, why have you also allowed your clergy to libel and defame me in the same paper, where hundreds of clergy read their side of things and without my views added, one side of things gets heard and believed, and the same with the rest of the press slander. How, with these massive irregularities, can you claim that anything you have done is to do with safeguarding, and again, since you have cleared the Dean at my expense, why have you not apologized publicly to him for suspending him and publishing the Korris report? And why have you not apologized for me for the defamation and data protection breaches that have led to hate attacks and shunning of me? How is what you have done anything to do with safeguarding?!
20. Can the Bishop explain, in the context of the public display of abuse of power and ignorance of vulnerability and the effects of abuse shown by the typically wealthy and powerful Church members in response to the 'safeguarding reports' How the Bishop and Diocese have improved safeguarding through their actions, and how the Bishop and Dioceses have countered these ignorant, bigoted and narrow attitudes and educated these people on the subjects of poverty, vulnerability, disability and abuse? Especially notable church officers such as Philip Bailhache, Ian LeMarquand, Bruce Willings and other conflicted Church members? Can the Bishops publicly describe the work they and his dioceses have done in response to the open bigoted prejudiced and nasty attacks on me and on all abuse survivors and vulnerable people as a result of the Bishops unprecedented public attack on me and the Jersey Deanery through the Korris report?
21. Can the Bishops explain what action has been taken against the Clergy and Laity in the Jersey Deanery case for their ongoing misconduct as a result of the safeguarding report? And when there is to be a safeguarding investigation into my complaints, presumably leading to further appropriate action? And why a number of people involved in misconduct were actually promoted, as seems to be a generic action by the Church of England?
The next set of questions are the ones that I sent to Jan Korris in my open letter to her:
Here are some questions that you and other people need to ask the Bishop of Winchester:
1. Why did he have me traced and violated, illegally by the same police who his safeguarding officer had me destroyed with? Why he do that AFTER publishing the Korris report and not in order to offer me a chance to participate?
2. Why were my amendments and views not added if it was a genuine safeguarding effort? And why was the report left up, not amended, until I took the Bishop to court?
3. Why did the Bishop not release the Steel report to a court of law if it was a genuine report? Why and how was he able to wriggle out of it, and will he do so again as I continue action against him?
4. Why did the Bishop claim that the Steel report was ready for release in November 2013, and then claim that someone had made a legal bid against the report's release? How could someone have made a legal bid when no-one knew what was in the report? This claim by the Bishop led to further slurs on me, most notably Peter Ould claiming I couldn't have made the legal bid as I was not intelligent enough - Peter Ould being the Vicar who blogged about sex until recently and illegally involved himself in my case to the detriment of the church and slandered me and jeered at me openly with the church refusing to restrain him until I kept up a sustained complaint - good safeguarding?
5. So if someone made a bid against the Steel report, and the Bishop had to amend it, then the report was not going to be accurate anyway, so then the Bishop claimed to be preparing to release it, again, in May, and Bob Hill and I both took action. Why was the Bishop trying to release this report to the wrong official in Jersey though? Again, when there is an independent investigation, outside of the Church, these things need to be queried.
6. Why does the Bishop keep claiming to have 'safeguarding and legal experts looking at the report? Why does he need these people looking at the reports if it is a fair and balanced report? Why have they been looking at this report for a year and more without contacting me to include my views and amendments? Why has the Bishop not sent me a copy of the Steel report to comment on?
Who are these legal and safeguarding experts?
If they are within the Church of England then they are conflicted, if they are not within the church then they would not have waited over a year to contact me for my views or declare the report conflicted and unbalanced and inappropriate denigration of a lone vulnerable adult. The Bishop's solicitors seemed unaware of the situation when I contacted them about this, and there is no sign of an outside safeguarding panel viewing this report, because if this happened, then due to the nature of the conflicted Steel report and due to the material about the mess the Bishop has made of my case being widely available, the Bishop would already be in a lot of trouble over the Steel report.
Presumably when Luther-Pendragon tell the Bishop to say that the Steel report is being looked at by legal and safeguarding experts, they are referring to the conflicted Jane Fisher and Elizabeth Hall, and the Bishop's chaplain, who is a trained Barrister. Thus the general public are being mislead.
7. Why did the Bishop of Winchester allow conflicted Jane Fisher to illegally refer me to the NSPCC? Especially when he had said that there would be no further unsolicited intervention in my life? And when Jane Fisher had a formal complaint against her, which the Bishop, Elizabeth Hall, Paul Butler and the Church of England have still failed to deal with? How are they committed to safeguarding when they have failed to record, investigate or resolve my complaint?
8. Why am I being made to live in fear of and trying to survive, continued press attacks while the Bishop of Winchester continues to lie about the Steel report and leave me waiting to be destroyed by it? Will any amount of safeguarding experts and legal experts make it into a genuine report when the fact that they are involved, ficticiously or for real just says the Bishop only cares about his and the Diocese's legal safety, as I remain excluded?!
9. Now that you have read my questions, ask yourself, what happens to the voiceless vulnerable when the church can be this dishonest and this cruel to someone who has a certain amount of ability to write to the church in defence? what happens to the voiceless when the Church of England control what the press get to see and when the Church can subject someone to the damage they have subjected me to, and never be called to account?
http://opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-jan-korris-church-england-counsellor-and-author-korris-report
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/why-was-korris-published.html
This is the end of the first letter of Questions. But the Questions are exhaustive, and I am trying to live a normal life despite being under pressure from this matter, so I will leave it at that for the moment.
sincerely,
HG
Further Reading:
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/03/30/open-letter-to-jan-korris/
http://opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-jan-korris-church-england-counsellor-and-author-korris-report
http://opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jerseys-external-affairs-minister-sir-philip-bailhache
http://opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jersey-deanery-15-october-2013
http://opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-bishop-paul-butler-and-macsas
http://opnlttr.com/letter/i-woke-and-wrote-bishop-morning
http://opnlttr.com/letter/archbishop-canterbury
http://opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jane-fisher-and-bishop-tim-dakin-0
http://opnlttr.com/letter/second-open-letter-bishop-winchester
http://opnlttr.com/letter/1st-open-letter-bishop-winchester-0
http://opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-very-reverend-bob-key-dean-jersey
http://opnlttr.com/letter/jane-fisher-safeguarding-director-winchester-diocese
No.1 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/03/bob-key-and-jersey-way.html
No.2 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-jersey-establishment-closes-ranks.html
No.3 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/03/bob-key-support-and-recognised-formula.html
No.4 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/03/senator-philip-bailhache-letter-to.html
No.5 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/04/open-letter-to-bishop-of-winchester-tim.html
No.6 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/04/dean-reinstated-press-release-from.html
No.7 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/05/business-as-usualthe-jersey-way.html
No.8 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/05/philip-bailhache-independenceagenda.html
No.9 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/06/senator-philip-bailhache-grouville.html
No.10 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/10/3rd-anniversary-of-abuse-victims.html
No.11 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/11/jersey-dean-who-exonerated-him.html
No.12 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/12/exonerated.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-dean-bishop-and-good-shepherds-fact.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/the-dean-and-voice-in-wilderness.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/jerseys-dean-and-victims-tale.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/jerseys-dean-victory-or-climb-down.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/jerseys-dean-did-punishment-fit-crime.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/jerseys-dean-diocese-of-winchester.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/jerseys-dean-red-letter-day.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/jerseys-dean-meaningless-apologies.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/jerseys-dean-doubting-thomases.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/jerseys-dean-another-meaningless-apology.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/jerseys-dean-and-silly-season.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/jerseys-dean-laitys-jep-advert.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-dame-heather-saint-or.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-dame-heather-saint-or.html
More of Bob Hill's Blogs:
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-truth-whole-truth-or.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/jerseys-dean-unofficial-report-on.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/a-reflection-on-2013.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/jerseys-dean-press-release-no-peace-no.html
http://introducingjersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/shafting-jersey.html
http://introducingjersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/carry-on-jersey.html
THURSDAY, 14 MARCH 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/03/looking-from-distance.html
TUESDAY, 19 MARCH 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-cloud-of-witnesses-or-fog.html
THURSDAY, 21 MARCH 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/03/investigating-deportation.html
FRIDAY, 31 MAY 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/05/canons-to-left-of-them.html
THURSDAY, 6 JUNE 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/06/odds-and-ends.html
TUESDAY, 23 JULY 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/07/change-in-jersey-law-to-clamp-down-on.html
TUESDAY, 13 AUGUST 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/08/watching-from-sidelines.html
THURSDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-curious-incident-of-dog-on-early.html
WEDNESDAY, 4 DECEMBER 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/12/jersey-and-winchester-view-from-guernsey.html
FRIDAY, 30 MAY 2014
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2014/05/stinking-bishop-and-wake-up-call.html
This is a letter of questions.
Some of Which I have already asked you but have decided to share with the general public.
The list of questions is exhaustive, because what the Church of England have done in their crazy showing off has brought up many many questions, and as you continue to subject me to harm and damage to my life, I am answering with questions.
1. Diocese of Winchester, Don't you think it was ultimate abuse of power that you liased with the police to destroy me for continuing to fight both your refusal to deal with my complaints and your illegal violations of my life, and then you used the same police to have me illegally traced so that you could go on destroying me?
2. Can you explain why, if your reports were about safeguarding, why you allowed Gavin Ashendent to be interviewed for the Steel report when he has never met me, was not in Jersey when I was there and was abusing his power as a former lawyer and chaplain to the Queen in order to protect the Dean, and has gone on to cause serious safeuarding issues in Jersey and the Diocese of Normandy?
What is being done about the safeguarding issues that Ashenden is causing in Jersey? Examples of which are commented on here:
1)http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/gavin-ashenden-and-devil.html
2)http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/on-demonic.html
3) http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/httpwww.html
3. This is one of your clergy, who you are permitting to use the press to spread terrible propaganda against vulnerable people and Islam. Can you explain why?
4. What is being done about Ashenden's behaviour, including his slander of me in the press and media, which is also a safeguarding issue? Can you explain why the Diocese of CAnterbury and the Diocese of Winchester are allowing Ashenden to run a column in the JEP that is furthering his damaging views and harm to vulnerable groups?
5. Unrelated. According to Bob Hill, the Diocese have agreed to pay for my accommodation for the rest of my life. That was in 2013. It is now 2015. Would the Diocese like to make the arrangement to backdate the money to 2013 and start paying me?
6. Could the Diocese of Winchester please explain why, if there was nothing wrong with the Steel report so that they were prepared to release it in 2013 and again in 2014, why it has been 'being looked at by legal and safeguarding experts' for a year now. With legal fees starting at £300 per hour, and safeguard expert fees probably not much lower, how much has a year of these experts cost? Who is paying, and why, if the report has twice been prepared for release, has it needed a year of 'being looked at'?
7. Can the Diocese then confirm that what they intend to release in the end is not the full whack of what Steel, Bailhache, Key, Ashenden, Birt, LeMarquand, LeFeuvre and other powerful and conflicted interrelated people engineered to cover up for the Dean and my abuser at my expense? Can the Diocese explain what worth a report hijacked by the defendants and amended is worth to the general public, transparency and safeguarding, especially considering how much it has cost?
How much, including the year of having the Steel report looked at by experts has this un-safeguarding report cost? And who are these experts? And why have these experts been given a report that excludes the person it is about and their views? Why after a year if these are genuine experts, haven't they spoken out about this being one sided?
8. A question was asked in the States of Jersey recently: Why is the Dean on Sabattical (again) and who is paying for it? I would like to ask the above question and also add, why was he apparently sent on Sabbattical by the Luitenant-Governor of Jersey? And why did he and the Deanery make a concerted effort to get the Steel report released before his sabbattical?
9. Can the Church please explain which authority they have referred the complaint about Sir Philip Bailhache's abuse of power and breaches of the data protection act while holding documents he was not entitled to, and when the results of that investigation will be available and where to get a copy?
10. On the same theme of investigation, who is investigating the smear campaign and lies about me in Jersey's local press and media by the Jersey Deanery, and the wider attacks on me as a result of the Bishop of Winchester and Archbishop of CAnterbury's launch of my case and the Korris report into the National Press. Who is carrying out this report and when will I be interviewed?
11. Remaining on the subject of reports and investigations. The Diocese of Winchester made a lot of noise about safeguarding and transparency and independent report, but as yet, no independent report that includes me has been arranged, unless it has been arranged without announcement, and as yet, I have not been contacted for interview. As all are aware, the Bishop has instigated investigations into Jane Fisher and the Deanery of Jersey's complaints against me, in the form of the Korris and Steel reports, but has not instigated any investigation into my complaints against the Jersey Deanery and Jane Fisher. Therefore this is an entirely unfair situation. When is the Bishop of Winchester or the Bishop of Dover going to arrange for a report into my complaints?
12. Can the Bishop explain exactly why he has effectively done a public, illegal and unjust investigation into me, and called it a safeguarding report? Can the Bishop explain how paradoxically destroying me while claiming it is in the interests of safeguarding makes sense? Can the Bishop explain why he has given a voice to my destroyers and unpheld them?
13 Can the Bishop explain why he had me illegally traced by the police on the claim that the diocese 'wanted to help me' after they had destroyed me, and he then went ahead in upholding the way the diocese had destroyed me, by threatening me, with the police and record that I would not have got if his clergy and safeguarding officer had not been doing wrong in the first place?
14. Can the Bishop of Winchester explain why, when he claims to consider Safeguarding is very important, why he has not dealt with Jane Fisher, his safeguarding director who has committed serious misconduct, and, as she is also a Reader in the Diocese of Winchester, why he has personally not dealt with complaints against her and left her to openly harass me, in the case of her illegally referring me to the NSPCC, illegally liasing about me, and her jeer of adding me on twitter last year, showing off that neither diocese nor police had dealt with he rmisconduct? And can the Bishop also explain how, as Jane Fisher is a reader, he has dealt with her conflict of interests in the 'Safeguarding complaint' as she is a reader alongside other readers in the Jersey Deanery, such as Ian LeMarquand and Neville Brookes and others who are close to my abuser? And can the Bishop explain why the formal complaints against Jane Fisher have not been dealt with and why after the complaints were made, she was allowed to continue to be involved in the Jersey Safeguarding matter? And why she refused to deal with the case of another vulnerable adult mistreated by the Church in Jersey, when she was in Jersey to illegally liase with the police over my case?
15. When is the Diocese of WInchester going to announce the conflicts of interest and coercions and abuses of power that rendered their 'visitation' and investigations in Jersey worthless? This includes connections between the Jersey Deanery and: Judiciary, Police, Masonic agreements, lawyers, advocates others involved in law, press and media workers, relatives and friends of the Dean, my abusers and the others listed here, other people not listed here. Unless the Diocese is quite open and blatant about these conflicts then they are neither being transparent nor honest, and if the Diocese do know these conflicts, then that again invalidates their 'investigations'.
16. What are the Diocese of Canterbury doing about the Jersey situation? Not a lot if Ashenden is anything to go by.
17. Did the Diocese of Winchester undertake this open public attack on me without foresight or was it deliberate? If the Bishop felt that he had the evidence on which to suspend the Dean, why did he then clear him before the Steel report was carried out, and thus defame me by anulling what had happened to me, and giving the press opportunity to attack me as discredited, why, if the Bishop re-instated the Dean, did he then proceed with the Steel report, having gone from suddenly suspending the Dean to suddenly clearing him? How did the evidence change from publicly suspending the Dean in the NAtional press, to clearing him? And why did the Steel report then occur when the Bishop had annulled his own actions, and why then has the Bishop not apologized to the Dean?
18. Why if the Dean was cleared, did he 'apologize' to no-one? Why did the feeble 'apology' never get sent to me by the Diocese? And why, when it was never sent to me, was it used as a 'trophy' on the Church website, after the Bishop cleared the Dean without even interviewing me?
19. Why, if the Korris report was inaccurate and thus you have cleared the Dean, have you not publicly annulled the Korris report and instead allowed me to continue being shamed and defamed by it? For example, in the Church (Times) Rag? Incidentally, why have you also allowed your clergy to libel and defame me in the same paper, where hundreds of clergy read their side of things and without my views added, one side of things gets heard and believed, and the same with the rest of the press slander. How, with these massive irregularities, can you claim that anything you have done is to do with safeguarding, and again, since you have cleared the Dean at my expense, why have you not apologized publicly to him for suspending him and publishing the Korris report? And why have you not apologized for me for the defamation and data protection breaches that have led to hate attacks and shunning of me? How is what you have done anything to do with safeguarding?!
20. Can the Bishop explain, in the context of the public display of abuse of power and ignorance of vulnerability and the effects of abuse shown by the typically wealthy and powerful Church members in response to the 'safeguarding reports' How the Bishop and Diocese have improved safeguarding through their actions, and how the Bishop and Dioceses have countered these ignorant, bigoted and narrow attitudes and educated these people on the subjects of poverty, vulnerability, disability and abuse? Especially notable church officers such as Philip Bailhache, Ian LeMarquand, Bruce Willings and other conflicted Church members? Can the Bishops publicly describe the work they and his dioceses have done in response to the open bigoted prejudiced and nasty attacks on me and on all abuse survivors and vulnerable people as a result of the Bishops unprecedented public attack on me and the Jersey Deanery through the Korris report?
21. Can the Bishops explain what action has been taken against the Clergy and Laity in the Jersey Deanery case for their ongoing misconduct as a result of the safeguarding report? And when there is to be a safeguarding investigation into my complaints, presumably leading to further appropriate action? And why a number of people involved in misconduct were actually promoted, as seems to be a generic action by the Church of England?
The next set of questions are the ones that I sent to Jan Korris in my open letter to her:
Here are some questions that you and other people need to ask the Bishop of Winchester:
1. Why did he have me traced and violated, illegally by the same police who his safeguarding officer had me destroyed with? Why he do that AFTER publishing the Korris report and not in order to offer me a chance to participate?
2. Why were my amendments and views not added if it was a genuine safeguarding effort? And why was the report left up, not amended, until I took the Bishop to court?
3. Why did the Bishop not release the Steel report to a court of law if it was a genuine report? Why and how was he able to wriggle out of it, and will he do so again as I continue action against him?
4. Why did the Bishop claim that the Steel report was ready for release in November 2013, and then claim that someone had made a legal bid against the report's release? How could someone have made a legal bid when no-one knew what was in the report? This claim by the Bishop led to further slurs on me, most notably Peter Ould claiming I couldn't have made the legal bid as I was not intelligent enough - Peter Ould being the Vicar who blogged about sex until recently and illegally involved himself in my case to the detriment of the church and slandered me and jeered at me openly with the church refusing to restrain him until I kept up a sustained complaint - good safeguarding?
5. So if someone made a bid against the Steel report, and the Bishop had to amend it, then the report was not going to be accurate anyway, so then the Bishop claimed to be preparing to release it, again, in May, and Bob Hill and I both took action. Why was the Bishop trying to release this report to the wrong official in Jersey though? Again, when there is an independent investigation, outside of the Church, these things need to be queried.
6. Why does the Bishop keep claiming to have 'safeguarding and legal experts looking at the report? Why does he need these people looking at the reports if it is a fair and balanced report? Why have they been looking at this report for a year and more without contacting me to include my views and amendments? Why has the Bishop not sent me a copy of the Steel report to comment on?
Who are these legal and safeguarding experts?
If they are within the Church of England then they are conflicted, if they are not within the church then they would not have waited over a year to contact me for my views or declare the report conflicted and unbalanced and inappropriate denigration of a lone vulnerable adult. The Bishop's solicitors seemed unaware of the situation when I contacted them about this, and there is no sign of an outside safeguarding panel viewing this report, because if this happened, then due to the nature of the conflicted Steel report and due to the material about the mess the Bishop has made of my case being widely available, the Bishop would already be in a lot of trouble over the Steel report.
Presumably when Luther-Pendragon tell the Bishop to say that the Steel report is being looked at by legal and safeguarding experts, they are referring to the conflicted Jane Fisher and Elizabeth Hall, and the Bishop's chaplain, who is a trained Barrister. Thus the general public are being mislead.
7. Why did the Bishop of Winchester allow conflicted Jane Fisher to illegally refer me to the NSPCC? Especially when he had said that there would be no further unsolicited intervention in my life? And when Jane Fisher had a formal complaint against her, which the Bishop, Elizabeth Hall, Paul Butler and the Church of England have still failed to deal with? How are they committed to safeguarding when they have failed to record, investigate or resolve my complaint?
8. Why am I being made to live in fear of and trying to survive, continued press attacks while the Bishop of Winchester continues to lie about the Steel report and leave me waiting to be destroyed by it? Will any amount of safeguarding experts and legal experts make it into a genuine report when the fact that they are involved, ficticiously or for real just says the Bishop only cares about his and the Diocese's legal safety, as I remain excluded?!
9. Now that you have read my questions, ask yourself, what happens to the voiceless vulnerable when the church can be this dishonest and this cruel to someone who has a certain amount of ability to write to the church in defence? what happens to the voiceless when the Church of England control what the press get to see and when the Church can subject someone to the damage they have subjected me to, and never be called to account?
http://opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-jan-korris-church-england-counsellor-and-author-korris-report
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/why-was-korris-published.html
This is the end of the first letter of Questions. But the Questions are exhaustive, and I am trying to live a normal life despite being under pressure from this matter, so I will leave it at that for the moment.
sincerely,
HG
Further Reading:
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/03/30/open-letter-to-jan-korris/
http://opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-jan-korris-church-england-counsellor-and-author-korris-report
http://opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jerseys-external-affairs-minister-sir-philip-bailhache
http://opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jersey-deanery-15-october-2013
http://opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-bishop-paul-butler-and-macsas
http://opnlttr.com/letter/i-woke-and-wrote-bishop-morning
http://opnlttr.com/letter/archbishop-canterbury
http://opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jane-fisher-and-bishop-tim-dakin-0
http://opnlttr.com/letter/second-open-letter-bishop-winchester
http://opnlttr.com/letter/1st-open-letter-bishop-winchester-0
http://opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-very-reverend-bob-key-dean-jersey
http://opnlttr.com/letter/jane-fisher-safeguarding-director-winchester-diocese
No.1 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/03/bob-key-and-jersey-way.html
No.2 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-jersey-establishment-closes-ranks.html
No.3 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/03/bob-key-support-and-recognised-formula.html
No.4 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/03/senator-philip-bailhache-letter-to.html
No.5 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/04/open-letter-to-bishop-of-winchester-tim.html
No.6 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/04/dean-reinstated-press-release-from.html
No.7 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/05/business-as-usualthe-jersey-way.html
No.8 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/05/philip-bailhache-independenceagenda.html
No.9 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/06/senator-philip-bailhache-grouville.html
No.10 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/10/3rd-anniversary-of-abuse-victims.html
No.11 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/11/jersey-dean-who-exonerated-him.html
No.12 http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.com/2013/12/exonerated.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-dean-bishop-and-good-shepherds-fact.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/the-dean-and-voice-in-wilderness.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/jerseys-dean-and-victims-tale.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/jerseys-dean-victory-or-climb-down.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/jerseys-dean-did-punishment-fit-crime.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/jerseys-dean-diocese-of-winchester.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/jerseys-dean-red-letter-day.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/jerseys-dean-meaningless-apologies.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/jerseys-dean-doubting-thomases.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/jerseys-dean-another-meaningless-apology.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/jerseys-dean-and-silly-season.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/jerseys-dean-laitys-jep-advert.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-dame-heather-saint-or.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-dame-heather-saint-or.html
More of Bob Hill's Blogs:
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-truth-whole-truth-or.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/jerseys-dean-unofficial-report-on.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/a-reflection-on-2013.html
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/jerseys-dean-press-release-no-peace-no.html
http://introducingjersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/shafting-jersey.html
http://introducingjersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/carry-on-jersey.html
THURSDAY, 14 MARCH 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/03/looking-from-distance.html
TUESDAY, 19 MARCH 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-cloud-of-witnesses-or-fog.html
THURSDAY, 21 MARCH 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/03/investigating-deportation.html
FRIDAY, 31 MAY 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/05/canons-to-left-of-them.html
THURSDAY, 6 JUNE 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/06/odds-and-ends.html
TUESDAY, 23 JULY 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/07/change-in-jersey-law-to-clamp-down-on.html
TUESDAY, 13 AUGUST 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/08/watching-from-sidelines.html
THURSDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-curious-incident-of-dog-on-early.html
WEDNESDAY, 4 DECEMBER 2013
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2013/12/jersey-and-winchester-view-from-guernsey.html
FRIDAY, 30 MAY 2014
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2014/05/stinking-bishop-and-wake-up-call.html
Sunday, 22 March 2015
Gavin Ashenden
Well, Gavin Ashenden is performing in the spotlight again.
He is apparently in the National press with his recent opinion on Islam.
I know he reads my blog, usually from the safety of Yemen or Normandy, but I know he won't mind me blogging about him, as he is never averse to maligning me or hurting other people's feelings.
Some peaople might expect me to write an open letter, about how he shouldn't be telling Muslims how to live when he hasn't worked out what Christianity is all about yet, But actually, he can make enough of a fool of himself and the church without my help.
Peacekeeper from Yemen, trouble stirrer from Jersey.
Do you remember Pepper Anne?
'...He's his own biggest fan...
Ashenden, Ashenden'
Here is the recent Story of Ashenden and Islam, as told by a Jersey Blogger:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/httpwww.html
Afterthought on Islam from me.
I do not like the way the media are playing up these stories of young people being radicalised. It is scaremongering. The Churchwarden's wife used to include in her daily fears that we were going to taken over by Muslims and it would be awful for us women.
I used to live among Muslims. They were peaceful, respectful and had good senses of humour, their beliefs lead them to have a set of ethics, something that Catholics and Buddhists have but the Church of England lacks.
Gavin Ashenden saw an advert in the church rag (Times) and it said 'Come and work where clergy discipline cannot reach you! Golden sand, corruption, old boys and favours in kind'.
So he went to work in Jersey.
It is a puzzle then why he is trying to take over in Normandy!
He is apparently in the National press with his recent opinion on Islam.
I know he reads my blog, usually from the safety of Yemen or Normandy, but I know he won't mind me blogging about him, as he is never averse to maligning me or hurting other people's feelings.
Some peaople might expect me to write an open letter, about how he shouldn't be telling Muslims how to live when he hasn't worked out what Christianity is all about yet, But actually, he can make enough of a fool of himself and the church without my help.
Peacekeeper from Yemen, trouble stirrer from Jersey.
Do you remember Pepper Anne?
'...He's his own biggest fan...
Ashenden, Ashenden'
Here is the recent Story of Ashenden and Islam, as told by a Jersey Blogger:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/httpwww.html
Afterthought on Islam from me.
I do not like the way the media are playing up these stories of young people being radicalised. It is scaremongering. The Churchwarden's wife used to include in her daily fears that we were going to taken over by Muslims and it would be awful for us women.
I used to live among Muslims. They were peaceful, respectful and had good senses of humour, their beliefs lead them to have a set of ethics, something that Catholics and Buddhists have but the Church of England lacks.
Gavin Ashenden saw an advert in the church rag (Times) and it said 'Come and work where clergy discipline cannot reach you! Golden sand, corruption, old boys and favours in kind'.
So he went to work in Jersey.
It is a puzzle then why he is trying to take over in Normandy!
Wednesday, 25 February 2015
Accidentally discovered the Deanery of Jersey's anthem while I was out...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EprQGmZ3Imw
And the Dean hasn't responded to my move back to Jersey tomorrow...
For some reason everyone is landing on my blog searching for Ashenden. Sorry, he isn't here, I fumigated. What exactly has he been spouting or whimpering in the JEP now? Is he back from salmon fishing in Yemen and adding the Yemen flag to my blog stats?
And the Dean hasn't responded to my move back to Jersey tomorrow...
For some reason everyone is landing on my blog searching for Ashenden. Sorry, he isn't here, I fumigated. What exactly has he been spouting or whimpering in the JEP now? Is he back from salmon fishing in Yemen and adding the Yemen flag to my blog stats?
Monday, 26 January 2015
Ashenden (my biggest fan) and his group of thugs on BBC Jersey this morning, demanding 'their report' were described to me as...
It's good when we can get a laugh out of something so lacking in amusement in reality.
What a terrible thing when people who call themselves Christians and run churches can behave so arrogantly, and most non-believers behave better than Ashenden's band, and of course non believer's don't have a corporation like the CofE in which to abuse their power.
It is time the world heard about this 'report' written by Ashenden and Birt and Bailhache, it is time the world really heard about Jersey and this ultimate power at the expense of the poor and vulnerable and victims.
Excuse me if I repeat myself.
It's good when we can get a laugh out of something so lacking in amusement in reality.
What a terrible thing when people who call themselves Christians and run churches can behave so arrogantly, and most non-believers behave better than Ashenden's band, and of course non believer's don't have a corporation like the CofE in which to abuse their power.
It is time the world heard about this 'report' written by Ashenden and Birt and Bailhache, it is time the world really heard about Jersey and this ultimate power at the expense of the poor and vulnerable and victims. The report doesn't need to be published, it is a conflicted whitewash, and the arrogance of these people who wrote it, in fighting for it to be published is unbelievable, they already know it unjustly clears wrongdoers and completely omits my story, the fact that they got away with hijacking the whole matter and clearing the Dean is unbelievable and now claiming their push for the report is Christian is doubly unbelievable.
When is their Bishop going to step in and stop them making fools of themselves.
Well, he appears to be in agreement with their behaviour, so maybe never.
Ashenden, the specialist 'peace-maker'
Nice to see Ashenden still keenly reading my blog from the Middle East, where he is probably stirring trouble there as he does in Jersey and Normandy as well as doing his usual effort to get acclaim for himself and build his ego.
He is the face of the Church of England, a cold-hearted and dishonest troublemaker, who damages the vulnerable and has abused his power in order to harm me and protect a wrongdoer, and yet the Church see fit to let him wear a dog collar as he continues his charade and his harm.
But he is only a small part of the massive wrongdoing, a small part, yes, I have heard that too, which is probably why he has to be so nasty and unChristian.
Funnily enough, this Jersey blog is timely, and funny:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/a-restored-palimpsest-of-4th-century.html
Ashenden has been trying to force himself into a position in the Diocese of Normandy, hurting people there and behaving very badly, after behaving very badly in Jersey. It is very funny that he is now showing off as 'peace envoy to the middle East' and showing up on my blog feed from there for some unknown reason tonight, well, not so unknown, his efforts to get the Steel report published, the reoprt that he contributed, helped to co-ordinate to without ever having met me while I was not included in the Steel report, that is why he is reading my blog, because of my reaction?
He reads my blog, I can count Ashenden as a fan, a regular reader, who avidly logs in while others in the Jersey Deanery distain it :) He runs on a firefox and Vista feed.
Yes, there are still safeguarding issues in Jersey, Ashenden is one of them, with his cold and unacceptable behaviour, his public shows of trying to exorcise the mentally ill, his mysogany, his bullying, his lack of people skills, his dishonesty his deplorable behaviour in the Dean of Jersey's case. It is hilarious that he is in the Middle East, maybe they can keep him?
Those who don't know it, he is a lawyer who wears a dog collar, and he used to be chaplain to the Queen, and he doesn't do well as a Parish priest anywhere as he is not a people person but thinks very highly of himself, far more highly than everyone else thinks of him.
Here is the letter that made him whimper about the Bishop owing me and the Dean of Jersey and apology in 2013, after he himself had behaved outrageously to me, slandering me on BBC Jersey:
http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-letter-to-jersey-deanery-as.html#.VMWuRtKsXqc
And here is Bob's illustrated version of it:
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-hgs-guest-posting-open.html
I think it is time that the Diocese of Dover dealt with all the safeguarding issues, including Gavin Ashenden, and if Bishop Willmott can't face actually doing anything about the Channel Islands situation, as appears to be the case, then he needs to hand it over to someone who can. Because, hey, I am not counsellor to the poor Diocese of Normandy who he has been trying to burden with his arrogant presence and I am tired of hearing their dismay as he marches in with his nose in the air.
The Church of England really aren't representative of Christianity any more. Ashenden is a real marker of that.
He is the face of the Church of England, a cold-hearted and dishonest troublemaker, who damages the vulnerable and has abused his power in order to harm me and protect a wrongdoer, and yet the Church see fit to let him wear a dog collar as he continues his charade and his harm.
But he is only a small part of the massive wrongdoing, a small part, yes, I have heard that too, which is probably why he has to be so nasty and unChristian.
Funnily enough, this Jersey blog is timely, and funny:
http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/a-restored-palimpsest-of-4th-century.html
Ashenden has been trying to force himself into a position in the Diocese of Normandy, hurting people there and behaving very badly, after behaving very badly in Jersey. It is very funny that he is now showing off as 'peace envoy to the middle East' and showing up on my blog feed from there for some unknown reason tonight, well, not so unknown, his efforts to get the Steel report published, the reoprt that he contributed, helped to co-ordinate to without ever having met me while I was not included in the Steel report, that is why he is reading my blog, because of my reaction?
He reads my blog, I can count Ashenden as a fan, a regular reader, who avidly logs in while others in the Jersey Deanery distain it :) He runs on a firefox and Vista feed.
Yes, there are still safeguarding issues in Jersey, Ashenden is one of them, with his cold and unacceptable behaviour, his public shows of trying to exorcise the mentally ill, his mysogany, his bullying, his lack of people skills, his dishonesty his deplorable behaviour in the Dean of Jersey's case. It is hilarious that he is in the Middle East, maybe they can keep him?
Those who don't know it, he is a lawyer who wears a dog collar, and he used to be chaplain to the Queen, and he doesn't do well as a Parish priest anywhere as he is not a people person but thinks very highly of himself, far more highly than everyone else thinks of him.
Here is the letter that made him whimper about the Bishop owing me and the Dean of Jersey and apology in 2013, after he himself had behaved outrageously to me, slandering me on BBC Jersey:
http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-letter-to-jersey-deanery-as.html#.VMWuRtKsXqc
And here is Bob's illustrated version of it:
http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jerseys-dean-hgs-guest-posting-open.html
I think it is time that the Diocese of Dover dealt with all the safeguarding issues, including Gavin Ashenden, and if Bishop Willmott can't face actually doing anything about the Channel Islands situation, as appears to be the case, then he needs to hand it over to someone who can. Because, hey, I am not counsellor to the poor Diocese of Normandy who he has been trying to burden with his arrogant presence and I am tired of hearing their dismay as he marches in with his nose in the air.
The Church of England really aren't representative of Christianity any more. Ashenden is a real marker of that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)