All sounds familiar in the text box...

I presume that was Hannah, she has spoken to me on the phone and she seems helpless to do anything as we suffer and Tilby, Murray and Venables coldly fob us off, put the phone down and refuse to act on the open wrongdoing in the Church.

The Church are afraid of losing their currency -schools, which is why they have this double-faced safeguarding fakery and failure (The anon tweeter has mentioned this before, and I am glad he seems to be pulling it off)

A letter to the Archbishop and Bishops regarding abuse and cover up.

cc National 'Safeguarding' Team and IICSA

10/01/2017

Dear Bishops Willmott and Dakin and Archbishop Welby,

I enclose the reminder of the formal complaint sent to Bishop Willmott last year, unfortunately he decided to try and fob me off through his secretary, adding to his image of dishonesty, deceit and cowardice.

Please make sure that both my formal complaint against the behaviour of yourselves and the Godless, evil and criminal Jersey Deanery are now either addressed or passed to a competent safeguarding body, as it is clear from the pronouncements without evidence of the Archbishop and Bishop about safeguarding in Jersey being good, while I was being destroyed, that neither the Archbishop nor Bishop have the faintest clue what safeguarding is.

That is reinforced by the fact that the Archbishop and Bishops themselves have led a public attack on my character through a million pounds worth of criminal and illegal whitewashes slurring me and covering up for wrongdoers. If you consider safeguarding to be good when you have been effectively forcing me to my death and branding me publicly for the abusers who you have openly aided and upheld in harming me. Then at very least you don't know what safeguarding is.

You met with and condoned the powerful criminals from Jersey and spoke with them on the phone and allowed them to condemn me in the press and media, you provided legal and PR help for yourselves, and you never met with me, spoken to me (apart from the Bishop of Winchester threatening me) or provided me with legal or PR help as you destroyed me publicly while I was voiceless. 

So how is safeguarding good in the Church of England? Are you going to answer? Are you going to answer the person who you have scourged and crucified publicly?

You spent a million pounds glorifying yourselves at my expense and upholding each and every wrongdoer and abuser and branding me publicly for life, flinging your and their version of my personal life all over the press and all over the world. You made it clear you condone abuse and will always protect abusers and wrongdoers. Do you really believe this is safeguarding?

Now, where is the million pounds for an investigation into what happened to ME? And also into the illegally accessed records of the whitewash.

If you continue to refuse to take responsibility for your actions and the severe, life-limiting and permanent harm to me, then each one of you must step down.

Even if you genuinely believed the Dean to be innocent of wrongdoing, you had no right to turn the matter into a discrediting press stunt at my expense, having never met me or heard my side and having only listened to the money and power of the powerful circle of lawyers and dignitaries surrounding the Dean. Including those who illegally accessed and tampered with already inaccurate police and other records.

What you should have been doing rather than destroying me for the sake of the Church's image, was holding these men, including the Dean, to account for their Godless and criminal behaviour instead of adding and to it and including your own Godless and criminal behaviour.

The Dean of Jersey, without remorse or any sort of reprimand for his serious criminal and dangerous actions, especially in conjunction with his circle over the past four years, is to go on to positions where he will remain a danger to the vulnerable, and you have lauded and upheld him, so tell me how safeguarding in the Church of England is good?

You nearly ended my destroyed and shattered life with your public attack on me and upholding of wrongdoers and I remain in utter anguish and waiting for death. Obviously from your onslaught without mercy, you have made it clear that you want me dead, and indeed it would be best, because I couldn't recover from the previous harm to me, the last four years is something that no human being could come back from, no human being, be they whole or crippled. No-one could survive what you have done to me. You have utterly condemned me.

So, why have you received my requests for you to pay for my attendance at Dignitas to be humanely put to sleep, and not answered them?

 You had a million pounds to pay for glorifying yourselves at my expense and publicly destroying me, you had that money to pay for cover-up of your wicked and criminal actions against me, and you are reluctant to pay a few thousand for me to fly to Switzerland to be killed, after your sustained efforts left me shattered beyond healing but still unable to die? 

Please explain this. No-one can deny that your efforts at publicly vilifying me and spewing your version of my life into your complicit press could be anything other than a constructive murder, and in fairness I should now have been dead for three years, but sadly for you I am not, and I have offered you a solution for your failed murder, because I am never going to heal.

 A mutual solution would be dignitas, and it would be better than having to endure another Christmas ruined by Justin Welby, the man who destroyed me, trotting out another load of vain and empty lies written for him at Christmas, waffling the vain empty cliches about the poor and homeless while his victim, in poverty and anguish and having endured three years sleeping rough because of his church, goes on suffering.

Jesus Wept. Justin the Narcissist must be silent eventually, surely?

The things that strangers said about me and the lies that your criminal clergy and laity have broadcast in the press and media, leading to hate attacks and threats against me while I was voiceless and jeered at when I even tried to answer this hatred, will never heal and can never be justified by you as anything but your wish for my death in shame and brokenness, as has nearly occured and will eventually occur.

Please make sure that there is an independent investigation into all of what has happened to me, make sure it includes me and my voice, from my books if I am dead by the time it occurs, I have written my books to ensure that I am heard in death if not in life.

Make sure that your collective actions of the past four years is stringently and completely investigated.

This includes investigation into the Steel report being continued when she was chosen by and acting for, the Jersey Deanery, why she was not withdrawn when requested, with evidence of her confliction, why the Korris report was published and labelled independent when it wasn't and why Korris broke the law and why her report was not withdrawn until I took the Bishop to court. 

Also why the Bishop kept on and on discrediting me over the Steel report, claiming to withold it for my welfare when he had not sent me a copy, but was basically telling the general public that the report was genuine and I was in the wrong. 

Claiming to care about my welfare as he and the Archbishop nearly caused my suicide and he told the general public he was feeding the conflicted lies of Steel into the conflicted Gladwin report was an act of evil. My consent for that has not been granted. I have not agreed.

The Bishop failed to tell the general public that I was forced to take him to court to save my life, he failed to tell the general public that he was supposed to make sure I agreed with the content of the Steel report before it was released. He failed to ever send me a copy of the Steel report.

None of this matter has been about safeguarding, or protecting the vulnerable, or anything meriting a million pound waste of trusting congregants' money. The outcome for me has repeatedly been near death, it has been permanent and very severe harm to my health and a lifetime of being branded that makes me long for death. There is no recovery from the kind of hatred from strangers, threats and lies that have been broadcast, none at all.

And to make it worse, the whitewash by Jersey Safeguarding partnership, cooked up by the intermeshed States, police and Deanery and used by the church to harm me further, And then the use of the 'National Safeguarding Team' to try to sweep up the pieces and cover it up, rubbing my raw wounds with sandpaper while refusing to do anything about any of your collective criminal and dangerous harm to me.

They are still refusing to act, because apparently you have 'advised' them not to, and they are employed by the Archbishop and his council, presumably to cover up while duping vulnerable victims by whining about caring about them and learning from them, as Jane Dodds did with me. I was already in enough anguish and suffering in a way that will never now relent, I didn't need that insult to injury that was the National Safeguarding Team.

 And I am continuing and will continue, to ask them to act upon your serious and criminal safeguarding failures that should have led to you collectively being removed, and one day someone will see my emails and letters to them and ask them why they didn't act.

That is evil, it is wickedness, and it beggars belief that instead of resigning, You remain, still a risk to the vulnerable and after committing such evil.

Either the Church has no clue what safeguarding means or you men should resign. As long as you stay, after taking part in such evil and refuse to take responsibility for yourselves, you know that your church isn't safeguarding anyone and isn't anything to do with God.

You completely lack integrity and you compound that by making false claims and misleading the general public while upholding dangerous men in your church and leaving me destroyed.

I have a formal complaint. It starts with abuse when I was 19 and runs to the present day, it comprises of lack of safeguarding, sexual, physical and emotional abuse, slander, illegal actions, abuse of power over the press, false claims about safeguarding, very serious harm to me, me being exposed to hatred and slander, police brutality and intrusions, homelessness and imprisonment because of your safeguarding failures, it is exhaustive, it contains a list of people's names already sent to you. I have had no adequate response. I am waiting, I am suffering.

The longer you leave it, the worse your failure in safeguarding becomes.

I will be producing and publishing a report about the National Safeguarding Team's part of this, which will be sent to the CSA inquiry no matter whether you can or cannot bribe them. But you do need to call an overarching investigation into my case, and every day that you ignore that, you harm me. While you don't safeguard, the risk of abuse is high.

The Archbishop's lack of understanding of safeguarding led to him claiming that safeguarding in Jersey is good, he appears to mistake a prolonged and power-abusive smear and discrediting campaign using the press and media against a vulnerable adult by his clergy as 'Good safeguarding'.

 Obviously his lack of understanding of safeguarding is so serious that it is a risk to vulnerable lives, he certainly nearly caused my death and until and unless that is dealt with properly, then there is a serious safeguarding breach, worse even, a complicit act of cover-up carried out by Bishop Willmott and Archbishop Welby.

And again, if most vulnerable adults are more voiceless than me, how many are being killed this way, and with the blessing of the National Safeguarding Team, who yatter lies and rubbish at the victims to try and placate them as the victims commit suicide.

If the National Safeguarding Team, who are well aware of the wrong in this matter and have said as much to me before being gagged when it was realised that I couldn't be duped and silenced, do not arrange for the resignations of the the Bishops and Archbishop over their serious harm to me, then a court or inquiry must do so, and the National Safeguarding Team should also resign.

 They are following up their failure by allowing the Dean to 'resign' lauded and honoured, again at my expense while I endure a re-awakening of the threats and attacks on me over this, some people are fooled by this resignation and the Archbishop and Bath and Wells employing that criminal, but not all.

The Archbishop claims that the Dean is a 'Godly Man', really? Has the Archbishop ever read a Bible? Didn't I send him one the other year as he continued to uphold the harm to me relentlessly? Does deceit and lies and hiding behind people of power and lawyers constitute Godly? Oh yes,  because the Archbishop does it too.

Does destroying someone the way the Dean has destroyed me count as Godly? Maybe someone switched the Archbishop's Bible for a Satanism Manual. Because what the Archbishop himself has done is evil.

There is no God or Christianity or integrity or good or safeguarding in what the Archbishop and Bishops and Archbishop's Council have done in destroying, threatening and publicly ruining me. I was already destroyed before the public attack on me was launched and I have suffered without relief while a million pounds was spent on the church's image, lawyers, PR firms, press releases and four whitewashes that are nothing to do with what happened to me.

It is time for you Godless and terrible cowards to step down. Do a lie like the Dean's 'Resignation', do it any way you want, but before you go, make sure that there is an overarching inquiry and also that Peter Ould and Gavin Ashenden who continue to attack the vulnerable unafraid, because in the Archbishop's eyes that is good safeguarding and Godly behaviour, are removed, along with Elaine Rose and all staff and clergy who have harmed me.

The Church currently don't safeguard, because they mistake safeguarding for image and segregation to protect the church. How can the comfortable middle class know what safeguarding means when they don't understand vulnerability or suffering, to the extent that they have an apartheid against the vulnerable to protect themselves?

All the high profile employment of 'people from social care backgrounds' does not remove the apartheid or the fact that these new employees are not allowed to actually safeguard because the church must be protected first.

The horrifying behaviour of Dodds, Tilby and Murray in my case, thinking they could mislead me after allowing the Bishop and Archbishop to destroy me publicly and then gag it all, is all the proof you need of that.

Make sure that I receive my copy of the Steel report as requested, you have no excuse whatsoever to withold it, and make sure any agency asking for a copy if they are concerned for my welfare, are given a copy of it, and also do not lie to any agency about being in contact with me, trying to include me in reports or trying to help me.

Please send a copy of the Steel report to the IICSA and explain to them that this is how you classify an independent safeguarding report, a report carried out by a member of the conflicted inner circle of Jersey's States, Judiciary, lawyers and Town Church who protected the Dean and destroyed me.

Let me just remind you of the blog that Bob Hill created just before he collapsed while defending me from hate attacks instigated by your Steel whitewash and the conflicted circle's need to have it published and snuff out my life with their hatred in the form of a report. Your million pound safeguarding failure and cover up cost this man his life.

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/jerseys-dean-letter-to-archbishop-of.html

Your pretences of care for my welfare while you destroyed me were the same as a rapist telling his victim he loved them as he raped them. Despicable and inexcusable,  you can't cold-bloodedly destroy someone and pretend to care about them for the sake of PR, it is despicable.

And do you really think you can excuse yourselves based on what you have heard about me? It beggars belief.  You've never met me. You must resign.

sincerely,

HG/JJ -  Church of England safeguarding failure victim.

The Dean, in response to so many questions

Dear Peeps,

The stats are up because of the Dean's 'Resignation'. Just as the stats went up when in the summer the Archbishop and Bishop smeared me and upheld the Dean earlier this year. More death threats, hate attacks and lies against me always result from these one-sided press shows.

The Dean, as you know, has had the freehold of the Deanery and would have stayed until retirement, but was made to step down. The big show in the press and the resulting troll attacks on me are to do with the same thing as the Bishop and Archbishop upholding the Dean and his engineered Steel report earlier this year.
It is all catastrophic dishonesty and safeguarding failure, cover up and show, because the Church's image matters more than anything else.

The Dean and his wife jeered at me that they had freehold of the Deanery and would remain until retirement, in the same conversation with me where they called me evil and tried to use one-sided accounts of abuse and harm I had suffered in the past against me. This conversation was not recorded or dealt with by Jane Fisher and was blatantly lied about in court where I had no voice.

In 11 years has Jersey become more Christian, less unequal, more honest or kind or Christian? No, from what I have seen of Stuart and Trevor and Shona being destroyed and the terrible behaviour of the Bailhache Brothers and others. The Dean has achieved nothing for his free house and massive salary, and he is a danger to the vulnerable through his dishonesty and his acts of destroying a vulnerable adult to save his own skin. It is astounding that the Church are upholding him and giving him other positions where he will be a safeguarding risk, after they spent a million pounds covering up for him and destroying me.

No lessons have been learned. The Church of England with their loud noise and hot air about safeguarding and habit of employing people 'from a social care background' to create an image but not good safeguarding, is as dishonest and corrupt as it always was.

There still needs to be an independent review into my case and why I have been publicly destroyed, and the church are still hiding behind lawyers and insurers and even if they were to be forced to allow a review, they would choose a conflicted person and call them independent, no lessons have been learned. The complicit press print whatever the church say, and have told me so, and my side is only printed in distorted snippets.

The Church need to be audited by the government, and use of the press and media for the Church's own ends needs to be investigated and regulated.
No lessons have been learned. The million pound Jersey farce is a disgrace that the Church can't even find the grace or Christianity to take responsibility for.
The Dean is upheld and there is no safeguarding in the Church.

But once the Dean returns to the UK, taking legal action against him will be much simpler. I hate trying to deal with paperwork for two different countries.

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-very-reverend-bob-key-dean-jersey

Bastards

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/21/church-of-england-warned-bishops-not-to-apologise-too-fully-to-s/

Bastards

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/21/church-of-england-warned-bishops-not-to-apologise-too-fully-to-s/

Bastards

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/21/church-of-england-warned-bishops-not-to-apologise-too-fully-to-s/

Safeguarding Failures

Formal complaint against Jane Dodds And Graham Tilby for re-abusing and distressing and already severely distressed and destroyed vulnerable adult.  Serious Formal complaint of harm and abuse by the Church of England and unchecked public abuse and harm by the Archbishop of Canterbury and Bishop of Winchester

Dear recipients, 

Please could all recipients who are not members of the Church of England make sure this email is sent to any authority with the power to intervene and safeguard. A vulnerable adult's life is at severe, genuine and ongoing risk at the hands of the Church of England, and this is being compounded by Jane Dodds and Graham Tilby, Safeguarding Directors of the church of england who are effectively condoning and compounding abuse and harm, trivilaising and excusing it and have refused to act to protect me and have watched as yet another one-sided Church abuse of the press has smeared, discredited and destroyed me, leaving me homeless, destitute and in collapse yet again. Three years of this is too much and too serious, no-one can go on standing by now.

I do not want contact from Jane Dodds, who is acting on behalf the seriously compromised  Bishop of Winchester and is causing me inordinate harm and distress while playing her part in yet another cover up after yet another public and press attack on my character and public discrediting of me. I refuse to meet with these people who have harmed me, and Dodds as well as trivialising the very serious and prolonged harm to me and refusing to act on it, is trying to force a meeting on me on behalf of the Bishop, further explained later in the email/letter/blog post and is trying to force intervention on me, violating me and undermining me. I am barely able to stay on my feet after the latest onslaught by the press over the whitewash of the abuse case, and Dodds is compounding a very serious situation.

Jane Dodds and her  upholding and taking part in  the most recent murderous attack on me is increasing the catastrophic damage from which I really don't think I can recover anyway.

Let me dispel a few myths in an email that will be sent to the courts in the event of my death or otherwise.

Each pre-meditated and deceitful press release by the Bishop and Archbishop is a serious safeguarding failure with no thought for my welfare whatsoever, indeed the Bishop and Archbishop are well aware that it harms me, and they do not arrange for my side to be heard, indeed they send what they like to the press and media, who use the name of the church and publish the press releases without question or investigation, the press and media attack me, the press and media ignore what I have to say and allow and even encourage attacks on me by strangers, as seen last year when Bob collapsed with the stress of trying to defend me, the lies and attacks are evidenced.

 The Archbishop and Bishop not only continue this persistent and relentless pattern of attack knowing very well what it is doing to me, but they have continued after costing Bob Hill his life, with no apology and no redaction, no attempt to ensure that my side is included. Total and utter disregard for both safeguarding and human life and welfare.  Presumably Dodds thinks she can excuse this not only to me but also to a court of law? And then can she explain why She and Graham Tibly ignore the attacks and their effects when they are a very very serious safeguarding failure, and why did neither she nor Graham Dodds responded to the attack on me and Bob Hill last year and didn't respond to ANYTHING sent to them until the Bishop of Winchester started intimidating me with fake apologies and bombarding me with emails and continuing to IGNORE MY REQUESTS FOR HIM TO STOP, JUST AS HE HAS IGNORED ALL WARNINGS TO STOP HARASSING AND HARMING ME, and then he went ahead with his press attack in conjunction with the Archbishop. 

I took the Bishop of Winchester to court in 2014 as he continued to discredit me with claims that the conflicted Steel report that he intended to publish at my expense and without my views 'would harm me' he failed to add to the press and media that Steel was conflicted and her report, just as Korris's, didn't include my story at all, both reports were whitewash coverups and Tilby and Dodds have failed to act either on these whitewashes or the press onslaught, the Bishop and Archbishop have publicly repeated their discrediting of me with Tilby and Dodds compliant.  Dodds has started a very see-through series of chummy and frothy emails to me, excusing the church and trying to force a meeting on me. She has to make sure this formal complaint against herself and Tilby is actioned and the proceedings to remove the Bishop of Winchester and Archbishop of Canterbury are from positions where they can abuse their power and destroy a vulnerable adult are dealt with first first. The evidence is there, a lot of it, so there is no excuse for this to be ignored any more.

Dodds does not need to contact me in order to deal with the above serious safeguarding failures, but obviously she has no intention of ever dealing with them. Now lets look at her emails in context of court evidence. Do you think her whimpering defence of the church will in any way be credible when she has refused to take immediate and serious action against the Archbishop and Bishop's serious safeguarding failures over the past three years? No, she will be seen and a loopy airy-fairy cover-up merchant, especially when three years of the press and media releases are presented to the court. 'What do you mean the church meant well?!' The church meant well in needlessly attacking a vulnerable adult in public and unchecked and knowing very well the distress they were causing? The church meant well in very serious discrediting and defamation and misleading of the general public? 

The church meant well in knowingly launching a prolonged and unchecked hate attack which no authority dares to challenge? This Dodds should resign immediately, why is she still there? There will be no safeguarding in the Church until Police, Social services, safeguarding agencies and other support agencies stand up to the Church of England solidly and without fear of reprisal. Why should one vulnerable adult who is likely to be driven to death, have to fight for her life for years on end because no agency will override the lies of the Church of the danger or standing up to an all-powerful and very dangerous and corrupt organization? Does it really have to take my death to end this terrible dictatorship? It won't be long now if so, because I simply cannot go on withstanding this, and what Dodd's has done in excusing the church is a jeer at someone who is crawling to their grave.

What about the safety of Children and the voiceless vulnerable when the church allow me to be attacked in the street by making me recognizable in their smear and discrediting campaign in the press?

There have been no apologies for the press and media attack and trolling and hate comments, there have been no apologies for the very very serious impact on my life, and Dodds may be able to froth and soft-soap and lie, but she is unable to come up with a credible excuse for the safeguarding board standing by and allowing this attack on me when I remain weak from the very serious prolonged attack last year that felled Bob Hill as he fought to defend me, and also weak from the following event of my best friend, a pillar of support, dying very quickly from an aggressive cancer.

What the Archbishop and Bishop have done in publicly discrediting me for three years in one-sided whitewash investigations and press releases and resulting smears of me is they have abused me, and they have abused me openly and knowingly, they have allowed me to be named and recognised within communities and have followed that up by having me traced and forced upon. This is ABUSE.

And while Jane Dodds has no reason whatsoever to go on and on acting on behalf of the Bishop and Archbishop as she is doing in contacting me on behalf of the Bishop, being deceitful and trying to change reality into more deceit and cover-up, she is obliged to stop lying and faking about what has happened and treat the Archbishop and Bishop's actions as abuse and act accordingly. It needs to be passed to an outside agency as Dodds and Tilby are showing open and blatant failure and bias.

You remember Jane Fisher, the deceitful and abusive safeguarding director who destroyed me? Dodds is carrying on the tradition. Apparently she thinks she can claim that no hurt was meant. You do not publicly attack and destroy someone and go on and on and on and on doing it as the Bishop and Archbishop have, and claim that no hurt was intended. You do not ever launch an attack on a vulnerable person in the press and then persist for over three years while they remain voiceless and suffering anguish, you simply do not, it is abuse, it is pre-meditated, and in the case of the Bishop and Archbishop, it started with a sham pretence of safeguarding and geared up into their self-defence as they clashed with some of the most powerful people in the world, the thugs that run Jersey, no thought for me or my welfare has been in evidence as the press releases and whitewash reports have continued to be upheld, made to look credible, fought over at my expense, and what have the safeguarding team done throughout this, and most notably during the recent attack? Nothing, although the recent attack has involved Jane Dodds liasing with the Bishop of Winchester as he proceeded with the press attack after ignoring my screams for him to stop contacting me.

The Bishop should not be contacting me at all except through a solicitor after I took him to court and especially not when I scream at him to leave me alone, so Jane Dodds is even more of a safeguarding failure to allow and uphold this.

An analogy I used to often use with Jane Fisher was: When you are destroying someone and you pretend to care as you do it, it is like a rapist trying to tell their victim that they love them and want to be their friend while raping them.

And remember, I can say that from experience, because as you know, Jane Fisher helped to leave me homeless on the streets with no access to the police due to her and the Bishop making me out to be mad and bad, so I couldn't report rape and believe me, none of those men were my friend or cared or worried about hurting me, and the archbishop and Bishop have no more concern for me than those men did, the Archbishop and Bishop, the same as those rapists(as well as being responsible for the rapes), know exactly what they are doing and how much harm they are doing, but their need to save their own skins means that a voiceless vulnerable adult is the weakest link, and even if they snuff me out, their priority is themselves. And do keep this email for that day, that day when Graham Tilby and Jane Dodds allow the next press attack, the one that kills me, and Dodds whitters about 'how no one meant to hurt me'. She isn't fit to be in safeguarding, but that is alright because she isn't really, she is covering up for abusers such as the Bishop and Archbishop.

There has been no apology or redaction from the Bishop or Archbishop, obviously the fake apologies come before press attacks and not after. The Safeguarding team have not issued an apology for allowing me to be attacked or an explanation of the following:

Why have there been only one-sided reports and press releases with no provision for me?

Why hasn't the independent report that I have asked for for years occured?

Why have the church not taken responsibility for forcing me into rough sleeping and actively preventing me from being housed and forcing me to flee through Fisher and Scott-Joynt's illegal violations of homeless services I tried to access and defamation of me whilst they also had me destroyed by the police for my objection to their interventions?

Why do safeguarding continue to allow the Bishop and Archbishop to abuse me?

How on God's earth can Tilby and  Dodds try to excuse the attacks that are killing me and allow them to continue?

How can Dodds or Tilby even delude themselves that there is any safeguarding after the way I have been publicly crucified?

Why is Dodds contacting me to whitter and whitewash instead of dealing with this very serious safeguarding failure, that she and Tilby are now openly party to?

Why is Dodds contacting me when she knows I know she is acting for an abuser, the Bishop of Winchester and she has enough evidence to launch an inquiry without contact?

Misleading the general public seriously and persistently through the press is a serious safeguarding failure, and Welby, with no shame at all, has gone on to throw tantrums and be pathetic in the spotlight over the Europe referendum, which is none of the church's business, but my narcissistic abuser, Justin Welby is desparate for attention.

Dodds already has this evidence, why has she not acted as an emergency?: The Bishop of Winchester has never met me and refused to, but lied to the press and media, implying that he had. He has persistently and relentlessly used the press and media for his own personal version of events ever since he showed very very serious disregard for safeguarding by launching my case into the press, he then stood by and let me be publicly destroyed, allowing the press and media and thus total strangers to attack me, he allowed members of the Jersey Deanery to print horrifyingly untrue and defamatory letters about me in the JEP and Church Times while my responses were ignored, and despite my complaints that became cries of anguish, he did nothing, well actually he threatened me for contacting him in anguish. The press and media attack has continued relentlessly and every time I have tried to get back on my feet, the attack has recurred. Don't you think Jane Dodds is not fit for her job when she tries to whitewash this reality out of the picture? Because this is cold hard and evidenced reality. 'The Church didn't mean to hurt me'? What is Dodds, a teenager sent for work experience by the jobcentre? Definitely not fit to be working with someone who is at risk for harm if she can excuse it like that! 

The Bishop has for three years, given powerful and connected wrongdoers a voice and left me silenced and condemned and feeling unable to believe in myself, I suffer 24 hours a day, with a lifetime of hurt publicly used to brand me, with the ignorance of the church to disability, vulnerability, dependence and poverty and the way abusers work compounding this. To the point now where the damage is so severe that I have lost my home and work and university and my body and mind are trying to shut down because the damage is so bad. Think about the people in concentration camps who didn't have family outside the camp as a reason to go on living and keep their identity for, in the end they couldn't persuade their minds and bodies to go on, and I am getting to that point after fighting for my life and rights against a so-called 'Christian' Church for so long.

I think Jane Dodds is either insane or not fit for her job to suddenly start acting to defend this public destroyal of me, and this email, this blog post, this letter, is to be produced to an inquiry and court when the time comes, be it in my death or otherwise, this letter is to be produced alongside her emails. Because I know, I learned from Jane Fisher, how the Church of England uses falsehoods in emails and letters and in the press and media, I learned from Jane Fisher how the Church's deceitful 'show' emails are used to protect the Church, and now I know how to respond. 

How does Dodds explain that the Dean's safeguarding failures are evidenced and the use of in-house clergy-lawyers can't change either that or the Dean's apology or the fact that the Church in the UK do not have any power over the Jersey church and yet instead of clarity and integrity, the Bishop and Archbishop have smeared and discredited ME publicly because of their failure in launching my case into the press and not carrying out balanced reports? Well all she has to say is that 'The Church didn't mean to hurt me'

Does a rapist mean to hurt his victim?

It really doesn't matter what Dodds thinks of how wonderful and well-meaning the church is, it shows that she is naive, incompetent or very deceitful, if she can see the evidence of the harm to me, the incredible stacks of evidence, and responds by whittering and trotting out the church's usual deceit, she can't remain in her position and this matter needs to go to someone who understands abuse and cover-up and especially someone who is not naive enough to think that the attacks on me are acceptable and look on as they occur.

When my case was launched into the press with no thought for my wellbeing, the Archbishop made a vague peacock apology to me in the press, part of the two-faced 'apology' campaign to vulnerable groups who can't answer back as the church glorify themselves this way, he then failed to meet me or respond to my correspondence, there is no excuse that Andrew Nunn may have been able to block correspondence, he should have been disciplined for his actions against me when I was in Jersey and should not be in a position to act for the Jersey Deanery or block my correspondence, but anyway, the Archbishop has always ignored or blocked correspondence, which makes his theoretical apology to me in the press into an empty falsehood. 

He has not met me, not responded to complaints against the Steel report, but has repeatedly met with the Dean of Jersey and his circle of powerful church-states-law-judiciary figures, who are above the law and can abuse their power infinitely, even to the point of altering and accessing the corrupt and inaccurate police records. The meetings are invariably flung into the press to launch attacks on me for the Jersey Deanery.

Not once has the Archbishop or Bishop met with me, heard my story or expressed a wish to do so, indeed, the Bishop refused to meet with me when asked to in 2013, when it became obvious to me and to Bob Hill that the matter was a farce. 

Remember the Bishop having to re-instate the Dean because he had no power to suspend him? Remember who was discredited as the Bishop whitewashed that? And tell me, is Jane Dodds really involved in this matter without being aware of that? No, Why has the Bishop of Winchester not been suspended then?

I know they are rubbish at Safeguarding but not rubbish enough to forget that,  so why is she lying to me? The Dean 'apologized' publicly, but the apology wasn't aimed at anyone, it was just a press release, that the Bishop failed to ensure reached me, and then the Bishop sent me a message saying 'no unsolicited intervention confirmed' in response to me asking him to stop violating my privacy. And then he and Jane Fisher illegally referred me to the NSPCC so that the Bishop could do another press stunt claiming that 'They had been working hard across the Diocese to provide help for me' which led to another onslaught of strangers calling me ungrateful because the press hate the Bishop as much as they hate me and they quoted me as saying I hadn't asked for the Bishop's help.

The press notably quote me or misquote me to attack the Bishop or to make me look mad. The Jersey press hate him almost as much as they hate me.

Jane Dodds can't credibly go on claiming that my feelings have been or are taken into account in any of this. She looks stupid and fake and does she or the Bishop really think I have no memory, no recollection of similar arrangements to what she and the Bishop are now doing?

Let me remind you. In 2009, while I was being destroyed in Jersey and by Jane Fisher, my Dad had a second stroke and went into a coma, he and I hadn't been close most of his life, mainly because I was afraid of him, he was autistic and had spent my childhood violently beating me for small mistakes or my maths learning difficulty, this is one of the reasons I was not close to my family, who the church have estranged me from completely now by having me destroyed, imprisoned, left homeless and then the press and media attacks which my family saw, and now think I am totally insane, another glaring safeguarding failure that Dodds can't see. 

Anyway, I fell prey to abuse in the church because I was unable to be close to my family. In my Dad's last year of life he knew I was in serious difficulties, and despite being autistic, he tried to help me. When he went into a coma I sat with him after his life support was switched off, my brothers and sisters left us alone as they went to get drunk.

Christmas came and I had nothing left to live for, if I hadn't made emergency arrangements to be admitted to Maytree for that Christmas I would have committed suicide. And I wish I had, if I had known that the hope that Maytree gave me would be destroyed the way it was by Fisher and Scott-Joynt, I would have committed suicide anyway.

If you are wondering why I mentioned this, I will get to that but let me make a point. None of this is any of the whitewash reports or press releases that exclude me.

I started 2010 with a bit of hope from Maytree, they sent me home with a letter telling me about how incredible what I had survived was, and how incredible what I was doing with my life and work and volunteering and education was.  (all of which, as you know, has been destroyed).

The deceit from Joyce Cockell, Jane Fisher, Tracy Bromley and others that that used to trick me into a meeting is one of the thousands of wounds that I carry, I was lied to and misled, into a set-up meeting to cover Fisher and Scott-Joynt's backs, and worse, not only was it a standard Church of England procedure set-up, it was to get their responsibility out of the way so that they could have me destroyed with the police, the lies, deceit and dishonesty regarding that meeting is a wound among thousands, but gouged deeper by lies and cover-up over it in the whitewash Korris report. 

So, after the meeting, having covered their backs and done nothing for my suffering, they began the destroyal that left me imprisoned and homeless, and I will never come to terms with the imprisonment, I retch when I have flashbacks and I fight my mind back into dissociation otherwise I would take my life. Some of you who read my blogs in the early days on the streets will know I had to completely dissociate in order to live with the horror of what has happened, while Fisher and Scott-Joynt, not satisfied with my homeless and destroyed state, continued to slander and destroy me.

Anyway, what is the point in telling you this? The Bishop and Jane Dodds think that another such back-covering meeting can be set-up, presumably followed by me being viciously assaulted by police where it won't leave marks, flung in a cell, imprisoned, jeered at  and left homeless and fleeing from persistent violations and slanders of me to homeless outreaches as previously occured.

I am not going to meet with the Church after over three years of being publicly, relentlessly and blatantly, openly destroyed, Dodds can stop now and she can stop sitting there and making silly silly noises that don't relate to the matter and she can ensure that my two very open and proud abusers, the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of Winchester are disciplined and removed from positions where they can abuse with impunity.

Furthermore, she is to alert the authorities to the fact that these people have behaved as if they are above the law and are a very blatant and open risk to the vulnerable and feel that they are protected to abuse by their name and status, and she can ensure that a balanced and independent inquiry that includes me and is safe for me, is called.

Let me also point out, that due to the Julie Wallman dirty tricks campaign that left me in collapse while Fisher and the Bishop beset me from all sides, I am not STUPID ENOUGH TO WALK INTO meeting that will be AN AMBUSH OR A SETUP, I AM WAITING RIGHT HERE UNTIL THE BISHOP'S PET POLICE ARRIVE, BEAT ME, IMPRISON ME AS BEFORE, OR MORE LIKELY KILL ME IN THE WEAKENED STATE I AM IN. I am sure from what I have experienced, that the church do not care as long as I am disposed of. Fisher's efforts to kill me off were sustained and deadly, and I will never recover.

Jane Dodds is both biased on behalf of the church and Bishop, and she is conflicted, she has failed and is failing to safeguard me and acts as if she either has very little understanding of vulnerability and safeguarding, or is deliberately protecting the Bishop and Archbishop. She is not in a position to continue to distress me by contacting me to protect and uphold my abusers, nor is she in a position to act in my case. The fact that she and Graham Tilby blatantly ignored my cries for help during last year's onslaught in the press and media but made contact when the Bishop launched his most recent deceit campaign is a statement that speaks as clearly as possible.

Do you think Dodd's statement 'The Church never meant to hurt you' is even remotely valid or relevant? It doesn't matter what they meant, if they cannot understand what they have done and are doing, even when told for over three years then they are a serious danger to to children and the vulnerable, and Dodds really is in a position where she should step down just for making such excuses.  Look at the evidence, look at her statement, it is ludicrous, for her to say something like that to someone who is as destroyed as I am, it shows contempt, or lack of understanding of safeguarding, or simply that she is acting on behalf of the church to protect the church.

Dodds can make a statement like that, but now she knows and can tell the church that their 'accidental' hurt of me through public destroyal of me 'hurt' me, why has there not been a public apology, redaction of the whitewashes and the morally wrong public apology to the Dean and abuse of the press over it, and an assurance that the Church of England will stop harassing me and independently investigate my complaint?

I guess I have benefitted from Jane Fisher's years of lies only in that I have learned to shine a light on the Godless Church of England's lies, the lies so weak that anyone who can think can see through them but most don't stop to think.

An independent inquiry can be called without a back-covering meeting with the Church, there is no doubt legally and in truth that that is the case, so please make sure if you care about safeguarding, that that is what happens. Don't pretend and don't make excuses, the whole of my adult life has been damaged by the Church of England, and I am facing death if I am not protected, and even in my death, I want this email read out against Jane Dodd's emails and I want a list of the hundreds of cries for help that I made read out, the hundreds of letters I went hungry in order to print and post, the huge books of defamatory press releases and reports that sit in a file and make me retch if I accidentally open it. But what I don't want is Dodds imitating Paul Butler and 'paying tribute' to me when I am forced to my death, what Butler did is what Butler does, the same as what Dodds is doing in my case.

As far as I know, the church have never before kept up such a sustained and public attack on someone as they have on me, ever. I know the Bishop has publicly destroyed one of his Clergy, Reverend Hawthorne, and also a homosexual couple who worked for him, and certainly Eli Ward and Theresa Cooper and several others have endured years of harm and cover up for being abused, but I think my case is one of the most serious cases of sustained abuse because no other case has had this level of open and blatant press hatred and smears aimed at the abuse survivor.

Is Dodds going to set my police record straight, ensure I can gain medical help and live my life openly and freely being me and not a fugitive any more? Is she going to publicly annul the whitewash Korris, Gladwin, Steel and Johnstone reports? Is she going to call the independent investigations into the abuse and harm I have suffered in the church and the three year run of public smearing and discrediting of me by the Jersey Deanery, Bishop of Winchester, Archbishop of Canterbury and associated people and strangers who have attacked me? No. So Jane Dodds is not credible and is not involved in safeguarding me. And nothing the Church could do or will do will change my ruined work record, the way I am branded and my poverty and ill health. Dodd's response to my case is beyond the pale.

Dodds, you can have your meeting, when Bob Hill is well and whole again, when he can walk and talk and smile again. When Bob, who the Church of England destroyed while 'accidentally' hurting me as a by-product of their coverup and narcississm and deceit, can speak and is healed, he can then sit in the meeting on my behalf and tell you what he thinks of you and then blog about it, so that the lies about the meeting can be countered by a man with the integrity and courage to stand up to an organization who are worse than Hitler's Nazi regime. The Church of England, who use God's Name in Vain for their deceit and corruption and abuse of the press and the vulnerable.

Nothing the Church ever says will be of value until Bob is whole and well and in Jersey caring for his wife and family. Never mind me being ruined and facing death, Mr Hill was a family man who sacrificed his life trying to save mine from harm by the Church of England and their press and media.

sincerely,

HG              

I will fight until I fall, with courage.

Update on harassment by the Church through the press and media

FAO Robin Kelly

Repeat Jersey Evening Post Complaint in response to further harm:

Dear IPSO and recipients,

The witness statement at the end of this email is vital reading.

I have copied the other standards teams in on this email as it does relate to similar behaviour by other press and media in Jersey. Also copied in Jersey's safeguarding board, who have failed me for three years by standing by and allowing the press and media and general public to harm me,  and also produced a whitewash of my case on behalf of the church and police.Also copied in are the communications departments for the Bishop of Winchester and Archbishop and a number of people who have contacted me complaining of the JEP and other media's attack on me in their representation of the Church of England

I understand that the response to my complaint about the Jersey Evening Post was another attack on me by the Jersey Evening Post (JEP) in the editorial as they have ignored my statement of fact and run an editorial demanding the release of the conflicted Steel report on behalf of the Jersey Deanery. This article will be sent in the next email after it has been transcripted for the future court case. There will probably not be a court case against the press/media during the time I ask the Press Standards and ofcom to act regarding the press and media bias and harm to me, however court cases against the Church and the press are currently separate matters.

This is now a very serious matter, described below by one of the Jersey people who have been supporting me through this crisis.

'However, I'm told the JEP [yesterday I think] did an editorial comment demanding release of Steel report - and was slagging off the Bishop [who's name escapes me at the moment, who commissioned the original report which, in the main, supported you, and caused the war between the Jersey C of E and UK C of E'

With this matter of bias and attack continuing with impunity, and with the editor of the JEP well aware of this being prejudice and an attack on a vulnerable person without her side being heard, isn't it time the IPSO took action? A newspaper that acts with such blatant and unjust prejudice and putting a vulnerable adult's life at risk is not just breaching journalistic and press codes, but now doing so in revenge for the complaints.

The JEP, along with ITV and the BBC persistently act on behalf of the Dean and push for the release of the conflicted Steel report and consistently fail to add that Steel is a member of the Judiciary circle connected to the Dean and the Town church and also fail noticably and persistently to publish the fact that the Steel, Korris and other reports do not contain my views and are thus not valid. The JEP, along with the BBC and ITV have spent the past 3 years discrediting me and misleading the general public to think that my abuser has no case to answer and that the Steel report should be published.

It remains that my side of the story is not in any newspaper, media or report. But even after I have made this most recent complaint, after the JEP and media have been allowed to continue their attack despite my complaints, they have continued to allow harm to me, and not just to me, but also allowing attacks on the man who is seriously ill after collapsing from the stress of defending me from harm by the Jersey press and media.

The Bishop of Winchester is under a court order over the Steel report after allowing it to continue when he was presented with evidence that it was conflicted. The JEP and Jersey media persist in not reporting this. The Bishop can't truthfully claim to be choosing not to publish the conflicted Steel report, he is not allowed to publish it, and the JEP persist in stirring people up and stirring up hatred over this report as well as defaming and smearing and discrediting me.

Please be reminded of their open and blatant upholding of Senator Philip Bailhache, lay chair of the Jersey Synod last year, on the front page of the JEP, Bob Hill who produced the blog on this, collapsed with the stress of defending me a few days later, and the JEP are currently allowing trolls to attack him as well as stirring them up to demand this report that the JEP have misrepresented for 3 years, second link:

http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/jerseys-dean-letter-to-archbishop-of.html

Scroll down for the kind of inaccuracies and nastiness the JEP allow: 

http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2016/05/22/bishop-defiant-over-dean-investigation/

I am being put under persistent undue stress over this matter.  I would like the IPSO to take this matter seriously and act promptly as this has persisted for over three years, has led to one man being left seriously ill and a vulnerable adult left destroyed publicly. There aren't any excuses any more, especially as the most recent attack was made yesterday after I made a complaint and is thus a revenge attack. And the JEP continue to misreport blatantly on the Steel report and stir up demands for this report when it is conflicted, invalid, under a court order, and written by a member of the defendent's circle despite protests, and the JEP do not report on this side of things.

Articles such as this one fail to state that this retiring bailiff is not only a member of the town church but also of the Dame Steel and the Dean's circle of judiciary, States and Town Church members, it omits what the JEP have been told for 3 years, that Steel is conflicted, that she is a member of this circle and thus not in a position to investigate the Dean:

http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2015/01/25/bailiffs-parting-shot-at-bishop-over-dean-report/ 

Nor has there been any comment there about why the Bailiff is only interested in the report on the Dean. The cries for this report to be published and the stirring up of the general public by this circle and their supporting newspaper, the JEP, are so very blatant and completely omitting my side of things, and for over three years I have endured this. I don't think any more excuses can be made now for this harassment by the JEP. And anyone who stands by and allows this should be asked why.

Then, this is Senator Bailhache, a Senator who is also lay chair of Jersey Deanery synod, conflicted not only by that but by being a colleague of Dame Heather Steel, he has written law publications with her, he has had her as a guest speaker at one of the conferences he ran, he arranged with her for her to be put forward to create a report that defamed me and cleared the Dean, he is very angry that instead of being one of the voiceless vulnerable such as the abuse victims he failed to protect as a judge by allowing their abusers to go on abusing, I have continued to speak up and fight back, and when the Bishop of Winchester failed to annul the Steel report, I took him to court. Which is why 

http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2015/11/04/senator-attacks-church-over-deans-suspension/

With these powerful people supporting the Dean and meeting with the Archbishop with all their legal expertise, I am left voiceless and continually attacked by the press and media on behalf of these powerful people. This is abuse, and there must be an end to it at some point. 

How can any member of the UK church know who in Jersey is conflicted when not a single member of the UK church has met with me and recorded my full story? The Bishop hasn't met with me, nor the Archbishop, and the only reports carried out have been conflicted and have not contained my views. For the press and media to continually raise the matter of the reports and mislead the general public but refuse to add my side of things, this is nothing to do with news or balanced reporting, it is just a further attack on me.

Presumably the JEP, overseen by my abuser's brother, will try to make excuses about me being mentally ill, this is something that abusers and their supporters do, it is a way of trying to discredit survivors, who do act in traumatised ways and have that used against them. 

My psychological report is available, I am assessed as free from serious mental illness and suffering Post Traumatic Stress. Each attack on my life by the Jersey press and media puts my life at risk and causes me profound distress. Although in the case of Mr. Sibcy and his newspaper, that seems to be either a bonus of one of the aims.

Here's my psychological report, and considering it's outcome, by a very skilled and experienced professional, how do you think I am coping after another three years of this biased and vicious harassmet by the Jersey Evening Post? 

Psychological report: http://lifeafterthediocese.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/this-is-who-church-and-press-are.html

The Archbishop's office have been made aware of the distress and damage, as have the Bishop of Winchester's office, but they have consistently ignored the damage done to me by the press and media and have continued to make press releases that are published without question by the JEP and Jersey's BBC and ITV. None of whom publish the reality of Steel's conflicted state and my side of things. ITV made a bluster and pretence of including me but for themselves and not me, and partly because of my complaint to ITV. No reporter, journalist or press or media personnell have interviewed me. They simply publish what suits them. And years of complaints about this has changed nothing.

When the press and media attack, defame and discredit a vulnerable person persistently and relentlessly, especially in my case, there is no recovery, there has been no apology each time over the years, the wounds have remained and have built up and built up. This matter must be concluded, properly and the attacks must stop.

There is no excuse for either the press and media or the Church of England's abuse of power in this matter, none. Both are responsible for ensuring that a balanced and equal story is shared, and for these years both have failed to do so.

The articles discrediting me remain available, and I am getting complaints from Jersey people who are afraid to complain to these abusive press and media themselves because in Jersey, the consequences of speaking up can be ruin. As I myself know. 

The Church are liable because they not only knowingly released one-sided stories, knowing the damage to me, but have failed to redact and remove these articles in the press or ensure that my side of things is heard.

The press and media are also liable because they have again omitted my side for their prejudice, also well aware of my complaints and distress over the years.

Finally, below is an article written by an independent observer of the Church and press and media campaign of abuse, I don't necessarily agree with the writer but he is just giving his view, without influence, and he is able to give his view because he has seen the press and media but looked beneath their bias, and most observers of this matter haven't been as reasonable and impartial, the impact of strangers attacking due to the cruel and self-serving church and press will affect me to my dying day, remember, more important than the needs of the Church and press in this, a vulnerable adult's life has been destroyed and is at risk and that makes the continued actions of church, press and media unjustifiable:

Bystander's written observation:

Waiting for HG

The media battle over the case of HG has been coming to the forefront of the news over the last year, largely as a result of proactive pushes by the church hierarchy in Jersey to obtain the Steel report.

Although it contained background information about the policy of chaperoning a churchwarden who was to tactile with women, and who was the subject of HG’s complaint, it has been widely seen that the Korris report was flawed in some respects. Not least of these was the inability of Jan Korris to interview HG herself, and yet to press ahead with the report regardless, basing HG’s testimony on emails from her to others; the obvious flaw in this is that it gives only one side of the story, and a highly selective one, as HG may have been angry in some emails, and those undoubtably were those selected to pass on to Korris by participants in the review both in Winchester and Jersey.

And while Korris mentioned that HG had been bound over to leave Jersey, and forcibly placed on a plane and left destitute in England, she failed to mention that this binding over to leave Jersey  could not have occurred had Michael Scott-Joynt decided to withdraw a complaint of harrassment, leaving just that of Bob Key, the Dean of Jersey,  standing.

The Bishop’s decision to published precipitated a crisis in which Winchester and Jersey were at loggerheads. This was not helped by the politicisation of the whole matter, which shifted the focus from HG onto the conflict between Bishop Tim Dakin and Dean of Jersey, Bob Key. Instrumental in this were Gavin Ashenden, Sir Philip Bailhache, and Bruce Willing, all of whom vilified HG.

Sir Philip wrote a letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury, and this seems to have involved access to confidential material, which he had been seen perusing on a plane trip between London and Jersey. Having blasted the passengers who had brought it to the attention of Deputy Trevor Pitman, as “malicious” and making them out to be liars, he finally grudgingly issued a statement in which he said he could have only had information in the public domain and not police records, and anyway he has been confused about which flight it was, and he didn’t really mean to brand the passengers “malicious”. It was a grudging apology because his position was untenable, but evidently he was amassing material to send to Canterbury in which he appeared to show not one whit of concern or compassion for HG. He even mooted the idea of an independent Diocese of Jersey. Such delusions of grandeur. A big fish in a small pond.

Meanwhile the Bishop had decided to take refuge behind a press agency, the rather pagan sounding Luther Pendragon, and commissioned two more reports by Dame Heather Steel, and Bishop Gladwin. Dame Steel, of course, as a QC, had met Sir Philip Bailhache, so could not be seen as impartial anyway. It may be remembered that in the UK, there were two attempts by the Government  to place conflicted persons in charge of an inquiry into historic child abuse, both of which folded under public criticism. It is not enough to be unbiased, there must be no suspicion that their could be bias, and in the case of Dame Heather, that certainly was not the case. Like Korris, she failed to engage with HG, but completed her report anyway.

The Bishop then decided to sit on the report, much to the chagrin of the Jersey church “rat pack” who were trying to get it seen to justify their position that Bob Key was a good guy – despite him admitting he made safeguarding mistakes – and Tim Dakin was a bad guy. A delegation led by the Chief Minister went to the UK, led by the Chief Minister, and with the Bailiff, the brother of Sir Philip, to get the report published but came away empty handed.

Meanwhile HG was asking for the report not to be published as she had suffered enough trauma already and it was destroying her life. Deaf and insensitive, the Jersey Church “rat pack” continued and no doubt will continue to complain., because until it is published, they can’t play their religious politics against the Bishop.

The latest development has been a sit down dinner with the Archbishop for the Dean and his wife, and an informal apology for all the hurt they had suffered, which was made public soon afterwards. It was only a supper, alas, and not the Last Supper, and no thirty pieces of silver for betraying HG in the first place.

Newspapers publish the story because it sells, and they don’t seem to be aware of the hurt it causes to HG, except as they can ask her to give “her side of the story”, and thus make a relativism of truth. The Bishop did send an email apology to HG, but still can’t leave alone as requested. And the Jersey Church “rat pack”, are still stirring the pot like the old hags in Shakespear’s Macbeth.

Where is HG in all of this? Like the play “Waiting for Godot”, her voice is not heard, and she is a presence of stage, while others strut their stuff and take centre stage.

end.

HG