Showing posts with label Archbishop Welby. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Archbishop Welby. Show all posts

Tuesday, 26 April 2016

Letters regarding the Press

16/04/16

Dear Right Honourable Prime Minister,

I spoke with your call handler at 10 Downing Street two weeks ago and she suggested that I wrote to you regarding my concerns. It was an ordeal phoning you as my disability means I can barely use a phone for conversation, but the situation demanded it.

I have thus written letter of concern and also the attached Open Letter to the press , to the parties concerned, including the Telegraph and the Archbishop's Press and Communications representatives and the National Child abuse inquiry. I will also publish this online, as the only way to stop the Church's repeat press and media abuse is to shame them, they are above the law and seemingly above you as you, the only thing that seems to stop their bad behaviour is simply telling them how bad it is, and most vulnerable people who they harm cannot do that, and I have paid dearly for doing so.
I have been unwell due to the issue that needs to be discussed but am now taking action as best I can.

This matter relates to the Church of England's use, or rather abuse, of the press in the past three years or more since Justin Welby became Archbishop. There has been one inappropriate and outrageous press stunt after another, some announce that the Archbishop doesn't know his own Church, and some, such as the recent ones, announce that he doesn't know his Bible, God, or the Ten Commandments, which he recently publicly broke for at least the second time. ('Honour thy Father(s) and Thy Mother, do not use them to glorify yourself and your Church).
I couldn't believe what I was seeing on the front page of the Telegraph that recent Saturday, nor last Sunday. I knew that April Fools day had gone, maybe the Telegraph got the timing wrong?
And unfortunately due to the severe damage to me by the Church of England, which isn't over, seeing Welby use a Newspaper Headline to announce his very personal life left me ill and off work, which isn't good as I am disabled and in poverty as a result. I deliver newspapers as part of my living.

And at a time when the Church are under investigation for mass abuse, I think Welby's need to force his most intimate personal life on the general public was inappropriate and also an insult to those of us who are suffering due to abuse in the church and also the terrible way that the church handles abuse cases, in my case I remain destroyed and suffering.

Thousands of men in this country do not know who their father is, thousands are not sure, some don't mind that much, some had a good replacement father, some feel the loss of the Father they didn't have, but few of them make the headlines of even the lesser papers, why? Because being illegitimate or finding out that your father is someone else, even a famous person, is not headline news. Especially not in a newspaper like the Telegraph, who, presumably will soon have a heading 'Only 15p! 5p Cheaper than the Daily Star!' in order to try to keep in circulation.

The Church should not be in a position to utilize the press for non-Christian blaring and stunts. Welby's stunt last Saturday surely horrified real Christians who know that this exhibitionism isn't the way to behave in public, which is why Sunday's headlines added to the horror, other leaders rallying round him, gagging for some of the press stunt limelight? Why? Is there no church left that doesn't see through Welby's terrible run of press stunts and see how unchristian and damaging it is to the vulnerable and to the Christian Faith?

Unfortunately the 'Clergy Discipline System' within the Church is a token and inadequate system, there to protect powerful wrongdoers and destroy the vulnerable, and it was used to harm me and protect wrongdoers, which is why I am asking you to handle this matter directly. I did make a clergy discipline complaint about the Archbishop and associated Bishops involved in harming me through a press publicity stunt three years ago, when they used a whitewash report into my case to simultaneously defame and destroy me and try to make the Church look good. I was threatened and my complaint was deliberately squashed.

There never has been such a resounding failure as the church 'safeguarding' attack on me, it did destroy me but the Church broke a number of laws and now they are being very very quiet indeed about it, and as they continue the hurtful press campaign but seem unable to answer me regarding the mess they have made of my case. I would like you to step in and bring an end both to the Church of England's abuse of the press and their harm to me and other victims.

Please would you call an independent inquiry into the Jersey Deanery and Diocese of Winchester abuse case, one that looks impartially at church-police-authorities illegal actions and harm through the press and abuse of power and repeated acts without my consent. The Church won't engage and have whitewashed this matter and left me destroyed, a fugitive and in fear of my life.

I am grateful for your help.

HG


Further Reading:



23/04/2013

Dear Independent Press Standards Organization,

I am a vulnerable adult who is at risk if my name and details are published or circulated, this is because courtesy of the Church of England I have been hounded, smeared and destroyed through their use of the press for stunts, I was one of Justin Welby's first stunts, a pretence of safeguarding to make the church look good.
He then left me to be ripped apart by the press and complete strangers by his misleading of the general public.

The recent stunt of Justin Welby making non-news as a headline cements my belief that the Church of England are paying the press a lot of money in order to make headlines. And because this is abuse of the press and is inappropriate as well as perverting public image of Christianity and giving the church limelight, advertising basically, when they are behaving badly. I feel that something should be done.
This is an especial priority now because Justin Welby launched his front page 'non-news' conveniently at a time when the Church of England are being investigated for systemic CSA crimes that Bishop Paul Butler has tried his hardest to sex up and use to glorify the Church. Butler is frequently in the press alongside Welby as Church Press Stuntman, deceiving the general public regarding safeguarding in the Church, while he has overseen me being vilified and destroyed publicly and has refused to respond to my distress or intervene.

As an abuse survivor who the Church have destroyed for press stunts and cover-up, I object to having my day ruined by Church press stunts when I have to deliver papers in the morning and am left ill and sickened at Welby's audacity when the Church of England are under investigation. And I am sure it impacts on other victims that have been left voiceless and harmed by the Church's continuing inability to safeguard or respond properly to complaints.

I have been destroyed by the Church, they grabbed headlines over three years ago to destroy me again in pretence of looking really good about safeguarding. They had no thought for my welfare and have left me voiceless, vilified and suffering, without making the press stunt a fair deal in making sure I was heard in the press on equal footing. Indeed their efforts to make me out to be insane to cover up a case that they handled as badly as possible, on top of their throwing me into the press with inaccurate reports, has led to me being a fugitive who has to routinely keep their identity hidden in order to protect themselves. I can't be me, I am living in fear, and all because of Welby's first 'paid up' headline press stunt.
An organization like the Church of England should not have the power over the press that they do. And certainly not for PR stunts that they make into headline news.

I would like to discuss Welby's string of press stunts and how they abuse the public and also go against what the church of England stand for (although they only now stand for it in theory).

The safeguarding stunt of my case was a desparate effort by the church to avoid investigation for abuse, it was a series of whitewashes and cover ups that abused and mislead the press and general public, and it resurfaces every few months and traumatizes me. It is astounding that Welby used me for his first 'apology' press stunt, of which there has been an endless stream over the past three years, and then has allowed me to be vilified and destroyed publicly. 

Following his 'apology', Welby has simply left me to be torn apart by the defendants in my case, powerful Church dignitaries who he has no control over, lawyers, judges, members of government, the usual Church of England club congregation, he has left me destroyed and allowed these conflicted people to abuse their power and carry out whitewash reports into my case themselves and this has continued to reach the press and destroy me, while Welby, having mislead the general public, has left me suffering intolerably and fails to respond to my concerns at all. What happens to the voiceless vulnerable when the Church have this inappropriate power over the press?
I am in fear of my life as lies and whitewash reports regarding my case hit the headlines every few months. The same press have never even tried to include my side of things and thus codes of conduct are being breached, surely.

The 'apology' stunts apparently aimed at vulnerable groups but the real aim is just simply to make the church look good, and notably these 'apologies' are carried out with no real interaction with the groups 'apologized' to, and at the same time as prominent members of the church are harming the same vulnerable groups, for example while the Archbishop was vaguely 'apologizing' to the gay community and trotting out the lines written for him by his press and communication departments on the advice that this will make the Church look good, the Bishop of Winchester was sacking two members of the clergy for being Gay, while Queens Chaplain Gavin Ashenden was launching yet another attack on the gay community, using his status to attack them just as he did the same to me.
I think Welby's press advisor/writer doesn't research, doesn't think of the welfare of those targeted and is overstepping a lot of boundaries. Welby appears to go along with what he is told to say to the press and media, even when he contradicts himself or invalidates the Church of England.

So there have been the apology stunts, and the one aimed at me was never delivered in person, it was purely a press stunt, followed by me being destroyed from then until now, and eventually I will not be able to endure it, as yet, no authority I have contacted will prevent harm to me, so could you be the first and stop the Church from manipulating and abusing the press. I understand you can't extend this to the BBC, but they and the Church are Birds of a Feather, both with a long history of abuse and cover up and deception of the general public.

On from the apology stunts, apparently it needed to be headline news that Welby 'wanted to drive Wonga out of business' (which would result in people like me ending up starving and homeless). Welby failed to research Wonga and was shamed by the fact his Church had shares in Wonga, as well as companies involved with weapons and pornography! I can't remember who helpfully outed that but Welby blustered and said the Church would drive Wonga out of business with a Credit Union run by the Church. He seems to forget that those of us who have been abused and are thus unwelcome in the Church would be excluded, and many members of the public who do not like the Church and their bad behaviour would also be excluded.

Every few months, either Butler or Welby comes out with an outrageous abuse of the press, in Butler's case it is to mislead about safeguarding and make people think the Church cares, for example 'praising the courage' of an abuse victim who committed suicide in the Bishop Ball case. Firstly Butler and other Bishops were in power and aware of their colleague's caution for abuse and did nothing, secondly what do the family think of this fat Bishop in the press praising their dead family member for church glorification purposes when the Church treated him the same way as they have treated me? This should not be happening. Butler has made no effort to resolve my case and I have nearly been driven to suicide and am at breaking point.

I think the reasons that the Church are not tackled over their outrageous behaviour is apathy, the Church are a law unto their own and people aren't listened to if they complain to the Church, a lot of people are being mislead by the Church's press stunts and more are being hurt, but no one feels that complaining to you is effective, as I have noted from many comments on social media, but someone has to start somewhere, and as I am destroyed by the Church and in fear of my life from their abuse of the press, it may as well be me who starts the objection. 

Onwards into the press stunts. Welby decided that his daughter would make a good showpiece, in the same manner as he has recently decided that his mother and one of his other fathers were.
Anyway, apparently this well-fed daughter of Welby's was feeling sad about a breakup of a relationship, so Welby decided to insult anyone who suffers genuine mental illness by pimping his daughter out as mentally ill, the point of this was unclear apart from that the church are gagging for attention and presumably he hoped this would grab attention from the public and mislead them to think that there are human beings in the Church. 

Reality is that mental illness is not a laughing matter and Welby has showed by allowing his church to publicly attack me on the excuse that I am mentally ill, that he doesn't understand or care about mental illness. The church have tried to use mental illness as an excuse to make me not credible, with no understanding of PTSD that they have caused.  The Church being mostly wealthy middle class with comfortable lives, do not understand human problems such as disability and trauma, and their abuse of the press using such topics to glorify themselves or to condemn someone like me is outrageous. I have little understanding of press guidelines, with only a short course in journalism on my CV, but I do know that ethically in the wider world and in safeguarding, the church's behaviour is unacceptable. There isn't any way their misleading self-glorification at the expense of the vulnerable is acceptable.

A few years ago, Justin Welby did a Christmas special press stunt, by launching one of his previous fathers into the press as a drunkard. In this case in his desparation for attention, the Archbishop broke one of the 10 commandments, as he has done again recently with another of his fathers, both of whom are presumably dead and unable to answer his smears of them. How embarrassing and shameless! 
Anyway, so for no apparently reason he did this Christmas special advertisement of the Church as having no respect for family or privacy or the 10 commandments, it doesn't matter if the man he was maligning was dead or wasn't his father. What mattered is that he was making press headlines setting a bad example to his Church and hurting real Christians who simply do not behave like that. And all of this has gone on while he has left me suffering and voiceless. I have said to him if he has time for press stunts, he has time to bring justice and closure to my case, which he has left open with repeat attacks on me from his church regularly and with my story not in any reports.

Paul Butler had a spate of Shameless and ridiculous limelight-seeking press stunts that mislead and amazed people. He made a huge show of 'handing over' big names to the police in the press limelight, whoever co-ordinates these press stunts should be very ashamed of themselves, and so should Butler, and I have asked why the police haven't brought charges against the Church for perverting the course of justice there as well as in my case where the church protected two serial abusers and destroyed me. I think it was a related Butler-led stunt that interestingly just before the National Abuse Inquiry, decided to tell the press another squeaky clean safeguarding lie, that they were having files regarding confession or abuse independently audited, oh what a co-incidence.  In my case the Church called a Church counsellor, a Bishop, a Church judge and other conflicted people 'independent' and allowed these people to destroy me, and Butler-Sloss who also features in my case, was also called independent while protecting Bishop Ball alongside Bishop Gladwin who also whitewashed my case. Thus I assume the independent auditing so proudly mentioned in the press was again a misuse of independent and a rapid cover up and shredding of files before the abuse inquiry, but the general public, mislead by the church and press, aren't to know that.

I am going to conclude with the most recent press stunt. Jesus did not say His followers should crow and strut in the limelight and use their family shamelessly as Welby has done. Jesus did not remove the 10 commandments. Jesus advocated prudence and simplicity and fairness. I do not know how Welby managed to conveniently get a paternity test and buy headlines with it, but it wasn't news, it isn't appropriate behaviour for a religious leader, and for the other church leaders to beg for limelight by supporting Welby's outrageous behaviour there is little hope for the Church. 
Most importantly, while the Church are under investigation for abuse, any headlines that are not necessary are an affront to victims of the Church, both those who are already under stress from having to give evidence and those of us who are voiceless and silenced.

Welby's church is very very messed up and problematic, with a huge amount of wealth and a very exclusive congregation and a lot of power to abuse, as has been shown in my efforts to get justice and a voice, so he shouldn't be taking time to discuss his personal life with a horrified, disgusted, fascinated, indifferent and admiring general public through newspapers and media that should be working within boundaries to ensure impartial and good news coverage without offence to members of the public.

What I would ask, if you may, is investigate how much money is being used to run this continuous press stunt, as it appears to be enough money to ensure that if Welby wants to talk about the warts on his toes and vaguely link that to Christianity, the press will comply without question, even if Welby headlines again the following week with 'oops, I meant the warts on my hands'.
Also, would you ensure that the press and media understand the impact of these rudderless press stunts on the vulnerable, especially those damaged by the Church. If possible remind the Church of England of their responsibility while they are being investigated for systemic abuse, that they should not be using the press for unimportant press stunts while victims have the stress of the inquiry to deal with, these victims need safeguarding from the Church's needless narcissistic showing off. And while the Church can't safeguard, they need to take their focus off press advertising and put it to creating safeguarding within the church.

I really think it is time that Welby started focussing on bringing some Christianity into his monster, power-hungry and oppressive church and stopped abusing the press and general public. Although he may need reminding what Christianity is.

Many thanks,

HG

This is officially CC Lambeth Palace, the BBC, the Abuse Inquiry and The Telegraph and Mail as a courtesy.

 **********************************

23/04/2013

Dear Independent Press Standards Organization,

I am a vulnerable adult who is at risk if my name and details are published or circulated, this is because courtesy of the Church of England I have been hounded, smeared and destroyed through their use of the press for stunts, I was one of Justin Welby's first stunts, a pretence of safeguarding to make the church look good.
He then left me to be ripped apart by the press and complete strangers by his misleading of the general public.

The recent stunt of Justin Welby making non-news as a headline cements my belief that the Church of England are paying the press a lot of money in order to make headlines. And because this is abuse of the press and is inappropriate as well as perverting public image of Christianity and giving the church limelight, advertising basically, when they are behaving badly. I feel that something should be done.
This is an especial priority now because Justin Welby launched his front page 'non-news' conveniently at a time when the Church of England are being investigated for systemic CSA crimes that Bishop Paul Butler has tried his hardest to sex up and use to glorify the Church. Butler is frequently in the press alongside Welby as Church Press Stuntman, deceiving the general public regarding safeguarding in the Church, while he has overseen me being vilified and destroyed publicly and has refused to respond to my distress or intervene.

As an abuse survivor who the Church have destroyed for press stunts and cover-up, I object to having my day ruined by Church press stunts when I have to deliver papers in the morning and am left ill and sickened at Welby's audacity when the Church of England are under investigation. And I am sure it impacts on other victims that have been left voiceless and harmed by the Church's continuing inability to safeguard or respond properly to complaints.

I have been destroyed by the Church, they grabbed headlines over three years ago to destroy me again in pretence of looking really good about safeguarding. They had no thought for my welfare and have left me voiceless, vilified and suffering, without making the press stunt a fair deal in making sure I was heard in the press on equal footing. Indeed their efforts to make me out to be insane to cover up a case that they handled as badly as possible, on top of their throwing me into the press with inaccurate reports, has led to me being a fugitive who has to routinely keep their identity hidden in order to protect themselves. I can't be me, I am living in fear, and all because of Welby's first 'paid up' headline press stunt.
An organization like the Church of England should not have the power over the press that they do. And certainly not for PR stunts that they make into headline news.

I would like to discuss Welby's string of press stunts and how they abuse the public and also go against what the church of England stand for (although they only now stand for it in theory).

The safeguarding stunt of my case was a desparate effort by the church to avoid investigation for abuse, it was a series of whitewashes and cover ups that abused and mislead the press and general public, and it resurfaces every few months and traumatizes me. It is astounding that Welby used me for his first 'apology' press stunt, of which there has been an endless stream over the past three years, and then has allowed me to be vilified and destroyed publicly. 

Following his 'apology', Welby has simply left me to be torn apart by the defendants in my case, powerful Church dignitaries who he has no control over, lawyers, judges, members of government, the usual Church of England club congregation, he has left me destroyed and allowed these conflicted people to abuse their power and carry out whitewash reports into my case themselves and this has continued to reach the press and destroy me, while Welby, having mislead the general public, has left me suffering intolerably and fails to respond to my concerns at all. What happens to the voiceless vulnerable when the Church have this inappropriate power over the press?
I am in fear of my life as lies and whitewash reports regarding my case hit the headlines every few months. The same press have never even tried to include my side of things and thus codes of conduct are being breached, surely.

The 'apology' stunts apparently aimed at vulnerable groups but the real aim is just simply to make the church look good, and notably these 'apologies' are carried out with no real interaction with the groups 'apologized' to, and at the same time as prominent members of the church are harming the same vulnerable groups, for example while the Archbishop was vaguely 'apologizing' to the gay community and trotting out the lines written for him by his press and communication departments on the advice that this will make the Church look good, the Bishop of Winchester was sacking two members of the clergy for being Gay, while Queens Chaplain Gavin Ashenden was launching yet another attack on the gay community, using his status to attack them just as he did the same to me.
I think Welby's press advisor/writer doesn't research, doesn't think of the welfare of those targeted and is overstepping a lot of boundaries. Welby appears to go along with what he is told to say to the press and media, even when he contradicts himself or invalidates the Church of England.

So there have been the apology stunts, and the one aimed at me was never delivered in person, it was purely a press stunt, followed by me being destroyed from then until now, and eventually I will not be able to endure it, as yet, no authority I have contacted will prevent harm to me, so could you be the first and stop the Church from manipulating and abusing the press. I understand you can't extend this to the BBC, but they and the Church are Birds of a Feather, both with a long history of abuse and cover up and deception of the general public.

On from the apology stunts, apparently it needed to be headline news that Welby 'wanted to drive Wonga out of business' (which would result in people like me ending up starving and homeless). Welby failed to research Wonga and was shamed by the fact his Church had shares in Wonga, as well as companies involved with weapons and pornography! I can't remember who helpfully outed that but Welby blustered and said the Church would drive Wonga out of business with a Credit Union run by the Church. He seems to forget that those of us who have been abused and are thus unwelcome in the Church would be excluded, and many members of the public who do not like the Church and their bad behaviour would also be excluded.

Every few months, either Butler or Welby comes out with an outrageous abuse of the press, in Butler's case it is to mislead about safeguarding and make people think the Church cares, for example 'praising the courage' of an abuse victim who committed suicide in the Bishop Ball case. Firstly Butler and other Bishops were in power and aware of their colleague's caution for abuse and did nothing, secondly what do the family think of this fat Bishop in the press praising their dead family member for church glorification purposes when the Church treated him the same way as they have treated me? This should not be happening. Butler has made no effort to resolve my case and I have nearly been driven to suicide and am at breaking point.

I think the reasons that the Church are not tackled over their outrageous behaviour is apathy, the Church are a law unto their own and people aren't listened to if they complain to the Church, a lot of people are being mislead by the Church's press stunts and more are being hurt, but no one feels that complaining to you is effective, as I have noted from many comments on social media, but someone has to start somewhere, and as I am destroyed by the Church and in fear of my life from their abuse of the press, it may as well be me who starts the objection. 

Onwards into the press stunts. Welby decided that his daughter would make a good showpiece, in the same manner as he has recently decided that his mother and one of his other fathers were.
Anyway, apparently this well-fed daughter of Welby's was feeling sad about a breakup of a relationship, so Welby decided to insult anyone who suffers genuine mental illness by pimping his daughter out as mentally ill, the point of this was unclear apart from that the church are gagging for attention and presumably he hoped this would grab attention from the public and mislead them to think that there are human beings in the Church. 

Reality is that mental illness is not a laughing matter and Welby has showed by allowing his church to publicly attack me on the excuse that I am mentally ill, that he doesn't understand or care about mental illness. The church have tried to use mental illness as an excuse to make me not credible, with no understanding of PTSD that they have caused.  The Church being mostly wealthy middle class with comfortable lives, do not understand human problems such as disability and trauma, and their abuse of the press using such topics to glorify themselves or to condemn someone like me is outrageous. I have little understanding of press guidelines, with only a short course in journalism on my CV, but I do know that ethically in the wider world and in safeguarding, the church's behaviour is unacceptable. There isn't any way their misleading self-glorification at the expense of the vulnerable is acceptable.

A few years ago, Justin Welby did a Christmas special press stunt, by launching one of his previous fathers into the press as a drunkard. In this case in his desparation for attention, the Archbishop broke one of the 10 commandments, as he has done again recently with another of his fathers, both of whom are presumably dead and unable to answer his smears of them. How embarrassing and shameless! 
Anyway, so for no apparently reason he did this Christmas special advertisement of the Church as having no respect for family or privacy or the 10 commandments, it doesn't matter if the man he was maligning was dead or wasn't his father. What mattered is that he was making press headlines setting a bad example to his Church and hurting real Christians who simply do not behave like that. And all of this has gone on while he has left me suffering and voiceless. I have said to him if he has time for press stunts, he has time to bring justice and closure to my case, which he has left open with repeat attacks on me from his church regularly and with my story not in any reports.

Paul Butler had a spate of Shameless and ridiculous limelight-seeking press stunts that mislead and amazed people. He made a huge show of 'handing over' big names to the police in the press limelight, whoever co-ordinates these press stunts should be very ashamed of themselves, and so should Butler, and I have asked why the police haven't brought charges against the Church for perverting the course of justice there as well as in my case where the church protected two serial abusers and destroyed me. I think it was a related Butler-led stunt that interestingly just before the National Abuse Inquiry, decided to tell the press another squeaky clean safeguarding lie, that they were having files regarding confession or abuse independently audited, oh what a co-incidence.  In my case the Church called a Church counsellor, a Bishop, a Church judge and other conflicted people 'independent' and allowed these people to destroy me, and Butler-Sloss who also features in my case, was also called independent while protecting Bishop Ball alongside Bishop Gladwin who also whitewashed my case. Thus I assume the independent auditing so proudly mentioned in the press was again a misuse of independent and a rapid cover up and shredding of files before the abuse inquiry, but the general public, mislead by the church and press, aren't to know that.

I am going to conclude with the most recent press stunt. Jesus did not say His followers should crow and strut in the limelight and use their family shamelessly as Welby has done. Jesus did not remove the 10 commandments. Jesus advocated prudence and simplicity and fairness. I do not know how Welby managed to conveniently get a paternity test and buy headlines with it, but it wasn't news, it isn't appropriate behaviour for a religious leader, and for the other church leaders to beg for limelight by supporting Welby's outrageous behaviour there is little hope for the Church. 
Most importantly, while the Church are under investigation for abuse, any headlines that are not necessary are an affront to victims of the Church, both those who are already under stress from having to give evidence and those of us who are voiceless and silenced.

Welby's church is very very messed up and problematic, with a huge amount of wealth and a very exclusive congregation and a lot of power to abuse, as has been shown in my efforts to get justice and a voice, so he shouldn't be taking time to discuss his personal life with a horrified, disgusted, fascinated, indifferent and admiring general public through newspapers and media that should be working within boundaries to ensure impartial and good news coverage without offence to members of the public.

What I would ask, if you may, is investigate how much money is being used to run this continuous press stunt, as it appears to be enough money to ensure that if Welby wants to talk about the warts on his toes and vaguely link that to Christianity, the press will comply without question, even if Welby headlines again the following week with 'oops, I meant the warts on my hands'.
Also, would you ensure that the press and media understand the impact of these rudderless press stunts on the vulnerable, especially those damaged by the Church. If possible remind the Church of England of their responsibility while they are being investigated for systemic abuse, that they should not be using the press for unimportant press stunts while victims have the stress of the inquiry to deal with, these victims need safeguarding from the Church's needless narcissistic showing off. And while the Church can't safeguard, they need to take their focus off press advertising and put it to creating safeguarding within the church.

I really think it is time that Welby started focussing on bringing some Christianity into his monster, power-hungry and oppressive church and stopped abusing the press and general public. Although he may need reminding what Christianity is.

Many thanks,

HG

This is officially CC Lambeth Palace, the BBC, the Abuse Inquiry and The Telegraph and Mail as a courtesy.



























Tuesday, 24 February 2015

The Archbishop's Career


The Archbishop is still spouting propaganda and lies in the paper, and it distresses me, 
I am still living under a death sentence,
why haven't my complaints been dealt with?
Why am I not free from the diocese of winchester and why is welby still being allowed to make a fool of himself?
Wasn't destroying me and leaving me homeless, destitute and shattered enough? Why did the church have to forcibly make me relive their side of things while I was left voiceless? And why am I still under a death sentence and not allowed to live? 
There is no organization, not even the Mafia, more evil than the Church who pretend to be Christians as they kill and destroy, who have the power to whine about caring for the vulnerable while destroying them and catering only for the wealthy.

Justin Welby's attentions seeking career:

  • Sets the scene by claiming not to believe in God - Time for him to resign if this was a Christian church, but he is there as a banker, a capitalist, to live off the wealth of the church and try to further it. 
  • He becomes Archbishop Wonga as he does his first real 'foot-in-mouth-because-he didn't research' - Time for him to resign again. He weakly flails and whines in response, claiming he will do Wonga out of business. Yes, so he is a banker, a capitalist, why is he running the church of England?
  • He and Paul Butler decide to curry public favour and kick Chichester victims in the face.
  • He and Paul Butler decide to curry favour and destroy me all over again with whitewashes in the news while I am homeless, voiceless and subject to a smear campaign that includes hatred and judgement from church people who have never met me.
  • The Archbishop continues to whitter and spout for two years while allowing me to be destroyed.
  • The Archbishop and Paul Butler run a full-on duplicity and currying attention and favour at the expense of victims spree, in the national press, while leaving me to be destroyed
  • December 2014. Justin Welby publicly defames his Father, in a whining attention-currying national press article. Any true Christian would be disgusted and ask this man to resign, but sadly most of the wealthy old ladies that make up the main body of the church of england would be too baffled 'What is the Archbishop talking about?' and pass over the article, while sheeple probably sent him lots of sympathetic letter, but the world overlooked the fact that he was breaking one of the Ten Commandments.
  • 2015. The Archbishop's duplicity campaign in full swing, he sets up a lot of publicity making a Bishop out to be a victim at Downing Street, Attacking the government, along with his fellow Archbishop, and with a second wave of their 'Vote Labout Sheeple! We don't want to be internally investigated!' Campaign.
  • The Archbishop shows off in the press, pretending to care about the vulnerable, no mention of me or Theresa Cooper. And the old ladies who make up the body of the church of England scratch their heads and go 'That young Archbishop! What does vulnerable mean?' While the sheeple fall and worship the church of England.
  • The Archbishop does another 'didn't bother to research, foot in mouth' over 'The living wage', because he is a banker and a labour politician who likes click words.
  • Then the Sun expose him as a hypocrite.
  • Then the Archbishop's script writer gets him to whine to pre-empt 'allegations of hypocrisy' which is the trademark pre-emptive dupliciousness of Butler, Welby and their fellow privately educated men. So the Archbishop's script writer is good, but the 'allegations of hypocrisy' are not allegations, they are true and correct statements that the Archbishop is a hypocrite. He cannot go on running a national club for the elderly and wealthy, that has an apartheide against the vulnerable, and still pretend to care about them, it makes him a hypocrite, he has left me suffering and yet he has time to show off in the paper, he is a hypocrite, he pays his staff badly and he publicly condemns others, he attacks tax dodgers and he is a millionaire tax-dodger running a millionaire tax dodging corporation himself. An organization claiming to be Christian and behaving constantly badly, heniously, exclusively, making the vulnerable unwelcome and to blame through apartheide 'safeguarding' policies and unwelcoming old wealthy people. So, whoever the script writer is for Wellby, they should be congratulated, but the more he shouts in the press without putting his brain in gear, the more of a fool he is making of himself and the church he was due to resign from when he denied God.
Would someone get the Archbishop to be quiet, resign or start making his church into something that actually gives him any right to criticize others?

The Archbishop claims to be 'declaring war on tax dodgers', apart from that meaning he is declaring war on himself, doesn't that mean he is declaring war on Philip Bailhache and Jersey who he went belly-up to, when Philip Bailhache turned up on his doorstep with illegally obtained material and a one sided concoction to clear the Dean? 
The Archbishop responded by clearing the Dean and allowing me to be publicly destroyed.
So, who is he declaring war on?  He is reminiscent of a puffed-up cockerel crowing loudly at a fox that is outside the hen-coop. It's all noise and bravado and it is making him look like an aimless attention seeking idiot.

The open letter to the Archbishop has just been amended: 

Wednesday, 18 February 2015

The Church of England Party start their election camapign...

They want a coalition with the Labour Party!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2957106/Church-England-takes-Russell-Brand-election-boycot-call-shocked-profound-effect-young-voters.html

And Miracles never cease, the Daily Mail were licking the Church's boots until very recently.

And Here the Church of England describe themselves! Take that log out of your own eye, WelbyDammned!

In an open letter they called for a ‘new direction’ in politics to replace a society they said is self-interested, fragmented, and badly led by politicians. 


Welby noiseboxes aimlessly around. But there is a recruitment drive to send people to Mars, and of course they will need an Archbishop up there...





Tuesday, 17 February 2015

Church Politics

The church have produced another document, a 50 page 'Vote Labour' documents, even the very conservative news reporter had trouble keeping a straight face.

What is it that the Church do not understand about Christianity? Jesus did not influence voters, and people who had been awaiting the Long expected Messiah felt let down by that. It was the Pharisees who did the Politics and considered themselves God's servants.

I say again, the Church of England are the modern day Pharisees.

And just to correct my error of earlier on the Dean of Jersey  letter, I forgot until I was reminded earlier, the Dean's wife is the real Dean of Jersey, as I was told by a clergyman in Jersey in 2010. Maybe I should have addressed that letter to her.

http://opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-very-reverend-bob-key-dean-jersey

Thursday, 12 February 2015

Anything and Everything

Good evening,

Sometimes I just feel like writing about anything and everything. It's an Ould habit.

Church joke (They must be joking):
Let's start with The CofE's latest desperate ploy to get people into church - using comedy. It is tempting to make a cheap shot and say that the Church of England are a joke as it is, but that would be shallow, I will instead a-muse on the situation :)

Firstly, I wish the church well in their comedy, but, they already have a tradition, in my experience, of inappropriate anecdotes and poor taste jokes during sermons, and they have been doing this throughout the time I have known them, and I don't think it changes a thing, but it does detract from what the sermon and service should be focussed on.
God isn't a joke. Yes, a service can be lighthearted, humerous, but the Church are so desparate, that they are in danger of undermining the purpose of the church service, and they already undermine it with Vicars and curates waffling on in anecdotes about their own lives that they think are funny and the congregation dutifully laughs, I have heard so many rubbish jokes, especially from George Lihou and Mike Taylor, jokes copied from a book, incongruent, badly told, not funny and making the service worthless. Where does the Church of England get money to employ comedians to teach their Priests to make services comical, when they are not paying compensation to the abuse victims that Justin Welby 'Weeps over'.

Jeff Southern, Jersey Politics (Maybe the Church can learn comedy from Jersey Politics).

Who is he? A Mezecite, I think, and Mezec is praising the Establishment in his latest blog, apparently the States members are all sudden loyal and dedicated people, doing their best for Jersey, Mezec is obviously running for Senator soon, because he has changed his tune.
I had a dream the other night that someone told me to speak to Jeff Southern, or is it Geoff Southern, about the Church matter, the person in the dream was so adamant, but dammit, no one has a solution to the massive corruption and abuse of power that is behind the actions of Jersey States, Judiciary and Police members who have destroyed me. No-one, and there will never be justice. Southern is only a deputy, what can he do? Apart from spout hot air like Higgins does at regular intervals.


Adoptive parents:

As you know, if you read my blogs, I am an adoptive daughter, and my adoptive mum proudly told that to everyone I introduced her to on Monday :) I love my Muvver.

As you know, I have been widely maligned for being naïve enough to let people, the Montagues, Lihous and Avertys, take over my life and call themselves 'family' to me, and each time they have taken me over, tried to magically cure me, got a lot of defensive anger for me and vilified and branded me for it, all three couples in collaboration with the political-judiciary circle from Jersey.

The Church of England keep mumbling a numb, dumb press release about how 'vulnerable adults sometimes get taken in and boundaries are crossed'. This is in line with their apartheid on poor and single vulnerable adults, maybe they should come into the real world, where a mixed up church contains a lot of bored old people and few vulnerable people, and the old people try to 'cure' the vulnerable, forcefully, Godding them and their problems to the point of abuse, and being disappointed and blaming the vulnerable person for responding with anger and distress.

You cannot cure a childhood of abuse by taking over the vulnerable adult, trying cackhandedly to act as a parent to them and putting them in a childhood position, not being prepared for the response as you make them a child again, cure for trauma does not come sweet and quiet, it comes through rage and grief. And these idiots, the Montagues, Lihous and Avertys, set the situations up, themselves, and felt proud of themselves, as they destroyed me and widely vilified me for my response, especially as there was sexual abuse in the case of the Montagues and Avertys, and dangerously irresponsible actions in all cases.

I know I have described this before in the post about my adoptive parents now, but it is incredible how different the situation has been with my adoptive Mum and her husband, who have been my friends since early 2011.
The adoptive parents didn't take over my life, in fact their boundaries and emotional competence in my case have been outstanding. They didn't do as the Church of England do, they didn't bulldoze, take over and expect miracles and vilify me for my reaction.
They became my friends, they did not take me over, and they proved trustworthy when the Diocese tried to take them from me by slander.

 The Church of England's well off congregations really do not understand the poor and vulnerable and so they are an embarrassment.
The only way anyone can help me is if they are trustworthy, and do not spread my confidences round the community and leave me belittled and abuse me. My now adoptive parents are trustworthy, and the people who took me over in the Church of England were not.

So when will the Church of England, who can't see past the ends of their noses, stop being a comedy act and actually look at the faults that their Church is riddled with and stop stoning me? They need to start by selling everything they own so that they can start to understand the poor and follow Christ's teachings.

The Death of a Homeless Hero:

Anne Naysmith. This inspirational and much loved lady demonstrated how long term homelessness can be caused, and how it can be addictive, and sustainable.
It was hard for me to learn to live indoors after over three years homeless. And even now, I sometimes think it would be easier to simply sleep rough.

Links: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/feb/11/homeless-ex-pianist-anne-naysmith-dies-in-road-accident

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/car-lady-of-chiswick-roughsleeping-former-concert-pianist-anne-naysmith-dies-10044112.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/11405187/Anne-Naysmith-pianist-obituary.html









Saturday, 7 February 2015

The Archbishop's usual...

Attention seeking in the press.

THe Archbishop claims to be 'doing war on the tax dodgers'.

Ahh, he can start with his own church, a wealthy and powerful corporation, which uniquely claims to be a charity, whilst also being a government department, while sitting on billions of pounds of wealth that Tony Baldry gets to play with!

And isn't the Archbishop also contradicting himself as usual by claming to declare war on the businesses who he also tries to curry favour from to keep his defunct 'Church' Going?

With his constant contradictions, of himself, his church and the Bible, will he not be remembered as 'Archbishop Contradiction'?
As well as 'Archbishop Wonga' of course!

'Let them eat cake
the Bishops cried

Thinking they'd get
the plebs on their side

The plebs took one look
at the wealthy old club

and thirsted after righteousness
down the pub

Archbishop Wonga knew hye had failed
so he put his head in his hands and wailed

Wednesday, 21 January 2015

What the church say and what they actually mean

There is such a discrepancy between what the church say and reality.

I never used to  take any notice of what the Church of England had to say in the press, in fact I had no reason to care what they said, until I realised that they are a Political party with massive power, which they abuse with impunity.

The first time I noticed the Church abuse of the press was in Jersey and while the Diocese of Winchester were destroying me and showing off in the press at the same time. I saw how what they put in the paper was PR rather than news or reality.
Unfortunately, even good people or well-meaning people are mislead by Church Propaganda and even repeat it, believe it and defend it. Planet Jersey, who are well meaning, often further harm to me by repeating church lies and propaganda, there's this rather puffed up guy who calls himself BoatyBoy, who often harms me and causes me distress by furthering the Church's lies about my case and about other things. He's the guy who for some unknown reason decided to attack me himself by sending money to the Dean of Jersey for me, I couldn't have thought of anything nastier to do to someone than sending money to their destroyer for them, but I give him the benefit of the doubt, he appears very naive and quite limited with regards understanding of the world and church and politics.
The problem with Jersey is that unless you can afford one of the private schools, you don't get much of a shot at education unless you are very pro-active.

But it is the same in the UK, this 'Mandate Now' guy on twitter was naively supporting the church's spin-doctor, Paul Butler, Jane Fisher's friend who is thus nothing to do with safeguarding. These big fat people can pronounce for the Church until eternity, it doesn't make the church anything more than a greedy, selective political club that uses Jesus' Name in vain.
Exaro News have appointed themselves as personal protectors of the church while slamming the government over abuse, that is a paradox that I can't figure out, but I imagine that the church are paying them enough to keep them running.

So what do Church Press releases mean?

  • 'We care about the poor' = 'We care about our image/we are politically advocating labout to win the next general election'.
  • 'We care about abuse victims' = 'We care that we averted a government inquiry into abuse in the church, and we are trying to avoid outside inquiy at all costs, and we will use victims as PR for the church while we are at it'.
  • 'We care about the minimum wage and living wage' = 'We use the poor as a PR stunt for the church because they are voiceless and we think it makes us look good, however, we forgot that people know we pay our clergy a very low salary and treat them like dirt at a diocesan level'.

 I think you could keep yourselves amused in future by deciphering the Church of England's press relase code! I would write more but I have to go out and look in bins because the Church of England left me homeless and destitute and shattered my career.



Living Wage

The Daily Fail have just called Justin Welby a hypocrite again over his comments on living wage at odds with the fact that the CofE don't pay their clergy well. They are correct, I think. JM used to complain to me about her salary, she apparently managed because her husband was better off than she was and could manage her money for her.

err, the Church are a rich corporation who pay their staff badly.

Monday, 22 December 2014

Daily Fail - Welby


DEAR 'Welby'

I am horrified to see that  as well as not believing in God, you don't believe in the Ten Commandments either, and are slandering your Father in the National Paper,
although the Daily Fail, your private advertisement and propaganda paper is hardly a paper any more, it is one of the 'rag' papers these days, especially as you appear to pay the Daily Fail to personally show you off, which again is nothing to do with Jesus.
What amuses me though, is, that despite being your personal propaganda paper, they always refer to you as 'Welby' Which is a mark of contempt, to refer to someone by their surname only.
'Welby' This and 'Welby' that, makes you into an object of church propaganda and not a human being, which would explain a LOT.

Don't you think, that since saying you don't believe in God, and now you have stooped to publicly maligning your own parents to get attention and sympathy, you really have sunk to new lows, too low even for Church of England leadership, which is really saying something! 
It is funny how your church didn't even murmur when you said you didn't believe in God.

You really are a very silly and vain man, full of affectation and pretence, and you are making a fool of your church, and it is time you left.

This 'Shake-up' you keep boasting about should include removing you.

Now, go and apologize to your parents, if they are still alive, and if not, you should be even more dreadfully ashamed of yourself and go and confess to a real priest and repent.
Especially as your time spent slandering and libelling your parents should be being spent on resolving the Jersey and Winchester matter.
It is no wonder, if you bad mouth your own parents in public, you have not been able to understand how wrong the actions of the Deanery and DIocese and church times have been against me.

There must be a time when your uncontrolled run of propaganda and lies in the press stops and you start dealing with the very serious issues in your church, such as employing a dangerous liar as a safeguarding officer and employing clergy in Jersey and a Bishop of Winchester who are without a shred of integrity or Christianity.

Use Jesus as a spirit level, would he approve of your continued harm to the vulnerable and your showing off in the press? No, because it is what the Pharisees did.

sincerely,
-- 
HG

Monday, 8 December 2014

A quick note to the Archbishop yesterday

Dear Justin Welby,
I was dismayed to see that you are advertising yourself and your church on the front paper of your newspaper, the Daily Mail again today.
Please would you think about the poor and consider donating the money you pay the Daily Mail to spearhead your self-glorification campaigns to organizations which help the poor, such as the Trussel Trust, who run so many foodbanks nationwide? That way, the poor Benefit, and your terrible propaganda that misleads anyone silly enough to read the Daily Mail or Church Times ends, kill two birds with one stone.
Because you have destroyed me through your million pound Winchester and Jersey cover up and condoned the actions of wrongdoers and allowed me to be extensively villified as a result of your and Dakin's self-glorifying pretence of a safeguarding investigation at my expense, I can't stand to see you making a loud empty noise about the poor from your palace. Before your church destroyed me, I was working and supporting myself, but since you permenantly destroyed and branded me, I am reliant on foodbanks and don't really want your input about them, especially as, the same as with the Jersey case, you seem entirely ignorant regarding foodbanks.
Are you aware of why Foodbanks are overloaded with destitute people now? Well, when foodbanks got established, the Government saw that this was good, and the government work in the same way as their government department, the Church of England do. The government abolished crisis loans and community care grants and started writing foodbank tickets for DWP customers who had no money due to one or other error or cruelty by the DWP, so the government send people to foodbanks to save the government money.
And who runs the foodbanks? The churches. And the churches feel that they are doing their Christian duty. So local to us, a talk was given of how the Churches were blessed (or rather gullible) to be taking such responsibilities as the government drop them.
The outcome is, no, the government wont support foodbanks, because, just as the church destroyed me and refuse to restore what they have taken from me, the government are not going to put right the Foodbank crisis that they have caused, and Nanny Welby whining and self-glorifying is a bit silly, especially as Nanny Welby should have quietly resigned after the 'Wonga' situation and then the horrific Jersey mess which remains in every way unresolved.
Putting it bluntly, deal with your own church and the problems they cause, rather than self-glorifying through the Newspapers that are on your private payroll, you have messed up so badly that it astounds me that you are even there, let alone self-glorifying through the press.
You have told the world that you doubt that there is a God, and you act as if there is no God, so please resign.
In recent news, I saw that a Vicar in the Blackburn Diocese and his daughter had been arrested. I saw no point to make in order to put that article on my blog, as it is one Priest and the church tend to trot out the line 'we are all human' as second best to the line 'Don't judge', which is usually used at a time when the church are being very judgemental.
But, the thing is, you claim to provide 'A Christian presence in every community' and as every day, other Press, not your pet Daily Mail, report on sex acts and depravity within the church, you are failing to provide that so-called Christian presence in every community and your safeguarding policy, which segregates and blames the vulnerable, is a joke.
So please, if you have time for your Pet Paper to interview you, you have time to take action both about the way you have destroyed me and also the mess your church is in. Do you think you could stop the headline self-glorification and crocodile tears until such a time as you have done so?
Or at least give me a break over Christmas from your insipid and duplicious noise?
Please note, that during the more recent destroyal of me, from March last year to the present time, you have never once found time to reply to my concerns, so please can the noise in the press stop because your priorities are wrong, deal with your church first, then show off in the paper.
I have had no apology for your destroyal of me, and there is no excuse whatsoever for the damage inflicted on me by the church of england, none whatsoever. You have showed that you are not a Christian Church and that your priorities are image, cover-up and self-glorification.
The foodbank self-glorification appears to be you marshalling your sheeple to adore you. The problem is, the church of england, a wealthy old club, have no understanding of foodbank clients, and treat them as naughty children, while your puffed up church members feel really good to be 'doing their Christian duty'. This is the real church of england, and any amount of 'working parties' about safeguarding will fail as long as you continue to equate safeguarding with looking down on, excluding and segregating vulnerable adults as you do in your policy of excluding the vulnerable from people's homes, and even boasting in the Church Times articles that 'people took vulnerable people in and thought they were doing the right thing'
Your attitude is inexcusable. I was damaged by this Church Policy where paedophiles who pay into the church coffers are allowed into the homes of clergy people, as my abuser in Jersey was, but I was excluded with no explaination from my curate friend's home as soon as Jane Fisher found out I was friends with the curate and would go round for tea, I was neither told nor had the policy explained to me, and it damaged my friendship with the curate before Jane Fisher proceeded to destroy that friendship by using the curate against me, and of course that isn't in any of the whitewash reports you have done at my expense, because you have excluded me from all reports.

Lets move on to other press-related issues.
The Church Times is barely a newspaper, used mainly for Church of England propaganda and self-glorification. And recently they and the Church's pretence of care for the vulnerable campaign made yet another boo-boo.
An article about the disabled in Church read that 'Disabled people couldn't read the liturgy, because it was aimed at the wealthy middles classes'.
Well yes, it is aimed at the wealthy middle classes, because it is their club. But you have all forgotten something, disabled people can be both wealthy and middle class.
The other boo-boo there was that autism is mentioned over and over again and while you/the Church times claim that that the 'Old English' of the liturgy is too complex for those such as us.
The Church remain in the dark ages with no understanding of people with disabilities.
Someone with autism is generally average to high intelligence, and many, such as myself, tend to speak rather formally and understand straightforward formal, standard and BBC English and find such language easier to work with than slang and sloppy English.
The thing that makes us unwelcome in the Church is not the liturgy, the liturgy never troubled me, what makes us unwelcome is that you are judgemental, unwelcoming, exclusive, your safeguarding is a joke, and you destroy and exclude and belittle vulnerable people, from your positions of wealth and power. The Church of ENgland is a club for the wealthy, with no understanding of the poor and vulnerable, and that isn't going to change under spin doctor like Paul Butler, who has protected Jane Fisher after her serious and illegal misconduct, as you yourself are also doing, in fact nothing will change as long as you continue to shout in the press and ignore the serious damage to me and others.
The other issue is that predators who have money, and even those who do not, know that the church is the best place for easy pickings, and if it comes to it, as demonstrated in Jersey and Winchester, when it comes to it, the Church will support them, the predators, and drive the victim out if they speak up. In My Case Jane Fisher supported both of my abusers and everyone who upheld them, and went out of her way to successfully and completely destroy me and cover for them and for her own misconduct, and I remain profoundly affected.

Part of the slanderous article in the church times that defames me as a result of the cover ups and conflicted investigations is that Eli Ward's case came up, and again in other press.
I have spoken to Eli at length, and the brief sentences where he says he is glad of the outcome and hopes the church will implement the suggestions for change belies the years of harm to him by the church, not just in abuse but in cover ups, the fact that he was also wrongly labelled insane, a common church and government trick to take away a victim's credibility.
What Eli told me is that the Great Grim Church are cowards who use intimidation, which I have certainly experienced and remain in fear for my life, home and liberty due to Jane Fisher's actions against me, and when Eli came out with his story against the church, he used his real name so that you could do nothing, it certainly played a part in you setting up the self-glorification and spin about safeguarding campaign, but until you can see us as real suffering human beings, you will never know what safeguarding is, nor impliment it, and as your reports still omit Jane Fisher's horrific actions, probably the best place for them to be heard is in court, a real court, not one I am flung into, voiceless and unheard after a beating and imprisonment as has happened several times due to your 'safeguarding officer' and her cover ups at my expense.
The church use the poor, they do not do as Jesus did and minister them, Jesus loved the lost and needy, you tread on them, use them and abuse them, leaving them voiceless and violated.

I was incredulous to see, a week or so after being left in collapse by the Church Times defamation of me more recently, that you were in the paper, Mindlessly praising journalists, what, the ones who defamed me to glorify you and your church? Madeleine Davis who has been slandering me for months on end? The Daily Mail journalists who kiss your feet? Yes, it must be wonderful to be the other side of the cover ups and propaganda and praise the journalists you use for propaganda, cover-ups and self-glorifications, but I can assure you, you have repeatly nearly cost me my life and health through the same, so again I say, sort your own house out before you continue to make a fool of yourself. And if you continue to harm me, I will take you back to court.
Do the right thing in God's eyes for the first time in your rather laughable term in office, deal with the Jersey and Winchester matter through an independent investigation.
I think I need to explain to you what independent means, it means outside of the church and people associated with the matters that have occured.
For example, Paul Butler is not independent, he is associated with Jane Fisher and the Montagues who abused me and were allowed to defend themselves by adding their voice to the wrongdoers in Jersey. John Gladwin, who is a Church of England Bishop who played a part in the Chichester cover up, is not independent, neither is Jan Korris, neither is Butler-Sloss, neither is Dame Heather Steel, so as yet all you have done is whitewash at my expense.
And please note, this is not just about abuse, it is about criminal activities by Jane Fisher in conjunction with two Bishops of Winchester,

Please enable an independent inquiry or I will return you to court to plead with a judge for this, if there is any judge left in this country who is not corrupt, freemason, on your payroll etc. Nonetheless, even if you kill me or imprison me as incessantly attempted by Jane Fisher to silence me previously, my voice will not go away and you are responsible in God's eyes for all your deceit, cover-up and harm to me and other vulnerable people.
Wealth, power, use of the press, propaganda, whitewashes, segregation of the poor and vulnerable, cover-ups and defamation are not things that Jesus did, so you either need to call it a day and stop claiming to be a 'Christian presence in every community' and stick with the wealth and power and abuse of the press, or you need to become Christians and stop doing the harm that you are doing.

No matter how tight your collective cover-ups are, it remains you have never given me a fair hearing at all, and have lied about this too, and until you put that right, you are in the wrong with God and thus not fit to be holding the positions that you hold.
So, years and years too late, when are you going to act on this matter? Without beating and imprisoning me to silence me!


sincerely,