Tuesday, 26 April 2016

Letters regarding the Press

16/04/16

Dear Right Honourable Prime Minister,

I spoke with your call handler at 10 Downing Street two weeks ago and she suggested that I wrote to you regarding my concerns. It was an ordeal phoning you as my disability means I can barely use a phone for conversation, but the situation demanded it.

I have thus written letter of concern and also the attached Open Letter to the press , to the parties concerned, including the Telegraph and the Archbishop's Press and Communications representatives and the National Child abuse inquiry. I will also publish this online, as the only way to stop the Church's repeat press and media abuse is to shame them, they are above the law and seemingly above you as you, the only thing that seems to stop their bad behaviour is simply telling them how bad it is, and most vulnerable people who they harm cannot do that, and I have paid dearly for doing so.
I have been unwell due to the issue that needs to be discussed but am now taking action as best I can.

This matter relates to the Church of England's use, or rather abuse, of the press in the past three years or more since Justin Welby became Archbishop. There has been one inappropriate and outrageous press stunt after another, some announce that the Archbishop doesn't know his own Church, and some, such as the recent ones, announce that he doesn't know his Bible, God, or the Ten Commandments, which he recently publicly broke for at least the second time. ('Honour thy Father(s) and Thy Mother, do not use them to glorify yourself and your Church).
I couldn't believe what I was seeing on the front page of the Telegraph that recent Saturday, nor last Sunday. I knew that April Fools day had gone, maybe the Telegraph got the timing wrong?
And unfortunately due to the severe damage to me by the Church of England, which isn't over, seeing Welby use a Newspaper Headline to announce his very personal life left me ill and off work, which isn't good as I am disabled and in poverty as a result. I deliver newspapers as part of my living.

And at a time when the Church are under investigation for mass abuse, I think Welby's need to force his most intimate personal life on the general public was inappropriate and also an insult to those of us who are suffering due to abuse in the church and also the terrible way that the church handles abuse cases, in my case I remain destroyed and suffering.

Thousands of men in this country do not know who their father is, thousands are not sure, some don't mind that much, some had a good replacement father, some feel the loss of the Father they didn't have, but few of them make the headlines of even the lesser papers, why? Because being illegitimate or finding out that your father is someone else, even a famous person, is not headline news. Especially not in a newspaper like the Telegraph, who, presumably will soon have a heading 'Only 15p! 5p Cheaper than the Daily Star!' in order to try to keep in circulation.

The Church should not be in a position to utilize the press for non-Christian blaring and stunts. Welby's stunt last Saturday surely horrified real Christians who know that this exhibitionism isn't the way to behave in public, which is why Sunday's headlines added to the horror, other leaders rallying round him, gagging for some of the press stunt limelight? Why? Is there no church left that doesn't see through Welby's terrible run of press stunts and see how unchristian and damaging it is to the vulnerable and to the Christian Faith?

Unfortunately the 'Clergy Discipline System' within the Church is a token and inadequate system, there to protect powerful wrongdoers and destroy the vulnerable, and it was used to harm me and protect wrongdoers, which is why I am asking you to handle this matter directly. I did make a clergy discipline complaint about the Archbishop and associated Bishops involved in harming me through a press publicity stunt three years ago, when they used a whitewash report into my case to simultaneously defame and destroy me and try to make the Church look good. I was threatened and my complaint was deliberately squashed.

There never has been such a resounding failure as the church 'safeguarding' attack on me, it did destroy me but the Church broke a number of laws and now they are being very very quiet indeed about it, and as they continue the hurtful press campaign but seem unable to answer me regarding the mess they have made of my case. I would like you to step in and bring an end both to the Church of England's abuse of the press and their harm to me and other victims.

Please would you call an independent inquiry into the Jersey Deanery and Diocese of Winchester abuse case, one that looks impartially at church-police-authorities illegal actions and harm through the press and abuse of power and repeated acts without my consent. The Church won't engage and have whitewashed this matter and left me destroyed, a fugitive and in fear of my life.

I am grateful for your help.

HG


Further Reading:



23/04/2013

Dear Independent Press Standards Organization,

I am a vulnerable adult who is at risk if my name and details are published or circulated, this is because courtesy of the Church of England I have been hounded, smeared and destroyed through their use of the press for stunts, I was one of Justin Welby's first stunts, a pretence of safeguarding to make the church look good.
He then left me to be ripped apart by the press and complete strangers by his misleading of the general public.

The recent stunt of Justin Welby making non-news as a headline cements my belief that the Church of England are paying the press a lot of money in order to make headlines. And because this is abuse of the press and is inappropriate as well as perverting public image of Christianity and giving the church limelight, advertising basically, when they are behaving badly. I feel that something should be done.
This is an especial priority now because Justin Welby launched his front page 'non-news' conveniently at a time when the Church of England are being investigated for systemic CSA crimes that Bishop Paul Butler has tried his hardest to sex up and use to glorify the Church. Butler is frequently in the press alongside Welby as Church Press Stuntman, deceiving the general public regarding safeguarding in the Church, while he has overseen me being vilified and destroyed publicly and has refused to respond to my distress or intervene.

As an abuse survivor who the Church have destroyed for press stunts and cover-up, I object to having my day ruined by Church press stunts when I have to deliver papers in the morning and am left ill and sickened at Welby's audacity when the Church of England are under investigation. And I am sure it impacts on other victims that have been left voiceless and harmed by the Church's continuing inability to safeguard or respond properly to complaints.

I have been destroyed by the Church, they grabbed headlines over three years ago to destroy me again in pretence of looking really good about safeguarding. They had no thought for my welfare and have left me voiceless, vilified and suffering, without making the press stunt a fair deal in making sure I was heard in the press on equal footing. Indeed their efforts to make me out to be insane to cover up a case that they handled as badly as possible, on top of their throwing me into the press with inaccurate reports, has led to me being a fugitive who has to routinely keep their identity hidden in order to protect themselves. I can't be me, I am living in fear, and all because of Welby's first 'paid up' headline press stunt.
An organization like the Church of England should not have the power over the press that they do. And certainly not for PR stunts that they make into headline news.

I would like to discuss Welby's string of press stunts and how they abuse the public and also go against what the church of England stand for (although they only now stand for it in theory).

The safeguarding stunt of my case was a desparate effort by the church to avoid investigation for abuse, it was a series of whitewashes and cover ups that abused and mislead the press and general public, and it resurfaces every few months and traumatizes me. It is astounding that Welby used me for his first 'apology' press stunt, of which there has been an endless stream over the past three years, and then has allowed me to be vilified and destroyed publicly. 

Following his 'apology', Welby has simply left me to be torn apart by the defendants in my case, powerful Church dignitaries who he has no control over, lawyers, judges, members of government, the usual Church of England club congregation, he has left me destroyed and allowed these conflicted people to abuse their power and carry out whitewash reports into my case themselves and this has continued to reach the press and destroy me, while Welby, having mislead the general public, has left me suffering intolerably and fails to respond to my concerns at all. What happens to the voiceless vulnerable when the Church have this inappropriate power over the press?
I am in fear of my life as lies and whitewash reports regarding my case hit the headlines every few months. The same press have never even tried to include my side of things and thus codes of conduct are being breached, surely.

The 'apology' stunts apparently aimed at vulnerable groups but the real aim is just simply to make the church look good, and notably these 'apologies' are carried out with no real interaction with the groups 'apologized' to, and at the same time as prominent members of the church are harming the same vulnerable groups, for example while the Archbishop was vaguely 'apologizing' to the gay community and trotting out the lines written for him by his press and communication departments on the advice that this will make the Church look good, the Bishop of Winchester was sacking two members of the clergy for being Gay, while Queens Chaplain Gavin Ashenden was launching yet another attack on the gay community, using his status to attack them just as he did the same to me.
I think Welby's press advisor/writer doesn't research, doesn't think of the welfare of those targeted and is overstepping a lot of boundaries. Welby appears to go along with what he is told to say to the press and media, even when he contradicts himself or invalidates the Church of England.

So there have been the apology stunts, and the one aimed at me was never delivered in person, it was purely a press stunt, followed by me being destroyed from then until now, and eventually I will not be able to endure it, as yet, no authority I have contacted will prevent harm to me, so could you be the first and stop the Church from manipulating and abusing the press. I understand you can't extend this to the BBC, but they and the Church are Birds of a Feather, both with a long history of abuse and cover up and deception of the general public.

On from the apology stunts, apparently it needed to be headline news that Welby 'wanted to drive Wonga out of business' (which would result in people like me ending up starving and homeless). Welby failed to research Wonga and was shamed by the fact his Church had shares in Wonga, as well as companies involved with weapons and pornography! I can't remember who helpfully outed that but Welby blustered and said the Church would drive Wonga out of business with a Credit Union run by the Church. He seems to forget that those of us who have been abused and are thus unwelcome in the Church would be excluded, and many members of the public who do not like the Church and their bad behaviour would also be excluded.

Every few months, either Butler or Welby comes out with an outrageous abuse of the press, in Butler's case it is to mislead about safeguarding and make people think the Church cares, for example 'praising the courage' of an abuse victim who committed suicide in the Bishop Ball case. Firstly Butler and other Bishops were in power and aware of their colleague's caution for abuse and did nothing, secondly what do the family think of this fat Bishop in the press praising their dead family member for church glorification purposes when the Church treated him the same way as they have treated me? This should not be happening. Butler has made no effort to resolve my case and I have nearly been driven to suicide and am at breaking point.

I think the reasons that the Church are not tackled over their outrageous behaviour is apathy, the Church are a law unto their own and people aren't listened to if they complain to the Church, a lot of people are being mislead by the Church's press stunts and more are being hurt, but no one feels that complaining to you is effective, as I have noted from many comments on social media, but someone has to start somewhere, and as I am destroyed by the Church and in fear of my life from their abuse of the press, it may as well be me who starts the objection. 

Onwards into the press stunts. Welby decided that his daughter would make a good showpiece, in the same manner as he has recently decided that his mother and one of his other fathers were.
Anyway, apparently this well-fed daughter of Welby's was feeling sad about a breakup of a relationship, so Welby decided to insult anyone who suffers genuine mental illness by pimping his daughter out as mentally ill, the point of this was unclear apart from that the church are gagging for attention and presumably he hoped this would grab attention from the public and mislead them to think that there are human beings in the Church. 

Reality is that mental illness is not a laughing matter and Welby has showed by allowing his church to publicly attack me on the excuse that I am mentally ill, that he doesn't understand or care about mental illness. The church have tried to use mental illness as an excuse to make me not credible, with no understanding of PTSD that they have caused.  The Church being mostly wealthy middle class with comfortable lives, do not understand human problems such as disability and trauma, and their abuse of the press using such topics to glorify themselves or to condemn someone like me is outrageous. I have little understanding of press guidelines, with only a short course in journalism on my CV, but I do know that ethically in the wider world and in safeguarding, the church's behaviour is unacceptable. There isn't any way their misleading self-glorification at the expense of the vulnerable is acceptable.

A few years ago, Justin Welby did a Christmas special press stunt, by launching one of his previous fathers into the press as a drunkard. In this case in his desparation for attention, the Archbishop broke one of the 10 commandments, as he has done again recently with another of his fathers, both of whom are presumably dead and unable to answer his smears of them. How embarrassing and shameless! 
Anyway, so for no apparently reason he did this Christmas special advertisement of the Church as having no respect for family or privacy or the 10 commandments, it doesn't matter if the man he was maligning was dead or wasn't his father. What mattered is that he was making press headlines setting a bad example to his Church and hurting real Christians who simply do not behave like that. And all of this has gone on while he has left me suffering and voiceless. I have said to him if he has time for press stunts, he has time to bring justice and closure to my case, which he has left open with repeat attacks on me from his church regularly and with my story not in any reports.

Paul Butler had a spate of Shameless and ridiculous limelight-seeking press stunts that mislead and amazed people. He made a huge show of 'handing over' big names to the police in the press limelight, whoever co-ordinates these press stunts should be very ashamed of themselves, and so should Butler, and I have asked why the police haven't brought charges against the Church for perverting the course of justice there as well as in my case where the church protected two serial abusers and destroyed me. I think it was a related Butler-led stunt that interestingly just before the National Abuse Inquiry, decided to tell the press another squeaky clean safeguarding lie, that they were having files regarding confession or abuse independently audited, oh what a co-incidence.  In my case the Church called a Church counsellor, a Bishop, a Church judge and other conflicted people 'independent' and allowed these people to destroy me, and Butler-Sloss who also features in my case, was also called independent while protecting Bishop Ball alongside Bishop Gladwin who also whitewashed my case. Thus I assume the independent auditing so proudly mentioned in the press was again a misuse of independent and a rapid cover up and shredding of files before the abuse inquiry, but the general public, mislead by the church and press, aren't to know that.

I am going to conclude with the most recent press stunt. Jesus did not say His followers should crow and strut in the limelight and use their family shamelessly as Welby has done. Jesus did not remove the 10 commandments. Jesus advocated prudence and simplicity and fairness. I do not know how Welby managed to conveniently get a paternity test and buy headlines with it, but it wasn't news, it isn't appropriate behaviour for a religious leader, and for the other church leaders to beg for limelight by supporting Welby's outrageous behaviour there is little hope for the Church. 
Most importantly, while the Church are under investigation for abuse, any headlines that are not necessary are an affront to victims of the Church, both those who are already under stress from having to give evidence and those of us who are voiceless and silenced.

Welby's church is very very messed up and problematic, with a huge amount of wealth and a very exclusive congregation and a lot of power to abuse, as has been shown in my efforts to get justice and a voice, so he shouldn't be taking time to discuss his personal life with a horrified, disgusted, fascinated, indifferent and admiring general public through newspapers and media that should be working within boundaries to ensure impartial and good news coverage without offence to members of the public.

What I would ask, if you may, is investigate how much money is being used to run this continuous press stunt, as it appears to be enough money to ensure that if Welby wants to talk about the warts on his toes and vaguely link that to Christianity, the press will comply without question, even if Welby headlines again the following week with 'oops, I meant the warts on my hands'.
Also, would you ensure that the press and media understand the impact of these rudderless press stunts on the vulnerable, especially those damaged by the Church. If possible remind the Church of England of their responsibility while they are being investigated for systemic abuse, that they should not be using the press for unimportant press stunts while victims have the stress of the inquiry to deal with, these victims need safeguarding from the Church's needless narcissistic showing off. And while the Church can't safeguard, they need to take their focus off press advertising and put it to creating safeguarding within the church.

I really think it is time that Welby started focussing on bringing some Christianity into his monster, power-hungry and oppressive church and stopped abusing the press and general public. Although he may need reminding what Christianity is.

Many thanks,

HG

This is officially CC Lambeth Palace, the BBC, the Abuse Inquiry and The Telegraph and Mail as a courtesy.

 **********************************

23/04/2013

Dear Independent Press Standards Organization,

I am a vulnerable adult who is at risk if my name and details are published or circulated, this is because courtesy of the Church of England I have been hounded, smeared and destroyed through their use of the press for stunts, I was one of Justin Welby's first stunts, a pretence of safeguarding to make the church look good.
He then left me to be ripped apart by the press and complete strangers by his misleading of the general public.

The recent stunt of Justin Welby making non-news as a headline cements my belief that the Church of England are paying the press a lot of money in order to make headlines. And because this is abuse of the press and is inappropriate as well as perverting public image of Christianity and giving the church limelight, advertising basically, when they are behaving badly. I feel that something should be done.
This is an especial priority now because Justin Welby launched his front page 'non-news' conveniently at a time when the Church of England are being investigated for systemic CSA crimes that Bishop Paul Butler has tried his hardest to sex up and use to glorify the Church. Butler is frequently in the press alongside Welby as Church Press Stuntman, deceiving the general public regarding safeguarding in the Church, while he has overseen me being vilified and destroyed publicly and has refused to respond to my distress or intervene.

As an abuse survivor who the Church have destroyed for press stunts and cover-up, I object to having my day ruined by Church press stunts when I have to deliver papers in the morning and am left ill and sickened at Welby's audacity when the Church of England are under investigation. And I am sure it impacts on other victims that have been left voiceless and harmed by the Church's continuing inability to safeguard or respond properly to complaints.

I have been destroyed by the Church, they grabbed headlines over three years ago to destroy me again in pretence of looking really good about safeguarding. They had no thought for my welfare and have left me voiceless, vilified and suffering, without making the press stunt a fair deal in making sure I was heard in the press on equal footing. Indeed their efforts to make me out to be insane to cover up a case that they handled as badly as possible, on top of their throwing me into the press with inaccurate reports, has led to me being a fugitive who has to routinely keep their identity hidden in order to protect themselves. I can't be me, I am living in fear, and all because of Welby's first 'paid up' headline press stunt.
An organization like the Church of England should not have the power over the press that they do. And certainly not for PR stunts that they make into headline news.

I would like to discuss Welby's string of press stunts and how they abuse the public and also go against what the church of England stand for (although they only now stand for it in theory).

The safeguarding stunt of my case was a desparate effort by the church to avoid investigation for abuse, it was a series of whitewashes and cover ups that abused and mislead the press and general public, and it resurfaces every few months and traumatizes me. It is astounding that Welby used me for his first 'apology' press stunt, of which there has been an endless stream over the past three years, and then has allowed me to be vilified and destroyed publicly. 

Following his 'apology', Welby has simply left me to be torn apart by the defendants in my case, powerful Church dignitaries who he has no control over, lawyers, judges, members of government, the usual Church of England club congregation, he has left me destroyed and allowed these conflicted people to abuse their power and carry out whitewash reports into my case themselves and this has continued to reach the press and destroy me, while Welby, having mislead the general public, has left me suffering intolerably and fails to respond to my concerns at all. What happens to the voiceless vulnerable when the Church have this inappropriate power over the press?
I am in fear of my life as lies and whitewash reports regarding my case hit the headlines every few months. The same press have never even tried to include my side of things and thus codes of conduct are being breached, surely.

The 'apology' stunts apparently aimed at vulnerable groups but the real aim is just simply to make the church look good, and notably these 'apologies' are carried out with no real interaction with the groups 'apologized' to, and at the same time as prominent members of the church are harming the same vulnerable groups, for example while the Archbishop was vaguely 'apologizing' to the gay community and trotting out the lines written for him by his press and communication departments on the advice that this will make the Church look good, the Bishop of Winchester was sacking two members of the clergy for being Gay, while Queens Chaplain Gavin Ashenden was launching yet another attack on the gay community, using his status to attack them just as he did the same to me.
I think Welby's press advisor/writer doesn't research, doesn't think of the welfare of those targeted and is overstepping a lot of boundaries. Welby appears to go along with what he is told to say to the press and media, even when he contradicts himself or invalidates the Church of England.

So there have been the apology stunts, and the one aimed at me was never delivered in person, it was purely a press stunt, followed by me being destroyed from then until now, and eventually I will not be able to endure it, as yet, no authority I have contacted will prevent harm to me, so could you be the first and stop the Church from manipulating and abusing the press. I understand you can't extend this to the BBC, but they and the Church are Birds of a Feather, both with a long history of abuse and cover up and deception of the general public.

On from the apology stunts, apparently it needed to be headline news that Welby 'wanted to drive Wonga out of business' (which would result in people like me ending up starving and homeless). Welby failed to research Wonga and was shamed by the fact his Church had shares in Wonga, as well as companies involved with weapons and pornography! I can't remember who helpfully outed that but Welby blustered and said the Church would drive Wonga out of business with a Credit Union run by the Church. He seems to forget that those of us who have been abused and are thus unwelcome in the Church would be excluded, and many members of the public who do not like the Church and their bad behaviour would also be excluded.

Every few months, either Butler or Welby comes out with an outrageous abuse of the press, in Butler's case it is to mislead about safeguarding and make people think the Church cares, for example 'praising the courage' of an abuse victim who committed suicide in the Bishop Ball case. Firstly Butler and other Bishops were in power and aware of their colleague's caution for abuse and did nothing, secondly what do the family think of this fat Bishop in the press praising their dead family member for church glorification purposes when the Church treated him the same way as they have treated me? This should not be happening. Butler has made no effort to resolve my case and I have nearly been driven to suicide and am at breaking point.

I think the reasons that the Church are not tackled over their outrageous behaviour is apathy, the Church are a law unto their own and people aren't listened to if they complain to the Church, a lot of people are being mislead by the Church's press stunts and more are being hurt, but no one feels that complaining to you is effective, as I have noted from many comments on social media, but someone has to start somewhere, and as I am destroyed by the Church and in fear of my life from their abuse of the press, it may as well be me who starts the objection. 

Onwards into the press stunts. Welby decided that his daughter would make a good showpiece, in the same manner as he has recently decided that his mother and one of his other fathers were.
Anyway, apparently this well-fed daughter of Welby's was feeling sad about a breakup of a relationship, so Welby decided to insult anyone who suffers genuine mental illness by pimping his daughter out as mentally ill, the point of this was unclear apart from that the church are gagging for attention and presumably he hoped this would grab attention from the public and mislead them to think that there are human beings in the Church. 

Reality is that mental illness is not a laughing matter and Welby has showed by allowing his church to publicly attack me on the excuse that I am mentally ill, that he doesn't understand or care about mental illness. The church have tried to use mental illness as an excuse to make me not credible, with no understanding of PTSD that they have caused.  The Church being mostly wealthy middle class with comfortable lives, do not understand human problems such as disability and trauma, and their abuse of the press using such topics to glorify themselves or to condemn someone like me is outrageous. I have little understanding of press guidelines, with only a short course in journalism on my CV, but I do know that ethically in the wider world and in safeguarding, the church's behaviour is unacceptable. There isn't any way their misleading self-glorification at the expense of the vulnerable is acceptable.

A few years ago, Justin Welby did a Christmas special press stunt, by launching one of his previous fathers into the press as a drunkard. In this case in his desparation for attention, the Archbishop broke one of the 10 commandments, as he has done again recently with another of his fathers, both of whom are presumably dead and unable to answer his smears of them. How embarrassing and shameless! 
Anyway, so for no apparently reason he did this Christmas special advertisement of the Church as having no respect for family or privacy or the 10 commandments, it doesn't matter if the man he was maligning was dead or wasn't his father. What mattered is that he was making press headlines setting a bad example to his Church and hurting real Christians who simply do not behave like that. And all of this has gone on while he has left me suffering and voiceless. I have said to him if he has time for press stunts, he has time to bring justice and closure to my case, which he has left open with repeat attacks on me from his church regularly and with my story not in any reports.

Paul Butler had a spate of Shameless and ridiculous limelight-seeking press stunts that mislead and amazed people. He made a huge show of 'handing over' big names to the police in the press limelight, whoever co-ordinates these press stunts should be very ashamed of themselves, and so should Butler, and I have asked why the police haven't brought charges against the Church for perverting the course of justice there as well as in my case where the church protected two serial abusers and destroyed me. I think it was a related Butler-led stunt that interestingly just before the National Abuse Inquiry, decided to tell the press another squeaky clean safeguarding lie, that they were having files regarding confession or abuse independently audited, oh what a co-incidence.  In my case the Church called a Church counsellor, a Bishop, a Church judge and other conflicted people 'independent' and allowed these people to destroy me, and Butler-Sloss who also features in my case, was also called independent while protecting Bishop Ball alongside Bishop Gladwin who also whitewashed my case. Thus I assume the independent auditing so proudly mentioned in the press was again a misuse of independent and a rapid cover up and shredding of files before the abuse inquiry, but the general public, mislead by the church and press, aren't to know that.

I am going to conclude with the most recent press stunt. Jesus did not say His followers should crow and strut in the limelight and use their family shamelessly as Welby has done. Jesus did not remove the 10 commandments. Jesus advocated prudence and simplicity and fairness. I do not know how Welby managed to conveniently get a paternity test and buy headlines with it, but it wasn't news, it isn't appropriate behaviour for a religious leader, and for the other church leaders to beg for limelight by supporting Welby's outrageous behaviour there is little hope for the Church. 
Most importantly, while the Church are under investigation for abuse, any headlines that are not necessary are an affront to victims of the Church, both those who are already under stress from having to give evidence and those of us who are voiceless and silenced.

Welby's church is very very messed up and problematic, with a huge amount of wealth and a very exclusive congregation and a lot of power to abuse, as has been shown in my efforts to get justice and a voice, so he shouldn't be taking time to discuss his personal life with a horrified, disgusted, fascinated, indifferent and admiring general public through newspapers and media that should be working within boundaries to ensure impartial and good news coverage without offence to members of the public.

What I would ask, if you may, is investigate how much money is being used to run this continuous press stunt, as it appears to be enough money to ensure that if Welby wants to talk about the warts on his toes and vaguely link that to Christianity, the press will comply without question, even if Welby headlines again the following week with 'oops, I meant the warts on my hands'.
Also, would you ensure that the press and media understand the impact of these rudderless press stunts on the vulnerable, especially those damaged by the Church. If possible remind the Church of England of their responsibility while they are being investigated for systemic abuse, that they should not be using the press for unimportant press stunts while victims have the stress of the inquiry to deal with, these victims need safeguarding from the Church's needless narcissistic showing off. And while the Church can't safeguard, they need to take their focus off press advertising and put it to creating safeguarding within the church.

I really think it is time that Welby started focussing on bringing some Christianity into his monster, power-hungry and oppressive church and stopped abusing the press and general public. Although he may need reminding what Christianity is.

Many thanks,

HG

This is officially CC Lambeth Palace, the BBC, the Abuse Inquiry and The Telegraph and Mail as a courtesy.



























I dunno about bravery, but this is how it is

The Dean is looking well in his recent public parade

Friday, 22 April 2016

An Interview with HG

1. When did you first take an interest in the night sky?

We used to lie on the grass and watch the stars when I was a child, and we watched an eclipse one night.

2. What constellations (or parts of them) do you know how to find?

The Easy ones, they showed us a vague view of andromeda on the club telescopes, but I can pick out the usual ones such as Orion, Ursa Major etc, I think the easiest is Ursa Minor, is that the one we call the 'Big Dipper'? 

3. Have you ever seen planets through a telescope? Which ones?
Yes, the club telescopes are excellent and I can't remember which ones, definitely Mars and Venus. I just love the lazer beam pointers, they are wicked! 

4. Do you like Gustav Holtz’s Planet Suite? Which is your favourite planet music? Do you know which planet (apart from Pluto), he misses out?
Yeah, I love the Planets Suite, especially Mars. I think he missed Earth out! 

5. Can you find the North Star?
Yes and it is cheaper than the Daily Echo.

6. Which pop songs can you name which mention stars or planets or outer space?
Rocket Man, Major Tom, Spaceman (what a crazy song), there are more but I can't recall them.

7. Which is the brightest planet in the night sky? And second brightest?
Mars and Venus are both bright, is Venus the one on the dawn horizon? My mind has been off astronomy for too long.

8.  Name two or three TV astronomers.
Patrick Moore, Brian Cox, can't remember, 

9. Do you know the names of any kinds of chocolate or sweets with astronomy names?
Mars/planets, Milky way/stars, Galaxy, star bar, 
stop making me crave chocolate! 

10. Have you visited the London Planetarium or the Peter Harrison Planetarium in London?

Noo, never had an opportunity, would love to! 

 

Wednesday, 6 April 2016

Jersey insists it isn't a tax haven!

And it also claims it was not a place where traffiking of children and systemic abuse occured.

But this is awesome:

Monday, 4 April 2016

Ours is an Island Tax Haven...

...
I know I am being egged on ever so slightly over this, but most readers will remember that awful dirge that my abuser's nephew wrote as a 'National Anthem' for Jersey, which was voted in by his fellow churchman, Sir Philip Bailhache, causing much dismay and consternation among genuine competitors.
Later I think it was Island Games competitors who said that they didn't want that awful dirge spoiling their sports - Bailhache could corruptly vote it in, but he couldn't make people accept it, it stank of Jersey Deanery arrogance. So Jersey's natural and eternal anthem, 'Beautiful Jersey' was played, just as it always has been on Liberation Day, the Day that Bailhache once used to degrade and rubbish abuse survivors through his speech.
Jersey is ruled by the chosen ones of the City of London, most notably the Bailhache Brothers, who use their exalted and conflicted positions to get away with anything they like, and no power on this planet can challenge them, the tax haven power is monsterous, but there are times when they do make fools of themselves in their belief that they can do as they please, and Gerard LeFeuvre's 'Island Home' and Bailhache's Liberation Day speech are two examples of that.

Anyway, Jersey is very much in the spotlight at the moment, at the same time that I am getting premonition of trouble awakening again in the fat and arrogant Jersey Deanery.

Jersey had an election a while back, but it may as well not have bothered, surveys and polls show that people do not like the Bailhache Brothers and the Council of Ministers, but in a similar system to the Catholic Church in Poland telling people who is to be elected and expecting them to be 'Good Catholics' and vote accordlingly, Jersey's Senators are chosen by the Finance Industry, the City of London, and the Church. I have a theory that the Church also choose the UK government as well, but that's another story.
Senator Gorst is not in any way a leader and he is not from Jersey, he was hand-picked by the City of London to be a nodding dog to the Bailhache Brothers and he doesn't appear to have a character or mind of his own, he is effeminate and he is a weed, he has harmed me personally by sock-puppeteering a whitewash report into my case, which broke the law, although as I have mentioned before, the law in Jersey doesn't apply at Senator level unless you fall out of favour, for example by speaking out against abuse.

Apparently a few years ago a certain vicar in Jersey had charges brought against him for interfering in election results, of course he went on to harm me and was duly promoted and honoured by Michael Scott-Joynt, who is now deservedly in hell.
It is amazing that all of this can go on and on, in full public view.

Oh what a rant, oh what accusations.

Anyway, Jersey has made the headlines in the last few days, as it does periodically, shock, horror, and nothing will be done, because of the City of London. The people in power in London and both Governments are in power because of the tax havens and they need them to remain, so no matter how angry the general public are, nothing will be done. Jersey dignitaries have ensured that Jersey and UK care inquiries have whitewashed out Jersey's part in child sex abuse and trade of children that was a perk of the job at one time, and these days apparently just to avoid more 'embarassment' those who still need such perks fly to faraway places at tax payers expense in order to fulfil their needs.

Recent fuss about flight costs by the general public will again lead to whitewash, although I have put in a request for the £1000 of tax payers money used by the Bailhache-Gorst clique on flights to try to force the release of their whitewash report into my case, to be investigated. One of the things that really needs looking into is the fact that they did this without my consent, when my court action against the Bishop means the report cannot be released unless I agree with it. So £1000 was wasted because of these men's arrogance and dishonesty.

I have no doubt that as well as the Camerons having money in Jersey, numerous other conflicted people do, and the Church of England and the Royal Family do too, this is why trying to get action taken against Jersey or trying to get abuse dealt with or justice brought is a waste of time. In short, Bishop Dakin's wages are paid by the people he stupidly publicly attacked when he also publicly attacked me in 2013, either he was extremely ill-informed or short sighted or he was lunatic enough to think he could get away with his public attack, and it beggars belief that he thought he could defame me or the Dean the way he did, internationally. It remains a jaw-dropping question-mark, but Luther-Pendragon have gagged him, so we will never know. And the Church refuse to engage with the matter, apologise, discipline anyone or carry out a balanced investigation which includes my side of things.

I think I have started to ramble a bit, so I will stop and get ready for my evening shift at work, and you will have to wait for the next exciting installment. The raw and unchallenged corruption of Jersey and the City of London is incredible, but nothing will ever be done.



Friday, 1 April 2016

Someone sent me this...

And it reminded me of how much Jersey and Hampshire's nasty police forces need a good old non-corrupt detective like Columbo (complete with glass eye and Basset Hound) to sort things out.

I used to really fancy Columbo, I liked the theme at the end of the one with the minature battle field episode but I have no idea what it was called. Anyone know?

Update: I just found the ending with the Battle field, the episode was 'Grand Deceptions' and the music is still as awesome as I remember it and I haven't heard it since I was 12 years old.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADrVhj8UjBo











































Thursday, 17 March 2016

An interview with HG

An Interview about food:
 1. Do you look to see if the vegetables you buy are organic or not? Why? (or why not?)
I can't afford to buy organic vegetables, I can barely afford vegetables.
 

2. Do you buy free range eggs or battery eggs (usually called “farm fresh!!).
I do buy free range eggs even if they cost more, because I will not deliberately contribute to the cruelty that battery farming is.
 

3. Do you drink bottled water or tap water when drinking a glass of water?
 I drink tap water, but usually filtered, I can't afford bottled water.
 

4. Have you ever eaten – snails, frogs legs? 
No, I don't think I have, I am very routine with my food and probably can't afford snails or frogs unless I catch them myself. Now there's an idea! I remember marshalling at Battle when there was that Escargots float, it was my favourite.
 

5. Jersey dishes – have you eaten congar soup or ormer? Did you like them?
 I have had Black Butter, Cabbage Loaf, Jersey Wonders and Ormer, and also whatever we could catch when low water fishing. I haven't had congar soup as far as I know. Jersey stuff is kind of OK but it is also kind of from a bygone age before imports.
 

6. A recent article suggested insects are the way of the future for people. Have you ever eaten any insects? Would you like to?
I have occasionally eaten insects when out on my bike. I am not sure that method is very healthy though, and they don't taste nice raw.
 

7. How do you like your eggs done best? Boiled, poached, fried, hard-boiled, other?
I like boiled or fried eggs, but my tummy doesn't, so I don't often have eggs.
 

8. Tea or Coffee – which do you prefer? And which kinds of teas / coffees?
 I am bi-caffienal, but with a lean towards tea. I like PG Tips or Typhoo, normal tea, and I like Nescafe Gold Instant Coffee and Wittards non-instant coffee. I can't afford Wittards, my parents sometimes send me some.
 

9. Do you ever used tinned veg – peas, tomatoes, bakes beans etc?
I have tinned baked beans but I dislike tins, so I don't often use tins. It is the metal that freaks me out.
 

10. What is your favourite meal? Starter, main and desert!
This is a tough question, I never have starters, I guess parsnip soup is a nice starter, then a nice roast dinner, followed by cheesecake. And then a coffee. Very calorific and very nice. Normally just one course is enough of a meal for me.
Thank you for the interview. 

Tuesday, 15 March 2016

Guernsey

Guernsey get off the blog. You no-lifers don't like what I write so don't read it.


I will not boast in anything
no, Yorkshire  , no Channel Islands , no Switzerland
I will not be so insecure
boast about my family

for Christ has given all of this
and didn't say abuse me


 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9FG12eTSbI


Damn you Guernsey, you want to read the blog, that reflects badly on you but it gets the stats up.

Everyone, Guernsey who have behaved so appallingly to me, are racking up stats like total narcissists if they are looking for something to boast about. 
Why would I blog about Warrens and Honors and Lihous? Fat boastful, pride-filled damagiung people. Even my neighbour from Guernsey still laughs about the Lihous.




 




Monday, 14 March 2016

New Open Letter to the Bishop of Winchester

Dear Bishop Dakin,

If you put down the phone when I ask for justice and a voice, I will write and I will write my letters for the general public to view, as I have been doing for three years now.

This is an imperfect letter, written during my assignment time and wasting precious and valuable time. I am autistic, not insane.

This morning I woke up from another night of nightmares and flashbacks and woke as usual seeing no point in life because of the level to which you have branded me.

I phoned your office and as usual they put the phone down on me. I gather that they don't put the phone down on paedophiles and paedophile protectors who you have supported and kept in church positions in Jersey? No, of course they don't, in the same way that you excluded me from your whitewash reports about my case and allowed those peadophile protectors in Church positions in Jersey to openly attack and defame me and rewrite my story to vilify me. Although that started when I lived in Jersey with Jane Fisher and the Scott-Joynts aiding this very same behaviour. And because it continues exactly the same, it is obvious that there has been no improvement in safeguarding in the Church of England. The church in Jersey employs a paedophile protector as lay chair, and the Bishop desparately sings to the press about how safe that exclusive and unsafe deanery is.

As yet you haven't take my statement about the Lihous, Warrens and Honours and Montagues, you haven't looked at how they liased with the Dean and his wife to clear the two abusers and brand me, you haven't even looked at the incident where the Dean openly attacked me over this, and Jane Fisher followed that up by refusing to record it and instead supporting the Dean in lying about it, it remains incredible that the Korris rubbish was founded on Fisher's claims against the Dean, when there is evidence that she aided him in destroying me. And While I remain silenced on these serious misconducts and Godless and evil and deceitful actions, I suffer. So why did you claim that your public attack on me was about safeguarding?!

And what report tells about the impact on me of being regressed to childhood by my abuser and the impact on me of having to deal with the police punishment of me whilst still regressed, and the psychological and emotional impact of the abuse there on top of the severe emotional harm to me by the Lihous and Montagues previously, on top of my childhood as well?
No report even tells of the regression of me to childhood, while Jan Korris brown-nosed the police for Jane Fisher, her friend and colleague.

And also what report tells of paradoxes like Jane Fisher having me attacked by Tim Sledge (one example) claiming I had 'caused the Montagues trouble' while the Korris report makes vague references to things being forgiven and concluded, if she was talking about the Montagues, and if she wasn't, where is the investigation into that? And where is my side of things? How is Juliet Montague's actions in taking me home to a husband who destroyed his own daughter and proceeded to do the same to me 'me causing trouble?' And have you asked Mr Montague if the orgasms he got from abusing me were really trouble? And his temper towards me and others was me causing trouble, when I was extremely vulnerable and have been damaged for life by it?
When is there to be an investigation not only into what has happened to me, but also into the number of serious misconducts by church officials? There is something very wrong with destroying someone, leaving them homeless and going on destroying them relentlessly.

So how can any report also tell of the yacht club child incident to do with my other abuser and thus raise concerns that he is possibly a paedophile? Well, no report does, because despite your massive and ludicrous attack on me in the international press, my story is not told at all, only the diocese and police's story is told, and the diocese and police liased to destroy me, while my abuser remains, to this day, upheld and esteemed in the church, bidding for another churchwarden position with the support of his esteemed friends who wrote the Steel report and also taking visiting lone church women home, such is the contempt of the church for what happened to me, and he is unrepentant because you and jane Fisher have given him the assurance that I was the bad person, not him, that I am worse than a paedophile.
And certainly that is the vein in which the church has run since I reported the abuse. You had me recorded in the JEP in 2010 as a criminal while my abuser and his friend the Dean triumphed,  and when you launched the attack on me three years ago, everyone looked the article up and told me about it!

You illegally liased with Stuart Gull, Jersey Police's version of Paul Butler, press stuntman and cover up expert, you used Gull to further defame me and allow Steel and Johnstone illegal access to my inaccurate police records.
Gull told the public that the churchwarden had no case to answer, after I reacted in extreme distress to being contacted by the police and told them to go to hell, well if you consider that you were hitting me on all sides, violating me through Julie Wallman, lying about me in the press, illegally referring me to the NSPCC, how did you think I would react to your exercise in clearing the abuser?!

Also, when are you going to investigate that as well as the only police action against me being perpetrated by the unforgiving church who would rather destroy an abuse victim and protect her abusers than anything, the police action was unbalanced with the police refusing to stop Fisher and the Scott-Joynts from provoking me, and refusing to protect me and making my distress out to be madness, every time they locked me in and left me damaged for life, they didn't  bail me so that I could produce evidence of my side of things.

 For example, communication between me and the diocese was TWO WAY, and JANE FISHER was provoking me, she also claimed that she and the Bishop, having slandered me all round winchester and shattered my long term friendships and relationships there, leaving me alienated, intended to help to house me.

Horrifying, they didn't have my consent, they violated my access to any help with their defamation and illegal liasons with authorities and along with the police brutality and detentions left me long-term homeless and on the run. Have you even recorded the deception by Jane Fisher and Juli Wills that enabled Fisher to distort things to the court of law later on?
Do you recall that I was imprisoned and thus unable to provide evidence to defend myself against the lies by Fisher and Scott-Joynt? Do you understand that I suffer psychological hell day and night as a result, left voiceless and destroyed for these people who would not stop harassing me.
Can you imagine the psychological damage of that and then you coming after me and violating me all over again?

You know that next time you try to have me battered and locked up, ( which my life is on hold waiting for, and it is like being in a Nazi concentration camp), they can't really go on battering me and locking me up without my evidence being heard, and these letters are part of my evidence.

If there is a God, I won't die without being heard, and although you killed Bob Hill by leaving him to fight you for me to be heard when he was too old and should have been retired, I want to be heard before I die, and every minute that you leave me voiceless and horrifically psychologically injured and living in fear, you are showing that you don't believe in God, you are in it for the free house and the money, to be honest I don't know why you Bishops even pretend any more.

I wish Bob had had the sense to hear me and not base his argument on ther Korris rubbish, because the Korris rubbish is the opinion of one silly, shallow church woman who didn't seem to understand that what she was doing was a multiple criminal offence, and you haven't had her battered and locked up for it.
The re-use of the Korris report by press and the Jersey bloggers has scarred me for life, there isn't any way of recovering from people publishing lies like that as if it was fact.

As you will know from the articles sent to you, Philip Bailhache, the Chair of the Jersey synod, has aided paedophiles in escaping justice and continuing to abuse, and has no remorse or conscience regarding this matter and instead thinks he can publicly attack me, while you stand by and let him.
So tell me again how your public attack on me and aiding these people in vilifying me is to do with safeguarding?

For three years I have suffered being constantly vilified and living in fear and my health has suffered, my health is still suffering. You have treated me with utter contempt throughout these three years and your pretences of care for my welfare while implying to the general public that the Dean is innocent and that the Steel report would harm me, was utterly disgusting. You failed to tell the general public that Steel was conflicted and you also failed to include me in any report, or annul the Steel report when you were shown with evidence that Steel was conflicted.

You also failed to apologize for your illegal harassment of me and perversion of the course of justice by releasing the Korris report not only to the general public but also to the police.
You basically had a report by a member of your church labelled as independent and excluded me from it and released it to the police and mislead them, although they had worked closely with Fisher and the Scott-Joynts to destroy me while ignoring my request to be protected from the illegal interferences of these persons.

You claimed to a court of law that Korris had tried to contact me, and that was a lie, there would have been evidence of that, and why exactly would you illegally authorise a member of the church to violate my privacy by contacting me after you branded me for life for contacting the church and fighting to be heard and to be freed from the grip of Fisher and Scott-Joynt's illegal violations of me after (and before) they illegally liased with police and services who illegally worked with them in response, to brand me and interfere in my life?

What is the end result of all this rape-violation of me? Well for me it is that every day and every night I suffer flashbacks to the rape-violations and being de-humanized and left voiceless to these illegal actions by people with their own agendas, it has damaged my soul in a way that no therapy and no amount of time will ever heal.

But if Korris had tried to contact me and failed, why exactly did you release that unbalanced report to the public and why did you not wait until AFTER you had had me violated and sickened and left in collapse by your abuse of power in illegally having me traced by the police that you had previously used to destroy me and brand me in a way that makes every day of the rest of my life worthless and anguished. Why didn't you use your attacking police to tell me you wanted to do this report and get my views? You blatant and wicked liar!

And why did you then, having had me traced, ignore me and my concerns and proceed with the conflicted Steel report and allow the Jersey Deanery and their friend, colleague and supporter Dame Heather Steel to publicly destroy me while you were too busy lying to the press to ensure that I was protected from this harm and that my side of things was heard too?
Was it good safeguarding? You claimed that this was all about safeguarding!

So, you and Jane Fisher made the foundation of the Korris rubbish to be about me being insane, the excuse that Jane Fisher and the Scott-Joynts and their police has cooked up to cover my distress and excuse themselves, and then you allowed me to be publicly attacked, even by people who didn't know me, such as Gavin Ashenden, Philip Bailhache, Teri Bond, you allowed me to be attacked not only in the Jersey press and media but internationally, and you also dragged in my estranged family, estranged from me as a result of the Church's destroyal of me.
And you had me publicly crucified, having tried to brand me as mentally ill. Let me ask you, is the Church really so draconian that they think mental illness is a punishable crime?

Or was that just pure evil on your part, to allow someone you have labelled mentally ill to be attacked in that way, because if so, it looks very strongly as if you were trying to force me to commit suicide. Do you think someone who is mentally ill can withstand what I have withstood? Do you think they should have to? Have you ever heard of the term 'safeguarding'?

And do you have any notion at all of what autism or trauma are, and what being publicly violated and branded and left outcast and cut off from help as a result of your actions has done and is doing to me?

As yet you have failed to annul the Korris report, why? You intended to release the Steel report and have apparently faced more than just MY legal action each time you have prepared to release it, but the leaks of the Steel report collectively suggest that it contradicts the Korris report. And that, combined with my formal request for anullment of the Korris report as a whitewash and an untruth to protect church and police, should have led to a public annulment and an apology before each preparation of release of the Steel whitewash.

Also, seeing as you attacked the Dean publicly before clearing him, you owe him an apology. I know very well that he isn't innocent, indeed you allowed him to gather his circle of lawyers and judges to defame and vilify me and make him out to be innocent. You are responsible because you publicly attacked him and me.

You cleared the Dean without investigation, having allowed Philip Bailhache and others to illegally access and use to their advantage, my inaccurate police records caused by the police and church destroying me for reporting my well-connected church officer abuser, you have never made any public condemnation of the people involved in that blatantly illegal activity, they are treated as Royalty in the Church while you have not only had me excluded from Church, you have slandered me worldwide and through all denominations internationally.
It was horrifying to see that organizations such as Huffington Post, Thinking Anglicans and even Premier Christian Radio took up the attack on me and spread the lies that Luther Pendragon wrote for you.
Horrifying, the damage to me is for life, and what has happened to my abuser and his dignitary friends? Treated like Royalty in Church and laughing as they did when you had me dragged from my home, deported, left homeless and still violated unremittingly despite being homeless and in shock.
Why? Do the Church of England really think this is safeguarding?!
Presumably yes, CofE safeguarding involves protecting dignitaries who behave corruptly and alienating abuse survivors and the vulnerable.

Have you reprimanded anyone at all for harming me over this matter? Well how could you when you don't know or care about my story and have done such wrong yourself? If you have millions to waste on publicly destroying me, please also find a million to investigate what has happened to me.

I am still waiting for you to arrange an independent investigation and annul the million pound Steel Whitewash.
I am waiting for you to apologize and I am waiting for you to state that I am safe in my home and community and that I do not need to live in fear of the press and police who you bought and influence with your status and money and the misguided 'Church' label that a few people still think means good and right.

If this matter was about safeguarding, why did you publicly destroy someone voiceless, weak, homeless and already so horrifically damaged that withstanding the public attack was something that they just couldn't survive?
Why would you launch such a case into the press when a homeless and vulnerable adult's life and welfare was already at risk and would then be even more so? Do you really believe you are justified in what you have done to me because of what you have heard from the defendants and their police? No matter how much time goes by, this remains a raw and blatant injustice.

While you keep up the orders of Luther-Pendragon to stay silent, you leave me suffering.
I have asked you for copies of the Steel report, from the original to the latest amendment, now please provide them. You told a court of law that you would, they concern me as they were written about my case with no input from me and you refused to stop the report when you were made aware with evidence that it was conflicted.
You left me waiting to be destroyed. Why would you do that to someone who you labelled as mentally ill to cover up the trauma and emotional distress suffered at the hands of your diocese and your clergy and your rogue abusive safeguarding director?
Would any of you respond well to having your name blackened wherever you went and your privacy violated constantly and unremittingly and illegally but with nowhere to turn to for redress because you are labelled as insane by the church for your distress?

I understand that the Safeguarding officer in question has moved to another position, along with the previous head of safeguarding, and one of several church members and clergy and officers who contact me about your church says that the strategy of Paul butler was to move males into the safeguarding positions in the Church because of the national child abuse inquiry, because males are better liars. Is that the case? I doubt that you need to worry about the UK child abuse inquiry as I have been told that the same dignitaries in Jersey who destroyed me have been allowed to intervene in the UK inquiry to keep Jersey looking clean so it is a whitewash after your own heart.

In any case, you are liable for Fisher's prolonged harm to me in order to cover up for the Church.
What happens to the voiceless vulnerable? Those who can't write when you leave them voiceless and vilified and defamed and branded and broken, what happens to them when you defame them internationally and leave them living as fugitives and put the phone down on them whilst allowing their aggressors meeting time and phone time and a voice and an opinion, especially in the press?
How many deaths occur as a result of the Church of England's desire to look good and pretend to safeguard?
How many of those deaths does Paul Butler use as press stunts? One recently, with the fake press claim that things are better in the CofE.
They aren't.
And how are you going to use my death, if you don't bring a  conclusion to this sustained damage to me? Huge press stunts and lies about my mental health with the help of your police?

Can you really not see a problem with spending a million pounds and more on reports and investigations which are prejudiced and unbalanced and put a vulnerable person's welfare and life at risk, and you try to justify it through the vilification of that vulnerable by the defendants, when you hand the reports over to the defendants? No wonder Luther-Pendragon advise you to stay silent and put the phone down on the vulnerable adult who you are cruelly and unjustly leaving suffering!

The fact that you need to hide behind a Godless firm like Luther-Pendragon, who's role is to mislead and protect you, shows that you are very dishonest and that you have no right to call or consider your position to be anything whatsoever to do with Jesus or God, and in that vein, you are invalid and are taking a lot of money and a free home when your role is null and void. You are one of the things your church have tried to vilify me with because my vulnerability allowed me to keep being taken over by church people, you are a sponger who is living off what you are not entitled to because your actions against me invalidate you.

I understand that you will fail to have the courtesy to respond to this, I am used to that, you respond only to Luther-Pendragon and the powerful Jersey clique of lawyer-clergy-laity-judiciary-freemasons, nothing new there, but you can't go on calling yourself a Bishop if you won't conclude or take responsibility for your mess. Mark Hedley worked very hard to protect you and threaten me, but again, that only shows what the Church of England is and how much the government or outside agencies need to intervene and independently audit the Church and expose the corruption and deceit and blatant abuses of power with church police, judges, lawyers and other agencies which is what the core of the Church of England is about.

My Clergy Discipline complaint remains, and it remains valid, it needs to be dealt with by an outside agency who can see, where Mark Hedley fails to, that your attack on me and your deceit and dishonesty and the damage you have done are not only not appropriate, but also illegal. And the reason that Hedley can't see that is because no wealthy middle class church dignitary does understand poverty and vulnerability, they just judge the poor.
Jesus lived among the poor and had nothing, the Church of England lord it over the poor and destroy them and justify themselves by their status.

On a final note, and this letter will add to the many now available, for which you show no shame and have no answer, but, I remind you every year that if you intend to crucify me this Good Friday, make sure I have the donkey to ride up to the Cathedral on and spoil your pomp and show. You missed the boat the other year when I was 33 and had spent three years travelling homeless due to your Church and jeered by your pharisees.

I am sure you weren't a disappointment to Scott-Joynt, he wanted a bigot like himself who made a show about Africa, but you aren't a Bishop and you do need to step down, what you have done would lead to instant dismissal and legal action in a normal company, but the Church still get away with behaving as they like at the moment, until someone intervenes and changes the law of the land to include the Church and it's members as punishable for crime and protection of criminals.

Your statement to the world is that abuse is an approved practice in the Church and will be upheld and protected and you are happy to horrifically destroy anyone who reports it and you have a free reign and leave from the police and local authorities to do so.

sincerely,

HG

Other letters on this subject:
http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jane-fisher-and-bishop-tim-dakin-0

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/jane-fisher-safeguarding-director-winchester-diocese

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-very-reverend-bob-key-dean-jersey

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/1st-open-letter-bishop-winchester-0

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/second-open-letter-bishop-winchester

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/i-woke-and-wrote-bishop-morning

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jersey-deanery-15-october-2013

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jerseys-external-affairs-minister-sir-philip-bailhache

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/open-letter-jan-korris-church-england-counsellor-and-author-korris-report
http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/letter-questions-dioceses-winchester-and-canterbury

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/second-letter-questions-dioceses-winchester-and-canterbury

Wednesday, 9 March 2016

Flu to Jersey

Flu to Jersey
Flu to Jersey
on a seagull to Kingy
Bird flu

They're calling it swine flu
in the States
Business class 
at extortionate rates

Dear Jersey
you are quarantined
If you come to the UK
We Will Deport You

Don't you Dare bring your Flu Here
Duty Free Flu
and use our hospitals 
while calling us Foreigners !

 Guernsey, what is so fascinating about this? Get off the blog, donkeys, hee-haw, have a carrot!



Wednesday, 2 March 2016

Jersey's conflicting headlines

One headline reads 'No apology from civil servants over South Africa Flights'
The other headline reads 'Civil servant Sorry for £13,000 flights'  minister apologises unreservedly.

Typical Jersey

Saturday, 20 February 2016

An Open Letter to Jersey Safeguarding Partnership and related authorities

20/02/2016
 
Dear Safeguarding Jersey Partnership and LSBC, cc police and other agencies,

As you cut me off and delete my messages, I will re-iterate my formal complaint by email and also add a formal complaint that you don't have any right to try to silence a legitimate complaint and wouldn't treat the defendants in my case this way because they have status whereas I am vulnerable.
In 2013, the conflicted Jane Fisher, Stuart Gull, Bishop of Winchester, Glenys Johnstone and church dignitary Ian Gorst liased to create a series of Whitewash reports to ensure that church and police were collectively cleared at my expense while I was left voiceless.
Ian Gorst is openly conflicted in his support of the Dean and no report arranged by him is credible. Jersey Police treated me so horrifically that I will never recover, but Glenys Johnstone liased with the police without my consent, got only their side of things, and told Bob Hill that the police had done nothing wrong, a year before she made a token effort to contact me, having finished this whitewash report. This glaring misconduct has gone unchallenged by Senator Gorst or the church or police or press or indeed any authority, but that is very typical of Jersey. Jersey is a haven for anyone powerful enough to be protected by it's corrupt government and it's agencies, if they want to commit misconduct and abuse, they will, and will never be challenged on it.
And that is proved yet again as Stuart Gull remains the press stuntman for the police, showing off every few months in the news about abuse cases for the benefit of the care inquiry, despite his illegal actions in my case.
I am sure I am not the only victim of SOJP beatings for reporting abuse who sees this press stunt madness with horror and disgust, and as for the victims who the police have killed...

Jersey police's actions and their sustained efforts to make me out to be mad and their very serious and criminal dishonesty remain unchallenged, but who is going to challenge a corrupt police force overseen by a corrupt government?
In 2013, Glenys Johnstone claimed that the police had done no wrong, well if their serious misconduct isn't wrong, then Jersey is as dangerous as the fantasist bloggers think it is, Johnstone told Bob Hill that the police had done no wrong. I never authorized any conversation between Mr Hill and Mrs Johnstone, nor sharing of information nor any interaction at all, so Johnstone has broken the law in declaring her whitewash to a member of the public in Jersey, especially after she stood by and allowed Philip Bailhache to breach the data protection act and release my name and my abuser's name to the general public without any protest or action on her behalf or on behalf of the safeguarding team.
Indeed they have failed to respond to various complaints regarding my welfare at the hands of the conflicted church-states members in Jersey as lies continue to be released into the press by Philip Bailhache - presumably Gull isn't investigating Bailhache and nor are the church, even though he has posed a risk to children and the vulnerable by his actions in protecting paedophiles and other wrongdoers, which in turn has led to repeated abuses that Bailhache has showed no concern or remorse for.
The Bishop of Dover's claim that the churches in Jersey were safe could only have been a joke while Bailhache is lay chair of the synod, having publicly attacked me with no reaction from the church and having enabled abuse by defending various paedophiles and allowing them to continue to abuse, as well as the Dean having openly been a friend and supporter of my abuser and thus allowed to destroy me, aided by Jane Fisher, and that is only a small snapshot of the church's lack of safeguarding, but again, Willmott's press stunt was for the benefit of the care inquiry, and while what I experienced in the church has not been investigated or dealt with, Willmott is a blatant and knowing liar. But unchallenged in the 'Island without Safeguarding' of course.

Knowing that Stuart Gull is dishonest and willing to behave illegally, I would assume his repeat 'investigations into high profile figures' every time the care inquiry makes Jersey look bad are of this form 'pretend to investigate chosen people so that the care inquiry cannot investigate them, then let them off, having used the usual police and chosen lawyers Jersey Way, and thus the inquiry can do nothing about them', although some of the blogger fantasists think the inquiry are complicit, which wouldn't be that far fetched, to be honest, we know nothing will be done and nothing will change, the police in Jersey only have the power to brutalize and lie on record about vulnerable people, they do not have the power to hold to account the people who pay their wages/bribes delete as appropriate.
I can assure you with confidence, not one of those 'high profile figures' will be named, shamed or blamed, you will not see their names dragged through the mud, you will not see them lied about in the press as I have been.
Can you see the difference between the poor and vulnerable and rich and powerful in Jersey? There is no safeguarding or justice for the vulnerable, while the powerful in the police, church and states can act exactly as they please, and the care inquiry won't change that. Because it has no power.
As long as I remain voiceless, slandered and subjected to henious whitewashes, I will go on suffering and it will go on affecting my mental and physical health, so why has Glenys Johnstone not resolved this matter that she and the LGO and LSCB and Police complaints and social services have received for three years? Because you are determined to try and keep the 'Mad' label on me? Then you need to ask why you are in your roles at all.
Wouldn't you say that years is a bit too long for the safeguarding board, notoriously bad as they are, to resolve this matter?
I understand there has been another article about failures to safeguard, hence Gull's recent showing off, and presumably this is why so many people are viewing my blog and looking up Glenys Johnstone and Jersey Safeguarding Failures. Which reminds me of the trauma and damage Johnstone has done.
In 2014 Mike Higgins, a crackpot Jersey Deputy who meddles, and as a friend of Bob Hill, meddled dangerously in my case and damaged me, demanded answers from Ian leMarquand, who as you know, thinks one-off paedophilia is not a problem at all (as if there was any such thing), and who was also Home Affairs Minister, overseer of the police and also a Church reader and friend of my abuser.
LeMarquand failed to declare his conflict of interests and background as a reader in one church where I had been treated shamefully for reporting my abuser, and instead publicly defamed me and lied about me and my case in the States and in the press and media.
The Safeguarding board did nothing to prevent or act on this, because their job is not to safeguard the vulnerable but to protect powerful abusers such as Mr LeMarquand, who was allowed to go on and give evidence to the inquiry as a witness not as an abuser or paedophile protector.
I wonder if he is even one of Gull's 'high profile' fakes?
Higgins hasn't apologized for his actions against me, he is a bit like the bloggers, so deluded that they are doing good, they have no idea that it is human beings they are using, not puppets. Again it is a safeguarding issue, but as yet, there is no safeguarding in Jersey. Safeguarding presents in accountability, and Jersey is famous for not having any of that in stock.

Gull shouldn't be in a position of working with abuse victims or showing off about the high profile people that he will liase with lawyers such as Heather Steel to clear. He has had a formal complaint against him for his tandem illegal activities in liasing with Heather Steel illegally and with Glenys Johnstone while he was conflicted by his liason with Heather Steel to help clear the Church of England. So when are the safeguarding board going to act on this? Oh, they can't, they are headed by Gorst's chosen cover-up chair, Glenys Johnstone!
Unless the Care Inquiry can change this culture of back-scratching and blatant illegal action, then they will have been ineffective in changing things in Jersey, and judging by their secret meetings with Bailhache and others, they won't be making any difference, but presumably the whitewash reports are on hold until the care inquiry leaves.
But what is the point of all these whitewash reports? Just box ticking? Because while abusers and wrongdoers have had their say, I have not been invited to any fair or impartial investigation at all. I have been treated with complete contempt by the church and Jersey authorities, and the smear campaign makes people feel that is justified, it is not, there is no justification in attacking a vulnerable adult and drive her to despair, the law forbids you to attack a murderer or a rapist the way I have been attacked, so why have Jersey Police and the authorities allowed abusers and paedophile protectors to attack me as if they are shining angels? And why doesn't any single person in safeguarding or social services understand that if someone is abused and voiceless and provoked constantly they will get angry?!
Jersey Safeguarding board are obliged to call a genuinely independent investigation which includes me. They are not legally allowed to go on allowing me to be harmed or defamed.
Also, make sure a very strong point is made about investigating the illegal 'safeguarding' meeting that Bob Hill mentioned to me.
No consent was given by me. Also all the safeguarding board were doing was a box-ticking cover up for the diocese of winchester, make sure the diocese and their illegal actions are properly investigated, they knew Steel was conflicted, they also knew that I had a complaint about Jersey Police, and they knew that Gull would not be credibly allowed to liase with Johnstone and Steel as Steel had been named as conflicted and her aim of protecting the Dean on behalf of her colleagues the Bailhache brothers and Michael Birt was very clear.
The police were thus able to act illegally in covering their own tracks, aid Steel illegally, whitewash with Johnstone and leave me voiceless as the Bishop of Winchester boasted in the paper about reports and 'care' for me, which involved an illegal and inappropriate referral to the NSPCC which he tried to force on me and threatened me.
I know Jersey is inefficient and unable to safeguard or recognise corruption and illegal police-states-judiciary actions as wrong, but three years is a bit much for me to wit for resolution.
Dear LSBC if you put the phone down and cut off my messages about this, you are not fit for purpose, there needs to be a genuine serious case review now that includes ALL the abuse that I have survived in the Church of England and ALL the failures of social services and police and others and the criminal interferences by Jane Fisher, and the massive discrepancies such as her openly slandering me as a troublemaker when I returned homeless to my home town of Winchester and yet describing in the Korris rubbish the things she slandered me as a troublemaker as 'things that had been forgiven' isn't it funny how a devious liar like Fisher or Julie Wallman can re-write a story to suit their audience?
And speaking of Korris, it is very important that there is a serious review into that as it breached the data protection act, was an attack on me to cover up for the church, excluded me and my story, covered up for the police and Jane Fisher and failed to give a true picture, and not only that, it was sent to the police and published internationally as if it was fact and was thus used to base all following reports on. As yet there has been no apology, redaction or anullment of it at all.
(Make sure all these whitewashes are annulled and that I receive an apology from yourselves and the church).

Following on from that, the police liased illegally with Fisher again, my abuser and destroyer Jane Fisher, to try and cook up a way of clearing the abuser they had protected between them at my expense, the police  decided they now had 'evidence' that apparently Fisher had witheld, but as far as I know, she has not yet been arrested for perverting the course of justice, why not?
Anyway, the police launched on me, presumably they expected me to be stupid enough to come to Jersey and be brutalized and called mad and flung in a cell while they cleared my abuser, instead, they got a formal complaint for harassing me. Jersey police do not punish abusers, they punish their victims, and their first punishment of me, that day they first let my abuser go in 2008 was enough to leave me out of my mind, hence me going 'mad' as I did, and to this day I haven't recovered and I don't think I ever will, sometimes I am back there on St. Clements Bay, and the sea is frozen and the darkness is deep, and nothing will ever make the dark and cold go away, nothing. The police came and got me that night brutally and viciously, brutalizing me, threatening to handcuff me and they threw me on the floor of a cell and slammed the door. And what had I done? Nothing worse than reporting an abuser, because back then, I really hadn't started fighting the church for justice. I was deeply traumatized and fragile and at breaking point, and what had the police done that day? sent me an email clearing my abuser and claiming that 'the poor man had learned his lesson and I should leave the poor man alone'.
This poor man is the one who laughed when he saw me in the street, a serial abuser who slandered me round the churches and went to services with the Dean who was supposed to be investigating him. Jersey police's actions towards me that day, viciously assaulting me and flinging me in a cell while calling my abuser a '[poor man' caused me a massive breakdown that led to me degenerating rapidly and never recovering. You can bet your life that none of that is in Johnstone's whitewash. And the Korris report whitewash and brown-nosing of the police for fisher was unbelievable. And Gull wasn't there when the police behaved heniously and covered up for themselves but he is liable for spreading the untruthful slander that is a joke of a police record, and also allowing Philip Bailhache, Dame Steel's colleague illegal access to those records that Bailhache then shared with the general public.
So when Jersey police contacted me, I contacted a Jersey Politician and asked him to act as a mediator to inform the police that I had no faith in them or their motives and that if they tried to subpoena me to clear the abuser who they had protected, I would very easily be able to provide a medical certificate stating I was not fit to appear in court.
I was not fit to appear in court in Jersey when the police destroyed me for the Dean, but the police lied and said they had had me assessed, they most certainly did not, you cannot assess an unconscious person and no-one assessed me when I was awake.
Anyway, Stuart Gull then proceeded to further mislead the general public and press by claiming there was no case against the churchwarden, while omitting that I had stated that I would not under any circumstances co-operate with the corrupt and brutal police force, it is entirely their responsibility that an abuser is free and laughing and knowing he will be well looked after by church and police if he wishes to abuse again.
To be honest, judging by the volume of illegal actions by the church and police, it would be unsurprising if church, police or even the safeguarding board pointed my abuser in the direction of vulnerable children or adults for a couple of quid. Just to remind you at this point that my abuser regressed me so I was like a young child while he abused me, he is a paedophile and the police tried to make my warnings about him and the yatch club cadets and his grad daughter out to be me committing an offence.
I guess in Jersey logic trying to protect children against a paedophile is an offence, especially the brother of an alledged rapist member of the states who is too important to be tried for rape.

The damage by the church, police and press is being compounded and prolonged by the fear of these whitewash reports and it is time this prolonged and completely unjust punishment of my whole life is ended.  These reports are nothing to do with my case, from the Korris rubbish to the Johnstone whitewash, I have had no voice, these reports have each been arranged to cover up and deny responsibility. And it is time someone stepped in and stopped the discrediting of me as mad, and ended this matter, for what kind of psychopaths are the church and police and safeguarding boards to inflict this on me if they think I am mentally ill? It would imply they are trying to force suicide by defaming me and allowing me to be smeared in the press while not having any voice against the lies in the reports and  not having any report detailing my side of things !
Presumably the authorities think I am either going to stop making a complaint or they are going to silence me in the traditional way attempted by the police on behalf of the church, the vicious brutalizations and police jeers which have scarred me for life but are not mentioned in any report.
No, my complaint remains for every single day that I wake up suffering and every single night where I have nightmares, so basically the complaint remains to the end of my life, which I do expect to be as a result of an 'accident' in a police cell as I continue to live in fear of the private mafia that the police are.
What amuses me recently is that fantasist bloggers Neil McMurray and Rico Troll-Sorda are all over 'operation coverup-showoff-whistle' and think it is genuine rather than a smoke screen that will blow away with the care inquiry's departure, but if you saw Sorda and McMurray causing me anguish by using my case to attack their hated states and using the Korris rubbish as if it was fact but also never recording my side of things, maybe it isn't that surprising, but again, there is a massive safeguarding issues with these bloggers, they are doing all this stuff, and Bob Hill's anguishing and horrific re-write of my case based on the Korris rubbish, has left me further severely damaged, I am hanging on by a thread, and I am concerned that other survivors will have been used by the bloggers and driven to suicide, purely because Jersey's authorities are failing survivors and allowing their cases and mine to be handed over to these unqualified but well meaning spectators who step in and can only do things that fit in with their own political aims.
If you look at the fantasy blogs, commentors who bring a polite counterpoint or disagree or state their concern either with points in the blog or with comments on the blog - are attacked and called names and told - anonymously of course, things that equate to 'go kill yourself' and McMurray especially both allows this and when challenged, says he sees no problem. This is despite the bloggers being obsessed with a troll called Jon Shorrck-Hawoth who they attack for apparently doing exactly what I have just described.
Now surely safeguarding in Jersey should both be adequate to bypass the need for these vigilantes taking over cases as they did with mine, and to prevent all of this from happening, the Korris report is so very pointedly a lying cover-up that it nearly caused me to commit suicide as it was illegally published internationally, leading to hate attacks by strangers and great efforts to trace me, again, I was homeless and very traumatised, it is a miracle I survived it and held on as the attacks continued and have never stopped, and I live as a fugitive. The bloggers and Bob making statements and taking actions based on the Korris report, further spreading it's harm and deep deep shame of me, was nearly the last straw, and I haven't recovered.
Nothing whatsoever has been done about Jan Korris's serious breach of BACP ethics and the law and safeguarding boundaries and my safety and privacy. Nothing, and the church have failed at any point to address my concerns, which re-iterates the fact that none of this has been even remotely to do with safeguarding.
Also, the church remain unable to even contact me to apologize for the harm done or their action of allowing the Steel-Gull-Johnstone whitewash even thlough they were told with evidence that this was a serious conflict of interests and breach of my privacy and rights, the 'appontment' off officer Gull of the conflicted Jersey police by the Bishop of Winchester was illegal and Gull was not permitted or in a position to liase with Steel and Johnstone. And yet during all of this, no attempt was made to include my views, indeed Steel didn't intend to interview me and didn't contact me until I actually got her @ChurchofEngland email address when she was reported in a massive advert in the JEP to be acting on behalf of the Jersey Deanery in a complaint against Bishop Dakin, which was hilarious as her report was supposedly being done on his behalf, a massive conflict that again no-one has explained yet, but I contacted Steel to ask her to resign as she was both conflicted and malicious.
She didn't. Nor has the Bishop of Winchester been removed for attacking me and the Dean publicly and following that with a long serious of serious misconducts to protect himself when he realised belatedly that he had no right whatsoever to do what he did.
Another thing out of thousands of points in this massively conflicted and complex case is the complete omission from any report of the glaring conflicts within the church in my case, for example the Dean aiding the liason of my abusers and their families and friends to brand me as a troublemaker and Jane Fisher not only not acting on this but also both aiding and magnifying it. No report mentions that nor does any report or any person in the police, press, church or safeguarding counter it with my side of things why? Well because no-one has got my side of things, no one has recorded and reported my side of things, instead the archaic church and politician and abuser trick of labelling a survivor mad and a troublemaker and using their PTDS against them  has been used to the max. And incredibly in this day and age, no one has questioned this.
Also I must comment and eventually something must be done before too many more vulnerable people are killed by police, neither Jersey nor Hampshire Police are capable of understanding that trauma is not madness and madness is neither a punishable offence nor curable by brutality, jeers, refusing to hear their victim's side of things or other serious misconducts. they are in the dark ages and completely ignorant of autism or trauma or even understanding that someone like me could not cope with the prolonged and sustained trauma and abuse I had suffered, as yet nothing has been done and there is no system to complain about the police and ensure my side is on record rather than me being left as a branded fugitive who's life is very limited and ashamed as a result of the branding.

I look forward to you arranging a proper independent investigation, although I doubt that you are capable of that. As you know, I have a lot more to say but I also have two assignments to do and this letter, written because the LSCB would rather protect Johnstone and put the phone down on me and delete my messages, has taken up a lot of time. This letter is not comprehensive it contains a fraction of my concerns about this complex case, a fraction!
Make sure the investigation includes Jane Fisher's persistent illegal actions and obtaining of confidential information and interference in my interactions with services, authorities and people in Jersey when she had been told clearly and persistently by me to stop harassing me, and also her continued and persistent interference in Winchester after she aided the Dean in destroying me and leaving me homeless, most specifically her illegal liason with the council and homeless services and especially social services who thus made me out to be insane and refused to protect me from Fisher, who was allowed to continue to harass me and use the police against me for my reaction. So far what you have been doing is protecting Fisher and the horrendously behaved police and their branding of me, and leaving me voiceless and hanging onto my life by the skin of my teeth, I cannot begin to describe to you the damage to my health and my trust for services that should be helping me.
The Korris report deliberately omits the fact that Jane Fisher provoked me and interfered constantly and relentlessly, breaking up friendships and my interactions with support services and what she and the Bishop claim is harassment was me screaming for this illegal action to stop.

If Fisher had been stopped early on when she made sure I was attacked by Matthew Price and threatened for saying perfectly truthfully that the Dean had committed misconduct, while Fisher got her and the Bishop's side of things broadcast to cover up for the church, if she had been stopped then, and intervention had protected me from further harm by Fisher and Fisher had instead ensured my abuser was dealt with instead of protected by the Dean, I have no doubt that the irreparable damage that has occurred would have been prevented. Unfortunately Bob Hill likes Matthew Price and instead of listening to the fact that Price was also protected by the church for destroying his clergy wife, Bob does as he does, and omits that whole incident from my story because it suits him better, and again, how can any report that omits the severe breakdown and the ensuing misconduct by the police even begin to be accurate.
It is time for me to be heard, and it is time for action to be taken regarding all and every person who has left me living in fear and suffering severe emotional and physical health problems as a result of this prolonged and very nasty matter. I want to move on, and although I will never really move on from the police brutality because part of my brain stopped as a result of it and is in the dark on St. Clements Bay forever, I have to live and I have to keep moving forward, and being forced to live in fear is a breach of my human rights (not that they have heard of those in Jersey).

This letter will now be published on the internet.
Sincerely,

HG/JJ

Friday, 12 February 2016

Jersey musings, similarities

Good evening,

Just when you thought I would never actually write anything on here again :)

Can you all make sure our uncle Bob is OK? I was having nightmares about him.

The JEP, which I only glance at, because who in their right mind reads that rag, especially after their attacks on me? Have been running a lot of stories about the Care Inquiry this evening.

So, I will start, Headline read 'Stuart Syvret was right to be concerned'
It made me think.
Was it Frank Walker who recently commented on Stuart's change in demeanor when he made the abuse discoveries?
I recall that clique of politicians making him out to be mad in 2008/9.
Just like they made me out to be mad.

I am pretty sure even before the injustices and imprisonments, from the time Stuart discovered the abuse, he would have been suffering Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. He never makes a fuss about himself and his health publicly, but he isn't mad, and believe it or not, neither am I.
I was already horrifically damaged when the churchwarden 'regressed' me to childhood and abused me, claiming it would 'heal' me, and the ensuing horrific police and church actions, not properly recorded, added to that, and then Fisher decided to persist in destroying me, culminating in the Korris attack and the public destroyal of me.
Stuart has been ripped apart by the press and media too, but at least he spoke up, and he should be able to speak to the care inquiry without fearing for his life.
 I still fear for my life.

Islands, boats and missing boys:

I am going to be controversial from now on and I am going to talk about Adrian Lynch. I really hope no-one gets angry over this.

We know that Ted Heath used to take boys out on boats, and a witness, Linda Corby, says she saw that one less boy came back one time,

Some years ago, a young man, Damien Nettles, vanished from Cowes on Hampshire's Isle of Wight, he was never seen or heard from again, and the police messed up the investigation, couldn't even get Damien's age right and considered him to be an adult, not a minor as a result, leading to delays in investigation. Appeals have been made continuously over the years regarding his disappearance, although efforts to prevent digging in the nearby Parkhurst Forest have been solid despite a tip off that Damien may be buried there.
I read about this case as his mother posts on the 'Good Cop Down' blog written by a Hampshire Police Officer who knows as well as I do how corrupt and nasty and brutal Hampshire Constabulary are.

Anyway.

Recently the sad news of Adrian Lynch (I hope I spelled that right) going missing reminded me of the Damien Nettles case.

My thoughts are with both families, I may be autistic and with reactive attachment disorder but I know what love feels like, and I know I love my parents and my recently deceased friend and I know what missing people and grief feels like.
 And when you don't know what happened it must be worse.

But what I feel is, these two dissapearances involve young men, islands and, I think they involve boats, but neither island has a good, honest or caring police force.
Did Hampshire or Jersey Constabulary check boat movements? Or is it even possible to check all boat movements?  Do they all show up on AIS? I don't think the small ones do.

I know Cathy Fox and others do blogs about the boat kidnap and slavery/exploitation trade.
What if that is relevant here?
What if I get absolutely slaughtered for putting two and two together and getting 5.375?


The Bishop of Winchester gives another explosive sermon

Saturday, 23 January 2016

Random picture of a small teeny thing

Embedded image permalink what the hell did you think I was going to post?

Lady Vicars, start hormone therapy...

Please do look at the 2600 comments on this online article:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3412363/Bishop-London-applauds-vicars-grown-beards-reach-Muslims-Tower-Hamlets.html#comments

The Bishop of London, famous for his unChristian attitude to Occupy London protesters and his purple socks, says that Vicars should grow beards to reach out to muslims.
What about the lady vicars? :) do you think if they grew beards, they would reach out to muslims?

It's personal choice.

Grow a beard if you wish, but I will continue to be clean shaven while respecting Muslim culture and beliefs.

And what about Jewish people, does the Bishop want to reach out to them too?

Then he adds worldly rubbish about David Beckham, glorifying a plastic chav and calling him a saint! This truly is the Church of England!

Well, every time I think the Church has reached a new low for the sake of publicity, I am surprised again.

Someone has just suggested female Vicars should wear Burkas.



Friday, 22 January 2016

don't forget to click on the links for the youtube songs that describe the picures...

 ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
.........................................


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh-JoW_8qw0

.....................................

......................................

   

I told you I don't like this video








.................................. but seeing as I am being creative and this song was one of my first Jersey soundtrack songs........................................
...............................  
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB86UzewPdo




Sunday, 17 January 2016

An interview with HG


Transport:
 
1 When did you learn to ride a bicycle? How old were you?
 
I learned to ride a bike when I was 8 years old, later than my siblings due to undiagnosed dyspraxia.
 
2 Did you go to any course on hand signals / road signs?
 
I actually did a course on road safety and cycling proficiency when I was about 10 years old, against my parents' wishes as it involved contact with the outside world and authorities.
 
3 Do you give your bikes a name?
 
No, not normally, although the Blue Bike was originally called Rebecca, I just call it the Blue Bike.
 
4 How old were you when you passed your driving test?
 
I was in my early 20s, my problem was not driving but fear or driving instructors, so when my placid old landlord sold me his old car and sat with me as I drove it around, that solved the driving problem.
 
5 Was it in England or Jersey?
 
England.
6 Did you have lessons, (how many) and how many goes before you passed?
 
Someone paid for a few lessons for me before I took my test, and it was money well spent. 
 
7 Which is the most tricky part of driving? Reversing into a space backwards between two cars, reversing into a sideways space between two cars, or something else?
 
Ah, the dreaded three point turn :)
 
 
8 What’s the fastest speed you have driven?
 
Shh! 
Too fast. But I never speed now, it is a sin according to the Catholic Faith.
 
9 What kinds of cars have you driven? Did they all have names? What were the names?
 
Yeah, Ok, my cars have names. I can't remember the first few, but Anna was the most significan one, named after my old friend Anna, the one who taught me to love music. Anna lasted for years, Warrior was her brief replacement before I was homeless, and now Florence has taken Anna's place. 
Mostly my cars have been Peugeot, and that is what I prefer, the other two were a Rover Metro and an Austin Metro and they were both rather rubbish and didn't last long.
 
10 How do you decide what name to give a car?
 
I have never really thought about it, Anna was always Anna, Warrior was Warrior because he was a boy car, Florence was named for me, she came to me as Florence.
11 What’s the furthest you have ever driven?
 
Probably Hampshire to Scotland or Around New Zealand, although I was sharing the driving that time.
 
12 Do you drive cars with gears or automatic? Which you usually drive, have you ever tried the other?
 
I drive geared cars, I have been offered automatics here and there but to be honest, I am fine with gears, no need to change while I am young and strong, and geared cars are cheaper and simpler to fix.
13 If you could be given any car for free, which car would you like? And why?
 
Ah, just a little Peugeot would do for me, something like Florence but younger so less repairs.

Thursday, 14 January 2016

The Dean has a whole lot more than homophobia to apologise for

The Dean thinks the Church has a whole lot more than homophobia to apologise for.
The Dean has a whole lot more than homophobia to apologise for, including destroying me to cover his own back, and also allowing Gavin Ashenden to go on behaving appallingly.

When Women Bishops were voted in, the Dean and other people who were against women Bishops, were included in the countrywide campaign of frothy notices and announcements about how pleased they were that women Bishops had been voted in.
So presumably the homophobic Dean has been beamed his message from Canterbury to trot out, while Ashenden doesn't listen to much apart from the voices in his head these days. So they are giving out opposing messages and neither because they care about homosexual people.

As for being welcome in Jersey churches, you have to be rich and/or narrowminded.
I would like someone to volunteer to go to the town church and announce their gay wedding please.

Wednesday, 13 January 2016

Primates

Apparently the Church of England are doing a spineless conference called 'Primates'.
I have to say it is apt.
Primates conjours up an image of apes, scratching and grunting.
Yes. I like the CofE having a primates meeting, swinging from tree to tree and pissing on the zoo bars. Very apt and suitable.
Unfortunately they are more likely to piss out propaganda for the gullible to swallow.

Apparently attendance in the CofE has fallen to less than a million, which begs the question - DO WE REALLY HAVE ALMOST A MILLION RICH, ARROGANT AND GULLIBLE OLD PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY WHO WE CAN'T OTHERWISE OCCUPY IN USEFUL AND ALTRUISTIC WAYS?!

Anyway, I like Peter Broadbent's take on it Justin Welby  'alledgedly' gave a very good speech that told us all where we are'

I was unclear as to if the 'aledgedly' referred to the speech not neccessarily being Welby's own original material, or if Broadbent simply couldn' be bothered to attend or listen to the speech? The tone points to the former.

At least the Church are giving us a laugh, although the damage they do far outweighs that.


Monday, 4 January 2016

Gavin Ashenden


Due to the incredible increase in views of this blog, obviously due to Ashenden behaving badly (or acting out his insanity) I decided to update this post from a while back:

Well, Gavin Ashenden is performing in the spotlight again.
He is apparently in the National press with his recent opinion on Islam.

I know he reads my blog, usually from the safety of Yemen or Normandy, but I know he won't mind me blogging about him, as he is never averse to maligning me or hurting other people's feelings.

Some peaople might expect me to write an open letter, about how he shouldn't be telling Muslims how to live when he hasn't worked out what Christianity is all about yet, But actually, he can make enough of a fool of himself and the church without my help.

Peacekeeper from Yemen, trouble stirrer from Jersey.

Do you remember Pepper Anne?

'...He's his own biggest fan...
Ashenden, Ashenden'

Here is the recent Story of Ashenden and Islam, as told by a Jersey Blogger:

http://tonymusings.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/httpwww.html

Afterthought on Islam from me.
I do not like the way the media are playing up these stories of young people being radicalised. It is scaremongering. The Churchwarden's wife used to include in her daily fears that we were going to taken over by Muslims and it would be awful for us women.
I used to live among Muslims. They were peaceful, respectful and had good senses of humour, their beliefs lead them to have a set of ethics, something that Catholics and Buddhists have but the Church of England lacks.

Gavin Ashenden saw an advert in the church rag (Times) and it said 'Come and work where clergy discipline cannot reach you! Golden sand, corruption, old boys and favours in kind'.
So he went to work in Jersey.
It is a puzzle then why he is trying to take over in Normandy!

Further Ashenden reading and links for recent viewers after his most recent rantings.

 http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jersey-deanery-15-october-2013

 http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/lies-that-bishop-willmott-tells-us.html#.Vojvp1LP7D4

 http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/ashenden-googles-himself.html#.VorLElLP7D4

 http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/gavin-ashenden-2.html#.VorLSlLP7D4