Publication by Dan Wooding/Assist

This says so much that it doesn't say, Jersey:

http://www.sloppynoodle.com/wp/bill-latham-in-on-the-start-of-tearfund-and-the-man-who-suggested-the-first-overseas-project-for-jersey-overseas-aid-back-in-1972/

The Heads of the CSA inquiry have something in common! The CofE!

Butler-Sloss Church of England hand picked.
Fiona Woolf. Also, church of england.

Sits on St. Clements PCC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiona_Woolf

Charitable work and other interests[edit]

Woolf is involved in supporting the work of a number of charitable and other organisations. She is a trustee of Raleigh International,^[14] a governor of the Guildhall School of Music and Drama,^[15] a trustee of the Friends of Oxford Shakespeare Company,^[16] and a member of the Parochial Church Council of St Clement Eastcheap. She is also chairman of the Chelsea Opera Group Trust,^[17] and is actively involved in the operation, fundraising and co-ordination of its volunteers, as well as being a member of its choir.

Don't consider this a co-incidence! The Church of England are controlling the inquiry, with their 'friends' in the government, a bit like the Jersey Deanery cover up only much Bigger.

This is why Paul Butler is shooting his mouth off, again.

Why church and government investigations into abuse are not adequate

There, you have missed me seriously blogging, haven't you?
I am just going to copy what I absently scribbled on my notepad this morning.

People in Government or the Church of England who investigate abuse are usually well off, comfortable, stable and always have been, as were there parents and as are their children.

They cannot and usually don't try to, see things from the perspective of a poor, vulnerable dependent child or adult. They have not lived through it and so cannot understand it.

Imagine Lady Butler-Sloss for example. She has had a good life, she likes the Church of England, she acts for them, she told a victim that she 'didn't want to give the press a Bishop' ie, the Bishop may have abused, but his status was more important than the Victim's story being heard.

Any effective inquiry really needs at least one survivor who is healed to the point where their memories or flashbacks wont affect them partaking in investigations. Any inquiry needs someone who has been through it and understands what survivors are going through.

And, of course, for an inquiry to be independent, it needs outside members of inquiry. On a personal Note, the Korris report claims to be independent when Korris was someone who carried out Church contracts and included Lady Butler-Sloss's advice, as well as the Church of England's head of Safeguarding, Elizabeth Hall, in her inquiry, hardly independent, Lady 'Dont-give-the-press-aBishop and Jane Fisher's friend and colleague Elizabeth Hall who has refused a formal complaint against Jane Fisher, also the Korris report was comiled from selected notes and emails by Jane Fisher, who is known to write emails for 'show'  and 'evidence'.
So how was the Korris report independent? It wasn't.

John Gladwin, a retired Church of England Bishop, is not independent, nor is Heather Steel, Philip Bailhahce's colleague, Lady Butler-Sloss's colleague.

So far all church report omit my views, even though the Diocese were sent my amendments to the Korris report.

And as for government Investigations, they elected Lady Butler-Sloss, who didn't want to give the press a Bishop, and who's brother was involved in preventing full and proper inquiries into CSA.

The only proper, thorough and genuine inquiries are going to be independent and include survivors. Internal investigations, even those that claim wrongly to be independent, risk protecting wrongdoers, as the church reports into my case do.

THIS IS FROM SIMON DANCZUK'S RECENT TELEGRAPH ARTICLE, IT ILLUSTRATES JUST HOW LITTLE UNDERSTANDING AUTHORITIES HAVE OF ABUSE SURVIVORS AND THE PROBLEMS THEY HAVE:

Think of the 1,400 children abused in Rotherham. They were beaten, had guns pointed at their heads, were routinely gang raped, had petrol poured over them and were threatened with being set alight. What do you think happens to these kids?

They don’t tend to end up in nice jobs, washing their cars in the suburban sunshine on a Sunday morning. They grow up angry, resentful and lost to society. The Prime Minister talks about sending in welfare squads to tackle “problem families”, but what about the lost generation that’s being created now by allowing children to be abused on an industrial level?

I’ve sat before these people and listened to their stories. I remember every one. Some have managed to turn their lives around, and these stories are inspirational. But, for most, the burden of abuse is too heavy to bear. Kids who walk through the fire of extreme abuse make very different choices to the rest of us. They end up joining the Foreign Legion, committing violent crimes, taking drugs or sleeping on the streets. When I looked at the criminal record of one victim and asked why he couldn’t stay on the straight and narrow, he told me it was safer in prison.

For most, they struggle to make relationships and the human cost is massive. “I don’t have friends, I prefer to be on my own because I don’t trust people,” one sexually abused man told me. He’d made a living over the past 20 years working with the travelling community on the margins of society. These were the only people who didn’t judge him, he said.

But talking to bosses in children’s services and the multitude of highly paid professionals running our protective agencies, you’ll never get any real understanding of the depth or complexity of the people they’re dealing with. It’s become a cold science where the hard work of gaining trust, taking a human approach and supporting people has been replaced with a detached, long-lens view. And it’s not just management that has this view. At one point last year, I made a complaint on behalf of one of the Rochdale grooming victims as a social worker kept appearing outside her house, peering through the window. Is that the “help” a survivor of sexual abuse needs?

The Church and the CSA inquiry

Dear Bishop Butler,

I object to you and your church choosing one cover-up merchant like Butler-Sloss after another to hijack the national CSA inquiry and protect the Church of England.

The Church of England is an abusive organization, which has blatantly destroyed and villified me, excluded me from inquiries and handed them over to my abuser's supporters, and failed at any point to gather my full story and balance the inquiry, you have also continued to employ the safeguarding officer who destroyed me for the sake of cover up, who also, with Butler-Sloss and Korris, mainly covered up her wrongdoing that led to me being left homeless and destitute.

Until this matter is resolved, the Church of England have no credibility, and furthermore, being such a shambolic organization for safeguarding, being an organization which has covered it's back through people like Butler-Sloss, being an abuse-ridden and damaging organization,and destroying me through safeguarding, I object strongly to your involvement in the choosing of a new chair for the CSA inquiry.

I have yet to hear you speak regarding the Butler-Sloss whitewashes or the way the Diocese of Winchester and Jersey Deanery have ripped my life to shreds and villified me.

Currently one particular ongoing harm to me caused by you and your church is a whitewash safeguarding 'investigation' within Jersey into the way the authorities treated me, this report, which has yet to be released, was already written and the clearing of wrongdoers announced, in February, and within the last few weeks I have been contacted, so that the sham safeguarding board can put on record that they contacted me, this report was instrumented by you and your church and you are liable for the further harm that it will cause me, on top of the massive wrecking of my life in the press that your whitewash Korris and Steel reports, influenced by Lady Butler-Sloss, a colleague of Steel and her friend Bailhache who led a smear campaign against me to protect the Dean, has caused.

Those who don't know it, Steel is conflicted judge who was nominated by Philip Bailhache, Jersey Senator-Jurat-Church officer associate of my church officer abuser abuser and friend of the Dean, to ensure that the Dean was cleared and I was utterly publicly crucified.

Butler-Sloss a colleague of Steel and Bailhache played a part in the Korris report and was acknowledged as such, the horrifying, inaccurate and unprofessional Korris report ripped my world apart when the Diocese of Winchester and Jane Fisher had it published, with no thought whatsoever for safeguarding and my welfare, 

the Korris report was proudly displayed on the Diocesan website despite omitting my views and despite my protests and despite the Diocese refusing to add my amendments sent to Korris and from Korris to the Diocese -evidenced.

The Korris report was only removed from the Diocesan website very recently due to a legal bid. This too is evidenced, the Korris report remains published internationally on a number of websites and has shamed and defamed me in a way from which I will never recover.

The diocese lied to a court of law in claiming attempts had been made to include me in the Korris report, obviously none of my amendments were added and there is no record or evidence that any effort was made to contact me. 

My side remains unheard and I object to Bishop Butler and Archbishop Welby making any pronouncements about the CSA in the meantime.

Archbishop Welby claims that more abuse will be uncovered in the church, of course it will, the church have silenced victims for years, refused and delayed complaints and treated victims like dirt, I am not the only one to have been sent mad by abuse and proclaimed insane by the church, not by a long way, I can NAME others who have! 

Now, why, when the Church have not resolved this matter, taken my complaint and done a proper inquiry on my behalf, is the Church, who's representative Lady Butler-Sloss, still playing a part in influencing the national CSA inquiry. Survivors want an inquiry, not another whitewash and cover up like Butler-Sloss-Steel-Korris-Bailhache.

Those who are not aware of who Philip Bailhache is, he is a Jersey senator, member of the judiciary and also church officer, who used his role of senator to support the dean and church in which he was an officer, by running a smear campaign against me, writing a letter full of untruths and inaccuracies to the Archbishop, who accepted his letter, and headed a press-based smear campaign against me, for the Dean and for the church officer who abused me, I suffered massive harm as a result and was voiceless against this defamation of me that resulted from the Korris report being published and the Bishop of Winchester attacking the Dean and Deanery of Jersey, an inexperienced Bishop given a diocese and role he wasn't fit for, attacked his own deanery publicly over my case, without even meeting me or getting my side of things, and the result was the smear campaign and Philip Bailhache appointing his friend and colleague Dame Steel to damn me and clear the Dean and other wrongdoers.

The Bishop then threatened me for begging him and his church to leave me alone and not do a repeat of ther prolonged act of harassment and breaches of my human rights in 2010/2011 which the Diocese of Winchester, with the safeguarding officer who commited these breaches of my human rights leading them, did not include in ANY investigation. While I am left scarred by police beatings and detentions inflicted on me by the police on behalf of Jane Fisher and Michael Scott-Joynt because I protested their interference in my life and breach of human rights, as well as persisting in asking them to dealwith my complaint. Which, to this day, they haven't. The Korris report does not deal with my complaint and conveniently omits Jane Fisher's illegal actions.

And, last year AFTER my second formal complaint against safeguarding officer Jane Fisher, she was still working in her role, unsupervised, unreprimanded and was allowed to illegally refer me for 'help' to the NSPCC, as if a children's charity could help an adult who is scarred for life by the very woman who illegally referred her! 

The church need to get ther house in order before they have the right to get involved in things such as the National Child Abuse inquiry. 

The Church of England looks silly and yet they keep shouting in the press.

•  Women Bishops were elected because if the Church had refused, the Government would have forced it on them which would have made them look worse. 
• Welby is pre-empting all the suppressed and silenced Church victims coming forward by making headlines, look bad doing that or look worse when they do?
• The Church had Butler-Sloss nicely in place, oh dear, her Chichester cover-up was blown as a result, what about her Winchester cover-up? Who will the church now force into position to lead the inquiry and protect them?

sincerely, 

-- 

HG

My blog   http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/