23/10/15
A first formal
open letter of reprimand, correction and warning to Mr Ian Gorst, Chief
Minister of Jersey, cc Jersey’s Lieutenant-Governor, who this formal letter is
also aimed at. This is also a first formal warning that action is to be taken
and must be taken, in Jersey and the UK to bring the matters below to a close.
This letter also
contains a formal complaint against Sir Philip Bailhache, which is to be dealt
with by relevant and non-conflicted authorities.
This letter in no
way covers my full complaint nor can it, but it is an initial step, expected to
be followed by further investigation by
the authorities approached or further formal letters/proceedings.
Tribute: This letter
contains information made available to the public by the Jersey bloggers. Thank
you.
Dear Chief Minister
Gorst,
I haven’t had the
pleasure of meeting you nor sharing my story with you but I see from
yesterday’s press release that you are deeply involved in my case. I am sure that as a Christian and a Minister
setting an example to your people, you are keen to meet me and hear my story,
which makes it surprising that you haven’t contacted me at all about a report
about my case that you are fighting to have released. I look forward to your
arrangement of a meeting before you proceed any further, as you are currently
causing me distress and disruption to my life with your actions, and I am sure
that if you are a Christian and a minister of integrity, then you won’t want
that. I am sure you are very keen for my side to be heard on equal footing with
those who have the advantage of lawyers, money for legal advice and also a
voice in the press.
Let me tell you about
me. Despite being utterly destroyed and left homeless after suffering very
badly in Jersey for a long time for reporting a man who abused me and who was a serial abuser and my
second abuser in the Church of England, and despite continuing to be destroyed
when I left Jersey because the Bishop of Winchester and Jane Fisher needed to
cover up what they did to me, I have rebuilt my life as best I can, although
the results of horrendous church and police behaviour will affect me for the
rest of my life.
I am disabled, I have
physical disabilities and also autism and post traumatic stress from the
terrible way I was treated by the church and police. But I am also a person who
lives a fairly normal life, I have a flat, I go to work and I go to
University. I would like to move on now
and stop being distressed and disrupted by the actions of the Jersey Deanery,
who’s bad behaviour is now openly upheld by you and the Governor.
I would gather that people in the esteemed
standing that yourself and the Lieutenant-Governor have would not be able to
imagine what being able to attend university means to someone who’s lifetime of
poverty and abuse has prevented it thus far, no doubt you both, and your
parents and children took your places at Oxford for granted because you could,
I don’t have that kind of privilege . But what I can tell you is that your
ongoing attempts to have the conflicted and invalid Steel report published is
badly affecting my work and study, taking away things I have worked hard for
and value in a life so severely damaged by the Church of England and police,
and if you consider yourself to be just and fair, impartial or Christian, you
will desist. You can’t read this and
dismiss it unless you are without conscience at all.
Here are Bob Hill’s
blogs on the Steel report, just to help you to understand what you are fighting
for, it will be sent to you in paper form but for the benefit of a wider
audience these links will be clickable online:
Responsibility:
I hold Jane Fisher of
the Winchester Diocese completely responsible for all harm I have suffered,
from being first abused by another church serial abuser when I was 19, to the
constant harm to me since and especially for the harm in Jersey where she
allowed another serial abuser access to me by allowing him to be in a church
position. I hold her responsible for upholding the Jersey Deanery in harming me
for reporting my abuser, and I hold her responsible for her part of the cover
up, I hold her responsible for deceit and illegal and violating harm to me
through agencies and services in Jersey and Winchester including LaMoye Prison
and I hold her responsible for making me homeless, slandering me to all
churches and outreach in my home town of Winchester and leaving me alienated
from my friends and causing me further lasting harm through the police for my
response to her cover ups at my expense, I hold her responsible for continuing
to pursue and defame me, especially through the police and Korris report in
2013. I hold myself responsible for my shameful reactions to this intolerable
treatment when I was unable to recover from what happened to me.
But I hold you
responsible for making me live under stress and in danger of continued harm
when I need to move on with my life. I will be taking action against Jane
Fisher and the diocese of Winchester as well as you if this Steel report farce
is not concluded and if I am defamed by any sort of release.
It is worth noting
that there have been at least 3 court cases regarding the Steel report, one of
which led to the Bishop of Winchester agreeing that he would not release the
Steel report without first discussing the content of it with me and complying
with certain things at very least. He
has not complied with this so I think you also need to be contacting me as well
as the Bishop of Dover and Archbishop of Canterbury, not least because this
report is supposedly about what happened to me in Jersey, and I would suggest
that your fight for this report to be released looks desperate and very
strange.
Regarding the above,
the report is about my case, (well no, it was the Deanery’s illegal hijack of
my case) and due to the court order and your actions to try to get the Steel
report released, you are actually breaking the law. You are not permitted to cause
me distress and harm regarding the Steel report nor try to force it’s release,
the Bishop of Winchester is also acting illegally by allowing you to harm me
through his illegal reports. You are only allowed to get the report released
with my consent and when I agree that what it contains is correct. Do you
understand that? So please make contact with me regarding your wishes. This is
legally binding and a formal warning.
For the Steel report
to have had so many legal interactions and costs associated with it, there is
obviously something very wrong with it, plus it will not be the same report
that your colleagues originally
illegally engineered to clear the Dean and destroy me in the first place
if, as is suggested by the Bishop of Winchester’s words, it has been modified,
altered, partly redacted. So tell me, how many flight costs did your effort to
get the Steel report published cost?
I am just recalling
Philip Bailhache’s repeat attempts to derail the Jersey care inquiry because of
‘cost’ and with at least five of you men flying business class to and from
Canterbury and all the expenses involved, I think you need to have a rethink
about what you are doing, because it is a bit too blatant. And who is paying
for your flights? And I can’t not add this – did Philip Bailhache breach the
data protection act on the plane again?!
Philip Bailhache
usually estimates either £50,000 or £500,000 for things he wants closed down,
so I am going to do an estimate of plane fares and expenses for a group of
incredibly arrogant and unchristian men from Jersey who are desperately trying
to force the release of a whitewash report:
Assume business class
and a plush hotel, costs and meals and cost accordingly: £1000 plus. At a time
when the government in Jersey are making cuts that affect the general public
due to missing money and very poor budgeting. And then this week a probably
equally expensive delegation to meet the Chinese president?! Jersey is a tiny
insignificant island with no trade with China. So why is your government short
of money? Because they waste it trying to look good at other people’s expense.
Using £1000 of tax
payer’s money to try to snuff out the life of a vulnerable adult with a report
thinly disguised as an investigation but in reality just a pure and blatant
cover up and attack on a vulnerable adult? Something is very wrong with that
picture. Both you and the Lieutenant-Governor are aware of Bob Hill also taking
the matter to court, although he proceeded without my consent. So to see you so
desperately trying to get this report released without contacting me to ensure
that my views are included makes you appear very very duplicitous or so
misinformed and incompetent that you aren’t fit for you post.
Why was this such
important government business and who in the States signed the travel money off
for it?
I know that
collectively your little group who went to Canterbury appear to think you are
above any reproof, but I must comment, if Philip Bailhache is so eager to close
the care inquiry down, and you still try to give the illusion that the Steel
report is to do with safeguarding, how do you square that paradox up? It has
laughingly been described by bloggers as ‘Bailhache’s uncoverup’ as opposed to
his cover ups.
On the subjects of
immigrants. Can you explain why you have spoken about taking in refugees?
Jersey’s school, social, housing and health services are atrocious, Jersey’s
population is far too much for these systems already and the government and
judicial systems are very very conflicted and outdated, and this is exampled in
you and the Lieutenant-Governor going with Philip Bailhache to Canterbury.
Indeed I believe refugees who come to Jersey will have a worse quality of life
not better.
Please can you
explain why you so urgently and desperately need this report released? Despite knowing, and you can’t not know when
you oversee Jersey, of the links between Dame Steel, the Bailhache Brothers and
others?
If you are really
desperate for this engineered report to exonerate the Dean and destroy me, then
you need to get in touch with me, because legally the Church of England are not
allowed to release the whitewash that you are so desperate for, but I will be
taking the Bishop of Winchester back to court and asking him to present this
report in its entirety and without the amendments made after each legal bid
against it.
You need to contact
me to access the Steel report that way. Dame Steel will also receive a summons
on this occasion and will be questioned about the illegal liaison with Officer
Stuart Gull of Jersey police and you are still obliged to investigate this
illegal activity as well as the tandem illegal whitewash between Stuart Gull of
the conflicted and guilty Jersey police and Safeguarding board to create
another whitewash where Johnstone cleared the police without carrying out an
investigation, much the same as the way that the Bishop cleared the Dean, and
as officer Gull was also ‘appointed by the Bishop of Winchester’ to liaise with
Steel, and did so illegally and is a member of a police force who grievously
harmed me, why was he involved, having never met or interviewed me, in clearing
the police to Glenys Johnstone who announced that they had committed no wrong
and that her report was almost complete the year before she made a token pretence
of including me?! Time Jersey justice was overhauled by real justice.
I know you made the
statement regarding refugees for PR reasons but I would be concerned for any
refugees being brought to Jersey when I have seen you fighting for the release
of a report that you have been told with evidence is conflicted and when you
are well aware of my anguish at the whole corrupt and deceitful process that
the Church and press have gone through in the last few years. No refugee would
be safe in Jersey, they would be open to harm with no redress. – It is tempting also to say that you would
deport them in their pyjamas after brutalizing them if they ever dared to stand
up to the wrong that goes on in Jersey.
So being invited to live in Jersey would simply be out of the frying pan
and into the fire for anyone seeking a better life. I can state that as I am living testament to
that fact.
Continuing on this
subject, I have several suggestions if you continue to harm me.
Resolution
suggestions:
1. As you know, since the Korris
rubbish broke in the press, I have been offered homes and jobs in Jersey by
numerous people who don’t believe the Jersey Deanery and Diocese of
Winchester’s deceitful lies about my case. If you continue to harm me, I will
take up those offers even though quality of life in Jersey is poor due to the
factors I mentioned earlier. And I will use my time in Jersey to put the record
straight very legally and very powerfully – are you ready?
2. I can take you on legally. And I
feel that that will make you laugh but Goliath laughed and David killed him. My
mum took Greville Janner on for his crimes in the 90s and dealt with a police
force as corrupt and dishonest as Jersey’s proudly is, and although I and my
family suffered terribly and I am left permanently psychologically damaged, the
world knows about Janner now. Believe me, even taking a legal stand against you
will go down in history, and it may take years but as you refuse to let me live
in peace, then it is time for me to at last start giving the evidence that has
been waiting all this time while Jersey and the Diocese of Winchester have been
showing the world what immature and deceitful and dishonest mean. Are you
ready?
3. You can call an independent inquiry
that includes my side of things; now that there is no doubt whatsoever from
this letter that the Steel report is known not to contain my side. If you
continue to harm me with press releases regarding the Steel report or efforts
to release the Steel report, this letter is evidence that you are distressing
me and that I have asked you personally to arrange for my side to be shared.
After all what is the point of one-sided press releases and reports? They make
the perpetrators look incredibly incredibly corrupt and vindictive. So the
third and final offer that you make sure my own story and evidence is heard
clearly to balance the Steel report. Until you do this, you are stating that
you uphold the harm to me. Make sure my story in full reaches the same media as
would publish the Steel report.
If you are unable to
respond to my options and decide what the best way to continue is, then you
must understand that your bids for the Steel report are invalid and you must
desist from causing me distress for dishonest reasons. Or indeed, being involved, as it is not
appropriate.
Considering that the
Steel report is supposed to be a Safeguarding report and you have shown
complete and utter disregard for safeguarding me, I would like to know why you
want that report released so urgently! So urgently that three of the most
powerful men in Jersey had to fly to the UK and couldn’t simply have a phone
conference with the Mainland Bishops – Would it be anything to do with you
taking more illegally obtained and defamatory documents with you? And did Sir
Philip feel the need to read them where they could be seen by the general
public again?
You are actually
guilty of aiding and abetting crimes, including harassment and defamation. You
know you can be deported in your pyjamas without underwear for less than that,
right? Did you declare Ian Lemarquand’s conflict of interests to the States and
BBC Jersey when he defamed me and also claimed I wasn’t deported in my pyjamas?
It isn’t too late so do that, especially as you are wasting my study time and I
have two assignments due in as well as an exam in two weeks time.
As you may have
realised, I have a bad habit of actually acting on things I offer to do. The
Bishop of Winchester didn’t believe it either until he had to pay thousands to
a church lawyer to lie to a court of law for him.
I know there was an
investigation into police corruption in Jersey, and I know someone who was
investigating and she told me she was horrified by what was going in Jersey.
Unfortunately I see that nothing has changed and Jersey police are still very
corrupt and dishonest, and brutal when they can get away with it.
However, there has
not been a full investigation from the outside into the corruption and
deviousness of the conflicted Jersey states and judiciary members, which stands
out in all its glory in your expensive trip to try to force the release of a
report that is technically nothing to do with you, and without you
communicating with me, when the report was a result of what happened to me,
although I am assured that it is a cover up that doesn’t remotely resemble what
happened to me but defames me to exonerate the Dean. Hardly surprising as it
was written by the conflicted states and judiciary members, most of whom are
involved in the church, including yourself.
This letter, as well
as being a formal open letter is a wide circulation letter and even if you
refuse to read it, you will be liable for having been sent the contents of it
by me and other people to whom it is circulated, if you make any further
attempt, knowing what this letter contains and the distress that you are
causing, to try to force the release of the Steel report.
Here’s a lovely
message from Jesus Himself to you:
‘Philip Bailhache, Ian Gorst, and other powerful and well-to-do
dignitaries were publicly stoning a woman to death for having the audacity to
stand up to abuse and corruption. Jesus came along, ‘what are you doing,
Children of God? He asked. We are right with God and we are good, this woman is
bad and we will make a public example of her! In who’s name? We are doing all
we do in God’s Name! They replied. And from where do you learn how to behave as
God wishes? From the Bible, from Church! They responded. ‘I see’ Said Jesus.
There are several
alternative endings, including Jesus joining in because that is what Bailhache
and Gorst would expect, but it makes the point whichever way it ends.
Please now read my
letter to the Jersey Deanery:
I know that due to
the ‘Jersey Way’, the term applied to the unjust systems in Jersey that keep
people silenced out of fear, has destroyed a number of people who have stood up
to Philip Bailhache, but I am already destroyed, and if it takes my life to
stop this injustice, am willing to proceed,
before I even came to Jersey I dreamed that I perished in Jersey at the
hands of the church, and if that is what will be, then so be it, as long as my
crucifixion allows the souls that have been lost in darkness to come out into
the light.
I hereby officially,
formally, legally and conclusively declare the Steel report null and void, it
is not representative of my case nor does it contain my views, it is what it
was set up to be, a whitewash that is to be destroyed or formally investigated
for illegal access to police and other records without my consent and
harassment and defamation. The Steel report was an act of pure madness and the
Bishop was told to halt it and call an independent investigation. It is thus continued madness that the Chief
Minister and Governor of Jersey are demanding it’s release so loudly and
frantically, and should they continue having received this letter, their
motives will be Chrystal clear!
On a lighter note,
did Bishop Trevor’s sense of humour in the press amuse you? Apparently ‘God’s
people are safe in Jersey churches’! Hilarious. It took a million pounds and
nearly took a vulnerable adult’s life in order to arrange social lunches for
old, wealthy and completely uncaring people in the church and that makes the
churches safe! Tell me again why you need the Steel report released?!
Conclusion. HG
The following pages
are a formal complaint:
Formal complaint
against Sir Philip Bailhache:
Please note. This
letter will be circulated online with the links that I will show in the formal
complaint, and they can be accessed this way by online readers. The links will
appear as text for most recipients of a paper copy of this letter, and some
recipients of the paper copy of this letter, including the Chief Minister and
Lieutenant-Governor will also receive the linked documents on paper. The reason
for this is because a majority of circulation will be online and I am living on
about £100 per week so I can’t afford printing costs.
Anyone reading this
is very welcome to send it to the Chief Minister and Lieutenant-Governor
themselves as well, in order that they cannot claim not to have received it
without thus making a statement of incompetence that makes them unfit for their
positions.
Points of Complaint:
1. Complaint 1. Breach of the data
protection act and abuse of those who complained about it.
This complaint
initially occurred without my knowledge and was not made by me, it was made by
two businessmen who witnessed Philip Bailhache reading illegally procured
police documents and other sensitive information containing my name and the
name of my abuser on a plane while he was presumably flying to (or from!)
influencing the church or authorities in the UK against me. His flight was
presumably paid for by the States and it remains uninvestigated as to why this
was States Business. Philip Bailhache a church officer and dignitary was
abusing his power and dual roles and acting illegally.
A complaint was brought
to Deputy Trevor Pitman by the two witnesses, and they were then openly
slandered and attacked verbally by Philip Bailhache, who’s money and power
really appear to make him believe that he can behave like a two year old having
a tantrum in public. And seeing as he hasn’t been abused and destroyed to lead
him to behave like that, he probably should have been deported and left homeless and destitute
after a bit of police brutality and imprisonment, no, hang on, one rule for the
poor and vulnerable and another for the wealthy and powerful, the Jersey way.
Anyway, back to Sir
Philip’s bad behaviour. Trevor Pitman was understandably alarmed at what he
heard the men had witnessed and also the reaction of Philip Bailhache to the
concerns.
He brought the matter
to you, and it is a safeguarding matter as well as a legal, criminal and
disciplinary matter. You did not act on it, you did not discipline or reprimand
Philip Bailhache, who then made a confused statement to the States, nothing
further was done, and despite you saying you believed the witnesses, you then
promoted Philip Bailhache to the post of External Affairs Minister. Now would
you like to explain that to me when you meet me to get my side of things to
counter the Steel report? Can you also explain why you want a safeguarding
report released so urgently when you haven’t dealt with this matter?
This is a formal
complaint because this is a serious matter and harmful to me. You are
responsible for arranging for Philip Bailhache to be disciplined as you have
stated that you believe the witnesses.
This is Trevor
Pitman’s account of the data protection incident, it will be sent to you on
paper with this letter but appears here as links for the benefit of the wider
audience:
Philip Bailhache contradicts himself, link to
evidence:
2. Illegal influence
of an investigation and illegal handling of police documents
This relates to the
matters above, Sir Philip Bailhache has no right to influence police, church or
safeguarding investigations from his abused dual roles in church and States, he
has no right to use his legal expertise or colleagues such as Dame Steel to
defame a vulnerable adult, you need to arrange a safeguarding investigation in
order to ensure that he never uses his position to do this again, especially as
he frequently flies to other countries in his role. Also, neither he nor Dame
Steel have any right to have police documents or records relating to me, and
you are obliged to carry out a very serious formal investigation into this, you
will need to enlist an agency outside of Jersey to do this.
3. Defamation of a homeless and
distressed vulnerable adult who he had never met.
In 2013 Philip
Bailhache abused his power and dual roles in church and States by circulating
letters about me to the church and public, a defamatory attack on me when he
had never even met me or heard my side of things. He left me traumatized. He
misled the general public, as he has before and since, and used his title of
‘Sir’ and his role in the States to influence people to sign a letter demanding
the re-instatement of the Dean. He didn’t give anyone who he influenced my side
of things, and you didn’t act on his bad behaviour and this blatant
safeguarding failure, nor did Jersey safeguarding board, who I contacted.
Now let me put this
in context. It is illegal to name a rapist or murderer, and it is illegal to
keep up a sustained public attack on a rapist or murderer. You have aided and
supported Philip Bailhache in publicly harming me, and you, and he, both
claiming to be Christians, are stating in this ongoing attack on me, that I am
worse than a murderer or rapist and that I have no right to privacy, dignity or
freedom to go on with my life.
And on the subject of
rapists, abusers and all other criminals you think I am worse than. We need to
talk about the repeated incidences of Sir Philip’s name being brought up in
conjunction with protection of paedophiles.
Here is Philip
Bailhache’s defamatory attack on me:
4. Abuse of power in
dual roles in Church and state.
This is already
mentioned in the complaint so far. But I must give an honourable mention to the
recent fracas in the States where it was claimed that Deputy Tadier was claimed
to be doing something wrong by using ‘what would Jesus do? As a sentence to
make a point, his actions weren’t wrong. Any Bailhache with years and years of
actions which Jesus would abhor has no right to speak or use their personal
faith as an attempt to control or gag anyone, especially not when they have
allowed the notorious bully, Terry LeMain to invoke Jesus’ and God’s Name in
the States repeatedly.
As well as in my
case, Philip Bailhache has used his role as an attempt to influence the general
public into calling for the care abuse inquiry to be closed down, misleading
them about costs and putting emphasis on how ‘tax payers money will be wasted’.
It isn’t a waste of money but Philip Bailhache does not want an inquiry that
calls him to account for failing victims and protecting abusers to continue.
However, he appears to have used his position to meet with the inquiry in
secret and thus affect the outcome presumably, this has dismayed and distressed
witnesses. This should be looked at and considered. Be aware that I am writing
this using a number of sources of evidence and this complaint is too big to be
completed within one letter, so I will await your arrangements for interview
and investigation, and until you are able to disprove the conflict of interests
and answer this formal complaint and resolve the issues around it, you are not
in a position to continue pushing for the conflicted Steel report to be
published.
This is one of the
examples given of Philip Bailhache protecting a Paedophile:
And here is a recent
article that the State Media had the audacity to publish, which you also need
to investigate:
5. Abuse of dual roles in church of
government.
As previously
described, Sir Philip makes no differentiation between his church and
government roles nor professional boundaries. He sat on the synod with my
abuser as a church officer and was and is in positions where he has regular
contact with people involved in cover up and wrongdoing regarding this matter.
He is therefore not behaving appropriately in being part of any government
delegation demanding the release of the Steel report; he is also a former
colleague of Dame Steel and wrote publications on law with her, evidenced. And
he asked her to be a speaker at a conference that he hosted. Dame Steel tried
to lie to Bob Hill about this at a meeting in which she defamed me. She has
never met me or heard my side of things but was asked by me to resign from the
investigation due to her conflicts of interest.
Now that you are aware of that, are you really going to continue to try
to force the report to be published? (You were already aware of it but I am
making you formally aware of it).
6. Bullying and silencing of States
members and the public, abuse of power.
Interestingly Deputy
Bob Hill’s recent evidence to the care inquiry illustrated this point. The abuse of power that silences complainants
and victims, this situation is caused by police, states and press, and a lot by
Philip Bailhache.
Deputy Tadier is the
latest in what is becoming a line of people who are seemingly suspended,
bankrupted, imprisoned, deported etc for saying or doing something that certain
people in the States, most notably the Bailhache Brothers, don’t like. And I
watch this happening and I see that you don’t act, don’t speak up about it.
Shona Pitman was bringing a vote of no confidence against Philip Bailhache, and
of course Trevor Pitman brought Sir Philip’s data protection act breach to you.
And so they are bankrupt. Stuart raised the systemic abuse matter and Sir
Bailhache literally tried to silence him. The States went as far as trying to
remove Stuart's blog and the evidence available to the general public.
Philip Bailhache and
His Colleague Michael Birt, who incidentally has also been involved in defaming
me in his town church and States positions, have both given liberation day
speeches that have undermined and rubbished abuse victims and made the Jersey
Way attitude of the States clear. You would rather defame, silence and ruin
abuse victims and their supporters than admit the abuse and abuse of power
problems, Jersey looking good as a finance centre is far too important, but you
and Bailhache seem to fail to see that you have given Jersey a bad name by
doing just that.
You need to take
action to reprimand Philip Bailhache as his behaviour, actions and words are
not befitting for a man in roles such as the ones he holds. Especially as he is
Jersey’s main ambassador to other countries and makes many trips, you must make
sure money is not being spent where this man can cause offence and harm, it
reflects badly on Jersey and is a waste of tax payer’s money. You need to
ensure that Sir Bailhache receives training in how to conduct himself in
public, and you need to reprimand his decades of unchecked bad behaviour.
You also need to
contact Canterbury again, I know you are so keen on safeguarding that you have
been over there begging for the release of a report, but you need to make sure
that the Church of England suspend Philip Bailhache from all offices in the
Church due to his decades of bad behaviour, insulting and slurring people, even people that he has never met, attacking
a vulnerable adult who he has never met and using his dual roles and influence
over the press and public to do so.
Acting in a way that
is detrimental to vulnerable abuse survivors who he has failed while he has
been in law and judiciary positions. Attempting to close down abuse inquiries
that he didn’t like and hijacking inquiries to protect wrongdoers, protecting
paedophiles and discrediting their victims, acting in conflicted roles even
when he has been told that they are conflicted, this is an exhaustive list, so
please start referring to the evidence presented and make sure that Dame
Steel’s friend and colleague Sir Philip Bailhache is suspended and
investigated, and in the meantime he is not credible in using tax payers money
for delegations to Canterbury, and to be honest, because of his actions, I have
grave concerns regarding his frequent trips abroad at tax payers’ expense
because his behaviour poses a risk to the vulnerable.
Did you see the video
of Sir Philip’s behaviour at the meeting he and the conflicted Gavin Ashenden
set up to further harm me? Please ask Bob Hill for a copy for your
investigation.
I hope that you are
as pro-active and eager in responding and actioning this complaint as you have
been in trying to force the release of the Steel report.
This letter is not
the complete story; it is part of it, the tip of the iceberg, so I look forward
to you facilitating the illumination of the full and true story.
You may be interested
to know that instead of just one book about the way myself and others have been
destroyed by the Jersey way, there are going to be two books, one will simply
be a collection of the letters written over the past few years. Would you like
signed copies?
Philip Bailhache’s
behaviour is not fitting of a man who calls himself a Christian, nor is it
fitting of man who holds States, Church or Judiciary roles, he appears unable
to see two sides to things nor do anything but abuse his power and behave badly
with no fear of consequences. The recent farcical trip to Canterbury means that
that exactly the same applies to the Lieutenant-Governor and yourself, the
Chief Minister of Jersey.
Due to the fact that
sexual abuse has been a part in this matter, it is illegal to release my name
or any confidential details to the public or to anyone who might release my
details to the public, and on the same subject, another reason that the Steel
report cannot be released is because Philip Bailhache released all details and
made me and my abuser traceable and identifiable, other breaches of the data
protection act have also occurred and are evidenced, therefore you are not
allowed to know or publish my legal name.
Sincerely,
HG – Korris report
complainant.
These documents were
written very quickly so please excuse errors in spelling, grammar or
references.
Re the comment at 1237.
