HG requests the release of the Steel report

27/05/2016

Formal Demand to the Bishop of Winchester for a copy of the Steel Report to be released to HG:

Dear Bishop Tim Dakin, Bishop of Winchester,

In  2014 I took you to court as you had announced to the Jersey Press and Media that you intended to release the conflicted Steel report to a member of the Dean of Jersey's conflicted circle of church-judiciary-States-legal people. You didn't contact me to warn me then, nor did you show any concern for me whatsoever. Your recent pretence of concern and your failure to notify the press that the Steel report is under a court agreement means that you lack credibility.

You had failed to annul the Steel report when you were made aware that she was a member of this conflicted circle mentioned above and was conflicted by her close association with the Jersey Deanery, most notably her colleagues Philip and William Bailhache and Michael Birt. You also failed to arrange an independent interviewer to record my story as requested. Just as you failed to amend the Korris report.

You have also so far failed to provide me with a copy of the Steel report despite being repeatedly asked. Now why would that be? I am sure the Jersey Press and Media can think of many reasons, but none of them excuse you, nor can you excuse yourself. If it is a balanced and fair report and contains my side, why has it not been released to me? Or the court, for that matter, especially as you have stated that you are going to breach the agreement with the court and release it to John Gladwin for his report on behalf of the Jersey Deanery.  Publication or sharing defamation of me with any individual is illegal.

Use of that report in another report, without my consent counts as breach of the court agreement. And why would you release it to Gladwin's report without first giving me a copy and making sure I agree with the content, corrupting another report without question although Gladwin has stated he is also acting on behalf of the Jersey Deanery!

 Your statement implies that you consider the Steel report to be fact, even though you are bound over to release the report to me first and gain my agreement that what is in it is true. You and John Gladwin are going to be in serious trouble if you keep up this harassment.

Gladwin has made it clear on the phone that he unquestioningly supports the Jersey Deanery and their conflicted Steel whitewash, isn't it fascinating just how deep corruption and ignorance in the Church of England runs?  Gladwin is the man who worked with Butler-Sloss in the famous Peter Ball cover-up, and despite Butler-Sloss being discredited and despite her ignoring my plea for help in 2011 and proceeding instead to whitewash with Korris, nothing has yet been done about the Gladwin-Sloss coverup team, although thankfully she was prevented from corrupting the current inquiry into systemic crimes against children by the Church.

And eventually if this onslaught against me continues, that corruption and cruelty will not be contained by the Church buying the press or lawyers or judges or police or any agencies who are supposed to protect the vulnerable but have failed me.

I have already said this, but how do you think attacking and discrediting and smearing a vulnerable and destroyed survivor even remotely relates to safeguarding?  You have removed any credibility or pretence of this matter being about safeguarding as you have severely and persistently harmed me by misleading and stirring up the press for over three years with no thought for my welfare. Each new attack reinforces the fact that this is not about safeguarding.

 Each one-sided whitewash report and each press attack belies any pretence of that. Firstly the church are remorselessly and relentlessly destroying me for no justifiable reason through the one-sided press attacks, and secondly, what does cover-up and dishonesty do for safeguarding? Thirdly, what have the whitewash reports achieved for safeguarding?

Here is my proposal for the release of the Steel report. If it is supposedly about my case, release it to me, as requested repeatedly.

I will release the Steel report, with the help of my supporters. We will read it, we will report any criminal and illegal actions shown up in it, we will counter every paragraph with my unheard and unseen evidence and we will release this to the press and media with laughter, and even if they try to report only one side of things, we will bring this festering pathetic little cover-up out into the open and back into the courts.  Don't you think it's time?

Once the Steel whitewash is public and rubbished publicly as it should be, seeing as you launched this attack on me and have upheld it for over three years, please make sure investigations into the following occur:

• ·        The abuse and damage I suffered in the Church previous to Jersey
• ·        Why Jane Fisher actively co-ordinated me being discredited in Jersey over this on behalf of the Dean, my abusers and the Lihous and Warrens.
• ·        Why no report has been carried out into Jane Fisher's illegal and damaging actions/a report into this
• ·        What happened to me in Jersey, including the police's henious actions on behalf of the church and all illegal liasons.
• ·        What happened after Jersey as Scott-Joynt and Fisher acted illegally to cover up and destroy me and drive me and defame me to authorities in illegal liasons
• ·        Why your reports omit my side of things
• ·        The damage done to me by you and the press and Jersey deanery and Archbishop and why these years of harm have gone by with no investigations into these things on this list.

Probably a good idea to channel the money being wasted on keeping Gladwin fat and use it for these investigations. 

Gladwin and his colleagues Steel and Butler-Sloss make their livings and abuse their power through their whitewashes.

The whole church of England is shamed by two people who they have destroyed. And no matter how one-sided the press are in reporting on this, that fact remains. Can you imagine Jesus upholding or approving ANY of what has happened, or condoning the way Bob and I have been destroyed? The Church aren't even thinking in terms of Jesus or what He stood for.

Please ensure all copies of the Steel report, the series of redactions and alterations, all material, is sent, and bring this pathetic relentless use of the press for cover-up to an end.

By the way, how will the Jersey Press and Media respond to this if at all? Will they support me in my demand or will ignore my side again or will they print this?

Headline 'HG asks for release of Steel report'

Note that the JEP's bad headlines and bad grammar means they miss the 'The' Out, some of the JEP bad grammar and headlines beggar belief, they probably need an investigation themselves into why their standards are so low. Oh, I know why their standards are so low, their director has taught them to have a bad cigarette in one hand as they type. He's my abuser's brother, you know. The worst Christmas of my life was spent in his fog of cigarette smoke.

No consent is given by me for release of any reports carried out by the Church of England to the public or within the church or within any other report. 

HG

'Je Suis Bob Hill, Je vais me battre jusqu'à ce que je tombe , avec courage'.

Releasing the report

Dear IPSO and other recipients including the Editor of the JEP, and Jersey's BBC and ITV who have behaved equally inappropriately and the IPSO review panel as IPSO are not responding quick enough to stop the attacks by the JEP.

The press and media have seen my statement of fact and there is no excuse for the continuing discrediting of me without balancing reports and statements with my side of things. There never has been an excuse.

I attach yet another damaging effort to discredit me, this is a previously mentioned article, written by Andy Sibcy, editor of the Jersey Evening Post, seemingly in response to my complaint, showing that he doesn't believe he and his biased and unprofessional newspaper will be held to account, and showing contempt for my contact and statement of fact.

I would like to make a few points about this article and the Jersey Evening Post.

The onslaught against me by the Jersey Evening Post and Jersey media go against safeguarding, despite the church claiming that this prolonged and relentless attack on my character is about safeguarding. Obviously the Church of England have kind of missed the point regarding the meaning of the word.

During this pitiful revenge reporting by Sibcy, he makes assumptions as to why the Bishop of Winchester is witholding the Steel report. Ignoring the Statement of Fact from me that states that the Bishop is under a court order regarding the Steel report. Sibcy tries to use the witholding of the report to discredit me yet again, as had happened repeatedly, as he tries to say that could be witheld to 'protect' HG, no, it is witheld because it was subject to court proceedings as it is a one-sided whitewash put together by the Jersey Deanery and their States, judiciary and lawyer members, Has Sibcy read or taken my side of things? Either he hasn't or he has and he is only reporting one side of things. Very unprofessional, basically an attack on me.

He also talks about it being witheld as a 'coverup', because as well as discrediting me in his childish, biased and one-sided rant, he is also serving the Jersey Deanery by attacking the Bishop of Winchester,a service that the Jersey press and media have done for the Jersey Deanery alongside attacking me for over three years now. But no sign of Sibcy either acknowledging my side of things or using them to balance his revenge rant.

Upholding the Jersey Deanery he states that they maintain that they haven't done anything wrong and that the Archbishop has stated that safeguarding standards are as high in the Jersey Deanery as elsewhere in the church. So obviously  church safeguarding standards are appallingly low, considering what I have witnessed and experienced, sibcy fails to point out that the repeat one-sided press and media onslaught which incredibly continues to omit that the church have not interviewed me or included me in any reports, is a very serious safeguarding failure and as the Archbishop continues to uphold both the wrongdoing and cover-up in the Jersey church and the one-sided attack on me through and as a result of the press and media, the situation goes beyond just a safeguarding failure and becomes a criminal matter.

Until there is a report into what happened to me in the Jersey Deanery, the Archbishop is not in a position to either uphold the Jersey Deanery or apologize to the Dean and exonorate him, and as yet there has been no report, nothing but one-sided and conflicted whitewashes, but Sibcy is abusing his power and misleading the general public with his assumptions about what the Steel report contains.

Jersey's safeguarding board, who also did a whitewash on behalf of the church, also continue to look on dumbly as this is brought to their attention, although again, a recent report showed their failure as a safeguarding board to be profound. This onslaught with people standing by and allowing it, is a massive and complex safeguarding failure.

Incredibly at the end of his one-sided attack on me and the Bishop of Winchester, Sibcy tries to claim that the failure to release the Steel report isn't fair on me. His blatant act of pushing for the release of this report on behalf of the Jersey Deanery is incredible, the arrogance that he thinks he can act as a mouthpiece for the Jersey Deanery without balancing the story is astounding, the attempt to use me as a push for the Steel report is ludicrous, as most readers of this will have seen from the recent witness statement, and some from receiving the evidence, Heather Steel is conflicted and wrote a whitewash to clear the Dean and discredit me. I took legal action regarding the Steel report, and thus after discrediting me, Sibcy is not in a position to use my name in vain. He also has no right to make assumptions about what is contained in the Steel report in order to further discredit me without justification and stating a source for his statement about what the Steel report contains. 

The question to ask is WHY the Jersey Deanery and their employees of press and media are so desparate for the release of a report that they know is not balanced and is conflicted, why they fight so loudly for this report? Why are they not fighting for me to be included in a report when they know I have been excluded? I would like to see Sibcy print that but for three years he hasn't, maybe his employers in the Church wouldn't like it?

To add to all this, something I have asked again and again as years of attacks on me have gone by, what happens to the voiceless vulnerable when the press and media behave like this on behalf of the church or other overpowerful and corrupt organisations? What happens to those who cannot speak and also cannot write as I do? I was once mute and I learned to write to communicate and now it remains my preferred form of communication but what happens to the voiceless vulnerable? I am of the understanding, from what I have heard from a person in Jersey who will be reading this, that there have been suicides as a result of the Jersey Evening Post and media behaving in this horrible and unjust and unjustifiable and unbalanced way to other vulnerable people who have been mistreated by people of power in Jersey.

My complaint about this behaviour has been being made for a long time, and in the case of the IPSO, Sibcy is behaving as if he expects to be allowed to continue to re-abuse me without action from them, so I will send all the paperwork to the internal review as well, and I will continue action for as long as it takes to prevent the press and media abusing me and others on behalf of the church and related corrupt and dishonest authorities. Constructive murder or manslaughter is the best way of describing this relentless attack as it tears my life apart yet again.

I would also like to remind Sibcy and the IPSO that the continued display of troll and  offensive comments and attacks on Bob Hill who is seriously ill as a result of trying to protect me from these press and media onslaughts by the Jersey Evening Post are not in any way defensible or justifiable. Bob should not have had to defend my life and wellbeing at the cost of his own life as a result of this massive and prolonged safeguarding failure of the church press and media campaign against me, it is vile and unspeakable that the Jersey press and media can stoop this low for this long, inexcusable.

Are the regulators really going to go on allowing these persistent and life-shattering onslaughts against me?

But despite my contact of the press, despite my statement of facts, my side is still not included, which is an indication that what they are doing and have done is not reporting, not broadcasting news, just acting as a political, biased, misleading and foul mouthpiece on behalf of the Church of England who's glaring and profound failure in running a proper safeguarding investigation stands out clearly, waiting for a time when there is proper reporting on it and a proper regulator, proper justice and long overdue independent oversight of the Church of England.

I attach the blatantly biased petty revenge  effort by Sibcy to abuse his power over the press and public and push for the release of a report that is under a court order and on behalf of the Church who he is representing, please rotate the article when you download it, our scanner wouldn't scan it to portrait.

Will the regulators act on this onslaught? Or the next one? Or is this to persist indefinitely?

Sincerely, 

HG