Now scrap your act of harassment against me and go plague someone else, oh, am I right in saying you are one of the negligent members of Leicestershire social services who ALLOWED BECK AND JANNER ACCESS TO CHILDREN TO ABUSE?
Dear all,
This is the letter that has been sent by post to Mrs Glenys Johnston today.
Dear Mrs Johnston,
Due to harm, distress and harassment by you as chair of Jersey's so-called safeguarding board, I am starting legal proceedings against you.
Last year you were apparently comissioned by Jersey's Chief Minister, to investigate my case.
This was a doubly conflicted action as Jersey's chief minister had allowed some of his his senators to smear and defame me because as well as holding positions in the States, they also held positions in the church.
You apparently started this report last year but did not contact me, and as Deputy Higgins has continued to badger the States about this matter, you claimed in February to have almost completed the report, and to be trying to contact me for my views.
That is not a report, that is a whitewash where you try to contact the victim as an afterthought, and although my email address was readily available through the police and Bob Hill and Mike Higgins, no attempt was made to contact me.
Nor was there any response to my emails to you.
A few weeks ago, when your report was surely finished, you made contact with me.
I had already been told that you had cleared the police of misconduct.
Well how did you do that when their records were inaccurate and you had not spoken to me?
Why was a member of the conflicted police, who are overseen by a church of england reader, friend and supporter of my abuser and the dean, who condemns me, allowed to illegally access my records, which are inaccurate and clear the police of wrongdoing? This same police officer who the Bishop 'appointed' to alos illegally access my records for Dame Steel. a friend and colleague of another Senator-church officer who used his position to smear me and clear the Dean?
What you are producing, which will harm me and not give a clear picture of what happened to me, is a whitewash. You had finished your report, you had created an inaccurate and illegal report, and you intend to harm me by publishing it, at the same time as you are proven to be failing to either protect or report on, the welfare and safety of Jersey children.
You are also conflicted by previous roles in Leicestershire social services, and the fact that I am a witness/survivor
I would therefore inform you formally that I intend to take legal action against you.
Please stop harassing me through whitewash reports done on behalf of wrongdoers, you are seen to be acting for the conflicted states/police of Jersey and the Diocese of Winchester, who are legally forbidden to harm me further and your actions are an act of harm to me by them as they instigated this.
You are not to publish any report that excludes my views, is conflicted, publicly harms me, involves illegal access of records and illegal conversations, covers up, denies or omits wrongdoing by the police or other Jersey authorities, as it is not a true representation of the harm I suffered and it is an act of harassment and harm to me.
Why contact me when you have completed a report that clears wrongdoers?
Hello sham safeguarding board, are you still determined to illegally harass and defame me? How does the UN human rights committee sound to you?
ReplyDeleteHello sham safeguarding board, are you still determined to illegally harass and defame me? How does the UN human rights committee sound to you?
ReplyDeleteAs Jersey's sham safeguarding board take advantage of me being in collapse from the recent church-press attack, they think they will get away with it. Be assured I will fight until I am killed.
ReplyDeleteAs Jersey's sham safeguarding board take advantage of me being in collapse from the recent church-press attack, they think they will get away with it. Be assured I will fight until I am killed.
ReplyDeleteAs Jersey's sham safeguarding board take advantage of me being in collapse from the recent church-press attack, they think they will get away with it. Be assured I will fight until I am killed.
ReplyDeleteHG would love to know why the asswipes have started reading this one recently. Obviously Johnstone and her safeguarding failures mean to harm HG and seeing as the NSPCC-Serious case review panel are conflicted, they are obviously supporting this harm to HG
ReplyDelete