Tony has done a blog about the Dean.
The question is, why did the Bishop suspend the Dean and then let it be said that he was acting in good faith? Why not get to the good faith bit first?
Personally I do not believe that the Dean was acting in an appropriate way. Calling me wicked and saying I was not abused is not good practice. Nor is the way he handled the whole matter, he should have ensured that it was dealt with impartially, and as I mentioned at the time to the man at Autism Jersey, it could not be dealt with impartially by priests on the island, because all priests knew the church warden from Deanery Synod and Evangelical Alliance, and the Dean and his wife went to church and events with the church warden.