Thursday 6 August 2015

Formal and Public Letter to Mrs Glenys Johnstone, OBE, chair of Jersey's safeguarding report

Of course the obvious question is... Is Johnstone also a member of the Church of England as Korris and the others are?

 06/08/2015

Formal Letter to Glenys Johnstone, Chair of Jersey’s ‘Independent’ Safeguarding Panel. This letter is distributed to the press, media, Jersey bloggers and also published online on blogs and websites, this letter is also distributed among twitter and other social media and survivors groups. Observers of this letter, there is a whole list of links at the end and throughout to illustrate the matter. This letter will not be redacted and will form part of an ongoing complaint.

Dear Mrs Johnstone,
Hello, I am HG, the abuse survivor who you have been helping to destroy.

You don’t know me, and you don’t want to, but I know my formal letter of warning reached you, I know you reacted, and I know you have been repeatedly reading the letters posted on my blog. Why don’t you hear about who I am instead of listening and documenting lies? I observe no response from you, a diocese of Winchester style contempt for my views.

Here is my daily diary that started online in 2011, when I was homeless and still being harmed by Jane Fisher’s illegal interventions, as I still am through you. Life After the Diocese was originally called ‘Homeless’ and then ‘The Wanderer’ and named ‘Life After the Diocese’ in honour of the prolonged attack on me by the Diocese in 2013: 

http://lifeafterthediocese.blogspot.co.uk/

The story of a peaceful life daily harmed by the church and police and your panel and the trauma they have caused, I dare you to read it, the Church of England are terrified of it, they won’t read it because it invalidated their attack on me and it discredits them. This diary has had a good following from the start and helped to save my life and restore me.

It is difficult to find the right spelling for your name but I will get it right in time for court, it is made harder by Bob Hill spelling it several ways.

I don’t know a lot about you except that you are dishonest and that you have made me suffer prolonged stress and illness by whitewashing a report and saying that the police have committed no misconduct when they have, and leaving me waiting to be further damaged and defamed by your whitewash alongside waiting to be destroyed by the Steel whitewash, and the two reports are not mutually exclusive, they are linked by Jane Fisher and Stuart Gull, part of a relationship of mutual cover-up between the Diocese of Winchester and Jersey police that has now been running at my expense since 2008, and even the Korris rubbish shows glimpses of it although it has been well covered up.

Both your report and the Steel report are whitewashes to mutually scratch police and church backs, and it is astounding it is still happening considering how such whitewashes and cover ups are currently hitting the news with regular impact in other abuse cases. We will chat about LEICESTER in that context during this letter.

Can you imagine any situation, under any excuse, when members of the defendants team are allowed to write the report, to the exclusion of the victim, and that be considered balanced or fair? Because Stuart Gull represents the seriously compromised States of Jersey Police, who committed serious and sustained misconduct and Dame Heather Steel represents her friends and colleagues in the intermeshed Jersey Deanery and Judiciary, including Philip Bailhache, Michael Birt, Ian LeMarquand, Bridget Shaw, Gavin Ashenden, etc, all of whom have been involved in other misconducts, but none of whom have been subject to public crucifiction as I have.

Are they vulnerable? Are they abuse survivors? No. Have you acted on their harassment of me in the press and community? No. Have you been asked to? Yes. So why have you proceeded your conflicted whitewash without my consent and knowing it is conflicted, instead? Don’t you think you have got the concept of safeguarding inside out then? Please deal with the safeguarding issue of dignitaries in Jersey slurring and attacking abuse survivors.

Let me just clarify a few things about Police officer Stuart Gull, who you have liased with, he is part of your safeguarding panel, he is also the officer ‘appointed’ by the Bishop of Winchester in a grandiouse show in the press, to liase without my consent with the conflicted Dame Heather Steel, who is allied with members of the Jersey Deanery, to illegally access my inaccurate police records.

Let me ask you something, do wrongdoers usually put their hands up and admit to wrongdoing? Do they put their misconducts on record or cover up for themselves? Especially if they are in authority and at risk of dismissals or press and public negativity? If people who are essentially defendants are allowed to have control of or influence of reports, for example Steel and Gull and Fisher, are they going to do a fair and balanced report? Are they going to include my side of things? Or are they going to ensure that I am excluded, and the people they are protecting are cleared? I think you either know the answer to that or you are not fit to be in your job.

The Korris report was the first and only whitewash to be published, that was primarily Jane Fisher’s cover up for her misconduct, notably it excluded me, and the Bishop of Winchester ignored my views on it until I took him to court and he then hurriedly removed the report from the diocesan website while muttering lies about how he had ‘tried to include me’ which was indeed a blatant lie, which he has never tried to qualify by explaining why he didn’t amend the report with my views.
The Bishop further refuses to discipline the conflicted Jane Fisher or remove her from this matter, again showing that this is nothing to do with safeguarding at all. Jane Fisher’s colleagues, Paul Butler and Elizabeth Hall, famous for their desparate uncoverup to try and prevent the church from being investigated, are also protecting Fisher, even though she is responsible for serious and sustained harm to me.

In the same vein, you told Bob Hill the police had no case to answer when your whitewash was first announced, failed to interview me, and contacted me after you had apparently completed your report. Steel was much the same vein. And what excuse do you all have for these whitewashes that exclude the key witness? That I am mad? Bad? Have you heard my story? Heard how severe the trauma was that led to what happened? No, you haven’t even tried to hear me, so what use are your reports? What is their purpose apart from being a box ticking exercise and a cover-up for wrongdoers? Why then are you collectively claiming that these are safeguarding exercises?

I am not on trial any more, not voiceless,  we who survived, we have a voice and we can say ‘No more’. So this is the end of me being condemned by you and your associates. I say that in Jesus Name too.
I am just going to illustrate a few points, madness:

http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/13082013.html#.VcPE0vlViko

Previous letters to Glenys Johnstone:

http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/as-jerseys-sham-safeguarding-board.html#.VcPG-_lViko

http://whatreallyhappenedinthechurch.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/final-formal-letter-to-glenys-johnston.html#.VcPHIvlViko

Unfortunately you do have to be part of an investigation now, an investigation into how this massive whitewash was engineered at my expense and has left me ill and under massive pressure and stress for the past few years.

And you personally need to be involved in an investigation that explores your links between high profile abusers in Leicester and their cover up, and your timely ‘choice’ to head safeguarding in Jersey. I am sure that as you have been happy to play a part in publicly destroying me, you will not take offence at the connection I have made and already shared with you. Your actions led to me making that connection.

You were in Leicester social services during a time that high profile abusers were also operating to take advantage of vulnerable children, and unfortunately I was also around, as I am sure you have realised. Would you like to talk about Greville Janner and Frank Beck, and then your transfer to heading Jersey’s safeguarding at such a sensitive time – a time when other powerful people are being linked to abuse in the care homes in Jersey. 
Stuart Gull is a spin doctor and cover up doctor for the police, am I right in assuming, due to your whitewash in my case, that you, having not faced any investigation for the endemic abuse in Leicestershire, not just Beck and Janner, and why that abuse was going on under your nose, moved to Jersey to continue the good work?

I am sure you won’t like my ‘allegations’ but allow that to illustrate just how much I dislike YOUR allegations! You have tried to discredit me by claiming that the serious and sustained misconduct of Jersey police didn’t occur! You have no idea how hard it is for me to survive not only the horror of what I survived in Jersey, followed by the combined and sustained attack on me by you and Gull and Steel and the Diocese and Deanery, if I was anyone else I would have conveniently committed suicide, as some of the Leicester Victims who you failed conveniently did, as some of the Jersey abuse survivors conveniently did, convenient for you and your police and the dignitaries who you have protected.

I am trying to find you a copy of the letter written to Jersey’s joke of a police complaints authority in 2009, that they never responded to, and it only got much much worse from then on, this isn’t in your scabby excuse for a report, I recall a lot of evidence that both Jersey and Leicester police are very corrupt and have deliberately acted for abusers in power, some of the psychological harm to me that prevents me relating to people well is directly as a result of Leicestershire constabulary’s failures, and more from Jersey police.

Back to the Leicester matter, I know both from my childhood and from accounts of survivors on the streets how horrendous the care system in Leicester/shire was, now can you tell me a bit about your OBE in return? We could go through a list of titles allocated to both abusers and people who covered for them, an interesting trend in the news, but here’s a complete and utter wild card question, did a man called Mark Lupton ever come to your blind eyes or bribe? Oops, I meant attention!

So Glenys, I gather you are not an observant lady, all that abuse going on in Leicester/shire, and you didn’t notice a thing and you got an OBE for it! And in Jersey you are still not noticing a thing! Wow! I guess you get to be a Dame or something pretty soon?

I already know how wrongdoers in authority react to being challenged. Stuart Syvret and Trevor and Shona Pitman were ruined for challenging them, my parents suffered terribly, and I have been repeatedly and publicly destroyed. So before you set off the routine beatings and imprisonments, remember, I have survived it repeatedly, I am brutally and severely harmed but I have lived, and my attitude now is that you will kill me or I will live, but this letter is printed and circulated, indelibly, copied, recorded, forever. I learned that from the Jersey bloggers, especially Stuart Syvret and Trevor Pitman. You can ruin, even kill, but you can no longer delete, and I hope survivors are picking that message up very fast.

You and your police and church only know how to destroy in order to silence, but as I said, it doesn’t work any more, the world is changing, it worked in Leicester in the 80s and 90s, it worked in other areas, Islington, Kincora, it worked against victims who ‘committed suicide’ and met other accidents, but I am prepared to live or die, I have survived so much that I will not take my life, I will let you take my life by police beatings if necessary, as long as the culture of cover- up continues to be smashed as a result and other survivors are freed. There are a lot of survivors now, and Leicester and Jersey stand out, and you are now a link, as far as I am concerned, and I saw that link through your whitewash of my case.

Your whitewash and your link to Leicester means you are not credible, how are you doing in influencing the Jersey Care Inquiry, seeing as you were wheeled in AFTER the inquiry was decided? Jersey had NO safeguarding provision previously and reports and press articles indicate that is still doesn’t, just a damn good pretence on your part!
Let’s see if Jersey has ‘learned lessons’ or has any safeguarding, shall we? I want this complaint investigated, and all the complaints surrounding it!  That will be the test.

Can we just go back to your Liecester connection? You are probably in contact with Keith Vaz? The esteemed member of the committee regards Child abuse? The interlinks are so clear aren’t they? You are part of those interlinks, and your place is the same as Vaz’s, if I judge by my case, keep it sweet for the dignitaries and police? Yes?

Mr Vaz was approached about Greville Janner, by my MOTHER in 1992, and he sent her away and defended Janner. How do you feel about your associate, Mr Vaz, at the moment? Do you remember it all? Leicester in the 80s and 90s, complaints about Janner? What did you do? What earned you the OBE? Why is Vaz on the committee regards the CSA inquiry?

I wonder what your response will be to this letter? Maybe I will know in a few years, judging by you contacting me a year after you had stated the police were innocent and contacting me only as a token, like Steel did, after you had made your arrangements to clear wrongdoers.
Let me do a little diagram: Ted Heath-Leon Brittan-Greville Janner-Vaz-Glenys Johnstone-Heather Steel-Philip Bailhache-Ted Heath-(Name redacted)-Ian LeMarquand-(name redacted)-ButlerSloss, Hedley. this is almost exhaustive but rather than being an allegation it is a power line. Time it ended. No-one should be in an omnipotent position to prevent justice for victims.

I just thought I would observe a pattern that illustrates how the various reports on my case were engineered, John Gladwin was wheeled in due to his name for the Chichester report but he was relegated to looking at ‘constitutional issues’, Steel then ‘stepped forward’ to whitewash the rest for the Deanery and because she didn’t investigate the police and deportation, couldn’t credibly whitewash that, Johnstone could whitewash that from her dual position. Neat, you have to look hard to see the arrangement.

Let me assure you, Jersey police actually contradicted themselves while keeping inaccurate records about me for those they favoured. I lived through appallingly dishonest aand brutal treatment at their hands when I was suffering traumatic stress from the sexual and very severe emotional abuse at the hands of the church warden, and your whitewash will not change that.

Let me be clear, you are going to be sued or face an injunction over your whitewash, I do not have any respect for titles or dignitaries, they haven’t done anything to earn respect, it is those on the ground who are working with and for survivors who are commanding respect, the old days of titles and dignitaries being above the law and ‘giving the order’ for those such as me to be destroyed for writing these things are over. Destroying me will not erase these indelible words, nor will the legal expertise or corruption and brutality of any police force or dignitaries change my course, I survived the last lot, branded and horrifically damaged, I survived it to write this.

You will not harm me further. I formally make that clear. You have claimed in response to a Freedom of information act request that you still intend to publish the whitewash, and this letter is to explain to you why you have no right to do so and why you are guilty of misconduct and who you are guilty of misconduct in liason with.

Jane Fisher was recorded and witnessed as being in Jersey to engineer this matter, and other acts of hers have been witnessed, so as well as holding you liable, the Diocese will also continued to be held to account for your and Steel and Gull’s actions, I will continue to contest them until their prolonged attack on my life is destroyed, and having me beaten and locked up will not turn my course, and if I am killed, as I nearly have been by the public crucifiction and the trauma, these words are indelible like the statements made in the 90s against Janner.

I hereby officially discredit and annul your position and report on my case, you have proved unreliable and dishonest and devious in recording events in Jersey relating to my case, and yes, this can and will be shown to a court of law. Your report is forbidden by me from any further publication, it is not to be shared with the diocese if you have not already shared it, after all it was a whitewash for their aims, and they and you will face legal action if it has been shared or is used by them, and this is now written and recorded.

And this is the well-worn phrase I have shared with you all collectively regarding this matter ‘If this is how you treat me and I have barely survived and been able to answer back in a small voice against you and your press, what happens to the voiceless vulnerable who you do this to?’ What happens to countless whitewashes and beatings and silencing of vulnerable? Will it all come to light as the tide changes against you? Or will those deaths remain in silence and in vain, blamed on madness as you tried to with me? I think Lowell Goddard needs a copy of this letter, would you do the honours?

The gentleman who you defamed in the only report you have published is dead, can’t answer back, I speak for him, you are annulled.
If I hear you spluttering about ‘allegations’ ‘unfounded’ and harassment, you kicked off by harassing me, and put me in a position to believe that you are complicit in cover-ups at my expense to protect wrongdoers. 
And seeing as you have been unwilling to genuinely include me in any report, you have no right to swipe this aside with the defamatory opinions that others have of me, you need to at least consider their own misconducts first and include them in any report to balance it.

Sincerely,

HG


And Here are some of the relevant links, these are exhaustive so this is only a few:

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/second-letter-questions-dioceses-winchester-and-canterbury

http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/letter-questions-dioceses-winchester-and-canterbury
More of Bob Hill's Blogs:







Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

11th Interview with HG -Sent from Jersey this morning:

A note on interviews, the sets of interview questions are genuine and sent to me, mainly I am asked about my life, but I think it is understood that when I can cope with the trauma, I will be interviewed about the Church and Jersey.


Interview
 
1. Would you trust Bob Key, the Dean of Jersey?

No, he has proved untrustworthy and extremely harmfully so.

2. Are there any of the Jersey Anglican clergy whom you would trust?

No, your questions are challenging and painful but understandable.

3. Are there any of any other denomination?

No. No offence to anyone.

4. Do you think Jersey should have remained with Winchester?
I do not know, basically that is Jersey and Winchester's own personal decision and I am not in the Diocese or Deanery so I don't have a say, in fact I am not even a member of the CofE (Thankfully).

5.  Which churches in Jersey have you visited?

Most, there is some lovely architecture and artwork in some of them.

6. Have you ever visited Winchester cathedral? If so, did you see the statue of the diver, and do you know why it is there?

Yes indeed, Winchester became my home town when I was 17 and left my family, and the Cathedral was a central and important part of our lives, of course I know the statue and story of the diver and how he saved the Cathedral, that is William Walker! :) I love the stories of the Cathedral and it's history, it reminds me of home, and what was before the Diocese publicly destroyed me in my home town and drove me out. My Cathedral is part of my Winchester forever.
I guess the Diocese forgot to mention all that when they were using Korris to make me out to be a crazy stalker, yes?

7. Have you been approached to give evidence to the Jersey Care Enquiry?

No, but Philip Bailhache has approached them to give evidence, I am not a care survivor so I don't count, but I guess Sir Bailhache must be a care survivor.

8. Are there any Jersey politicians – past or present – that you have met?

My best memory is a St. Helier Deputy at Grev D' Lecq, flipping her lid over a speeding car on a Sunday morning, I have no idea who it was, it wasn't Shona Pitman.
Of course I knew Ian LeMarquand because he was a church of england reader and friend of my abuser as well as being elected Home Affairs Minister, I still have his daughter's excited emails to me about him being elected. But of course my clearest memory of him is how he blocked me for receiving prayers and then lied both about that, and about his knowledge of me being abused, his lie was so blatant because he had previously told people not to touch me because he knew I had been abused, before he knew it was his friend who had abused me,  and another memory of him was him trivialising paedophilia and letting someone off an abuse charge when he was a magistrate.
Who else, well Stuart Syvret was supposed to meet with me regarding the Dean, but he caused me some problems by not turning up for the meeting and just blogging about the Dean and my abuser instead! However, I did meet him at the child abuse march, and Monty Tadier and ? Ben Shenton? Brave and honourable men to speak for the voiceless.
I used to meet the Loo-tenant-Governor sometimes because he used to come to my work place and I let him go first on the roundabout at St. Aubin once :) 


9. Do you trust any of them?

I think Monty and Stuart have good hearts and are trying hard to ensure that the right thing is done.

10. Have you met any of Jersey’s bloggers?

Yes, I have met Mr Bob Hill, BEM, he is a very brave man, lost all his hair in the MET police, never got compensation but got a BEM instead. And of course I met Stuart briefly at the march and then nearly met him regarding the Dean.

11. Do you think the Steel report would be fair to you? Would you like it kept unpublished?

As Mr Hill has said, the Steel report is not worth the paper it is written on, it is a whitewash by Steel and Key and Ashenden and Willing and other contributors, how can a report written by the defendants to clear a defendant and ruin the plaintiff be a genuine or authoritive report? Steel is a colleague and friend of the wrongdoers in the Jersey Deanery and the Bishop of Winchester looks like an utter idiot for handing the report over to them, a bit like letting Greville Janner write an investigative report about himself (of course no, he got his friend and colleague Keith Vaz to do that, no?) Same thing.

12. Have you ever met Heather Steel, Bishop Gladwin, Bishop of Dover, Bishop of Winchester? Say something about the meetings.

I never met Steel, she tried to get paperwork about me without even getting my consent, and for some reason was also allowed to illegally access my police records in conjunction with the conflicted officer Gull, who has also influenced the Glenys Johnstone whitewash, Steel would never even have bothered with me if I hadn't got her email address off the Jersey Deanery who were using her to make a complaint against Bishop Dakin - Hilarious, but Steel refused to step down and let a non-conflicted person take over the safeguarding investigation, while Bishop Dakin refused and ignored numerous people contacting him with evidence of Steel's conflict of interests and links to members of the Jersey Deanery.

I have met Bishop Gladwin, Bob Hill forced Gladwin into a meeting and it made no difference, after the token meeting, the whitewash continued.

Yes I know the Bishop of Dover, he used to be Bishop of Basingstoke and he aint really a Bishop, just an old politician who reputedly had a sweetheart relationship with the female vicar I used to be friends with while her marriage was a sham - all that damaged my faith and disillusioned me back when I still thought the CofE was about God.

I have never met the Bishop of Winchester, he blatantly lied and claimed he had met with me to apologize personally, he never did any such thing, when he realised I would not take the onslaught against me quietly, he threatened me by email. He isn't a Christian, he isn't a good Bishop, he is there because Scott-Joynt wanted to be replaced by 'someone who cared about Africa' rather than a competent Bishop.




Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

An interview with Sir Phil

Good morning Sir Phil, now what do you make of the recent Ted Heath situation?

 It was nothing to do with me, I have alibis, and expensive lawyers, in fact, I am my own expensive lawyer! It works for my friend Keith, it works for me.

What about the victims, Sir Phil?

 Well, we have a policy in the church of england, where I am also a church officer, victims must be silenced at all costs, to avoid scandal, we even deported one a few years ago, well, two actually, that is how far we must go to keep the standards up, we are planning legislation to mass-deport all Jersey care survivors once we finish discrediting this 'Care inquiry'.

 Thank you Sir Phil, now, it is alledged that HG, the church survivor who you have publicly discredited with the help of your dual roles and connections, has been taking sustained action against the Bishop of Winchester, can you tell us a bit about the cost of this?

 ooh, I know this one! It's £50,000, or was that 500,000, I know it was one or the other because these are my statutory 'plucked out of the air' figures that I keep for occasions such as this! 

 TBC


No offence intended to any abuse survivors.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Jane Fisher, Gavin Ashenden, this list is exhaustive

Embedded image permalink
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday 5 August 2015

Reblogging 'Will Jersey police continue to cover up for Ted Heath?

Well, if he is dead, what would be their vested interest in continuing the cover up?
Err, well, some of the people who presumably allowed Heath access to children in Jersey are still around and in important positions in Jersey, I guess that would be the vest.

This below is a link to Cathy Fox/L. Corby's blogs on Ted Heath and Jersey police, and the article below it is me waking up from distress and adding my noisy and shaky views direct to Jersey police, usual mad style.

https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/08/05/will-the-jersey-police-continue-to-cover-up-for-edward-heath/#respond


HG:


Dear Jersey police and fake safeguarding,

Two issues,

mindless abuser-supporting thugs that you are, there is no doubt that you have been protecting Ted Heath for many years and no-one doubts that, 
but are you aware that one of his crew preserved at least part of the 'Morning Cloud' yacht where he is alledged to have abused, and even got rid of, children, at sea? You need to get there and get the DNA before the guy wipes it, if he hasn't already.

This member of crew protests Ted Heath's innocence but has gone against his express wishes by preserving the yacht that Heath wanted 'destroyed without trace' ie he wanted the DNA destroyed without trace.

Are you going to include this yacht that has been preserved against Heath's wishes in your inquiries or is a whitewash a whitewash as usual for you corrupt private mafia?
 Don't ask me where this preserved yacht is, I do not know, and as far as I know it isn't the whole yacht, and if this man was on Heath's crew, he will have scrubbed it clean without trace anyway.
But he is still around, for you to question, which you probably wont, because you are Jersey police, corruption and protection of abuser and destroying victims is what you do.
Nonetheless, you have been made aware of this.

Serious case review:

By the way, if your whitewash 'serious case review' about my case is published, I will proceed sustained and public action against you.
I am aware that Johnson is either lying for public performance or still genuinely threatening to publish that whitewash that she created for the diocese and police's mutual programme of protecting each other from liability and it was done at the request of my abuser, Jane Fisher, who's serious misconduct destroyed me.

You can't claim it is a genuine review when I was never interviewed, you kept inaccurate records and part of Johnson's team was conflicted officer Gull who never met me but met with steel and allowed illegal access to my inaccurate records in order to aid Steel in destroying me.
Steel, judge she may be, will be sued for her report, and Johnson will be facing a harassment order as the Bishop of Winchester was and is. Evidence of the conflicted connections and the difference between what happened to me and the lies that have been written are available, as is the evidence of how this whole massive attack on me by the Diocese and their police evolved, none of it is to do with safeguarding, all of it is to do with back covering.

If it is released, as it was only another act of cover up and harassment against me by Jane Fisher and Jersey police, I will publicly take action.
Johnson already knows I intend to take her to court for claiming the police did nothing wrong when they did and writing this report with Gull and then contacting me after she wrote it to pretend to include me, so make sure she knows this.

I know who is liable for harming me and I will not allow myself to be defamed or destroyed for their failures and criminal misconduct any further. I hope that that is understood.
If I had been anyone else with learning difficulties who could not think for myself or write, I would have died under what has essentially just been years long attack on me.

And, with no mediator or anyone to support me throughout this, the fact I have held onto my life, despite suffering day and night is incredible, but I may well lose my life to your acts of harassment - whitewash reports and the resulting attacks on me in the press, which, interestingly enough, you have not seen as a safeguarding issue, total strangers attacking someone vulnerable and homeless and lying about them? Not a sound from you. No serious case review into Ian LeMarquand and Philip Bailhache's serious misconduct in dual roles in this matter? Why not?
It will make headline news if you publish anything about me, why should I live under threat of people who are supposed to protect the vulnerable?

Don't think for one minute even with the Jersey mafia ready to beat me and lock me up, that I wont come and file in Jersey against any further harm to me. It is time Johnson's threat of publishing her and Gull's engineered lies came to an end.

I know Bailhache and co have corrupted the care inquiry but I hope the inquiry realise that nothing has changed and the police have no choice now but to investigate the dead dignitaries they have protected for so long, problem is, Bailhache and LeMarquand aren't likely to die soon are they?

HG

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday 4 August 2015

Sir Edward Heath

I have been thinking about the news.

Well actually the news is not new really, what tends to happen is that things like this are being talked about months, years before either the police or the press act.

I don't doubt the people who have been speaking about Ted Heath being an abuser for some time.
There are a lot of survivors who have been finding their voice through social media and they have been denied, condemned, vilified even, for being abused and speaking up.
Every time the police and press very belatedly get involved, that brings both trauma and validation to the survivors.
A little bit like it was for me when the Diocese launched into the press, although in that case, I remain unheard, condemned and vilifed, but lets leave my story aside.

I noted a story a while back in a magazine, it was about Ted Heath's yacht, 'Morning Cloud'.
What interested me is that he wanted every part of that yacht destroyed without trace.

Doesn't that set alarm bells ringing? I heard the excuse that he it was because he was eccentric.
Unfortunately I have a theory it was not because he was eccentric.
I think it was to get rid of the DNA of abused and possibly drowned boys who he took out on his yacht.
Because I believe the survivors.

Unfortunately for Ted Heath, someone has gone against his wishes and preserved part of 'Morning Cloud' although I wonder if any DNA at all could be find on the salvaged part of the yacht.

I wonder if the police are going to seek out the former member of Heath's crew who has preserved the remains of 'Morning Cloud', and I wonder if that member of the crew has given the yacht a good old clean?

I have only talked with one person about this and he defended Ted Heath, to my surprise, because I have no doubts and never did.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)