Welcome to the Anything and Everything Jersey and Winchester abuse case blog.

Please scroll past these initial links to get to the main blog or the post you have come to read.

This is a statement from last summer:

Here is a link to the four great letters:

Here is a collection of Open Letters:

Here is my psychological report from last year:

This is my Daily Blog running from October 2011 until now:

These are other people's blogs on my case:



The blog itself is quite broken up, not written in an ordered fashion, a bit mixed up, like I am, talking about Jersey, the Diocese and my life.

Thank you for reading my blog, please persevere if it is at a bitty phase, go back and find what you are looking for in older posts, use the search button, or look at the favourite posts and links in the side bars.

The blog is heavy, I know, but the case is complex and the reality is that it has always been beyond me to get past the trauma and tell my story, so I am doing my best, in bits, to do so, as well as sharing related articles and links.


  • I was abused in the Church of England as a vulnerable adult aged 19.
  • I was abused by the husband of a vicar who was also my counsellor, this vicar took me home as a replacement for her stepdaughter who her husband, the girl's father, had abused and abandoned.
  • I was further abused by another church officer.
  • The church tried to close my complaints down, refused to deal with them and left both abusers and those who stood up for them in church positions.
  • The church got me a criminal record for speaking up, they claimed I was harassing them.
  • I had never been in police trouble before, but as a result, I lost my home and job, and was left on the streets, injured by the police and severely traumatized.

  • Last year, years too late and the other side of me being destroyed, and while I was still homeless and destitute, the church launched on me in the National press, claiming to apologize.
  • They also launched in the press, a 'report' into what had happened. This report was hideously inaccurate although it did show how members of church had abused process in not dealing with my complaint.
  • The report, although not naming me, made it quite easy for me to be identified, I was one of very few autistic 33 year old women in the UK on the streets, and enough people who I met and was looked after by, knew who the report was about, and I lost friends and was shunned as a result.
  • I also had strangers condemning and maligning me, it was heartbreaking.
  • Then a church officer associated with my abuser, also in government, released my name and breached the data protection act.

  • As a result of the Press reports and the report released, an all-out war broke out between the Diocese and Deanery involved, with me caught in the middle, I was slandered, I was smeared, I was condemned.
  • The Church offered no help and I became ill as each new inaccurate report and cover up came out, each new damnation of me.
  • New investigations were comissioned, and one was blatantly conflicted, to be carried out by a member of the group who supported the wrongdoers.
  • I have been excluded from all reports, which, to save the church, are whitewashes which cover up the original admissions of wrongdoing.
  • The church have treated me coldly, threatened me, despite them having me illegally traced by police, and have not helped me, instead they made illegal referrals of me to what they called help, without my consent and without checking it would help or what I wanted.
  • I have pleaded with them to stop the harm to me, but to no avail, and I am living in fear, severely traumatized and knowing I cannot withstand the damning press reports and whitewashes forever.

Monday, 12 September 2016

Gavin Ashenden

Don't keep coming to my blog to look for info on Ashenden, we know he has sexual problems, it has been documented for years, we know he went bonkers when his first wife left him, there is a clear correlation.
Regards his recent move. What? Nothing to say except that, lawyer or not, if he returns to the UK, he will face action, along with some of his associates if they ever dare to return to the UK.
And finally, if you really want to know about Ashenden. His change of profile picture kind of tells you in itself that he is off his fucking tree as well as being a raving narcissist and nothing to do with Jesus.

Sunday, 4 September 2016

Gavin Ashenden

A divorcee clergyman who is on his second marriage, has not been reprimanded or dealt with either for his open harm to me in the press and media or his repeat and ongoing attacks on various vulnerable groups, most notably his homophobic attacks which he rather incredibly tries to use Christianity as an excuse for.
It is horrifying, just as it was with my case, that the press and media uphold this without question, but less surprising that the Church of England turn their embarrassed backs and do nothing, because they have no power to discipline clergy in Jersey or France.
God didn't condemn gay people, he did condemn divorce, and for so long the Church have twisted the Bible and Christianity to suit themselves, and it has got to blatant.
Is there ever going to be an overhaul of the archaic Church, and a system of accountability and discipline put in place?

Friday, 26 August 2016

Not quite!

bysedd pwyntio i fod yn seren yn yr awyr fel neges gan rywun sy'n methu gweld rhwygo wynebau streipiau gan olau lleuad afon hon o ffyliaid

Monday, 22 August 2016

Announcing the Books

Yes, well, I will announce the books for the first time, and then I will go and collect my washing from the laundry.
I have been working this morning but I am exhausted and I am sitting here trying to edit several other books, and I am actually wearing a jumper! The third book has had some blips with publishing but I hope that it will be available without too much delay. There are a few errors here and there, but I want to be heard before the CofE kill me. Sorry I can't lower the prices more, the royalties are quite low and any money made will make my life a bit less harsh.

Coming Home was the first to publish. This was written freehand in a month, and it describes the rebuild of my life from when I left the streets, against the backdrop of the petty and vicious Church of England un/civil war and their launches in the press:

The Silent World is my second book. This describes my childhood:

Goodnight Anna is my best book. Life on the streets in glorious reality colour. Goodnight Anna has had some technical issues but I hope that it is on sale now or soon without further issues.




Sunday, 21 August 2016

White hats and black hats

Jane Dodds, Muriel Nicholas.
Two safeguarders suddenly vanished.
One from Jersey's unsafeguarding partnership and the other from the Church of England.
Very worrying. No one has resolved my case yet, I still live in fear.

But the casualties on the Black Hats Side is far steeper than on the White Hats side.

On the whitehats there is only Bob Hill wounded and out of action and HG walking wounded and still playing with grenades.

The mysterious loss of CofE blackhats is a puzzle. Elizabeth Hall, Jill Sandham, Jane Fisher, nearly Butler but he has come back for a second round of grenades, why can't they keep anyone? Presumably because anyone with a conscience can't work in safeguarding when they are not allowed to safeguard.
So is Graham Tilby going to leave as well, or is he to swap his hat from white to black?

Sunday, 7 August 2016

This is a load of lies

This blog is an example of me being re-abused as a result of the lies about my case in the press by the Church of England, the blogger in question has been corrected and asked to remove the post and he has ignored this.

This is a load of uninformed lies and the blogger in question has been asked repeatedly to stop re-abusing me and take it down.
The Bishop of Winchester did none of this suppression of the Steel report of his own free will, he was told to do it, and because he was told to do it, he discredited me by implying again that I was asking for the report to be stopped because it hurt me, rather than the reality of him not only being under a court agreement for allowing the conflicted Steel whitewash to continue, but also being told that he was not to publish it.

The Bishop had no compassion or care for my welfare throughout the three years and more that he has had me publicly destroyed, and the blogger in question continues his ill informed re-abuse of me because of his grudge against the States of Jersey. He is the last blogger to continue to use me as ammunition in this grudge that this group of bloggers have against the States of Jersey, as the other bloggers have kindly desisted, except one who is too seriously damaged by a brain haemmorage to continue.  The bloggers have never been interested in my side of things but have selselessly used me for ammunition with no regard for my wellbeing, and they have seriously harmed me.

The blogger's name is 'Polo' or Pól Ó Duibhir, and he's from Dublin.

Unfortunately 'Polo' hasn't been able to answer my complaint of his furthering the shaming and discrediting of me by the Bishop of Winchester, so he isn't really credible. He has also refused to remove the rubbish that he has written, and as it is about my case, is misleading and is harming me, his motive is nothing to do with my welfare or clarity about my case, it is just a meaningless and aimless grudge attack on Jersey, which he is famous for, to the point of being complained about in the Jersey Evening Post.

He is a bit of a nut by reputation anyway, especially with his persistent low level harassment of the Pope on twitter, which is no doubt a source of great amusement to many. I have no doubt that the Pope never notices the annoying little Polo-fly buzzing around.
But this illustrates a point regarding safeguarding in the church of england. The CofE attacked me publicly and allowed many cranks and grudge-bearers to further the harm to me with their own opinions.
The church have failed at any point to stem this secondary harassment of me, which is mentioned early on in my newly published book, their failure again re-enforcing the pretences of care for my welfare as lies.

Let me finish with a short statement.

  • The Bishop did not withold the Steel report. He would have published it if he had not been stopped.
  • The Bishop did not want to withold the Steel report, he had no interest in my welfare and even threatened me for complaining about his actions that harmed me. There is proof of this. 
  • I took the Bishop to court in 2014 because the Bishop, without any warning to me or thought for my welfare, intended to release the Steel report to members of the conflicted Church-States-Judiciary circle who had written the report to damn me and cover up. Why would he suddenly change from such psychopathic disregard for my welfare to 'caring' and 'apologizing' and 'Witholding' this same report?
  • There was  an agreement in place from the court case that I had to agree to what was in the Steel report. Which of course the Bishop knew would never happen. 
  • The Bishop allowed the Steel report to go ahead at my expense despite knowing it was conflicted, thus any pretence of care for my welfare by the Bishop has been a lie.
  • The Bishop's statement last month about the Steel report and pretence of care for me was a lie, as he was continuing the severe harm to me of press and media lies and discrediting of me.
  • The Bishop has failed at any point to make sure that I have been adequately interviewed and included in reports and has allowed an outright whitewash at my expense after making it abundantly clear in his threats early on that the whole process was a PR procedure that went wrong and there had never been any intention of redeeming or helping me.
  • The Church have no excuse whatsoever to go on allowing bloggers and other cranks and rogue safeguarding boards to continue to terrorize me nor can they excuse leaving me living in fear of the next attack while my health suffers. Any blog upholding the terrible abuse of me by the Bishop of Winchester and others, and trying to change the Bishop's psychopathic public harm to me into anything that puts him in a good life is an abuse of me.
  • The Bishop had no right to state that he was feeding the Steel Whitewash into the Gladwin Whitewash because he didn't have my agreement that the Steel report was valid and he didn't have my permission to feed one whitewash into another, and to feed a known whitewash into another report is to invalidate the other report. And the National Safeguarding Team know this was said and have not responded. The Bishop isn't allowed to go on acting as if he can validly use the Steel report, because what he has done is publicly discredit me and he doesn't have my agreement to what is in the Steel report, so if he is allowed to continue, he is committing a crime.
  •  Apparently the ill-informed Polo, who believes everything he reads in biased press and media, thinks that the Bishop has shown care and compassion for me over this, but he hasn't contacted me to get my views. So who has a better view of things, this crank or the victim who knows why the Bishop had to make such an empty and desparate show? Why are cranks still allowed to go on furthering the discrediting of me for the Church after three years of complaints that this harm is the Church's responsibility as they provoked it? Haven't the Church of England heard of safeguarding yet?!
  • The Church of England do not and will not safeguard until such deceit and discrediting of the vulnerable stops, and until such people as Dakin are removed as unfit to officiate as soon as they behave like this, three years of attacking a vulnerable adult publicly and with no justification would lead to sacking before three years in any other orgnaization.
  • . And especially  Paul Butler still needs to be removed so that every time church abuse is uncovered, we don't have to endure someone pressing the button on his back so that he trots out sickening empty apologies and lies about safeguarding. That is another re-abuse of victims.
  • What Polo has written about my case is a pointed example of how I am still being re-abused by strangers as a result of the church of England's prolonged and henious public punishment of me for reporting abuse within the Church, abuse by two serial offenders who have remained protected while I have been destroyed. 
  • I see Polo and his little circle of ill-informed grudge-bloggers as being on the same level as my abusers and the Bishop of Winchester. That is my last word on the matter for now, but the theme of this post will be re-produced in one of the books that I will publish.

Sure they do...

Thursday, 28 July 2016

This applies to the Diocese and Deanery, it says it all

Jersey safeguarding update

Jersey Safeguarding Partnership,

I am just going to add to my complaint regarding the safeguarding board.

You can't be blind to the fact that I am suffering severe traumatic stress, which has been compounded by the last three years of public hate attack by the church. 
Did you even bother to think of the psychological harm to me of sitting through a meeting with you over your whitewash version of events?

Your report is an attack on me and you have showed no concern whatsoever for me.
I wouldn't survive your whitewash. I certainly could not sit through a meeting regarding an engineered whitewash and agree to it and be traumatized with the memories of what I lived through being dragged up by wrongdoers who have tried to re-record what I lived through to protect themselves. And I would be wasting my time giving my side of things to a complicit group of people who have no interest in my side of things or my welfare and have already created the report on behalf of the wrongdoers.
You people have lost the plot and are without purpose or understanding of safeguarding. How can you put someone at risk and under pressure as you have with me and still call yourselves safeguarding?

I remain traumatized and profoundly upset and distressed by your attack on me last week.
Of course I will always fight back but that does not remove the impact on me. It is affecting my ability to cope with day-to-day situations still. 


Wednesday, 27 July 2016


Good morning Central contact and Jersey safeguarding (debatable) partnership.

Today I have a heavy day's clearance work to finish, and then I have to assess quite an important new contract.

I hope that you are going to behave yourselves and not do anything illegal to hurt me.

You didn't respond to Central Contact yesterday, which is odd, because you wanted Central Contact to be the medium for communication, so much so that you set up a fake profile and account and terrorized me through it over your whitewash, which you had already been told very clearly to stop badgering me about.

I hope that you are very clear now that you do not have my consent for you whitewash and that you are not to terrorize me and that you have a formal complaint to deal with.
You are very slow on the uptake as I have presented this to you for a long time, hence my anger.

No more silly games today, I have work to do, and while the alcoholic man who you publicly defamed could not stand up for himself, I can, and I knew the alcoholic man who you defamed, he hated the protein milkshakes and he used to get me to drink them, and undoubtedly others recognized him from your defamatory attack too.
If you publish reports in which the individual is recognizable, that is illegal, it is not in any way an exercise in safeguarding, it is an attack. I understand that you felt able to defame him because he was dead but that doesn't make it ethically alright.

And as you know, I have been attacked and defamed in the small community for Jersey for over three years, and you want to add to it because the dignitaries are sore at losing their Steel report.
Why are you publishing attacks on vulnerable individuals? Why would a safeguarding team actually humiliate and defame people who are known in a small island community? I fail to comprehend why you are so vindictive? 

I haven't looked it up but did you also do a report into Hubert's death? Am I mistaken. That was a sad day when my mate wasn't sitting there any more and I was told he was dead. Anyway, you seem to pick and choose cases and trot them out for publicity every so often, you seem as far removed from safeguarding as you can get, 

No attacks today please.


Sunday, 24 July 2016

Jersey Safeguarding Partnership Complaint

This email is sent from Central Contact as requested by Jersey's Safeguarding Partnership, and is a letter from HG who the safeguarding partnership are bullying over a report.



1. First and foremost, Senator Ian Gorst should not have shown the interest in my case that he has, as he is an evangelical church member who, with his family, have long established links to the Churchwarden who sexually abused me, and other people close to the churchwarden, including conflicted States-Church Members. 

You have been made aware of the conflicts of interest repeatedly but have failed to respond. The only times you have contacted me have been when you have been trying to force me to agree to your report. You have not even tried to address my concerns. And if your report is about my treatment, it does look odd that you have re-abused me by ignoring my concerns and pushing for your report to be published despite my concerns and other people's concerns too.

I consider your report to simply be another punishment by the conflicted circle in Jersey, and certainly the indication is that it is their consolation prize for the banned Steel report. I don't need any further media and press attention and harm. You should be listening to me, not to the conflicted circle. My wellbeing should be your priority, not a report that has been created in dubious and conflicted circumstances, and if I say to you that I do not want this report published, and explain to you why, then you should listen, you should not troll or bully me or treat me like a naughty child.

2. The next question is, you and I know that you have been proven resoundingly unfit for purpose by recent reports into your conduct, actions and inactions. Senator Gorst's second in command trotted out the usual feeble lines in the news at the time, but seeing as you have been proven to fail consistently in your duties, and considering the fact that you have received my complaints for years, and failed to communicate with me except to try to push your whitewash on me, especially since the Steel report failed, and thus you are presumably acting on behalf of the Church. Senator Gorst's inappropriate and extreme involvement would re-enforce that belief. Would it not be better to accept that the report is another of your failures, and then you can start focussing on an overhaul of your organization which removes the culprits of the failures in my case and others.

3. The safeguarding board were presumably covering the police misconduct, although they have never actually contacted me to explain what they were covering. And of course Glenys Johnstone told a member of the public that she had cleared the police of misconduct a year before she tried to contact me, and was rebuffed by me because it had been apparent that the report was a whitewash without any concern for my feelings regarding Johnstone and Gull publicly discrediting me at the time. 

Why, if the report included the police misconduct, was a member of the States of Jersey Police who had never met me, allowed to be involved and influence the report? What would the police say? Especially a force so corrupt that the IPCC were flown in to investigate them specifically? 'It's a fair cop, guv?' No, they were quite simply given an opportunity to cover up further, tamper with evidence, defame me and ensure that a fair investigation can never be carried out.

4. Why have conflicted interconnected States-Church-Judiciary members been allowed to influence this report? What kind of report hears the defendants and records their views and only considers the alleged victim as an afterthought and then you try to force her to agree to such a report?

This is not a genuine report, you have not responded to concerns about it, and you resorted to bullying and trolling when instructed by a member of the church who took legal advice because he wants his church and authorities cleared and me further defamed after three years of me being maligned and discredited by the conflicted church-states judiciary members in the press. A scenario which amounts to abuse, and which the safeguarding panel have done nothing whatsoever about, despite being asked. So why is this report of your so important? The same people who were involved in the things that you have done a serious case review, have done exactly the same again, with you looking on. No lessons have been learned, and you still appear to be protecting abusers despite the damning report against you.

Further to the Church conflict of interests, It has been suggested to me that the Diocese of Canterbury, who openly uphold the Deanery of Jersey's bad behaviour and lie about safeguarding being good while the Jersey Deanery have continued to harm me, are involved with you in this. This is very seriously inappropriate and conflicted, The people who have done wrong should not be running the show and steering investigations into their wrongdoing. That goes against the best interests of any victim of failings by authorities or the Church.

5. Don't you think that Senator Gorst's time would be better occupied controlling the behaviour of his church-states-judiciary members, who's public attacks on my character are a safeguarding failure that show both you and the church up as unable to safeguard?

 Your report is apparently designated to be a further act of defamation, discrediting and attack on my character on top of what I have suffered from the Jersey press and public with no voice in reply for over three years. For three years the slurs on me in the press and media have been brought to your and Gorst's attentions, and rather than acting on them and saying that this is a grave safeguarding concern, you have ignored complaints and continued to badger me about your report.

 No more material that can harm or distress me should be released, and confidential records violated, tampered with and turned into a report that you feel that you need to release despite my feelings, is not safeguarding, it is an attack and a violation, one that should not have been instigated and which should have been terminated upon my request in 2013.

What happens to other vulnerable people who are made to suffer this? Why do authorities who have done wrong still have this ability to breach human rights and put people under threat of harm like this?

6. No report into anything at all excuses you badgering someone with autism who is at breaking point because of your safeguarding failures over the past three years of allowing her to be publicly defamed and discredited by you, the police and the conflicted States-Church-Judiciary circle.

Especially not when you have been told to leave her alone and stop badgering her and annul your conflicted report and also stop the attack on her. Your 'central contact' email whimpers about you receiving hurtful emails, which is very self-interested indeed, especially considering the hurt you have allowed and inflicted, but you fail to mention that the hurtful correspondence you have received is in reply to the much more serious hurt that you have allowed and inflicted. You are not vulnerable, not abused and destroyed, have not spent three years sleeping rough due to failures and have not spent a further three years being publicly smeared in press and media while the safeguarding partnership and authorities look on, join in and deny any hope of justice or resolution.

7. The fact that HG contacted the serious case review panel and numerous other organizations to ask you to be stopped from continuing to push the whitewash on her should have been a good indicator to you, if you are genuine safeguarding professionals, that it was time for you to stop forcing your report and apologize. Evidence will be made available to court and enquiry of the pleas to the Serious Case Review Panel and the subsequent efforts of the conflicted John Cameron to try to close that down. Cameron's repeat interferences in the case need to be investigated.

8. The fact that your repeat demands came as the care inquiry withdrew from Jersey and the Steel report was banned, should be investigated, and because it is extremely likely that Senator Gorst was egged on in his interference, his involvement and other conflicted people's involvement should go before an investigation and disciplinary panel, as it is pure abuse of power, and the conduct of his colleagues in the three year petty war between the Diocese and Deanery, has already been presented to the States Complaints Department, but not properly responded to. As you need something to occupy you and have nothing better to do than bully the vulnerable, maybe you could make it your project to ensure this is arranged. No-one can carry out an investigation impartially unless they are independent, and you are not.

9. Why is it so hard for you to comprehend that more public attention and media attention would harm me? it is very simple. The media and press have been very biased and very hurtful and discredited me without being challenged, even when they published blatant lies, and as your report was not instigated or carried out correctly, impartially or for the right reasons, I see it as a threat to my wellbeing, and you have not at any point tried to reassure me, which increases my concern.

This point is a very simple comprehensive explanation of my objection to your report. My wellbeing is more important than your need to make distorted confidential information and tampered-with evidence public to meet anyone else's demands or any target or legislation, and you have a duty of care to me, and you have resoundingly failed in your duty of care thus far and are still failing as you continue to push for your report.
 Sentors Gorst, Bailhache and LeMarquand are known to have abused their positions to handle and mis-use evidence and inaccurate police records in order to discredit me and protect the Church, of which they are members and dignitaries, and your time would be better spent investigating this rather than pushing for your report that they have been involved with.

Point 9 concludes my points due to being a perfectly good reason on it's own for you to stop bullying me and threatening my welfare with your report. I will say conclusively that you are not to release your report or any part of it, and you are not to bully, intimidate, threaten, harass or annoy me regarding this matter any more. I know that you won't like that and you may feel upset, but that is that. No more. You  need to take a step back and a long hard look at yourselves, because you have failed children in Jersey and you have failed me. Worse still, the damage to me and to those children can never be undone.

Any child abused will be changed for life by the abuse, and I have been abused and mistreated all my life, I don't need you to continue the abuse me. I will suffer for the rest of my life what I suffered in Jersey, in flashbacks and nightmares and trauma and sadness, why do you need to drag this up and keep pushing it onto me? I have moved on as best I can, why can't the dignitaries who are sponsoring your misconduct do the same?

Something needs to change about these 'Safeguarding Partnerships' and 'serious case reviews' because all they appear to be is an open invitation to wrongdoers in power to abuse power and cover wrongdoing by themselves and others in authorities. Being cynical I would ask if that was what they were set up for, especially considering the damning reports of the last few years.

I hope that the safeguarding partnership have actually read this document, as they appear to have ignored the previous ones and continued to try to bully me into agreeing to their whitewash.

The university are trying to encourage me to write more concisely...That'll be the day!


Further Reading: 

Starting to respond to bullying by Jersey's safeguarding partnership

Good morning 'Central contact' Jersey Safeguarding Partnership, 

No more smell of desperation attacks today please, I have to return to work as normal today and work a full and normal day even if it is going to be hot today.
Losing almost three days work to your bullying is not acceptable. You are liable and I hope that dismissal proceedings for the troll, Glenys Johnstone, Stewart Gull and any advisors in the NSPCC are now underway.
No-one who took part in the troll attack can credibly remain, not even the bimbo who answered the phone and said they had been advised by central contact. And presumably the troll attack contingent are also the ones involved in persistently failing abused children in Jersey.

I will have to work this weekend as well as today, which is not ideal as I don't feel well and I do need more rest. I can't afford time off at the moment, as you are aware, my work and my business are technically seasonal, so as well as working as much as I can now, I am negotiating the contracts to get me through the winter. You owe me the money for three days work.

Your foolish and ill-advised bullying has been very damaging and you need to think about the impact and the danger that you pose to the vulnerable by taking mis-advice and following it through. Your report is not and never was anything to do with what happened to me, and for three years you have openly allowed and taken part in, the safeguarding failure of letting the interconnected states, church, police and judiciary who your whitewash was presumably about, openly continue to abuse and harm me, so isn't it rather silly that you have trolled me on behalf of one of those conflicted States-Church members who is so desparate for you to destroy me publicly with the whitewash that he sought legal advice?!

Wow, why do a report and trot out the usual sickening empty whimper about 'lessons have been learned' when the same people are still openly committing abuse and misconduct against me with your blessing and help?! This would be a comedy if it was so very serious. Nothing has been learned, no-one has faced any action for abusing and harming me, and the wrongdoers have openly and with you blessing and help, publicly destroyed me, and you have trolled me because those wrongdoers want you to publish their whitewash created by you, as a consolation prize because they were too blatant with their Steel Whitewash, nearly got away with it, cost Bob Hill his life and still lost their Steel whitewash because it was too blatant. 
Your whitewash is too blatant and you have abused and harmed me, and I am awaiting an apology and the results of disciplinary action against you for your actions.

If the NSPCC were the advisors for this attack on me through you, as one indicator would suggest, they are increasingly likely to face legal action as well, on a number of counts.

Please make sure my complaint against you is esculated until it reaches a competent and impartial person - probably outside of Jersey then.

And if you send me any rubbish today I will continue my efforts to raise the profile of my complaint about your criminal acts in my case.

I would like you to commission a serious case review into the harm to me by you and your colleagues in the states-church-judiciary-police circle and especially into the desparation to defame and discredit me leading to the recent troll attack by you. I don't think that there is any escaping the fact that the troll attack and the incorrect motives and complicit behaviour by the safeguarding board is serious case review material, and make a strong point that the troll attack came not long after you have been pointedly, angrily and repeatedly told to stop bullying me over your whitewash. Provide both the troll attack and my fury at your repeat efforts to force your whitewash on me, to whoever the panel investigating will be.


Sunday, 10 July 2016

impending attack

I get premonitions before the church attacks, usually they come in the form of sharp images of Jersey and a feeling of sadness.
At the moment I have had Jersey and Winchester premonitions. Unusual.
But also we have a situation where the conflicted Peter Wanless who has allowed John Cameron's continued harmful involvement, sitting on his serious case review panel at the same time as the Church of England are having their corrupt abusers and fat old men't meeting, otherwise known as the general synod.
Usually the synod cooks up harm to me, but both these abuser-protector meetings at once?
I have made a complaint to the serious case review panel despite Wanless and Cameron's actions, but presumably they are going to support the now desparate Glenys Johnstone in her bid to release her share of the horrific whitewash.
They will if Cameron has a say, while I have no idea what the church intend to attack me with next.
It's hard to live with having been destroyed utterly and publicly and still not being safe.

Monday, 4 July 2016

church of comedy

'Good morning and welcome to this service of family communion led by the Reverend JJ Nortyperson. Today we are going to talk about denominations - quick churchwardens! Lock the Doors!'

'Dear Reverend Nortyperson, When Jesus was tempted by the devil after His Baptism, did He live on Locums and wild honey like John the Baptist?'

According to legend, the Bishop of Winchester abides by, and advocates 3 P's.
One before he puts his dress on for the service, and one after the service. And one in the middle if they run short of communion wine.

She's not the Messiah, she's a very Nortyperson!