Repeat request

A while back I asked for help with communication and writing.

I was lucky, I got a few replies.

Including a lovely church of england chap from Jersey and a lady who said my blog was anger and allegations, I also got a complete fruitcake who claimed to be a millionaire and said he would try to get me 800,000 pounds from the church if I stopped talking about abuse! What a cracker!

I need someone to help me by hearing my full story and scribing it with me. This blog does not contain my full story, in fact it is a mess.
So far, no one has heard my full story. The church have never wanted my story at all.

This is a job for Paul Butler

Trot Bishop Paul Butler out to be profoundly ashamed or sorry on behalf of the church.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/church-of-england-embroiled-in-another-alleged-child-abuse-scandal-9650278.html

And can anyone help my friend?

http://ilianadupree.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/please-help-save-our-lives.html

Re the illegal referral to the NSPCC by the Diocese, that Bob Hill and Julie Wallman facilitated

I know people are looking for the Letter to Sir Philip Bailhache at the moment, but I thought I would bring this to the top today, to remind the NSPCC of what happened in 2013.
The Open letter to Philip Bailhache is available here: http://opnlttr.com/letter/letter-jerseys-external-affairs-minister-sir-philip-bailhache

NSPCC:

Regarding emails with John Cameron and Bob Hill in this post, I had had a breakdown by the time Bob was making the accusations he makes. He and Julie Wallman liased without my consent with the diocese who destroyed me, to try and have me put away under the guise of being housed by the NSPCC, Jane Fisher is the Key person responsible for destroying me, and the horror that Bob and Julie facilitated this attack on my rights and privacy and dignity remains with me, I have never really recovered, and can't, I trusted Bob Hill, and he handed me over to my destroyers as if my story was nothing, and his attitude remains the attitude you see in the email, he accuses me, as he did previously, of lying, and he slates me for not agreeing to be handed over to be incaracarated yet again with the pretence of housing me through the NSPCC.
Bob is very self righteous about helping me, but he never has, he has refused my story and rewritten it, using it as a grudge against Jersey and calling me a liar about what has happened since, rewriting my story in a style that excuses the diocese and uses the Korris rubbish which excuses Jane Fisher and Michael Scott-Joynt.
Note Bob's comments about Ian leMarquand and the States, because as I had a breakdown, Mike Higgins was inciting hatred and lies in the States and press regarding my case, instructed to do so by Bob Hill.
I was duped into this bed and breakfast situation he mentions by Julie Wallman's lies, and it nearly killed me.


From: <help@nspcc.org.uk>
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: query, second email as no response so far
To: ******************************************

Good Afternoon,
Thank you for your email, apologies for the late response.

The NSPCC is a children’s charity and all of the work that we do relates to protecting children. Some of our service centres in local areas work with families to support parents however the NSPCC does not provide accommodation for adults or take referrals for an adult. If we received concerns for an adult or a family that were in need of accommodation the NSPCC would signpost them to the relevant external agencies, e.g. adult social services, charities and shelters, police etc.

For more information on  the support our service centres can provide in your local area please visit:
http://www.nspcc.org.uk/what-we-do/NSPCC-in-your-area/nspcc-in-your-area_wda84792.html
We hope this has been of some assistance. If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Kind Regards
Sarah Snape
Contact Centre

On 05/08/14 11:12, *********** wrote:

Dear Sir or madam,

It has been some days since I contacted you, and I have had no response.

You are giving out the impression that you are not interested in queries.

Please could you answer my question.

Does the NSPCC, as I have heard, provide accommodation for adults.

If so, what provision is made and why, and if not, then what do they do when an adult is referred to them?

sincerely,

Bob Hill <bobps91@yahoo.co.uk>	11/22/13
to me, JULIE

 Good Morning

,

Thank you for your emails. I do feel that we have reached the crossroads. You will have to vacate your digs in a week and you must decide what you want which is best for you. No one can make that decision. I have spent months trying to help and so too has Julie in more recent times but if you can not trust us there is no point in continuing our involvement.

Your reaction last week end was very hard to take because we had no idea what you had received from Winchester and that not only would you not forward the email but you accused us of betraying you.  You say you did not open the email but I question how you knew that the NCPCC was being asked to help you unless you had read the contents.

Winchester has now sent me the email and I have told them that I am very cross at the way they have acted and that they should have invited you with me/Julie to discuss how it could keep the promise given to you by John and Christine in June. Unfortunately Winchester is in a world of its own and we cannot change want they have done but we can help you to have say in what is being proposed.

There is no point in moaning about what John and Christine promised, they let us both down, but you have won a victory in that Winchester will fund you future accommodation and they will leave how it is done with you and the NSPCC who do have facilities for adults. I am sure that if you agree to work with them it will be a small step, but you must take it.

I am not going to send any more emails to you but I do want to speak to you because we need to talk to find out how we go ahead or pull up the anchor. You now have a room in which you can Skype me. I will be publishing another Blog sometime this morning on the answers Le Marquand gave in the States on Tuesday so I hope will be around most of the day.

Please let me know when would be a good time to Skype.

Regards,
Bob
F.J (Bob) Hill, BEM

From: <JCAMERON@nspcc.org.uk>
Date: 18 November 2013 15:35
Subject: Winchester Diocese
To: r*********r@gmail.com

Dear,

I hope you do not mind me emailing you unannounced.  I have recently been contacted by  Jane Fisher from Winchester Dioceses.  She had concerns that you may be having some difficulties at present and seeking advice and support, she thought that we may be able to assist you in some way.

  We perhaps can arrange to meet to see how best we can support you. However  understand that you may not wish to make contact with me at this stage but should you wish to do so then please feel free to call me or email at any time.

Kind regards

John

John Cameron

Head of Child Protection Operations

NSPCC

42 Curtain Road

London

EC2A 3NH

From: **********************************************
Date: 18 November 2013 15:45
Subject: harassment
To: jcameron@nspcc.org.uk

Dear John Cameron or fake John Cameron,

whichever applies.

This email address is defunct apart from being used for a battle against the diocese of Winchester and I do not open unsolicited emails on behalf of the Diocese.

According to you email address you are from the nspcc, and the online reports show that there is such a person, but there is no guaruntee you are genuine and not a fake, and no reason whatsoever for such a person to contact me and the more I receive emails on behalf of that vile corporation the more furious I am, and they know it, so desist or I will include you in the harrasment complaint.

Emails regarding that vile corporation are to go via Bob Hill, now desist.

From: *********************************************
Date: 19 November 2013 10:30
Subject: formal complaint
To: help@nspcc.org.uk

Good morning,

The Diocese of Winchester who destroyed me for being an abuse victim who spoke up, have been harassing me, and yesterday started using one of your employees, John Cameron, to harass me.

There are no children involved in this dispute, thus Mr Cameron's violation of my life and privacy is ludicrous and inappropriate, and is to stop.

Sincerely,

Visitor from Ireland, if your Vicar is hurting you, speak to the diocese or Bishop, speak to someone about it, or if all else fails, find another church, some churches and priests are just the wrong fit.

Another Bishop Arrested

With historic abuse allegations, they often interview rather than arrest, so don't let the church trivialize this.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/aug/05/bishop-gloucester-sexual-assault-detained-michael-perham

Please help us to remove this vulnerable adult from unjust imprisonment urgently

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/nottinghamshire-police-and-rt-hon-chris-grayling-free-melanie-shaw#share

This is horrifying, I relive my own terror at the police's hands, please support us in supporting this woman, she will be driven mad, it took me every ounce of my strength to survive

http://wacedinburgh.wordpress.com/2014/07/31/abuse-witness-melanie-shaw-remanded-no-evidence-presented/

http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2013/29-november/news/uk/jersey-case-statement-from-dakin

http://www.northernstar.com.au/topic/anglican-diocese-of-grafton/

The latest scare for the church to latch onto and try and get publicity for themselves

Propaganda, swine flu, the church loved it, they bought it, they bought the hysteria, they banned communion even though swine flu was a fake disease that killed no one and was made from hysteria and propaganda, and a sheeple population blindly closed down when told to, despite the fact that real flu can be a killer and swine flue wasn't.
The media tried to hard to 'make' deaths from swine flu happen, and managed to get a few.
Even though real flue kills thousands each year.

Jane Fisher was notably a sheeple when I asked her why the church were upholding hysteria.
I remember the church upholding the ban on communion and the hysterical church of england guidelines on not touching each other, and then my church went and enjoyed a bring and share lunch after a communion service without communion.
I have no doubt that the rich and arrogant who run the church will be called to account for insulting Jesus when they finally stand before him, along with their other evils.

But here's the thing.
The latest propaganda/scare, that we are as a nation about to be instructed to panic over and live in antiseptic tanks, is ebola, it is a killer, it is being deliberately spread, as all these things are, and believe me, it will be within the next week or two that the church start screaming hysterically 'Look at us! We are on the ebola train! We are going to curtail your lives to get attention for ourselves! We are going to publicly make a fuss and use ebola as we used swine flu! We are a government department after all! It is our job to spread propaganda!

I am so glad I am shot of that antiChrist Church of England, so glad I am not one of their rich old sheeple.

Petitions

I just found this petition while researching to do a similar petition but with more detail.
It needs more signatures.

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/57830

My petitions:

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/theresa-may-home-secretary-include-jersey-channel-islands-in-the-historic-csa-inquiry

and

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/the-archbishop-of-canterbury-rt-revd-justin-welby-enable-outside-investigation-into-church-abuse-and-misconduct-complaints

more signatures always welcome.

EDM 2014

Early day motion 279

INQUIRY INTO CHILD ABUSE AND THE CROWN DEPENDENCIES

• Session: 2014-15
• Date tabled: 21.07.2014
• Primary sponsor: Hemming, John
• Sponsors:
  Total number of signatures: 1

  Hemming, John

  That this House, being conscious of the numerous cases of previously concealed child abuse in which individuals have been able to use their status as public figures to deter victims and to prevent or disrupt investigations of their crimes, and being conscious that in some cases abusers, and those who have concealed abuse, have been able to use their positions in public office and the institutions of the state such as Parliament and Government to shield them and their wrongdoing from proper, lawful scrutiny, recognises that the dangers of such cover-ups occurring are even greater in small, quasi-self-governing communities than at national level, where, even though checks and balances are more extensive, child abuse and cover-ups by the well-connected have still occurred; notes that a local public inquiry in Jersey into child abuse, the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry, has not gained the confidence of all victims and witnesses; and calls on the relevant UK authorities, the Secretary of State for Justice, the Crown and the Privy Council, in exercise of their responsibilities and powers to ensure good governance, the rule of law and proper administration of justice in the Crown Dependencies, to empower the overarching UK inquiry into child abuse to include the Crown Dependencies.

EDM 2005

Early day motion 745

HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CHANNEL ISLANDS

• Session: 2004-05
• Date tabled: 22.02.2005
• Primary sponsor: Mitchell, Austin
• Sponsors:
  Total number of signatures: 24

  Abbott, Diane	Caton, Martin	Clapham, Michael	Clarke, Tony
  Corbyn, Jeremy	Cryer, Ann	Etherington, Bill	Griffiths, Win
  Hancock, Mike	Holmes, Paul	Hopkins, Kelvin	Jones, Lynne
  Jones, Nigel	Lazarowicz, Mark	Marris, Rob	Marsden, Paul
  McDonnell, John	Mitchell, Austin	Rapson, Syd	Reed, Andy
  Simpson, Alan	Taylor, David	Tyler, Paul	Vis, Rudi

  That this House in congratulating the Channel Islands of Jersey and Guernsey on the forthcoming celebrations of the 60th anniversary of their liberation from Nazi occupation, in which they were the only parts of the British Isles to be subjected to enemy occupation, reminds the UK Government that the governments in the Islands remain reluctant to achieve, still less enforce, even minimal standards of human rights compliance and that the inhabitants of these British territories are denied the protection of international treaty and convention obligations contrary to the commitments entered into by successive UK governments which have ultimate responsibility for the good governance of the Channel Islands; and urges the Government to celebrate the anniversary of occupation by an inquiry to determine the extent to which the Islands are now compliant with human rights obligations and to make recommendations to speed implementation of all of them.

Dependency or Sovereignty? Time to take stock

The Jersey and Guernsey Law Review have published Dependency or Sovereignty? Time to take stock, a transcript of the proceedings of their conference in September 2010, edited by Sir Philip Bailhache. The contributonrs include William Bailhache, Michael Beloff QC, Sir Vic de Carey, Lord Falconer, Richard Falle, HE Sverrir Gunnlaugsson, Lord Hoffman, Prof. Jeffrey Jowell, Michael Lagopolous, Richard McMahon QC, Prince Nikolaus of Liechtenstein, Colin Powell, David Simmons, Dame Heather Steel, Prof. Alastair Sutton and Sir Andrew Wood.

The constitutional relationship between the UK and the Channel Islands may be said to have been in an almost constant state of fluidity from the outset and this conference considers the state of the relationship in the present day and in the future.

Daily link

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-jersey-28510515


://abusecrimesenquiry.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/this_is_ace.pdf

Open letter to Theresa May, not my letter

http://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2014/07/27/an-open-letter-to-theresa-may-calling-for-michael-mansfield-qc-to-chair-the-child-abuse-inquiry/

Jersey safeguarding, bored?

http://thebaldtruthjersey.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/jersey-child-abuse-cover-up-another.html

Jersey news

The usual wonderfully solemn and serious L.A. Maison tells it how it is:

http://my-maison-detre.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/jersey-shaken-to-its-core-by-radicals.html

Why?

Those who are new or who are wondering.
I am fighting for my human rights to live in peace and be free from harm and defamation.

First Newspaper Mention?

The Anything and Everything gets a mention right at the bottom:

http://paper.li/tiggrtalk/1366272420

final formal letter to Glenys Johnston, intent to take legal action

Dear mrs Johnstone,how nice to see you reading this again, what prompted you?
Now scrap your act of harassment against me and go plague someone else, oh, am I right in saying you are one of the negligent members of Leicestershire social services who ALLOWED BECK AND JANNER ACCESS TO CHILDREN TO ABUSE?



Dear all, 

This is the letter that has been sent by post to Mrs Glenys Johnston today.

Dear Mrs Johnston,

Due to harm, distress and harassment by you as chair of Jersey's so-called safeguarding board, I am starting legal proceedings against you.

Last year you were apparently comissioned by Jersey's Chief Minister, to investigate my case. 

This was a doubly conflicted action as Jersey's chief minister had allowed some of his his senators to smear and defame me because as well as holding positions in the States, they also held positions in the church.

You apparently started this report last year but did not contact me, and as Deputy Higgins has continued to badger the States about this matter, you claimed in February to have almost completed the report, and to be trying to contact me for my views.

That is not a report, that is a whitewash where you try to contact the victim as an afterthought, and although my email address was readily available through the police and Bob Hill and Mike Higgins, no attempt was made to contact me.

Nor was there any response to my emails to you.

A few weeks ago, when your report was surely finished, you made contact with me.

I had already been told that you had cleared the police of misconduct.

Well how did you do that when their records were inaccurate and you had not spoken to me?

Why was a member of the conflicted police, who are overseen by a church of england reader, friend and supporter of my abuser and the dean, who condemns me, allowed to illegally access my records, which are inaccurate and clear the police of wrongdoing? This same police officer who the Bishop 'appointed' to alos illegally access my records for Dame Steel. a friend and colleague of another Senator-church officer who used his position to smear me and clear the Dean?

What you are producing, which will harm me and not give a clear picture of what happened to me, is a whitewash. You had finished your report, you had created an inaccurate and illegal report, and you intend to harm me by publishing it, at the same time as you are proven to be failing to either protect or report on, the welfare and safety of Jersey children.

You are also conflicted by previous roles in Leicestershire social services, and the fact that I am a witness/survivor

I would therefore inform you formally that I intend to take legal action against you.

Please stop harassing me through whitewash reports done on behalf of wrongdoers, you are seen to be acting for the conflicted states/police of Jersey and the Diocese of Winchester, who are legally forbidden to harm me further and your actions are an act of harm to me by them as they instigated this.

You are not to publish any report that excludes my views, is conflicted, publicly harms me, involves illegal access of records and illegal conversations, covers up, denies or omits wrongdoing by the police or other Jersey authorities, as it is not a true representation of the harm I suffered and it is an act of harassment and harm to me.

Why contact me when you have completed a report that clears wrongdoers?